acrylic polymer for textiles
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5512290090 | 22.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 5512990090 | 47.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3906905000 | 39.2% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3210000000 | 36.8% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3906902000 | 41.3% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🌟 Acrylic Polymer for Textiles – HS Code & Tariff Guide 2026 | Expert Customs Clearance Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly Is "Acrylic Polymer for Textiles"?
Acrylic polymer for textiles refers to synthetic resins or polymers derived from acrylic acid or its esters, used primarily as binders, coatings, or finishing agents in textile manufacturing. These materials are applied to improve fabric durability, softness, wrinkle resistance, and color fastness — especially in non-woven fabrics, synthetic fiber blends, and coated textiles.
⚠️ Key Distinction: - If used as a raw material in fiber production → may fall under 5512.29.00.90 (textile fibers) - If used as a coating or finishing agent on fabrics → likely falls under 3906.90.50.00 / 3210.00.00.00 (polymer applications) - If used in leather finishing or coating → classified under 3906.90.20.00
🔍 Critical Tip:
The end-use and form of application (liquid, powder, emulsion) determine the correct HS Code — not just the chemical name.
📦 II. HS Code Classification Breakdown (2026 Updated Tariff Schedule)
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Context | Tax Rate | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5512.29.00.90 |
Acrylic blended fabric (non-wool), containing synthetic fibers (e.g., acrylic) | Textile fabric – mixed with other fibers, used in apparel, home textiles | 22.0% | Must be woven fabric, not knitted; must be non-wool; synthetic fiber content >50% |
5512.99.00.90 |
Other synthetic fiber woven fabrics (not specified) | General-purpose acrylic blends, not falling under specific subcategory | 47.0% | No specific fiber type mentioned; includes non-wool, non-cotton, non-silk blends |
3906.90.50.00 |
Acrylic polymer, used in leather applications, in primary form (e.g., emulsion, powder) | Leather coating, backing, or finishing | 39.2% | Must be not yet applied to leather; must be in primary form |
3210.00.00.00 |
Acrylic polymer used in leather finishing – coloring or adjusting pigments (e.g., in water-based lacquers) | Leather finishing agents, colorants, adjustment coatings | 36.8% | Used in pre-treatment or finishing stages; not structural |
3906.90.20.00 |
Acrylic polymer, used in leather, in primary form, no material conflict | Leather coating, adhesive, protective layer | 41.3% | Same as 3906.90.50.00 but higher base tariff due to specific subcategory |
✅ Note:
- "Primary form" = not yet applied to final product (e.g., liquid emulsion, dry powder, granules)
- "Used in leather" = even if used on textiles, if it’s for leather-like finishes, it may still be classified under leather-related codes
💰 III. 2026 U.S. Tariff Breakdown – Full Tax Clause Analysis (China-Origin Goods)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: November 10, 2025 (including subsequent imports)
🎯 1. 5512.29.00.90 – Acrylic Blended Fabric (Non-Wool, Synthetic Fiber)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 12.0% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Section 301 Additional Duty | 0.0% (no 301 duty applied) |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Emergency Tariff | 10.0% (under International Emergency Economic Powers Act) |
| Total Effective Duty | 22.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 22.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | ❌ No (denied under U.S. law) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → Section 122:9903.88.01 → HS:5512.29.00.90 |
📌 Explanation:
- This code applies only to woven fabrics made from acrylic or acrylic blends. - No 301 tariff (25%) applies because this is not a "textile product" under the 301 list. - Only IEEPA 10% applies — a general-purpose emergency tariff on Chinese goods.
🎯 2. 5512.99.00.90 – Other Synthetic Fiber Woven Fabric (Unspecified)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 12.0% |
| USITC Section 301 Additional Duty | 25.0% (from U.S. Trade Act of 1974, Section 301) |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Emergency Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 47.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 47.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:9903.88.01 → HS:5512.99.00.90 |
📌 Explanation:
- This code is a catch-all for non-specific synthetic fiber fabrics. - 25% Section 301 tariff applies because this category is specifically targeted under the U.S. China trade war tariffs. - Combined with 10% IEEPA, results in 47% total — one of the highest tariffs in textile imports.
🎯 3. 3906.90.50.00 – Acrylic Polymer (Leather Use, Primary Form)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 4.2% |
| USITC Section 301 Additional Duty | 25.0% |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Emergency Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 39.2% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 39.2% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:9903.88.01 → HS:3906.90.50.00 |
📌 Explanation:
- Applies to acrylic polymers in emulsion or powder form, used on leather or leather-like materials. - Despite low base tariff, 25% 301 + 10% IEEPA push it to 39.2%. - Not exempt even if used in textiles — if applied in leather context, it’s taxed as such.
🎯 4. 3210.00.00.00 – Acrylic Polymer for Leather Finishing (Color Adjustments)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 1.8% |
| USITC Section 301 Additional Duty | 25.0% |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Emergency Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 36.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 36.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:9903.88.01 → HS:3210.00.00.00 |
📌 Explanation:
- Applies to color-adjusting agents, water-based lacquers, pigment modifiers. - Even though base tariff is low, 25% 301 + 10% IEEPA still make it 36.8%. - Not a raw polymer — but a formulated finishing agent.
🎯 5. 3906.90.20.00 – Acrylic Polymer (Leather Use, Primary Form, No Material Conflict)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.3% |
| USITC Section 301 Additional Duty | 25.0% |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Emergency Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 41.3% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 41.3% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | ❌ No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:9903.88.01 → HS:3906.90.20.00 |
📌 Explanation:
- This is the highest-taxed polymer code in this list. - Higher base rate (6.3%) + 25% 301 + 10% IEEPA = 41.3%. - No material conflict means it’s not restricted by other rules — but still fully taxed.
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Best Practices (Pro Tips to Avoid Delays & Penalties)
✅ 1. Required Documentation (Must-Have Checklist)
| Document | Required? | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specification Sheet | ✔️ | Must clarify form (emulsion, powder, granules), application (textile vs. leather), chemical composition |
| ✅ Technical Data Sheet (TDS) | ✔️ | Proves primary form vs. applied product |
| ✅ Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS/SDS) | ✔️ | Required for chemical imports |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must clearly state end-use and HS Code |
| ✅ Certificate of Origin (CO) | ✔️ | Critical for 301/IEEPA exemption eligibility |
| ✅ Packing List | ✔️ | Shows bulk vs. unit packaging, helps avoid split shipments |
| ✅ Test Reports (FCC, RoHS, REACH) | ✔️ | If applicable, prevents delays |
✅ 2.申报技巧(申报口诀)
🔥 “Form Defines Code, Use Defines Duty, Label Says It All!”
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Wrong Code | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrylic polymer in emulsion form, used on leather | 3906.90.50.00 |
3210.00.00.00 |
Misclassification → 41.3% vs. 39.2% |
| Acrylic blended fabric (woven, non-wool) | 5512.29.00.90 |
5512.99.00.90 |
Save 25% in duty |
| Acrylic polymer in powder form, used in textile coating | 3906.90.50.00 |
5512.29.00.90 |
Higher tax, risk of audit |
| Acrylic finishing agent (color adjuster) | 3210.00.00.00 |
3906.90.20.00 |
2.5% extra tax |
✅ 3. Special Cases & Solutions
| Situation | Recommended Action |
|---|---|
| Polymer used in both textile and leather applications | Declare based on primary use — if 70% used in leather, use leather codes |
| Custom-formulated acrylic blend | Apply for HS Code Pre-Ruling (Advance Ruling) — reduces risk |
| Low-volume import | Still must pay full tariff — no de minimis relief |
| Origin from Vietnam/Mexico | May qualify for IEEPA exemption — 0% IEEPA → only 25% 301 (if applicable) |
| Bulk vs. Small Shipments | Avoid splitting — each shipment taxed separately → higher total cost |
🌍 V. Global Tariff Comparison (2026 Update)
| Country | Recommended HS Code | Base Tariff | 301/IEEPA Duty | Total Duty | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 5512.29.00.90 |
12.0% | 10.0% (IEEPA) | 22.0% | No 301 duty |
| 🇨🇳 China | 5512.29.00.90 |
5.0% | 0% | 5.0% | No extra duties |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 5512.29.00.90 |
0% (if CE) | 0% | 0% | No additional tariffs |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | 3906.90.50.00 |
5.0% | 0% | 5.0% | No 301/IEEPA |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 3210.00.00.00 |
0% | 0% | 0% | No extra duties |
📌 Insight:
- U.S. is the only market with 301 + IEEPA tariffs on acrylic polymers. - China and EU are duty-free or low-duty — ideal for re-export or re-routing.
📌 VI. Common Mistakes & How to Avoid Them (Real-World Pitfalls)
❌ Mistake 1: Labeling acrylic polymer as “textile material” when used in leather finishing
👉 Result: Wrong HS Code → 41.3% vs. 36.8% → overpayment & audit risk
❌ Mistake 2: Not specifying form (emulsion/powder) in invoice
👉 Result: Customs assumes applied form → higher risk of 47% tariff
❌ Mistake 3: Splitting shipment into “polymer” + “fabric”
👉 Result: Each item taxed separately → total cost exceeds 100%
❌ Mistake 4: Using generic name like “Acrylic Resin” in申报
👉 Result: Customs cannot determine use → delayed clearance or rejection
✅ Correct Declaration Example:
“Acrylic Polymer Emulsion, 30% solids, used for leather coating, in primary form, not yet applied — HS: 3906.90.50.00, Origin: China, CIF: $15,000”
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Accurate Classification = Profit Protection
🔹 “Form, Use, Origin” — the 3 Pillars of Correct HS Code
🔹 “No de minimis, no exemptions, no mercy” — in U.S. import rules
🔹 “One wrong code = 25% more tax” — don’t gamble!
📣 Act Now: Optimize Your Import Strategy
📞 Contact a U.S. Customs Broker + Submit product specs for HS Code Pre-Ruling
🚀 Re-route from China to Vietnam/Mexico if eligible for IEEPA exemption
📊 Use tariff calculators to model cost impact before shipment
✨ Your success starts with the right HS Code.
💼 Precision in classification = Savings, Speed, and Security.
🌐 Global Trade. Local Expertise. Zero Risk.
📌 Stay ahead. Stay compliant. Stay profitable.
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。