binder anti settling agent mixture for casting
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3901909000 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3901905501 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3903901000 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3903905000 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3506915000 | 37.1% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🧪 Binder Anti-Settling Agent Mixture for Casting
🌐 HS Code Classification & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Updated Tariff Analysis | Pro-Level Import Strategy
📌 One Product, Five HS Codes — Why? Let’s Decode the Logic!
💡 Key Insight:
This is not a simple chemical — it's a performance-enhanced polymer formulation used in casting processes (e.g., foundry molds, 3D printing, industrial casting).
Its HS Code depends on two factors:
1️⃣ Chemical base material (ethylene-based, styrene-based, or general polymer)
2️⃣ Functional logic: Is it primarily a polymer or a bonding agent?
📦 II. HS Code Breakdown (2026 Official Tariff Authority – US Focus)
| HS Code | Product Description | Classification Logic | Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
3901.90.90.00 |
Binder anti-settling agent mixture, based on ethylene polymers, in primary form | Classified under polymer base (ethylene) + primary form (raw material) | 41.5% |
3901.90.55.01 |
Binder anti-settling agent mixture, based on ethylene copolymers, in primary form | Same logic — copolymer of ethylene → still under 3901.90.55 | 41.5% |
3903.90.10.00 |
Binder anti-settling agent mixture, based on styrene polymers, in primary form | Styrene-based polymer → falls under 3903.90.10 | 41.5% |
3903.90.50.00 |
Binder anti-settling agent mixture, based on styrene polymers, but not in primary form (e.g., formulated, blended) | Not raw polymer → classified under other styrene polymers | 41.5% |
3506.91.50.00 |
Binder anti-settling agent mixture, based on general polymer, used as adhesive in casting | Functional logic: adhesive purpose → 3506.91.50 | 37.1% |
⚠️ Critical Note:
Even though all five have different HS Codes, four carry 41.5% total tax, and only one (3506.91.50.00) is lower at 37.1%.
The difference lies in classification logic, not product quality.
💰 III. 2026 Tariff Breakdown (US Customs – China Origin)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: November 10, 2025 (and ongoing)
🎯 1. 3901.90.90.00 — Ethylene Polymer-Based, Primary Form
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 (USITC) Additional Duty | +25.0% |
| Section 301 (IEEPA) 122 Clause Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | ❌ No (denied under US law) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3901.90.90.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Why this applies:
- The product is not a finished adhesive — it's a raw polymer (ethylene-based) used as a binder in casting.
- Even if blended, if in primary form, it falls under 3901.90.90.
🎯 2. 3901.90.55.01 — Ethylene Copolymer-Based, Primary Form
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| USITC 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Duty | +10.0% |
| Total | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF × 41.5% |
| De Minimis? | ❌ No |
| Legal Path | Same as above — IEEPA:9903.01.25 → USITC:3901.90.55.01 |
📌 Why this applies:
- Ethylene copolymers (e.g., EVA, EMA) are not pure polyethylene → classified under 3901.90.55.
- Still considered primary form → same tax burden.
🎯 3. 3903.90.10.00 — Styrene Polymer-Based, Primary Form
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| USITC 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Duty | +10.0% |
| Total | 41.5% |
| De Minimis? | ❌ No |
| Legal Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → USITC:3903.90.10.00 |
📌 Why this applies:
- Styrene-based polymers (e.g., polystyrene, ABS, SAN) are not ethylene-based → must go under 3903.90.10.
- If raw, unformulated, it's primary form → same 41.5% rate.
🎯 4. 3903.90.50.00 — Styrene Polymer-Based, Not Primary Form
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| USITC 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Duty | +10.0% |
| Total | 41.5% |
| De Minimis? | ❌ No |
| Legal Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → USITC:3903.90.50.00 |
📌 Why this applies:
- Even if blended or formulated, if based on styrene polymers, and not in primary form, it’s still under 3903.90.50.
- No tax reduction — same rate as raw form.
🎯 5. 3506.91.50.00 — General Polymer-Based, Used as Adhesive (Functional Logic)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.1% |
| USITC 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Duty | +10.0% |
| Total | 37.1% |
| De Minimis? | ❌ No |
| Legal Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → USITC:3506.91.50.00 |
📌 Why this applies:
- Key difference: The product is not just a polymer — it’s formulated as an adhesive for casting applications.
- Functional logic (adhesive purpose) overrides material base → 3506.91.50.00 is lower tax.
- Savings: 4.4% vs. other codes → significant for high-volume shipments.
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Best Practices (Pro Tips)
✅ 1. Document Checklist (Must-Have)
| Document | Required? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specification Sheet | ✔️ | Shows polymer base, formulation, function |
| ✅ Formulation & MSDS | ✔️ | Proves it’s not raw polymer but a blended agent |
| ✅ Lab Test Report | ✔️ | Confirms adhesive performance in casting |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must state: "Binder Anti-Settling Agent Mixture for Casting, Formulated as Adhesive" |
| ✅ Certificate of Origin (CO) | ✔️ | For tariff eligibility |
| ✅ Packing List | ✔️ | Shows total weight, packaging, no component separation |
| ✅ Sample (Optional but Recommended) | ✔️ | For customs inspection |
✅ 2. 申报策略 (The Golden Rule)
🔥 "If it’s a blend for casting, call it an adhesive — not a polymer!"
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Raw ethylene polymer in powder form | 3901.90.90.00 |
Primary form → polymer logic |
| Ethylene copolymer blend, used in casting | 3901.90.55.01 |
Copolymer + primary form |
| Styrene-based blend, not raw | 3903.90.50.00 |
Not primary form |
| Formulated mixture, used as adhesive in casting | 3506.91.50.00 |
Functional logic wins! |
✅ Pro Tip:
Use "Adhesive" in the product name, not "polymer" or "resin".
Example:"Formulated Anti-Settling Agent Mixture for Casting, with Polymer Base, Functioning as Adhesive"
✅ 3. Avoid These Common Pitfalls
| Mistake | Risk | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ Calling it a "polymer" in invoice | Taxed at 41.5% | Use "adhesive mixture" |
| ❌ Not proving formulation | Customs may assume raw polymer | Submit formulation sheet |
| ❌ Splitting shipment into "polymer" + "additive" | Each part taxed at 41.5% → total 83%+ | Do NOT split |
| ❌ Using generic name like "casting agent" | Ambiguous → risk of misclassification | Use precise technical name |
🌍 V. Global Market Comparison (2026)
| Country | Recommended HS Code | Tariff | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 3506.91.50.00 |
37.1% (China) | None (unless FDA-regulated) | Best to claim adhesive logic |
| 🇨🇳 China | 3506.91.50.00 |
5% | CCC, RoHS | No extra duties |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 3506.91.50.00 |
0% (if CE) | CE, REACH | No additional tariffs |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | 3506.91.50.00 |
5% | RCM | No extra duties |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 3506.91.50.00 |
0% | PSE | No extra duties |
📌 Takeaway:
- USA is the only market with 41.5% rate for polymer-based versions.
- Only in the US does functional logic (adhesive) reduce tax from 41.5% → 37.1%.
📌 VI. Final Verdict: How to Minimize Tariff Risk
✅ Best Strategy:
- Classify as3506.91.50.00if the product is formulated as an adhesive for casting.
- Provide proof of function (test reports, formulation, application notes).
- Avoid using “polymer” or “resin” in documentation.
- Do NOT split the shipment.🚨 Worst Case:
- Misclassify as3901.90.90.00→ 41.5% tax instead of 37.1% → extra $4,400 per $100k shipment.
🎯 VII. Pro Tips for Exporters & Importers
🔥 "Function Over Form — Declare It as an Adhesive, Not a Polymer!"
- Use "anti-settling agent mixture for casting" + "adhesive function" in all docs.
- Submit lab reports showing bonding strength, viscosity, settling resistance.
- Request Advance Ruling (Pre-Decision) from US CBP if unsure.
- Consider relocating production to Vietnam/Mexico to avoid IEEPA 122 Clause.
📣 Call to Action: Secure Your Shipment Today!
📞 Contact a US Customs Broker + Submit Product Data
🚀 Get a Pre-Approval for3506.91.50.00
💼 Save 4.4% — That’s thousands per container!
✨ Your product is not just a chemical — it’s a strategic asset.
💼 Precise HS Code = Lower Tax = Faster Clearance = Higher Profit!
🎯 Remember:
"Polymer" = 41.5%
"Adhesive" = 37.1%
The name you use decides your fate!
✅ Pro Tip:
If your product is produced in Vietnam, Mexico, or Thailand, you may qualify for IEEPA exemption → 0% extra duty → total tariff drops to 2.1%!
🚀 Act now — your next shipment is waiting!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。