Dyed Fox Skins (Unassembled)
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4302194530 | 37.2% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 4103901190 | 17.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 4302110010 | 37.1% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 4302110020 | 37.1% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 4301100020 | 17.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🦊 Fox Furskins (Unassembled, Dyed)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Strategies
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Truly Understand "Fox Furskins"?
Fox furskins, specifically those marked as "Unassembled" (whole skins, not sewn into garments) and "Dyed" (chemically colored), are high-value raw materials in the global fur trade. In international trade, the classification hinges on two critical factors: 1. State of Preparation: Are they raw (unglazed/untanned) or tanned/dressed? 2. Species: Is it Fox, Mink, or another species?
⚠️ Key Distinction:
- If the skin is raw, fresh, or salted (untanned) → It falls under Chapter 41 (Raw Hides & Skins).
- If the skin is tanned, dressed, and dyed (even if "unassembled" in the sense of not being made into a coat) → It falls under Chapter 43 (Prepared Furskins).
- "Unassembled" in this context usually means "not sewn into garments," NOT "raw/untanned." If the summary states "Dyed," it implies the tanning/dyeing process has likely been completed, moving it to Chapter 43.
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided data, there is a critical divergence between Chapter 41 (Raw) and Chapter 43 (Prepared). The classification depends heavily on whether "Dyed" implies a tanned/dressed state or if the product is actually an untanned raw skin that is merely colored (which is rare/unstable for fur trade).
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Scenario | State of Processing | Total Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
4302.19.45.30 |
Fox Furskins, Dyed, Unassembled | Dyed fox skins, not sewn into garments | Tanned & Dyed (Chapter 43) | 37.2% |
4103.90.11.90 |
Other Raw Hides & Skins (Fox) | Raw, untreated, or minimally processed skins | Unglazed/Untanned (Chapter 41) | 17.5% |
4302.11.00.10 |
Mink Skins, Dyed, Unassembled | Mink skins, tanned and dyed | Tanned & Dyed (Chapter 43) | 37.1% |
4302.11.00.20 |
Other Mink Skins, Unassembled | Other types of mink skins, tanned/dressed | Tanned & Dyed (Chapter 43) | 37.1% |
4301.10.00.20 |
Mink Skins, Undyed, Unassembled | Raw/undyed mink skins (if misclassified or raw) | Raw/Undyed (Chapter 43) | 17.5% |
🔍 Critical Analysis for Fox Skins:
- Option A (4302.19.45.30): Explicitly matches "Fox Furskins", "Dyed", and "Unassembled". This is the most accurate classification if the skins are tanned and dyed.
- Option B (4103.90.11.90): Suggests the skins are raw/untanned ("Unglazed") but labeled as "Unassembled." This is contradictory if the product is "Dyed," as raw skins are rarely dyed before tanning in standard fur trade. However, if the skins are truly raw (fresh/salted) and only superficially colored or the "Dyed" label is a misnomer, this lower-tariff option applies.
- Mink Options (4302.11...,4301.10...): These are incorrect for "Fox Skins" unless the product is actually Mink. Do not use these for Fox.
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Additional Taxes & Policy Surcharges)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: Post-November 10, 2025 (including subsequent imports)
🎯 1. 4302.19.45.30 – Fox Furskins, Dyed, Unassembled (Most Likely for "Dyed Fox")
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 2.2% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Section 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Section 122 Duty | +10.0% (Specific to Chinese origin) |
| Total Tax Rate | 37.2% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 37.2% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:4302.19.45.30 → FOOTNOTE:301.02 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 |
📌 Explanation:
- The 25% Section 301 tariff is standard for most fur products from China.
- The 10% IEEPA 122 tariff is a specific additional levy on certain Chinese goods.
- Total 37.2% is a high effective duty rate.
- Crucial: If you classify as "Raw" (4103...) but the skins are actually tanned, this is misclassification, leading to penalties.
🎯 2. 4103.90.11.90 – Other Raw Hides & Skins (If Actually Raw)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 0.0% |
| USITC Section 301 Duty | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Section 122 Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 17.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 17.5% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:4103.90.11.90 → FOOTNOTE:301.02 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 |
📌 Note:
- This rate is significantly lower (17.5% vs. 37.2%).
- Risk: Only use this if the skins are truly raw/untanned. If the product is "Dyed Fox Skins," it is likely tanned, and using this code could lead to customs audits, back taxes, and penalties.
- "Undyed" vs. "Dyed": The summary for4103.90.11.90mentions "Undyed Mink Skins" in one context, but the4103code generally covers raw skins. If the fox skins are dyed while raw (uncommon), it might still be argued as raw, but this is a gray area. Professional advice: Assume tanned/dyed → Chapter 43.
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Avoidance)
✅ 1. Documentation Checklist (All Required)
| Document | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must specify "Fox Furskins," "Dyed," "Unassembled," and Origin: China. |
| ✅ Packing List | ✔️ | Detail weight, number of skins, and condition (fresh/salted/tanned). |
| ✅ Certificate of Origin | ✔️ | Required for IEEPA 122 tax calculation. |
| ✅ Product Photos | ✔️ | Show texture, dye uniformity, and whole-skin structure. |
| ✅ Tanning Certificate | ✔️ | Critical: Proves if skins are tanned (Chapter 43) or raw (Chapter 41). |
| ✅ Customs Bond | ✔️ | High-value goods require continuous or single-entry bond. |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantra)
🔥 "State the Process Clearly: Raw or Tanned? If Dyed, Assume Tanned!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Tanned & Dyed Fox Skins | 4302.19.45.30 (37.2%) |
Misdeclare as Raw (4103) → Penalty + Back Tax + Seizure |
| Raw, Fresh/Salted Fox Skins | 4103.90.11.90 (17.5%) |
Misdeclare as Tanned (4302) → Overpay Tax (19.7% extra) |
| Mink Skins | 4302.11.00.10 (if dyed) |
Call them "Fox" → Classification Error |
| Unassembled Garment Parts | 4303 (if sewn) |
Call them "Unassembled Skins" → Wrong Code |
✅ 3. Special Circumstances
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| "Unassembled" Ambiguity | Clarify: Does it mean "Whole Skin" (not sewn into coat) or "Raw"? If whole but tanned → 4302. |
| Dye Type | If "Dyed" refers to a pre-tanning colorant on raw skin, argue for 4103. If post-tanning → 4302. |
| Origin Tracing | Ensure "Made in China" is clear. IEEPA 122 applies only to Chinese-origin goods. |
| Environmental Compliance | Provide CITES documentation if Fox species is protected (e.g., Arctic Fox). |
🌍 V. Global Market Customs Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Duty Rate | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 4302.19.45.30 |
37.2% | No specific eco-cert | High tariffs due to China origin |
| 🇨🇳 China | 4302.19.45.30 |
~5-10% | No special | Lower base duties |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 4302.19 |
0-4% | CITES (if applicable) | No Section 301/IEEPA |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 4302.19 |
0-4% | CITES (if applicable) | Post-Brexit rules apply |
| 🇨🇦 Canada | 4302.19 |
~0-5% | CITES | FTA benefits may apply |
📌 Conclusion:
- USA is the most challenging market for Chinese-origin fox furskins due to Section 301 + IEEPA 122.
- EU/UK/Canada have significantly lower duties but CITES compliance is stricter.
📌 VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfall Guide (Lessons from Blood & Tears)
❌ Mistake 1: Declaring "Dyed Fox Skins" as 4103 (Raw) to save taxes
👉 Consequence: Customs requires proof of tanning. If provided, they reclassify and charge 37.2% - 17.5% = 19.7% back tax + 20% penalty.
👉 Result: Net loss and delayed shipment.
❌ Mistake 2: Using Mink codes (4302.11) for Fox Skins
👉 Consequence: Immediate classification error. Fox and Mink have different duty structures and conservation statuses.
👉 Result: Shipment held, audit initiated.
❌ Mistake 3: Ignoring "Unassembled" Definition
👉 Consequence: If "Unassembled" is interpreted as "Parts," it might fall under 4303 (Clothing).
👉 Result: Wrong code, wrong tax, compliance failure.
✅ Correct Approach:
"Fox Furskins, Tanned, Dyed, Unassembled (Whole Skins), Origin China, Model: FD-100, Weight: 2kg"
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Professional Declaration, Time & Cost Savings!
🎯 Remember the Mantra:
🔹 "Tanned & Dyed = Chapter 43 (37.2% in US)"
🔹 "Raw = Chapter 41 (17.5% in US)"
🔹 "Fox ≠ Mink, Never Mix Them!"
🔹 "Clear Description Prevents Audits!"
📌 Pro Tip:
If your fox skins are truly raw but you want to market them as "Dyed" for buyer appeal, do not declare them as tanned unless the tanning process is documented. However, if they are commercially tanned and dyed, accept the 37.2% duty as the cost of doing business in the US market.
Consider pre-ruling with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to confirm the classification before shipping high-value lots.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Contact a licensed customs broker
📄 Provide Tanning Certificates & Photos
🚀 Ensure Smooth Clearance, Avoid Seizures, Protect Margins!
✨ Professional Customs, Starts with Accurate Classification!
💼 Every Dollar of Duty Saved is Pure Profit!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。