Aircraft Parts and Accessories
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9401104000 | 17.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 9401108000 | 17.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 8802200160 | 35.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 8802300160 | 35.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
✈️ Aircraft Parts and Accessories (航空部件与配件)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
📌 One, Product Definition and Classification: Do You Really Understand "Aircraft Parts"?
Aircraft parts are specialized components used in the manufacture, maintenance, or operation of civil and military aircraft. In international trade, accurate classification is critical because aviation parts are heavily scrutinized and often subject to specific section notes that exclude them from general machinery categories.
The classification depends heavily on: 1. Specificity: Are they dedicated to aircraft? 2. Function: Are they seats, structural parts, or general components? 3. Material: Are there conflicting material definitions?
⚠️ Key Distinction Point:
- Aircraft Seats: Classified under Chapter 94 (Furniture), specifically as parts of aircraft seats.
- General Aircraft Components: Classified under Chapter 88 (Aircraft, spacecraft, and parts thereof). Note 1 to Section XVI often excludes aircraft parts from other chapters, funneling them into Chapter 88.
📦 Two, HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided data, here are the four potential HS Codes for Aircraft Parts and Accessories.
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Material/Conflict Check | Total Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
9401.10.40.00 |
Seats for aircraft, specifically seats without material conflicts. | Passenger/Crew seats for airplanes. | No conflict. Fits "Part of seat" logic. | 17.5% |
9401.10.80.00 |
Other parts for aircraft seats, applicable to aviation equipment. | General parts for aircraft seating systems. | No obvious material conflict. Tends to match. | 17.5% |
8802.20.01.60 |
Other parts of aircraft of an unladen weight ≤ 2,000 kg. | General aviation components (non-seat). | No material or form conflict. Fallback logic. | 35.0% |
8802.30.01.60 |
Other parts of aircraft of an unladen weight > 2,000 kg but ≤ 15,000 kg. | Parts for medium-sized aircraft. | No obvious material conflict. Default fallback. | 35.0% |
🔍 Critical Analysis:
- Seats vs. Parts: If the item is a seat or a part of a seat, it must go to 9401. It cannot be misclassified as a general aircraft part (8802) because Chapter 94 has specific headings for seats.
- General Parts: If it is not a seat (e.g., engine parts, wings, avionics, landing gear), it falls under 8802.
- Weight Matters: For 8802, the subheading depends on the unladen weight of the aircraft the part belongs to.
- ≤ 2,000 kg:8802.20.01.60
- > 2,000 kg and ≤ 15,000 kg:8802.30.01.60
💰 Three, 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Additional Taxes)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Time: Includes subsequent imports (Post-2025 policies)
🎯 1. 9401.10.40.00 & 9401.10.80.00 —— Aircraft Seats and Parts
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 0.0% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Additional Duty | +7.5% |
| 122 Clause Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 17.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 17.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | 301:9903.01.03 → 122 Clause → USITC:9401.10 |
📌 Explanation:
- Base 0%: Furniture parts often have low base rates.
- 301 Tariff (7.5%): Applied to many furniture and related parts from China.
- 122 Clause (10%): A specific additional tariff triggered by certain trade actions.
- Total 17.5%: Significantly lower than general aircraft parts, making seat classification strategically important if applicable.
🎯 2. 8802.20.01.60 & 8802.30.01.60 —— Other Aircraft Parts (General)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 0.0% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Additional Duty | +25.0% |
| 122 Clause Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 35.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | 301:9903.01.01 → 122 Clause → USITC:8802.20/30 |
📌 Explanation:
- Base 0%: Aircraft parts generally have 0% base duty.
- 301 Tariff (25%): High section 301 rate applied to aerospace components.
- 122 Clause (10%): Additional 10%.
- Total 35.0%: High tariff. This applies to any part not classified as a seat.
🛠️ Four, Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Avoidance)
✅ 1. Documentation Checklist (No Shortages Allowed)
| Document | Must Provide | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specifications | ✔️ | Detailed tech sheet, weight, dimensions, material composition. |
| ✅ Part Number & OEM Reference | ✔️ | Essential for matching with aircraft manuals (IPC). |
| ✅ Intended Use Statement | ✔️ | Must explicitly state "For Aircraft [Model]" to justify 8802/9401. |
| ✅ Material Declaration | ✔️ | Crucial to prove no material conflict for 9401 classification. |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Clear description: "Aircraft Seat Part" or "Aircraft Component," NOT just "Part." |
| ✅ License/Export Control Info | ✔️ | If ITAR/EAR applicable, declare correctly to avoid seizure. |
✅ 2. Declaration Tips (Key Mantra)
🔥 “Seats go to 9401, Parts go to 8802, Weight decides 8802 Subheading, Don’t Split Declarations!”
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Aircraft Seat (Complete) | 9401.10.40.00 |
Misdeclare as 8802 → 35% Tax (Loss of savings) |
| Seat Frame/Cushion | 9401.10.80.00 |
Misdeclare as 8802 → 35% Tax |
| Engine Part / Wing | 8802.20.01.60 (if ≤2000kg aircraft) |
Misdeclare as 9401 → Rejection & Penalty |
| Mixed Shipment (Seat + Part) | Split Line Items | Single line "Aircraft Parts" → Customs may assign highest rate (35%) to all. |
| Unladen Weight Ambiguity | Provide Aircraft Model + Weight Data | Guessing weight → Risk of incorrect 8802 subheading |
✅ 3. Special Handling Cases
| Case | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Aircraft Seats | Provide OEM certificates and installation manuals. Prove it is a "part of a seat" not a "seat for furniture." |
| Avionics/Electronics | Do NOT use 9401. Use 8802 or other specific electronic codes if not strictly an aircraft part. |
| General Fasteners/Nuts | If not dedicated to aircraft, may fall under 7318 (General hardware), not 8802. Check "Dedicated Use." |
| Used Parts | Provide proof of airworthiness certificate (if required) and detailed condition report. |
🌍 Five, Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Certification Req. | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 9401.10 (Seats) or 8802 (Parts) |
17.5% (Seats) / 35.0% (Parts) | FAA/EASA compliance docs | High scrutiny on 301/122 clauses. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 9401.10 or 8802 |
~3.7% - 4.5% | EASA Certification | No 122/301 equivalents. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 9401.10 or 8802 |
0% - 5% | CCC (if applicable) | Low base tariffs, but strict inspection. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 9401.10 or 8802 |
~0% - 3% | JAA Certification | Liberal trade terms. |
📌 Conclusion:
- USA is the most expensive market for aircraft parts due to Section 301 and 122 Clause tariffs.
- Differentiating Seats (9401) from Parts (8802) saves 17.5% in taxes.
- Accurate Aircraft Weight Classification is vital for 8802 to avoid penalties.
📌 Six, Common Errors & Pitfall Guide (Lessons Learned)
❌ Error 1: Declaring Aircraft Seats as "General Aircraft Parts" (8802)
👉 Consequence: Pay 35% instead of 17.5%. Overpayment!
❌ Error 2: Declaring Seat Parts (e.g., frames) as "Furniture Parts" without proving aviation use
👉 Consequence: Customs may reject 9401.10 if "Aviation" use isn't proven, leading to delays.
❌ Error 3: Ignoring Unladen Weight for 8802
👉 Consequence: Misclassifying between 8802.20 and 8802.30. While both are 35% in this data, incorrect classification can lead to data mismatch penalties or future audits.
❌ Error 4: Mixing Dedicated Aircraft Parts with General Hardware in one HS Code
👉 Consequence: Customs may apply the higher tariff (35%) to the entire shipment if they deem the hardware as "aircraft parts."
✅ Correct Practice:
"Aircraft Passenger Seat, Model XYZ, for Boeing 737, Fabric/Aluminum, Part #ABC-123, Not for Furniture Use"
🎯 Seven, Conclusion: Professional Declaration, Save Cost, Ensure Compliance
🎯 Remember the Mantra:
🔹 "Seats to 9401 (17.5%), Parts to 8802 (35%), Weight Determines Subheading, Split Mixed Shipments!"
🔹 "HS Code Determines Tax, Difference of 17.5% is Huge, Declare Correctly, Avoid Fines!"
📌 Pro Tip:
If your parts are dual-use (civil/military), ensure Export Control Compliance (EAR/ITAR) is declared to avoid severe customs holds.
Consider applying for an Advance Ruling from CBP if the classification of new components is ambiguous.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Contact a licensed customs broker + Provide Technical Specifications + Verify Aircraft Weight & Model
🚀 Ensure your Air Parts clear customs Smoothly, Efficiently, and Cost-Effectively!
✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Precise Classification!
💼 Every cent of tariff saved is pure profit!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度（HS）是由世界海关组织（WCO）制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构：
- 章（2 位）——商品大类（例如：第 84 章：机器和机械设备）
- 品目（4 位）——章内的更具体分类
- 子目（6 位）——国际通用细分，所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分（8-10 位）——各国自行扩展的细分编码，如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时，适用的关税税率可能包括：
- 最惠国（MFN）税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税，如 301 条款（反倾销）、232 条款（国家安全）或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类，请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。