Fatty Alcohol Polypropylene Glycol Ether
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3402422010 | 39.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3402429000 | 38.7% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3824994140 | 39.6% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3824999330 | 40.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3402422010 | 39.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🧪 Fatty Alcohol Polypropylene Glycol Ether (Surfactants)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Classification Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Chemical Nature: What Exactly Is It?
Fatty Alcohol Polypropylene Glycol Ether is a non-ionic surfactant widely used in detergents, emulsifiers, and industrial cleaning agents. Its chemical structure consists of: 1. Fatty Alcohol (脂肪醇): Derived from vegetable or animal fats (lipid substances). 2. Polypropylene Glycol Ether (聚氧丙烯醚): An ethoxylated/polyether structure derived from propylene oxide.
⚠️ Key Classification Challenge:
Due to its complex composition (mixing lipid derivatives with synthetic polyethers), it can fall under different chapters depending on the primary functional characteristic emphasized during customs valuation: - Is it viewed primarily as a surfactant? → Chapter 34 - Is it viewed primarily as a chemical mixture/ester/diol? → Chapter 38
📦 II. HS Code Classification Matrix (2026 Latest Tariff Data)
Based on the provided tax data, there are 5 specific HS Codes available for this product. Note that two codes are identical but have different summaries, suggesting potential ambiguity or multiple entry points.
| HS Code | Product Description / Rationale | Tax Rate (Total) | Classification Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3402.42.20.10 | Surfactant Focus: Fatty alcohol is a lipid source; polypropylene glycol ether is the polyether material. | 39.0% | Fits "Preparations for washing" or surfactants based on physical form and usage. |
| 3402.42.90.00 | Non-ionic Surfactant Focus: Fatty alcohol is organic; polypropylene glycol ether is a typical non-ionic surfactant structure. | 38.7% | Aligns with the definition of non-ionic surfactants (Chapter 34). |
| 3824.99.41.40 | Ester/Derivative Focus: Fatty alcohol is a fatty acid derivative; chemically本质 (essence) is a mixture of fatty acid esters or related lipids. | 39.6% | Classifies based on material matching as a fatty acid derivative mixture. |
| 3824.99.93.30 | Alcohol Mixture Focus: Fatty alcohol is an alcohol substance; fits the "mixture of alcohols" material requirement with no conflict. | 40.0% | Classified as an "Other Prepared Binders/Preparations" based on alcohol properties. |
| 3824.99.93.30 | Catch-all Principle: Based on alcohol properties and residual principles, classified under other alcohol mixtures. | 40.0% | Same code as above, different interpretive summary (backup classification). |
🔍 Critical Insight:
- The lowest tax rate is 38.7% (HS3402.42.90.00). - The highest tax rate is 40.0% (HS3824.99.93.30). - The difference in total tax is small (1.3%), but the legal basis differs significantly. Misclassification can lead to penalties.
💰 III. Detailed Tariff Structure (US Import from China)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: November 10, 2025 (including subsequent imports)
🎯 1. HS Code 3402.42.20.10 (Surfactant - Lipid/Polyether Mix)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 4.0% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% (USITC Footnote) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% (Specific US Trade Policy) |
| Total Tax Rate | 39.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 39.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (High tariff rate exceeds exemption thresholds) |
| Legal Path | Base: 3402 → Sec301: 25% → Sec122: 10% |
📌 Explanation:
- The 25% Section 301 tariff applies to most Chinese chemical surfactants. - The 10% Section 122 tariff is an additional layer for specific chemical imports. - Total 39% is a significant cost driver.
🎯 2. HS Code 3402.42.90.00 (Non-ionic Surfactant)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.7% |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 38.7% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 38.7% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Path | Base: 3402 → Sec301: 25% → Sec122: 10% |
📌 Note:
- This is the most favorable classification among the 5 options. - It relies on the strong argument that the product is primarily a non-ionic surfactant.
🎯 3. HS Code 3824.99.41.40 (Fatty Acid Derivative Mixture)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 4.6% |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 39.6% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 39.6% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Path | Base: 3824 → Sec301: 25% → Sec122: 10% |
📌 Caution:
- Higher base tariff (4.6%) than Chapter 34 codes. - Requires strong documentation proving the product is a fatty acid ester/derivative mixture rather than a standard surfactant.
🎯 4. HS Code 3824.99.93.30 (Alcohol Mixture)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.0% |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 40.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 40.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Path | Base: 3824 → Sec301: 25% → Sec122: 10% |
📌 Note:
- Highest tax rate. - Used as a fallback if the product cannot be clearly defined as a surfactant or fatty acid derivative.
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance)
✅ 1. Documentation Checklist (Mandatory)
| Document | Required? | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Technical Data Sheet (TDS) | ✔️ | Must detail the surfactant function to support Chapter 34 classification. |
| ✅ Composition Breakdown | ✔️ | Percentage of fatty alcohol vs. polypropylene glycol ether. |
| ✅ Product Photos (Label/Container) | ✔️ | Show usage instructions (e.g., "Detergent Ingredient"). |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Clearly state "Non-ionic Surfactant" and HS Code. |
| ✅ Certificate of Origin | ✔️ | To confirm Chinese origin and apply correct Section 301/122 tariffs. |
✅ 2. Classification Strategy (Key Tips)
🔥 "Highlight Function, Not Just Chemistry!"
| Scenario | Recommended HS Code | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Product sold as detergent ingredient | 3402.42.90.00 (38.7%) | Strongest link to "Surfactant" definition. Lowest tax. |
| Product sold as chemical intermediate | 3824.99.41.40 (39.6%) | If buyer uses it for esterification, not washing. |
| Product sold as raw material blend | 3824.99.93.30 (40.0%) | Last resort if function is ambiguous. |
⚠️ Warning:
- Do NOT use generic terms like "Chemical Mix" or "Ether" on invoices.
- Use precise terms: "Non-ionic Surfactant, Fatty Alcohol Polypropylene Glycol Ether".
✅ 3. Special Case Handling
| Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| OEM/Private Label | Provide customer PO + specification sheet to prove intended use as surfactant. |
| Mixed Containers | Ensure all units have the same HS Code. Mixed classifications increase audit risk. |
| High-Value Shipments | Consider Advance Ruling from US CBP to lock in the 38.7% rate. |
🌍 V. Global Market Comparison (2026)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Estimated Duty (China Origin) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 3402.42.90.00 |
38.7% | Includes 301 + 122 tariffs. High cost. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 3402.42.90.00 |
4.0% - 5.0% | Low import duty. No Section 301. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 3824.99.90 |
6.5% | No Section 301/122. Lower base duty. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 3402.90.00 |
0.0% - 2.0% | Often 0% for surfactants under FTA. |
📌 Conclusion:
- USA is the most expensive market due to layered tariffs.
- EU and Japan are more favorable for Chinese-origin chemicals.
- Strategy: If targeting the US, ensure strict classification under 3402 to minimize the 39%+ burden.
📌 VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
❌ Mistake 1: Classifying as 3824.99.93.30 (40.0%) without justification
👉 Result: Overpayment of 1.3% per unit + audit risk if function is clearly surfactant.
❌ Mistake 2: Ignoring Section 122 Tariff
👉 Result: Unexpected 10% charge at port, causing shipment delays.
❌ Mistake 3: Using vague descriptions like "Industrial Chemical"
👉 Result: CBP may reclassify to a higher-tariff or restricted category.
❌ Mistake 4: Assuming De Minimis applies
👉 Result: Package seized or taxed retroactively (Section 301/122 items are not exempt).
✅ Correct Approach:
"Non-ionic Surfactant, Fatty Alcohol Polypropylene Glycol Ether, for Detergent Formulation, HS 3402.42.90.00"
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Professional Classification Saves Money
🎯 Key Takeaway:
🔹 Best HS Code:
3402.42.90.00(38.7% total tax)
🔹 Avoid:3824.99.93.30(40.0% total tax) unless necessary.
🔹 Always declare: "Non-ionic Surfactant" to support Chapter 34 classification.
📌 Pro Tip:
If your product is originally from Vietnam, Thailand, or Malaysia, you may qualify for tariff exemptions or lower rates under US trade policies.
For Chinese origin, Apply for a Pre-Ruling (CBP) to secure the 38.7% rate and avoid disputes.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Consult a licensed customs broker.
📄 Prepare TDS and Composition Analysis.
🚀 Classify as 3402.42.90.00 to optimize costs.
✨ Precision Classification = Lower Costs = Higher Profit!
💼 Every 0.1% saved on duty adds to your bottom line!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。