Natural Polymer Coarse Powder
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3505100015 | 0.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3913902090 | 40.8% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3913100000 | 21.7% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 1302390090 | 20.7% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 1302390010 | 20.7% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🌿 Natural Polymer Coarse Powder (Granular/Natural Polymer Particles)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand "Natural Polymer Coarse Powder"?
Natural Polymer Coarse Powder refers to primary shape products derived from natural polymers (such as starch derivatives, polysaccharides, plant mucilage, and thickeners). In international trade, these materials are often misclassified due to ambiguity between "chemical products," "food additives," and "plastic raw materials."
The key distinction lies in the source (plant/natural vs. synthetic) and the state (primary form/granular vs. processed sheets/films).
⚠️ Key Distinction Points:
- If the material is a starch derivative in primary form →归类 to Chapter 35 or Chapter 11/35 intersection.
- If it is a generic natural polymer (non-starch) →归类 to Chapter 39 (Other plastics/polyers).
- If it is a plant-based thickener/gum (like pectin, alginate, etc., but not agar/agarose specifically) →归类 to Chapter 13.
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided data, there are 5 potential HS Codes depending on the specific chemical nature and origin of the polymer.
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Tax Rate Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
3505.10.00.15 |
Starch derivatives & pastes (Natural Polymer Granules) | Starch-based biopolymers, primary form | 🔥 Lowest: 0.7¢/kg + 17.5% |
3913.90.20.90 |
Other natural polymers (unsulphonated) | Generic natural polymers, polysaccharides, primary form | 🔥 Highest: 40.8% |
3913.10.00.00 |
Natural polymers (unsulphonated) | Specific natural polymer definition, primary form | 🔥 Medium-High: 21.7% |
1302.39.00.90 |
Vegetable mucilage & thickeners (Other) | Plant-source mucilage/thickeners, not Agar/Agarose | 🔥 Medium: 20.7% |
1302.39.00.10 |
Vegetable mucilage & thickeners (Specific) | Plant-source extract attributes, primary form | 🔥 Medium: 20.7% |
🔍 Crucial Note:
- Chapter 35 is for "Albuminoidal substances; modified starches." If your product is starch-based, this is your best bet for lower duties. - Chapter 39 is for "Plastics and articles thereof; natural polymers." This applies to non-starch natural polymers (e.g., cellulose derivatives, lignin). - Chapter 13 is for "Lac; gums, resins and other vegetable saps and extracts." This specifically covers "vegetable mucilages and thickeners."
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surtaxes, Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Time: 2025 Nov 10 onwards (including subsequent imports)
🎯 1. 3505.10.00.15 —— Starch Derivatives (Best Case Scenario)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.7¢/kg (Specific duty) |
| Section 301 Surtax | +7.5% (Ad Valorem) |
| 122 Clause Tariff | +10% (Specific/Ad Valorem mix) |
| Total Effective Tax | ~17.5% + 0.7¢/kg |
| Tax Calculation | (CIF Value × 17.5%) + (Weight in kg × $0.007) |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No (High scrutiny on biopolymers) |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:3505.10.00.15 → Section 301: Footnote 9903.88.01 → Section 122: 10% |
📌 Explanation:
- This is the most favorable classification for "Natural Polymer Coarse Powder" if it is starch-derived. - The specific duty (0.7¢/kg) is negligible for most commercial volumes. - The ad valorem rate is ~17.5%, which is significantly lower than other chapters.
🎯 2. 3913.90.20.90 —— Other Natural Polymers (Worst Case Scenario)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.8% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +25.0% |
| 122 Clause Tariff | +10% |
| Total Effective Tax | 40.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 40.8% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → USITC:3913.90.20.90 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Warning:
- This is the highest risk classification. - If customs determines your "Natural Polymer" is not starch and not a "vegetable mucilage," they may default to "Other Natural Polymers." - Avoid this if possible! Ensure your product specifications clearly define it as starch-based or vegetable mucilage.
🎯 3. 3913.10.00.00 —— Natural Polymers (Unsulpohonated)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 4.2% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +7.5% |
| 122 Clause Tariff | +10% |
| Total Effective Tax | 21.7% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 21.7% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3913.10.00.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Note:
- A middle-ground option if the polymer is strictly defined as a "natural polymer" under Chapter 39 but doesn't fit the "Other" category. - Still high compared to Chapter 35.
🎯 4 & 5. 1302.39.00.90 / 1302.39.00.10 —— Vegetable Mucilages & Thickeners
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.2% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +7.5% |
| 122 Clause Tariff | +10% |
| Total Effective Tax | 20.7% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 20.7% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:1302.39.00.xx → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Note:
- These codes apply if the product is explicitly a plant-derived thickener (e.g., pectin, guar gum, carrageenan if not specified separately). - Crucial: Ensure it is NOT classified under Agar/Agarose (which has different codes). The data states "Not Agar class." - 20.7% is a competitive rate, slightly higher than Starch (17.5%) but much lower than Generic Natural Polymers (40.8%).
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Guide)
✅ 1. Required Documentation Checklist (Non-negotiable)
| Document | Mandatory? | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Technical Data Sheet (TDS) | ✔️ | Must specify: Origin (Plant/Starch), Chemical Composition, Physical Form (Coarse Powder/Granules). |
| ✅ Certificate of Analysis (COA) | ✔️ | Proves it is NOT synthetic. Must show "Natural Polymer" or "Starch Derivative." |
| ✅ Product Photos | ✔️ | Clear shots of packaging, label, and granule/powder texture. |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must use precise description: "Natural Polymer Coarse Powder, Derived from [Specific Plant/Starch]." |
| ✅ Bill of Lading | ✔️ | Consistent with Invoice. |
| ✅ Free Sale Certificate | ✔️ | From origin country, confirming safe use. |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mnemonic)
🔥 "Source Defines Code, Form Defines Rate, Ambiguity Kills Profit!"
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Incorrect Code | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starch-based Granules | 3505.10.00.15 |
3913.90.20.90 |
Save ~23% tax! |
| Plant Thickener (Non-Starch) | 1302.39.00.xx |
3913.90.20.90 |
Save ~20% tax! |
| Generic Natural Polymer | 3913.10.00.00 |
3505.10.00.15 |
Pay ~4% extra tax |
| Any Natural Polymer (China) | All above codes | Any code | Avoid De Minimis |
📌 Critical Tip:
- Do NOT simply declare as "Chemical Raw Material." This triggers random inspection and potential misclassification. - Do NOT declare as "Food Ingredient" unless you have FDA registration (if applicable). Stick to "Industrial/Chemical" unless explicitly for food. - Best Practice: Use the phrase "Primary Form Natural Polymer" to align with the HS Code summaries provided.
✅ 3. Special Case Handling
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM / Private Label | Provide supplier letter confirming raw material source (e.g., "Corn Starch Derivative"). |
| Mixed Shipments | Never mix different HS codes in one BL if they have vastly different duties. It invites audit. |
| Unclear Origin | If the source is ambiguous (e.g., "Hydrolyzed Protein"), customs may default to 3913.90.20.90 (40.8%). Prove the source! |
| Sample vs. Bulk | Both are subject to duties. No duty-free status for samples unless value < $800 (De Minimis), but 122/301 clauses may still apply depending on current enforcement. Assume duties apply. |
🌍 V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Est. Duty Rate (China Origin) | Certification Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 3505.10.00.15 |
17.5% + 0.7¢/kg | None | Lowest Rate. Avoid 3913.90.20.90 (40.8%). |
| 🇨🇳 China | 3505.10.00.15 |
Varies (MFN) | None | Import into China for re-export? Check Bonded Zones. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 1302.39 or 3913 |
0% - 6.5% | REACH Registration | EU has lower tariffs but strict REACH compliance. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 1302.39 or 3505 |
0% - 5% | JIS/Pharma Standards | Generally friendly, but verify pharma grade vs. industrial. |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 3505.10 |
0% - 5% | UKCA | Post-Brexit rules apply. |
📌 Conclusion:
- USA is the most expensive market due to Section 301 and 122 clauses. - Accurate classification is critical in the US. A 23% difference between3505and3913is massive. - Europe/Japan are more forgiving but require strict chemical compliance (REACH/JIS).
📌 VI. Common Errors & Pitfall Guide (Lessons Learned from Blood & Tears)
❌ Mistake 1: Classifying Starch-based powder as "Other Natural Polymers" (3913.90.20.90)
👉 Result: Pay 40.8% instead of 17.5%.
💡 Fix: Always specify "Starch Derivative" if applicable.
❌ Mistake 2: Using "Powder" as the only description
👉 Result: Customs may assume "Chemical" and apply higher scrutiny.
💡 Fix: Use "Natural Polymer Coarse Powder / Granules" and specify source.
❌ Mistake 3: Ignoring the "122 Clause"
👉 Result: Underestimating duties by 10%.
💡 Fix: Include 122 Clause (10%) in all cost calculations for US imports from China.
❌ Mistake 4: Assuming "Natural" = Duty Free
👉 Result: Customs rejects "Natural" claim due to lack of proof.
💡 Fix: Provide COA and Source Certificate.
✅ Correct Declaration Example:
"Natural Polymer Coarse Powder, Starch-Derived, Primary Form, Industrial Grade, Model NP-100, No Phthalates, FDA Compliant"
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Precise Classification Saves Money!
🎯 Remember the Mnemonic:
🔹 "Starch is King (3505, 17.5%), Plant Gum is Queen (1302, 20.7%), Generic is Prisoner (3913, 40.8%)."
🔹 "Source Proof is Key, 122 Clause is Real, Ambiguity is Risk."
📌 Pro Tip:
If your product is not from China, Section 301 and 122 clauses do NOT apply. Duties will be significantly lower.
If your product is from China, apply for a Pre-Ruling from CBP (Customs and Border Protection) to lock in the3505.10.00.15classification.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Consult your Customs Broker with the Technical Data Sheet (TDS).
📄 Prepare Source Documentation (Proving Plant/Starch Origin).
🚀 Optimize for3505.10.00.15to save ~23% in duties!
✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Precise Classification!
💼 Every cent counts in the age of Trade Wars!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。