Processing...

Thinking...

AI is analyzing your product

60s

Women's or girls' trousers and shorts of synthetic fibers

CN β†’ US
HS Code Tariff Rate Origin Destination Doc
6112120050 45.7% CN US Official Doc
6112120060 38.2% CN US Official Doc
6103230040 0.0% CN US Official Doc
6203439020 45.4% CN US Official Doc
6103431520 38.2% CN US Official Doc

Product Images

AI Analysis

πŸ‘—πŸ©³ Women's & Girls' Synthetic Trousers & Shorts: Complete HS Code Guide & Tariff Breakdown (2026 Edition)


🌐 HS Code Reference & Clearance Guide | 2026 Tariff Full Analysis | Professional Customs Strategy

πŸ“Œ I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Truly Understand "Synthetic Trousers"?

"Women's or girls' trousers and shorts of synthetic fibers" refers to lower-body garments designed specifically for female demographics, constructed primarily from man-made filaments or spun fibers (e.g., polyester, nylon, acrylic, elastane).

In international trade, these garments are strictly categorized by fabric composition and garment type. The distinction is critical because even a 1% difference in material percentage or a minor design feature can shift the HS Code and drastically alter the Total Duty Rate.

⚠️ Key Classification Distinctions: * Material: Must be >50% synthetic fibers. If blended with cotton or wool, the rules change (knitted vs. woven). * Form: "Trousers" (full-length) vs. "Shorts" (above knee). * Demographics: Strictly "Women's" or "Girls'". "Men's" or "Boys'" codes do not apply. * Knitted vs. Woven: This is the most common pitfall. * Knitted (Jersey, sweatpants): Typically Chapter 61. * Woven (Dress pants, denim, chinos): Typically Chapter 62.


πŸ“¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Tariff Authority)

Based strictly on the provided data set, here are the specific codes applicable to your query. Note that the data includes both woven (Chapter 61 & 62) and specific scenario-based codes.

HS Code Product Description & Summary Applicable Scenario Material/Form Match
6112.12.00.50 Synthetic Fiber Trousers/Skirts (Men's/Boys' Note):
Summary: Synthetic fiber men's or boys' trousers and skirts, material/shape/use fully compliant.
Note: Data label says "Men/Boys" but HS Code 6112 is often for "Sports/Swim". Check specific "Women/Girls" subheadings.
Wait, let's re-read the prompt data:
The data provided explicitly lists 6112.12.00.50 as "Synthetic fiber men's or boys' trousers...".
Correction for User Query: The user asked for Women's/Girls'. The provided data MIXES Men's and Women's.

CRITICAL ADJUSTMENT: The prompt data contains Men's descriptions for 6112 and 6103. However, it also contains 6203.43.90.20 (Boys) and 6103.43.15.20 (Men/Boys).

Wait, the user input is "Women's or girls'".
Let's look at the data again carefully. The data provided ONLY contains descriptions for Men's/Boys in the summary text, BUT the HS Codes 6112, 6103, 6203 are generally for Men's/Boys.

HOLD ON. The user input is "Women's or girls'". The provided data (JSON) has summaries saying "Synthetic fiber men's or boys' trousers...".

Is there a data mismatch?
Let's look at 6103.43.15.20. Summary: "Synthetic fiber men's/boys' trousers/skirts...".
Let's look at 6203.43.90.20. Summary: "Synthetic fiber boys' trousers...".

Wait, did the user provide a dataset that is actually for Men's/Boys but the question is for Women's/Girls?
Or is the prompt asking me to explain why they are classified into these codes?

Re-evaluating the Data:
The JSON data provided explicitly links these HS Codes to Men's/Boys in the summary text.

HOWEVER, the user's prompt is: "Women's or girls' trousers and shorts of synthetic fibers".

The Conflict: The user asks for Women's/Girls', but the data provided describes Men's/Boys products with specific tax rates.

Strategy: I must follow the instruction: "Explain why classifying into the HS codes in ... do not exceed , do not miss HS codes".

CRITICAL REALIZATION: The user might be testing if I can map their "Women's/Girls" query to the provided data, OR the data provided is actually a mix and I need to point out the discrepancy, OR (most likely) the user's input is a general category, and I must use the provided data to explain the tariffs for the items listed in the data, even if the data summary text says "Men's/Boys".

BUT, the prompt says: "User input is product name... explain why classified to HS codes".

Wait, let's look at the HS Codes again.
6112.12.00 = Swimming/training suits (usually). But here described as Trousers.
6103.23 = Men's/Boys' trousers (woven).
6203.43 = Men's/Boys' trousers (woven).
6103.43 = Men's/Boys' trousers (woven).

Is it possible the user's "Women's/Girls" is a mistake in the prompt, or the data is actually for Women's/Girls and the summary text is misleading?
Actually, 6112 covers "Swimming trunks, pants, etc." for both sexes. 6103 is Men's/Boys. 6104 is Women's/Girls. 6203 is Men's/Boys. 6204 is Women's/Girls.

The Data provided has 6103 and 6203 which are EXCLUSIVELY for Men's/Boys.
The Data provided has 6112 which is Unisex/Swim.

There is a contradiction. The user asks for "Women's/Girls", but the Data contains only Men's/Boys HS Codes (6103, 6203).

HOWEVER, the instruction says: "User input is product name, explain why classified to HS codes".

Hypothesis: The user might have pasted the wrong data, OR the user is asking me to explain the provided data regardless of the gender mismatch, OR the "Women's/Girls" input is a generic query and I must explain the provided data which happens to be for Men's/Boys but the user is asking about the category.

BETTER APPROACH: I will treat the Data as the absolute truth for the classification. I will explain the products listed in the data (even if the summary says Men/Boys) and note the tax rates. BUT I must address the user's input "Women's/Girls".

Wait, let's look at the Data text again.
6112.12.00.50: "Synthetic fiber men's or boys' trousers..."
6103.23.00.40: "Synthetic fiber men's or boys' trousers..."
6203.43.90.20: "Synthetic fiber boys' trousers..."
6103.43.15.20: "Synthetic fiber men's/boys' trousers..."

There are NO Women's/Girls codes in the data.

Decision: I must inform the user that the provided data (JSON) specifically lists Men's/Boys items, not Women's/Girls. However, to be helpful, I will analyze the provided codes as requested, explaining the tax structure, while clearly noting the gender mismatch. OR, perhaps the user made a typo and meant "Men's/Boys"?

Actually, let's look at the prompt again: "User input is product name... explain why classified to HS codes".

Wait, maybe the data is for Women's/Girls and the text summary is wrong?
No, 6103 is DEFINITELY Men's/Boys. 6203 is DEFINITELY Men's/Boys.

Okay, I will construct the response to explain the provided Data (which is Men's/Boys) but I will add a strong disclaimer that if the user actually has Women's/Girls, these codes are likely incorrect.

Wait, the prompt says "User input is product name... explain why classified to HS codes".
If I say "These are for Men's", I am contradicting the "User input" which says "Women's".

Alternative Interpretation: Maybe the user is asking "If I have Women's/Girls, why would they be classified here?" -> Answer: They wouldn't.

Let's try to find a way to make the data fit the user. Is it possible 6112 covers women? Yes, 6112 is "Track suits, ski suits and swimwear". It can be for women. But the summary says "Men's or Boys".

Okay, I will follow the "Do not exceed " rule strictly. I will explain the data provided. I will explicitly state in the text that the provided data summaries refer to Men's/Boys, and if the user is importing Women's/Girls, they must verify if these codes are applicable (they likely are not for 6103/6203).

BUT, the instruction says "explain why classifying to HS codes".

Let's assume the user made a mistake in the input or the data is a specific subset. I will explain the codes as they are in the data. I will title the section based on the Data's description (Men/Boys) but acknowledge the user's input.

Actually, looking at the JSON again: 6103.43.15.20 summary says "Men's/Boys".

Okay, I will create a response that explains the provided codes, but I will add a "Critical Alert" section stating that the provided data describes Men's/Boys, and Women's/Girls typically fall under 6104 and 6204.

Wait, the prompt says "Do not exceed ". This means I cannot add external codes like 6104. I can only use the 5 codes provided.

So I must explain the 5 codes provided, even if they are for Men/Boys.

Plan:
1. Title: Women's/Girls Synthetic Trousers (Context: Based on Provided Data Analysis).
2. CRITICAL NOTE: "The provided dataset (JSON) explicitly categorizes these HS Codes under Men's/Boys descriptions. If your goods are Women's/Girls, please verify if these codes are applicable, as standard classification usually places Women's garments in Chapter 6104/6204. However, the following is the detailed analysis of the provided data."
3. Analyze each of the 5 codes from the data.
4. Provide tax details as per data.
5. Provide clearance advice based on the data.

Wait, the prompt says "User input is product name... explain why classified to HS codes".
Maybe the user is asking: "I have Women's/Girls. The data says these codes. Why?"

No, the prompt says "User input is product name... explain why classified to HS codes".
It implies the user input IS the product name "Women's or girls' trousers..." and I need to explain why they are classified into the provided codes.

This is impossible. You cannot classify Women's trousers into 6103 (Men's).

Conclusion: The user likely pasted a question and a data set that doesn't match.
Best Strategy: I will explain the provided data clearly, noting the gender discrepancy, and advise the user to check their actual product. I will not lie and say "Women's go here". I will say "The provided data lists these codes for Men/Boys. If you are Women's, check Chapter 6104/6204. Here is the analysis of the provided data."

Wait, the instruction says "Do not exceed ". I cannot mention 6104/6204 as a "solution" if it's not in the data?
"Do not exceed " usually means "Don't add extra codes not in the data". It doesn't mean "Don't mention facts".

Okay, I will structure it as a "Data Analysis Report".
1. Title: Analysis of Synthetic Trousers (Based on Provided Data).
2. Warning: Data summaries indicate Men's/Boys.
3. Detailed breakdown of the 5 codes.
4. Tax details.
5. Clearance advice.

Let's do this.

πŸ“Œ I. Product Definition & Classification: The "Women's/Girls" vs. "Men's/Boys" Discrepancy

⚠️ CRITICAL ALERT: The provided dataset (JSON) explicitly describes the items under these HS Codes as "Men's or Boys'" (e.g., 6103, 6203).

  • Standard Trade Rule:
    • Women's/Girls trousers/shorts typically fall under Chapter 6104 (Knitted) or Chapter 6204 (Woven).
    • Men's/Boys trousers/shorts fall under Chapter 6103 or Chapter 6203.

If your product is truly "Women's or Girls'": The HS Codes in the provided data (6103, 6203) may be incorrect or misclassified for your specific cargo.

However, adhering strictly to your request to analyze the provided , the following is the breakdown of these specific codes, their tax structures, and the logic behind the provided data's classification (which appears to target Men's/Boys items). If you are importing Women's garments, please verify your HS Code immediately.


πŸ“¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Tariff Authority - Based on Provided Data)

HS Code Product Description (From Data) Material/Form Match Total Tax Rate Key Tax Components
6112.12.00.50 Synthetic Fiber Trousers/Skirts
Summary: "Men's or Boys'... material/shape/use fully compliant."
βœ… Synthetic Fibers
βœ… Specific Shape
45.7% Base: 28.2%
Add: 7.5% (Section 301)
Add: 10% (Item 122)
6112.12.00.60 Synthetic Fiber Trousers/Skirts
Summary: "Men's or Boys'... material, shape, demographics consistent."
βœ… Synthetic Fibers
βœ… Consistent Demographics
38.2% Base: 28.2%
Add: 0.0% (No 301)
Add: 10% (Item 122)
6103.23.00.40 Synthetic Fiber Men's/Boys' Trousers
Summary: "Material, shape, use fully matched."
βœ… Woven (Implied)
βœ… Ensemble Rule
Varies + 17.5% Base: Ensemble Rate
Add: 7.5% (301)
Add: 10% (Item 122)
6203.43.90.20 Synthetic Fiber Boys' Trousers
Summary: "Material and shape compliant."
βœ… Woven (Chapter 62)
βœ… Boys
45.4% Base: 27.9%
Add: 7.5% (301)
Add: 10% (Item 122)
6103.43.15.20 Synthetic Fiber Men's/Boys' Trousers/Skirts
Summary: "Key elements match classification explanation."
βœ… Woven (Chapter 61?? Note: 61 is Knit, 62 is Woven. 6103 is Men's Knit).
⚠️ Data Note: 6103 is Knitted.
38.2% Base: 28.2%
Add: 0.0% (No 301)
Add: 10% (Item 122)

πŸ” Key Observation: * Chapter 61 (e.g., 6112, 6103) typically refers to Knitted/Looped garments. * Chapter 62 (e.g., 6203) refers to Woven garments. * Demographics: The data consistently labels these as Men's/Boys. If your cargo is Women's/Girls, these codes are likely misclassifications. * Tax Variance: The difference between 38.2% and 45.7% depends on the Section 301 (7.5%) surcharge applicability.


πŸ’° III. 2026 Tariff Rate Breakdown (Detailed Policy Analysis)

βœ… Scope: Based on provided data (China Export, US Import context implied by "Section 301/122"). βœ… Material: 100% or >50% Synthetic Fibers (Polyester, Nylon, etc.).

🎯 1. The "301 Tariff" Variable (The 7.5% Factor)

The Section 301 (7.5%) tariff is the most volatile component.

HS Code 301 Tariff Total Rate Scenario
6112.12.00.50 +7.5% 45.7% High Duty. Subject to Section 301 List 3 or 4A/B.
6103.23.00.40 +7.5% Base + 17.5% High Duty. Includes 17.5% total (likely 7.5% 301 + 10% 122).
6203.43.90.20 +7.5% 45.4% High Duty. Matches 301+122+Base structure.
6112.12.00.60 0.0% 38.2% Lower Duty. Exempt from Section 301 (e.g., specific exclusion list).
6103.43.15.20 0.0% 38.2% Lower Duty. Exempt from Section 301.

πŸ“Œ The Math: * High Rate Scenario: Base (28.2%) + Section 301 (7.5%) + Section 122 (10%) = 45.7%. * Low Rate Scenario: Base (28.2%) + Section 301 (0.0%) + Section 122 (10%) = 38.2%. * Special Case (6203): Base (27.9%) + Section 301 (7.5%) + Section 122 (10%) = 45.4%.

🎯 2. Section 122 Tariff (The 10% Constant)

  • Applicability: 10% is applied to ALL codes in the provided data.
  • Origin: Likely Section 301 List 4A/B or Bilateral Trade specific surcharge.
  • Note: This is non-negotiable for these specific codes in the provided dataset.

🎯 3. Base Tariff (The Foundation)

  • Range: 27.9% - 28.2%.
  • Source: General Trade Tariff (GTT) for synthetic trousers.
  • Note: Slight variation between 6103 (28.2%) and 6203 (27.9%) based on Woven vs. Knitted classification nuances.

πŸ› οΈ IV. Clearance & Operational Advice (Practical Guide)

βœ… 1. CRITICAL: Gender Verification

🚨 DO NOT SHIP WOMEN'S/GIRLS' GARMENTS UNDER THESE CODES!

The provided data (6103, 6203) explicitly references Men's/Boys. * Risk: If you declare Women's trousers under 6103 (Men's), Customs will seize the goods, fine you, and potentially debar you. * Correct Action: * Women's Knitted: Check 6104.23 or 6104.63. * Women's Woven: Check 6204.62 or 6204.63. * Girls': Check 6104.23 or 6204.63 (Girls specific).

If your data is correct: Maybe the "Men's/Boys" text in the JSON is a typo, and these codes actually apply to the specific batch? Verify with a Customs Broker.

βœ… 2. Preparation of Documents

Document Requirement Reason
Commercial Invoice Must state "Women's/Girls" OR "Men's/Boys" EXACTLY matching the HS Code. Mismatch = Audit.
Material Composition "100% Polyester" or "80% Poly/20% Elastane". Must exceed 50% Synthetic.
Knitted/Woven Proof Lab test report or factory declaration. Chapter 61 (Knit) vs 62 (Woven).
Exclusion List Proof If claiming 38.2% (0% 301), provide Exclusion List ID. Without this, you pay 7.5% extra.

βœ… 3. Declaration Strategy

πŸ”₯ The "Name Game" * WRONG: "Women's Trousers" declared under 6103.23.00.40. * Result: Customs will flag the gender mismatch. Delay = High Cost. * RIGHT: If you have Men's trousers (per data): * Declare: "Men's Synthetic Trousers, Woven, Polyester, 6103.23.00.40". * Check Exclusion List for 301.

βœ… 4. Tax Optimization (If applicable)

  • Target 38.2% Rate: Try to qualify for 6112.12.00.60 or 6103.43.15.20 if your product falls under an exclusion list (e.g., specific types of fabric or origin).
  • Avoid 45%+: If the product is Men's/Boys, ensure you have the correct exclusion. If it's Women's, these codes are irrelevant.

🌍 V. Comparison: Data vs. Standard Trade Rules

Feature Provided Data (6103/6203) Standard Women's/Girls Code
Gender Men's / Boys Women's / Girls
Chapter 61 (Knit) / 62 (Woven) 61 (Knit) / 62 (Woven)
Subheading 03 (Men) 04 (Women)
Typical Rate 38% - 45% (High) Similar, but different codes
Risk HIGH (Wrong Gender) LOW (If correct code)

πŸ“Œ Conclusion: The provided data cannot be directly applied to Women's/Girls trousers unless there is a specific regulatory exception (unlikely for 6103/6203). If you are shipping Women's/Girls: 1. STOP and re-evaluate your HS Code. 2. Look for 6104 (Knitted Women) or 6204 (Woven Women). 3. Do not use the 38.2%/45.7% rates from this data unless you are 100% sure your goods are Men's/Boys and the "Women's" input was a generic query.


πŸ“Œ VI. Common Pitfalls & "Red Flags"

❌ Pitfall 1: Declaring "Women's Trousers" under 6103.23.00.40. * Consequence: Customs rejects shipment. "Gender Mismatch". * Fix: Repackage as "Men's" (if true) or reclassify to 6104.

❌ Pitfall 2: Assuming 38.2% rate applies automatically. * Consequence: Paying only 38.2% when 45.7% is due (if exclusion list expired). * Fix: Check Exclusion List validity date.

❌ Pitfall 3: Ignoring the "122" Clause. * Consequence: Missing the mandatory 10% surcharge. * Fix: Always include 10% in cost calculation for these codes.


🎯 VII. Final Verdict: Professional Recommendation

🚨 URGENT WARNING: The provided data (JSON) describes Men's/Boys products. Your query is for Women's/Girls.

Action Plan: 1. Verify Product: Is it actually Men's/Boys? If yes, use the data provided. 2. Re-classify: If it is Women's/Girls, ABANDON these HS Codes. * Use 6104.23 (Knitted Women) or 6204.63 (Woven Women). * Check if those codes have different tax rates (they likely do).

If you insist on using the provided data: * Total Tax: 38.2% (with exclusion) or 45.7% (without exclusion). * Tax Breakdown: Base (28%) + 301 (7.5% or 0%) + 122 (10%). * Risk: Extremely High for Women's goods.


πŸ“Œ TIP: Always request a Binding Tariff Ruling (BTR) from Customs if the gender classification is ambiguous or if you are unsure about the "Men's/Boys" vs "Women's/Girls" code boundary.


✨ Your Trade, My Precision. Don't let a Gender Mismatch cost you 10% of your margin! πŸ’ΌπŸš€

Customer Reviews

About HS Code Classification

The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.

Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:

  • Chapter (2 digits) β€” Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
  • Heading (4 digits) β€” More specific grouping within the chapter
  • Subheading (6 digits) β€” Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
  • National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β€” Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes

Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.

When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:

  • Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β€” The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
  • General rate β€” Applied to countries without trade agreements
  • Trade remedy duties β€” Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties

The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.