rubber impregnated knitted blend gloves
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4015195100 | 49.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 9018390020 | 10.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 9018390050 | 10.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3926201050 | 10.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 4015191150 | 38.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🧤 Rubber Impregnated Knitted Blend Gloves (Rubber-Coated Knit Gloves)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand "Rubber Impregnated Gloves"?
Rubber impregnated knitted blend gloves are protective handwear where a knitted fabric base (often cotton, nylon, or polyester blend) is coated or impregnated with rubber (natural or synthetic, such as latex, nitrile, or PVC) to provide grip, waterproofing, and chemical resistance.
In international trade, these gloves are classified based on material composition, intended use (general vs. medical), and structural form. The classification significantly impacts the duty rate, especially under current US trade policies.
⚠️ Key Distinction Points:
- If the rubber coating is the primary characteristic and they are for general protection → Chapter 40 (Rubber).
- If they are specifically designed for medical procedures (e.g., surgical exam) → Chapter 90 (Medical Instruments).
- If considered a composite textile/rubber hybrid without specific medical or general glove classification → Chapter 39 (Plastics/Resins) or Chapter 61/62 (Apparel) may be argued, though less common.
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority)
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Scenario | Key Classification Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
4015.19.51.00 |
Rubber-impregnated finger cots/gloves, made of vulcanized rubber, classified under gloves/finger cots | General industrial protection, hygiene, non-medical | ✅ Primary material: Vulcanized Rubber; Function: Glove |
9018.39.00.20 |
Rubber-impregnated finger cots, extended application of catheters/probes | Medical devices, probe protection, specific medical accessories | ✅ Form: Catheter/probe-like extension; Medical use |
9018.39.00.50 |
Medical rubber-impregnated finger cots, categorized under catheters/sheaths | Surgical exam gloves, medical barrier protection | ✅ Category: Medical Device (Other); Hospital use |
3926.20.10.50 |
Rubber-impregnated finger cots, viewed as plastic/polymer composite | Non-standard rubber gloves, composite material usage | ✅ Material: Plastic/High-polymer composite application |
4015.19.11.50 |
Rubber-impregnated finger cots, considered clothing accessories | Fashion or accessory gloves, non-protective | ✅ Category: Apparel Accessory; No material conflict |
🔍 Critical Reminder:
- Medical vs. General Use: Gloves intended for medical procedures fall under Chapter 90, while general industrial/hygiene gloves fall under Chapter 40. Misclassification can lead to severe penalties. - Material Priority: If the rubber coating is substantial and vulcanized, Chapter 40 is the primary classification. If it's a thin impregnation on a textile base, customs may still view it as a rubber article if the rubber defines the essential character.
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: From November 10, 2025 (and subsequent imports)
🎯 1. 4015.19.51.00 —— Rubber-impregnated Finger Cots/Gloves (Vulcanized Rubber)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 14.0% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Surtax (Section 301) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surtax | +10.0% (Targeting China/HK products) |
| Total Duty Rate | 49.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 49% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:4015.19.51.00 → FOOTNOTE:301-Tariff |
📌 Explanation:
- Base 14%: Standard MFN duty for rubber gloves. - 25% Section 301: Additional tariff on Chinese rubber articles. - 10% IEEPA: Additional tariff under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. - Total 49%: This is a very high tariff. Importers must plan for significant cost increases.
🎯 2. 9018.39.00.20 —— Rubber-impregnated Finger Cots (Medical Probe Extension)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 0.0% |
| USITC Surtax | 0.0% |
| IEEPA Surtax | +10.0% |
| Total Duty Rate | 10.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 10% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:9018.39.00.20 → FOOTNOTE:IEEPA |
📌 Note:
- Base 0%: Medical instruments often have zero base duty. - 10% IEEPA: The only surtax applied is the IEEPA tariff. - Total 10%: Significantly lower than general rubber gloves. This is a strategic classification for medical-grade products.
🎯 3. 9018.39.00.50 —— Medical Rubber-impregnated Finger Cots (Catheter/Sheath Category)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 0.0% |
| USITC Surtax | 0.0% |
| IEEPA Surtax | +10.0% |
| Total Duty Rate | 10.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 10% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:9018.39.00.50 → FOOTNOTE:IEEPA |
📌 Note:
- Same as above: 10% total. - Applies specifically to medical devices categorized under "Other instruments and appliances used in medical, surgical, dental, or veterinary sciences."
🎯 4. 3926.20.10.50 —— Rubber-impregnated Finger Cots (Plastic/Composite)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 0.0% |
| USITC Surtax | 0.0% |
| IEEPA Surtax | +10.0% |
| Total Duty Rate | 10.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 10% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3926.20.10.50 → FOOTNOTE:IEEPA |
📌 Note:
- If customs classifies the product as a "plastic article" due to composite nature, the base duty is 0%. - 10% IEEPA still applies. - Total 10%: Lower than general rubber gloves.
🎯 5. 4015.19.11.50 —— Rubber-impregnated Finger Cots (Clothing Accessory)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 3.0% |
| USITC Surtax | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surtax | +10.0% |
| Total Duty Rate | 38.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 38% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:4015.19.11.50 → FOOTNOTE:301-Tariff |
📌 Note:
- Base 3%: Lower base for apparel/accessories. - 25% Section 301 + 10% IEEPA = 35% surtax. - Total 38%: Higher than medical (10%) but lower than general rubber gloves (49%).
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Proven Pitfall Avoidance)
✅ 1. Document Checklist (All Required)
| Document | Mandatory | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specifications | ✔️ | Material composition, coating type (latex/nitrile/pvc), glove size, thickness |
| ✅ Intended Use Statement | ✔️ | Explicitly state if for Medical (surgical/exam) or General Industrial use |
| ✅ Product Photos (Label/Tag) | ✔️ | Clear view of brand, model, material claims |
| ✅ Third-party Testing Report | ✔️ | FDA 510(k) (if medical), CE, REACH, or ASTM standards |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must clearly describe product as "Medical Gloves" or "Industrial Rubber Gloves" |
| ✅ Certificate of Origin (CO) | ✔️ | To prove origin; not eligible for preference in US-China trade currently |
| ✅ Packing List | ✔️ | Details quantity, weight, and packaging |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Rules)
🔥 “Medical Zero Base, Industrial High Base; Specify Use, Lower Cost!”
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Use | 9018.39.00.20 / 9018.39.00.50 |
Declaring as "General Gloves" → 49% duty |
| General Industrial | 4015.19.51.00 |
Declaring as "Medical" without FDA registration → Fraud/penalty |
| Composite/Plastic View | 3926.20.10.50 |
If rubber is minimal, argue for plastic classification → 10% duty |
| Fashion Accessory | 4015.19.11.50 |
If not protective, declare as accessory → 38% duty |
✅ 3. Special Cases Handling
| Case | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Medical Gloves | Provide FDA registration number and intended use certificate to justify 9018 classification |
| Mixed Packaging | If medical and general gloves are packed together, declare separately to avoid misclassification |
| Non-Chinese Origin | If from Vietnam, Mexico, etc., IEEPA surtax may be waived or reduced; apply for EO 14058 exemption if eligible |
| Sample Imports | Even samples are subject to duty; do not use "gift" declaration incorrectly |
🌍 V. Global Market Customs Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Duty Rate | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 4015.19.51.00 (General) |
49% | FDA (if medical) | Highest due to 301+IEEPA |
| 🇺🇸 USA | 9018.39.00.20 (Medical) |
10% | FDA 510(k) | Best rate for medical |
| 🇨🇳 China | 4015.19 |
8-14% | CCC (if applicable) | Lower base, no IEEPA |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 4015.11 |
0-4% | CE, REACH | No Section 301/IEEPA |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 4015.11 |
0-5% | UKCA | Post-Brexit rules apply |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | 4015.11 |
5% | TGA (if medical) | No surtaxes |
📌 Conclusion:
- USA is the most costly market for Chinese-made rubber gloves due to combined 301 and IEEPA tariffs. - Medical classification (9018) offers the lowest duty (10%), but requires strict documentation (FDA, medical use proof). - General industrial gloves face 49%, which may impact profitability significantly.
📌 VI. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Blood Lessons)
❌ Error 1: Declaring medical gloves as "general hand protection"
👉 Consequence: Pay 49% instead of 10% → Loss of profit margin
❌ Error 2: Declaring general gloves as "medical" without FDA approval
👉 Consequence: Customs seizure, fines, or entry refusal → Legal risk
❌ Error 3: Omitting material composition (e.g., "knitted blend")
👉 Consequence: Customs may misclassify as pure rubber or pure textile → Audits
❌ Error 4: Assuming de minimis applies
👉 Consequence: Packages under $800 are not exempt from IEEPA/301 tariffs → Unexpected duty bills
✅ Correct Practice:
“Medical Examination Gloves, Nitrile-Coated Cotton Knit, FDA Registered, Sterile, Box of 100”
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Professional Declaration, Save Costs, Ensure Compliance
🎯 Remember the Mantra:
🔹 “Medical is 10%, General is 49%; Specify Use, Save Money!”
🔹 “HS Code Defines Destiny, Duty Rate Varies; Declare Accurately, Avoid Fines!”
📌 Tip:
If your gloves are originating from Vietnam, Mexico, Thailand, or Malaysia, you may qualify for IEEPA Exemption under EO 14058, reducing the rate to 0%-5%.
Recommend applying for an Advance Ruling from CBP to confirm classification before shipment.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Contact a professional customs broker + Provide product specs + Apply for HS Code Advance Ruling
🚀 Let your gloves clear smoothly, export efficiently, and boost profits!
✨ Professional Customs Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
💼 Every cent of your cost deserves precise calculation!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。