Storage Pouch
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4202929336 | 52.6% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3926901000 | 20.9% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 4202929315 | 52.6% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 4202999000 | 55.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3923102000 | 35.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
📦 Storage Pouch (收纳盒/袋)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
📌 Part I: Product Definition and Classification: Do You Really Understand "Storage Pouch"?
The term "Storage Pouch" is highly ambiguous in international trade. Depending on the material, structure, and intended use, it falls into completely different tariff categories. Misclassification can lead to drastic differences in duty rates (from 20.9% to 55.0%) and potential customs penalties.
In international trade, "Storage Pouch" generally refers to containers for organizing small items. It is broadly categorized into two main types:
Textile/Fabric-Based Containers (Chapter 42):
Pouches made of textile materials (canvas, nylon, polyester), leather, or plastics-coated fabrics. These are treated as "articles of apparel, accessories, or travel goods."
Plastic/Paper-Based Containers (Chapter 39/48):
Pouches made entirely of plastic films, hard plastics, or cardboard. These are treated as "packaging materials" or "general plastic articles."
⚠️ Key Distinction Point:
- If the outer surface is textile, leather, or non-woven fabric → It likely belongs to Chapter 42 (Higher Tax, ~52-55%).
- If the material is pure plastic (rigid or flexible film) → It likely belongs to Chapter 39 (Lower Tax, ~20-35%).
- If the structure is cardboard/paper → It may fall under different codes not listed in the provided data, but typically follows plastic-like packaging rules if coated.
📦 Part II: HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided data, here are the five potential HS Codes for "Storage Pouch":
| HS Code | Product Description | Material Basis | Classification Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
4202.92.93.36 |
Storage Pouch / Container | Textile Material | Outer surface is textile; classified under "Articles with outer surface of textile materials." |
3926.90.10.00 |
Plastic Storage Box/Container | Plastic | Inferred as plastic material; classified under "Other articles of plastics" as a container. |
4202.92.93.15 |
Storage Pouch / Container | Textile Material | Outer surface is textile; classified under "Articles with outer surface of textile materials." |
4202.99.90.00 |
General Storage Container | Mixed/Misc. | Generic container; material could be plastic, textile, or paper. Used when specific material isn't primary. |
3923.10.20.00 |
Plastic Packaging Articles | Plastic | Inferred as plastic packaging; fits the characteristic of "packaging articles of plastics." |
🔍 Critical Reminder:
- Chapter 42 items (4202.xx.xx) are significantly more expensive in tariffs due to the Section XVII (Textiles/Apparel) trade restrictions.
- Chapter 39 items (3926.xx.xx,3923.xx.xx) benefit from lower base duties but still face heavy US-specific surcharges.
- Never assume "pouch" means "fabric." A clear plastic ziplock bag is Chapter 39, not Chapter 42.
💰 Part III: 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges & Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: From November 10, 2025 (for subsequent imports)
🎯 1. 4202.92.93.36 & 4202.92.93.15 —— Textile-Based Storage Pouches
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 17.6% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge (USITC) | +25.0% (Based on USITC Footnote for Chapter 42) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% (Against Chinese/HK products, effective Nov 10, 2025) |
| Total Duty Rate | 52.6% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 52.6% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:4202.92.93.xx → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Explanation:
- These codes fall under Section 42 (Articles of Leather; Travel Goods).
- The 25% Section 301 duty is standard for many textile/apparel-related imports from China.
- The 10% IEEPA is an additional penalty on Chinese origin goods.
- Total 52.6% is extremely high. Cost-saving strategies must be prioritized.
🎯 2. 4202.99.90.00 —— General/Mixed Material Storage Container
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 20.0% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge (USITC) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% |
| Total Duty Rate | 55.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 55.0% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:4202.99.90.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Warning:
- This is the highest tariff in the dataset.
- Use this code only if the material composition is unclear or mixed, and cannot be firmly classified under specific textile or plastic subheadings.
- Always try to specify the primary material to potentially lower the base rate (e.g., to Chapter 39).
🎯 3. 3926.90.10.00 —— Plastic Storage Box/Container
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 3.4% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge (USITC) | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% |
| Total Duty Rate | 20.9% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 20.9% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3926.90.10.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Advantage:
- This is the lowest tax option if the product is confirmed plastic.
- Base duty is very low (3.4%).
- Section 301 surcharge is reduced to 7.5% for certain plastic articles (compared to 25% for textiles).
- Key Strategy: If your "pouch" is a rigid plastic box or a flexible plastic bag, insist on Classifying as Chapter 39.
🎯 4. 3923.10.20.00 —— Plastic Packaging Articles
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 0.0% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge (USITC) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% |
| Total Duty Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 35.0% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | ❌ No (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3923.10.20.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Nuance:
- Base duty is 0%, which looks attractive.
- However, the Section 301 surcharge jumps to 25% for packaging articles.
- Total 35.0% is higher than3926.90.10.00(20.9%).
- Comparison: If you can classify as3926.90.10.00(General Plastic Article), you save 14.1% in duty compared to3923.10.20.00.
- Strategy: Use3923.10.20.00only if the product is strictly defined as "packaging" (e.g., blister packs, shipping mailers) rather than a durable "storage container."
🛠️ Part IV: Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Guide)
✅ 1. Required Documentation Checklist (Non-Negotiable)
| Document | Mandatory? | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specifications | ✔️ | Must explicitly state Material Composition (e.g., "100% Polyester," "PP Plastic," "Mixed: Cotton Shell/PE Lining"). |
| ✅ Product Photos | ✔️ | Clear images showing texture (fabric weave vs. smooth plastic surface). |
| ✅ Structure Diagram | ✔️ | Show if it has a rigid frame (plastic) or is soft-sided (textile). |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Description must match HS Code logic (e.g., "Plastic Storage Box" vs. "Canvas Pouch"). |
| ✅ Packing List | ✔️ | List all contents. If mixed materials, provide ratio. |
| ✅ Pre-Ruling Document | ✔️ | Strongly Recommended. Apply for an Advance Ruling from US CBP to lock in the HS Code. |
✅ 2. Declaration Tactics (Key Mantras)
🔥 "Material Determines Chapter, Structure Determines Code, Accuracy Saves Money!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hard Plastic Box | 3926.90.10.00 (Plastic Article) |
Misdeclare as "Textile Pouch" | ❌ Severe Penalty for Misclassification |
| Hard Plastic Box | 3926.90.10.00 |
Misdeclare as "Plastic Packaging" (3923.10.20.00) |
❌ Overpay by 14.1% |
| Canvas/Fabric Pouch | 4202.92.93.36 (Textile Outer) |
Misdeclare as "Plastic" | ❌ Customs Rejection & Audit |
| Mixed Material (Textile Outer) | 4202.92.93.15 |
Misdeclare as "General Container" (4202.99.90.00) |
❌ Overpay by 2.4% |
✅ 3. Special Case Handling
| Scenario | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| Soft Plastic Bag (Ziplock) | Likely 3923.10.20.00 (Packaging). Check if it's for retail packaging or personal storage. If personal storage, consider 3926.90.10.00 if it's reusable/durable. |
| Fabric Pouch with Plastic Coating | If outer surface is textile → Chapter 42. The plastic coating does not change the classification if textile is the primary surface. |
| Collapsible Storage Bin (Plastic Frame + Fabric Cover) | Complex. If frame is plastic, might argue for 3926. If fabric cover is dominant, 4202. Seek Advance Ruling. |
| Cardboard Storage Box | Not listed in data. Typically Chapter 48. May have different tariffs. Ensure it's not coated with plastic that makes it "plastic article." |
🌍 Part V: Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Estimated Duty (China Origin) | Certification/Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 3926.90.10.00 (Plastic) |
20.9% | Highest cost market. 52-55% for Textiles. |
| 🇺🇸 USA | 4202.92.93.36 (Textile) |
52.6% | Avoid if possible. |
| 🇨🇳 China (Import) | 3926.90.10.00 |
~6.5% | Low tax, no Section 301. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 3926.90 |
~4-6.5% | No "Section 301" equivalent, but watch for Eco-design rules. |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 3926.90 |
~4-6.5% | Post-Brexit rules apply. |
📌 Conclusion:
- The US is the most expensive market for "Storage Pouches" due to the layered tariff structure (Base + Section 301 + IEEPA).
- Plastic (Chapter 39) is significantly cheaper than Textile (Chapter 42) in the US.
- Strategy: If your product is 51% textile and 49% plastic, it likely falls under Chapter 42. Try to redesign packaging or materials to shift classification if legally permissible.
📌 Part VI: Common Errors & Pitfall Guide (Lessons Learned)
❌ Error 1: Declaring a Fabric Pouch as Plastic to save taxes.
👉 Consequence: Customs inspection reveals fabric. Fines, seizure, and loss of trust.
❌ Error 2: Declaring a Plastic Box as Packaging (3923) instead of Article (3926).
👉 Consequence: You pay 35.0% instead of 20.9%. Overpayment of $14.10 per $100 value.
❌ Error 3: Not specifying material in the invoice.
👉 Consequence: Customs uses residual duty rate or highest possible duty. Audit risk.
❌ Error 4: Using "Storage Pouch" as the only description.
👉 Consequence: Ambiguity leads to random classification. Always specify material.
✅ Correct Practice:
"Reusable Plastic Storage Container, Transparent PP, Rectangular, 10L Capacity, Model XYZ"
OR
"Canvas Makeup Pouch with Zipper, 100% Cotton Outer, Polyester Lining"
🎯 Part VII: Conclusion: Professional Declaration, Save Cost, Ensure Compliance!
🎯 Remember the Mantras:
🔹 "Textile Out, Tax High (52%), Plastic In, Tax Low (20%)"
🔹 "Packaging vs. Article: 35% vs. 20%, Choose Wisely!"
🔹 "HS Code is Destiny, Description is Key, Pre-Ruling is King!"
📌 Pro Tip:
If your "Storage Pouch" is not made of plastic or textile (e.g., metal, wood), these codes do not apply. Ensure you select the correct chapter. For the codes above, only Plastic and Textile/Fabric are covered.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Contact a Professional Customs Broker
🖼️ Provide Clear Photos & Material Specs
📝 Apply for Advance Ruling (Pre-Ruling) from US CBP
🚀 Secure Your Profit Margin with Accurate Classification!
✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Precise Classification!
💼 Every Cent of Duty Matters! Calculate It Precisely!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。