High performance Rubber Aging Inhibitor
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3403990000 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3403195000 | 40.8% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3824992900 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3824994900 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 2904995000 | 38.7% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🛡️ High Performance Rubber Aging Inhibitor (Chemical Additives)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Compliance Strategy 📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: Understanding the Nature of the Product
High-performance rubber aging inhibitors are critical chemical additives used to extend the lifespan of rubber products (such as tires, seals, hoses, and gaskets) by preventing degradation caused by oxygen, ozone, heat, and UV light.
In international trade, these products are classified based on their chemical composition and primary function:
1. Lubricating/Processing Preparations (Chapter 34): * If the product is primarily formulated for the processing, lubrication, or protection of materials during manufacturing, it may fall under Chapter 34 (e.g., anti-adhesive preparations, processing aids).
2. Chemical Products & Preparations (Chapter 38): * If the product is a generic chemical additive for general industrial use or specific chemical protection not classified elsewhere, it falls under Chapter 38 (e.g., prepared binders for foundry molds, chemical products with anti-aging functions).
3. Organic Compounds (Chapter 29): * If the product consists of a specific, isolated organic chemical compound (such as a specific aromatic amine or phenolic derivative) that is defined in the Chapter 29 headings, it is classified as a raw chemical substance.
⚠️ Key Distinction Point: - Is it a pure chemical substance? → Chapter 29 - Is it a preparation/mixture for processing or general chemical protection? → Chapter 34 or 38
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (Based on Provided Data)
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Scenario | Classification Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
3403.99.00.00 |
Rubber Anti-Aging Agent | Lubrication & Corrosion Prevention | Classified as oil or chemical preparations for protecting materials. Fits the scope of lubricating and anti-corrosion agents. |
3403.19.50.00 |
Rubber Anti-Aging Agent | Material Treatment | Classified as a chemical preparation for material (rubber) treatment. Fits the scope of lubrication/treatment agents. |
3824.99.29.00 |
Rubber/Plastic Anti-Aging Agent | Chemical Protection | Classified as a chemical product. Its function (anti-aging) fits the definition of "chemical products and preparations." |
3824.99.49.00 |
Rubber/Plastic Anti-Aging Agent | Industrial Chemical Use | Classified as a chemical industry product. Fits "chemical products and preparations for chemical or related industries, not elsewhere specified." |
2904.99.50.00 |
Natural Rubber Anti-Aging Agent | Organic Compound | Classified as a synthetic/processed organic compound. Fits the material scope of "hydrocarbon derivatives." |
🔍 Critical Note: - The classification depends heavily on the exact chemical nature and commercial form (pure substance vs. mixture). - Codes
3824and3403are common for formulated additives. - Code2904is reserved for specific organic compounds (e.g., specific arylamines).
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges & Policies)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US) ✅ Country of Origin: China (CN) ✅ Effective Time: 2025/2026 (Current Trade War Context)
🎯 1. Code 3403.99.00.00 & 3824.99.29.00 & 3824.99.49.00
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% (USITC Footnote) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% (Specific Chinese Import Provision) |
| Total Tax Rate | 41.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 41.5% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No (Deny De Minimis) |
| Legal Basis | Base Rate + USITC Sec 301 + IEEPA Sec 122 |
📌 Explanation: - These codes attract the maximum standard trade war tariffs. - The 41.5% rate is substantial. Importers must ensure the value declaration is accurate to avoid penalties. - The 10% Section 122 tariff applies to specific strategic or sensitive chemical imports from China.
🎯 2. Code 3403.19.50.00
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.8% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 40.8% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 40.8% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis | Base Rate + USITC Sec 301 + IEEPA Sec 122 |
📌 Note: - Slightly lower base rate (5.8%) compared to the 6.5% group, but the surcharges are identical. - Total duty remains extremely high at 40.8%.
🎯 3. Code 2904.99.50.00
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.7% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 38.7% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 38.7% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis | Base Rate + USITC Sec 301 + IEEPA Sec 122 |
📌 Note: - This code has the lowest base tariff (3.7%). - If the product is a pure organic compound (not a mixture), this code offers a 2.8% saving compared to Chapter 38/34 codes. - Proof Required: MSDS, CAS number, and structural formula to prove it is a defined organic compound.
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance)
✅ 1. Documentation Checklist (Mandatory)
| Document | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ MSDS / SDS | ✔️ Critical | Must list ingredients, CAS numbers, and chemical nature. Essential for distinguishing between Chapter 29, 34, and 38. |
| ✅ Product Specifications | ✔️ | Detail the active ingredients, concentration, and intended use (e.g., "for tire manufacturing" vs. "general anti-aging"). |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must clearly state "Rubber Aging Inhibitor" or specific chemical name. Avoid vague terms like "Chemical Additive." |
| ✅ Packing List | ✔️ | Include net/gross weight, volume, and package dimensions. |
| ✅ CAS Number Proof | ✔️ | If claiming 2904.99.50.00, provide the CAS registry number to prove it is a specific organic compound. |
| ✅ Bill of Lading | ✔️ | Ensure cargo description matches invoice. |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategies (Key Tips)
🔥 "Declare by Chemical Nature, Not Just Function"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Incorrect Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Chemical Compound | Use 2904.99.50.00 |
Describe as "Mixture" → Misclassification Risk |
| Formulated Liquid/Gel | Use 3403.19.50.00 or 3824.99.xxxx |
Claim "Pure Substance" → Audit Failure |
| Vague "Anti-Aging Agent" | Specify: "Chemical Preparation for Rubber Protection" | Just write "Chemical" → Customs Detention |
| Mixed with Solvents | Classify based on essential character | Try to split into parts → Complex Valuation |
✅ 3. Special Considerations
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM/Private Label | Provide manufacturer’s technical data sheet to prove chemical composition. |
| High Volume Imports | Consider applying for a Tariff Engineering ruling if a more favorable classification exists. |
| Origin Marking | Ensure all packaging clearly states "Product of China" to avoid Country of Origin disputes. |
| Safety Regulations | Ensure compliance with EPA/DOT regulations for hazardous materials if applicable. |
🌍 V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Context)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Est. Tariff (China Origin) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 2904.99.50.00 (Best) or 3824 |
38.7% - 41.5% | High due to Sec 301 + 122. No De Minimis. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 2904 or 3824 |
~5-10% | Lower base rates, no Section 301. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 3824 or 3403 |
~6.5% | No Trump-era surcharges. VAT applies separately. |
| 🇲🇽 Mexico | 2904 or 3824 |
~0-5% (USMCA) | Check Rules of Origin for preferential treatment. |
📌 Conclusion: - The US market is the most costly due to the ~40% effective tariff rate. - Importers should carefully evaluate if the product can be classified under 2904 (pure compound) to save ~2.8% compared to 3824. - Supply Chain Diversification: Consider sourcing from non-China origins (e.g., Vietnam, Mexico) to avoid Section 301 and 122 tariffs if volume is high.
📌 VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
❌ Mistake 1: Declaring a mixture as a pure chemical (2904)
👉 Consequence: Customs rejects declaration, demands re-classification, and may impose penalties.
👉 Fix: Use MSDS to prove if it's a pure substance or a formulation.
❌ Mistake 2: Vague description "Rubber Chemical" 👉 Consequence: Customs exam delay, potential reclassification to higher duty rate. 👉 Fix: Use precise HS Code-based descriptions.
❌ Mistake 3: Ignoring Section 122 Tariff 👉 Consequence: Underpayment of 10% duties. 👉 Fix: Verify if the specific chemical falls under Section 122 scope (often applies to strategic chemicals).
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Precision Classification, Cost Optimization!
🎯 Remember:
🔹 "Pure Compound = 2904 (Lowest Base), Mixture = 3403/3824 (Higher Base)." 🔹 "Total Duty = Base + 25% Sec 301 + 10% Sec 122." 🔹 "MSDS is your Best Friend for Classification."
📌 Pro Tip: If your import volume is significant, consider filing a Request for Advance Ruling (Ruling Letter) with US CBP. This provides legal certainty on the HS Code and protects against future audits.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Consult a Customs Broker with your MSDS and Product Samples. 📄 Apply for a Pre-Ruling if possible. 🚀 Optimize your landed cost by choosing the most accurate HS Code.
✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification! 💼 Every Percentage Point of Duty Matters!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。