Organophosphorus Aromatic Insecticide
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3808915001 | 40.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 2931902600 | 16.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3808591000 | 16.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3808990800 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 2931902600 | 16.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🐜 Organophosphorus Aromatic Insecticide
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Strategy
📌 Part 1: Product Definition & Classification: Do You Truly Understand "Organophosphorus Aromatic Insecticides"?
Organophosphorus Aromatic Insecticides are complex agrochemical compounds combining aromatic ring structures with organophosphorus functional groups. In international trade, they are classified based on their chemical composition and primary use (pesticidal action).
Key Distinction:
The classification depends heavily on whether the customs authority prioritizes the chemical nature (Chapter 29) or the prepared formulation (Chapter 38). However, for specific "aromatic organophosphorus" types, specific subheadings in Chapter 38 often take precedence if they are presented as preparations.
⚠️ Critical Classification Points:
- If the product is a pure chemical substance with defined organic structure → Chapter 29.
- If the product is a preparation, formulation, or mixture intended for pest control → Chapter 38.
- Specific "Aromatic" Note: Certain codes explicitly mention "aromatic" components, leading to different tariff treatments compared to general insecticides.
📦 Part 2: HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Mapping)
Based on the provided data, here are the four possible HS Codes with their exact justifications:
| HS Code | Product Description | Justification from Data | Total Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
3808.59.10.00 |
Aromatic Insecticide (General Class) | Summary: The term "aromatic" in the product name fully matches the code explanation's "aromatic" category. "Insecticide" aligns with the code's purpose. Nature: Likely a specific aromatic insecticide formulation not listed elsewhere in 3808.51-59. |
16.5% |
3808.91.50.01 |
Organophosphorus Insecticide (Specific Class) | Summary: The product is explicitly for "insecticide" use, and "Organophosphorus" is considered a chemical material/property, fitting the pesticide category under this specific subheading. Nature: Specific classification for organophosphorus types. |
40.0% |
2931.90.26.00 |
Organophosphorus Chemical Substance (Pure Chemical) | Summary: The terms "Organophosphorus" and "Aromatic" completely correspond to the material category in the code. "Insecticide" corresponds to its agricultural use. Nature: Classified as a chemical entity under Chapter 29, likely a pure substance or specific derivative. |
16.5% |
3808.99.08.00 |
Other Insecticides (Aromatic Included) | Summary: The product name explicitly contains "Aromatic" as a key material/chemical property, and the use "Insecticide" matches the pesticide category. Nature: A broader category for insecticides that includes aromatic properties but doesn't fit the more specific 3808.59 or 3808.91 descriptions precisely in the local tariff schedule. |
41.5% |
🔍 Key Insight:
-3808.59.10.00vs3808.91.50.01: While both address aromatic/organophosphorus insecticides,3808.91.50.01carries a much higher tax burden (40%) due to specific "Organophosphorus" listing, whereas3808.59.10.00is more favorable (16.5%).
-2931.90.26.00: This is a Chapter 29 code (chemicals), not Chapter 38 (preparations). If the product is a pure chemical and not a formulated pesticide, this may be the correct, lower-taxed option (16.5%).
-3808.99.08.00: This is the most expensive option (41.5%) and should be avoided if the more specific3808.59.10.00or3808.91.50.01applies.
💰 Part 3: 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges & Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: November 10, 2025 onwards (for subsequent imports)
🎯 1. 3808.59.10.00 —— Aromatic Insecticide (Preparation)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% (No additional 301 tariff for this specific subheading in the provided data) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% (Targeting China/HK products under specific IEEPA provisions) |
| Total Effective Rate | 16.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 16.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable (Deemed commercial import) |
| Legal Basis Path | Base Tariff: 3808.59.10.00 → Section 122: 10% |
📌 Explanation:
- This code offers a moderate tax rate. The absence of the 25% Section 301 tariff makes it significantly cheaper than other categories.
- The 10% Section 122 tariff is a specific trade remedy measure.
🎯 2. 3808.91.50.01 —— Organophosphorus Insecticide (Specific Class)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25% (Standard 301 tariff for Chapter 38 goods) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Effective Rate | 40.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 40.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | Base Tariff: 3808.91.50.01 → Section 301: Footnote 9903.88.01 → Section 122: 10% |
📌 Warning:
- This is a high-cost classification. The combination of Base (5%) + 301 (25%) + 122 (10%) creates a heavy burden.
- Ensure the product truly fits this specific "Organophosphorus" definition before declaring under this code.
🎯 3. 2931.90.26.00 —— Organophosphorus Chemical Substance (Chapter 29)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% (Often excluded for certain chemical precursors/substances) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Effective Rate | 16.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 16.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | Base Tariff: 2931.90.26.00 → Section 122: 10% |
📌 Strategic Note:
- If the product is a pure chemical (not a formulated pesticide), this code is highly advantageous.
- It avoids the 25% Section 301 tariff, resulting in the same low rate as3808.59.10.00but under a different chapter.
- Crucial: Must provide evidence of chemical purity/structure to justify Chapter 29 over Chapter 38.
🎯 4. 3808.99.08.00 —— Other Insecticides (Broad Category)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Effective Rate | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | Base Tariff: 3808.99.08.00 → Section 301: Footnote 9903.88.01 → Section 122: 10% |
📌 Caution:
- This is the most expensive classification.
- It is a "catch-all" for insecticides that don't fit other specific subheadings.
- Avoid this code if your product qualifies for3808.59.10.00or3808.91.50.01, as the 1.5% difference is negligible compared to the risk of misclassification penalties.
🛠️ Part 4: Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Pitfall Avoidance Guide)
✅ 1. Documentation Checklist (Mandatory)
| Document | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specification Sheet | ✔️ | Must detail chemical structure, concentration, and formulation type. |
| ✅ MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) | ✔️ | Critical for hazardous chemicals; must list "Organophosphorus" and "Aromatic" components. |
| ✅ Chemical Structure Diagram | ✔️ | Essential for justifying Chapter 29 (2931.90.26.00) vs Chapter 38. |
| ✅ Third-Party Lab Report | ✔️ | GC/MS analysis to confirm purity and active ingredients. |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must clearly state "Organophosphorus Aromatic Insecticide" and HS Code. |
| ✅ Certificate of Origin (CO) | ✔️ | Required for Section 122 tariff application. |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantra)
🔥 "Chemical Pure? Go 2931. Formulation Aromatic? Try 3808.59. Avoid 3808.99 if possible!"
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Risk if Misclassified |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Chemical Substance (High Purity, not a ready-to-use pesticide) | 2931.90.26.00 (16.5%) |
Misdeclaring as 3808.99.08.00 → Pay 25% extra (41.5% vs 16.5%) |
| Formulated Insecticide (Ready-to-use, contains solvents/additives) | 3808.59.10.00 (16.5%) |
Misdeclaring as 3808.91.50.01 → Pay 23.5% extra (40% vs 16.5%) |
| Specific Organophosphorus (Clearly identified as such in regulations) | 3808.91.50.01 (40.0%) |
Misdeclaring as 3808.59.10.00 → Underpayment penalty + interest |
| General Insecticide Mix (No specific aromatic/organophosphorus label) | 3808.99.08.00 (41.5%) |
Last resort only. High cost. |
✅ 3. Special Considerations
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Custom Formulation | Provide contract + formula sheet. If the formula contains aromatic organophosphorus, it may fall under 3808.91.50.01. |
| Intermediate Chemical | If used only as an intermediate for synthesis, not for direct pest control, consider 2931.90.26.00. Provide proof of downstream industrial use. |
| EPA Registration | For Chapter 38 goods, ensure EPA registration is valid for importation. Lack of EPA approval can lead to seizure. |
| Origin Tracing | Clearly mark "Made in China" to comply with Section 122 tariff requirements. |
🌍 Part 5: Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 3808.59.10.00 |
16.5% (Base 6.5% + Sec 122 10%) | EPA + TSCA | Avoid 3808.99.08.00 (41.5%). |
| 🇺🇸 USA | 2931.90.26.00 |
16.5% (Base 6.5% + Sec 122 10%) | TSCA | Best for pure chemicals. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 2931.90.26.00 |
~0-5% | REACH-like compliance | Lower import duties for chemicals. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 2930.90.60 |
0-6.5% | REACH Registration | Strict chemical registration required. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 2931.90.26 |
0-3% | Fertilizer Control Law | Check specific agricultural regulations. |
📌 Conclusion:
- USA is the most complex market due to Section 122 and potential Section 301 tariffs.
- Chapter 29 (2931) offers the best tax efficiency if the product is a pure chemical.
- Chapter 38 (3808) is necessary for formulations, but3808.59.10.00is far superior to3808.91.50.01or3808.99.08.00.
📌 Part 6: Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
❌ Error 1: Declaring a formulated pesticide as a pure chemical (2931.90.26.00)
👉 Consequence: Customs will reclassify to 3808.99.08.00 (41.5%) and impose penalties for misdeclaration.
❌ Error 2: Declaring a pure chemical as a general insecticide (3808.99.08.00)
👉 Consequence: Paying 25% extra in Section 301 tariffs unnecessarily.
❌ Error 3: Ignoring the "Aromatic" or "Organophosphorus" distinction
👉 Consequence: Using the wrong subheading within Chapter 38 leads to significant rate differences (16.5% vs 40%).
❌ Error 4: Failing to provide MSDS or Chemical Structure
👉 Consequence: Customs detention, delay in clearance, and potential seizure for lack of safety data.
✅ Correct Practice:
"Organophosphorus Aromatic Insecticide, [Chemical Name], CAS No. [XXX], [Pure/Formula], EPA Reg. No. [XXX], Model [XYZ], TSCA Compliant"
🎯 Part 7: Conclusion: Precision Classification Saves Money!
🎯 Remember the Mantra:
🔹 "Pure Chemical? 2931 (16.5%). Formulated Aromatic? 3808.59 (16.5%). Avoid 3808.99 (41.5%) and 3808.91 (40%) if possible!"
🔹 "HS Code determines your cost. A 25% tariff difference can erase your profit margin!"
📌 Pro Tip:
If your product is a pure chemical and you want to ensure the lowest tax rate, apply for an Advance Ruling from US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to confirm classification under 2931.90.26.00 or 3808.59.10.00.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Consult with a licensed customs broker.
📄 Provide full chemical structure and formulation details.
🚀 Ensure EPA and TSCA compliance for smooth US entry.
✨ Professional clearance starts with precise classification!
💼 Every percent of tax saved is pure profit!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。