Leather Stain Repellent
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3307900000 | 40.4% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3403915000 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3307490000 | 41.0% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3403115000 | 36.4% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3809931000 | 41.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
🧴 Leather Stain Repellent (Leather Care & Protection Agents)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: What is "Leather Stain Repellent"?
Leather Stain Repellent is a specialized chemical formulation designed to protect leather goods (shoes, bags, upholstery, automotive interiors) from water, oil, and dirt stains. In international trade, its classification hinges on two critical factors: Chemical Nature and Primary Function.
Is it a cosmetic/nursing agent (Chapter 33)?
Is it a specific leather treatment preparation (Chapter 34)?
Or is it a general chemical auxiliary/impregnating agent (Chapter 38)?
⚠️ Key Distinction Point:
- If marketed as a "beauty/care" product for consumer use, it may fall under Chapter 33.
- If explicitly defined as a "preparation for treating leather" in industrial or professional contexts, it falls under Chapter 34.
- If it functions primarily as a chemical impregnating agent/penetrator without specific "care" branding, it may fall under Chapter 38.
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided data, here are the 5 most likely HS Code classifications for "Leather Stain Repellent," ranked by logic and tax impact.
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Logic | Material Conflict? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3403.11.50.00 | Preparations for treating leather, fur skins, or other materials; oils and fats containing other substances | Best Fit: Explicitly covers "preparations for treating leather." "Stain repellent" is a form of leather treatment/protection. | ❌ No |
| 3403.91.50.00 | Other preparations for treating leather, fur skins, or other materials; oils and fats containing other substances | Strong Fit: Covers leather treatment where the specific type isn't listed in 3403.11. Focuses on the "leather treatment" function. | ❌ No |
| 3307.90.00.00 | Other perfumes and toilet preparations (including deodorants for personal use and antiperspirants); prepared room deodorizers | Alternative Fit: Classified as "cosmetic/toiletry." If the product is marketed as a personal care item for shoes/bags, it falls here. | ❌ No |
| 3307.49.00.00 | Other deodorizers for rooms or other purposes (e.g., chemical preparations) | Weak Fit: Only applies if the primary function is interpreted as "deodorizing" or general chemical prep, not specific leather protection. | ❌ No |
| 3809.93.10.00 | Finishing agents and other products (e.g., dressings, dyes, pigments) for use in leather industry | Industrial Fit: If used in large-scale leather manufacturing/finishing processes rather than consumer care. | ❌ No |
🔍 Key Insight:
- 3403.11.50.00 is generally the most accurate for consumer-grade leather protectants because it specifically mentions "treating leather."
- 3809.93.10.00 is typically for industrial processing, not retail "stain repellents."
- 3307.90.00.00 is often used if the product is sold in beauty supply chains as a "leather care cosmetic."
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: USA (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: From Nov 10, 2025 (incl. subsequent imports)
🎯 1. 3403.11.50.00 —— Preparations for Treating Leather (Lowest Base Rate)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 1.4% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% (Under Section 301 Duties) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% (For China/HK products, effective Nov 10, 2025) |
| Total Tax Rate | 36.4% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 36.4% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3403.11.50.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Explanation:
- This is the most cost-effective option among the provided classifications.
- Despite the low base rate (1.4%), the 35% in additional tariffs (25% + 10%) make the total cost high.
- Crucial: If you can prove the product is NOT for personal use but for industrial leather processing, you might explore 3809, but consumer "stain repellents" are usually caught in 3403.
🎯 2. 3403.91.50.00 —— Other Leather Treatment Preparations
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 6.5% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3403.91.50.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Note:
- Higher base rate than 3403.11.
- Still considered a "leather treatment" product, so same surcharge rules apply.
🎯 3. 3307.49.00.00 —— Chemical Preparations (Deodorizers/General)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 6.0% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 41.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 41.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3307.49.00.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Note:
- This classification relies on interpreting the product as a "chemical preparation" for odor/general use rather than specific leather care. Riskier if customs inspects the label.
🎯 4. 3809.93.10.00 —— Finishing Agents for Leather Industry
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 6.5% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3809.93.10.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Note:
- Typically for B2B industrial use. If selling B2C, customs may reclassify this to Chapter 34 or 33.
🎯 5. 3307.90.00.00 — Other Perfumes/Toilet Preparations
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 5.4% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 40.4% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 40.4% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3307.90.00.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Note:
- Often used for consumer skincare-like leather care products.
- Lowest total rate among the "cosmetic" classifications, but higher than the best "leather treatment" code (3403.11.50.00).
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Avoidance)
✅ 1. Documentation Checklist (Non-negotiable)
| Document | Required? | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Spec Sheet | ✔️ | Must clearly state: "For use on leather," ingredients list, active compounds (e.g., silicone, fluoropolymer). |
| ✅ Product Photos (Label/Packaging) | ✔️ | Must show usage instructions ("Leather Protection," "Stain Repellent") to support Chapter 34 classification. |
| ✅ Third-Party Test Report | ✔️ | EPA, REACH, or safety data sheets (SDS) to prove chemical composition. |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must describe item as "Leather Treatment Preparation" or "Leather Care Agent," NOT just "Cleaner." |
| ✅ Packing List | ✔️ | Clear quantity and weight details. |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantra)
🔥 "Describe by Function, Don't Just Name It!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Leather Spray | "Chemical preparation for treating leather" → 3403.11.50.00 | "Shoe Polish" → Might be misclassified as cosmetic or general chemical. |
| Industrial Leather Finisher | "Finishing agent for leather industry" → 3809.93.10.00 | "Leather Cleaner" → Customs may reject if not for industrial scale. |
| Luxury Leather Care Kit | "Toiletry/Cosmetic preparation for leather" → 3307.90.00.00 | "Stain Repellent" → Too vague; customs will guess. |
| Deodorizer Spray (Non-Leather Specific) | "Deodorizing chemical preparation" → 3307.49.00.00 | "Leather Spray" → If it doesn't treat leather, this is wrong. |
📌 Critical Tip:
- Do NOT use vague terms like "Magic Spray."
- DO use terms like "Preparation for treating leather" (matches 3403).
- DO emphasize "Leather Protection/Impregnation" if using Chapter 38.
✅ 3. Special Cases & Risk Management
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Private Label | Provide contract + product design. Ensure label matches HS Code logic (e.g., if 3403, label must say "Leather Treatment"). |
| Mixed Packages (Leather Spray + Cloth) | Declare Leather Spray as main item. Cloth may be classified separately, but total value affects duty base. |
| Samples for Review | Even samples incur duty (De Minimis does not apply due to IEEPA/301 tariffs). |
| Chemical Composition Dispute | If customs challenges "Leather Treatment," provide SDS and usage instructions proving it bonds with/protects leather. |
🌍 V. Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Certification | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 3403.11.50.00 |
36.4% (Total) | SDS, FDA (if cosmetic claim) | Highest effective rate due to 301+IEEPA. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 3403.11.50.00 |
5% - 9% | None | Low tariff, easy clearance. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 3403.91.50.00 |
0% - 2% (if GSP) | REACH | No high surcharges like US. |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 3403.91.50.00 |
0% - 4% | UK REACH | Post-Brexit rules apply. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 3403.91.50.00 |
0% - 3% | JIS | Low duty, strict chemical registration. |
📌 Conclusion:
- USA is the hardest market for Leather Stain Repellent due to 35%+ in additional tariffs.
- EU/Asia are much more favorable (0-5%).
- Strategy: For US imports, optimize packaging and marketing to support the lowest base rate (3403.11.50.00), but expect 36.4% total landed cost impact.
📌 VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons from the Field)
❌ Mistake 1: Using "Shoe Cleaner" as the description for a "Stain Repellent."
👉 Result: Customs may classify as 3307.90.00.00 (40.4%) instead of 3403.11.50.00 (36.4%). Small difference, but precision saves money.
❌ Mistake 2: Claiming "De Minimis Exemption" for samples.
👉 Result: Denial. All China-origin goods under these chapters are subject to IEEPA/301 tariffs, no matter the value.
❌ Mistake 3: Omitting "Leather" from the product name in the invoice.
👉 Result: Customs may classify as 3809.93.10.00 (41.5%) or 3307.49.00.00 (41.0%), increasing cost.
❌ Mistake 4: Using "Cosmetic" claims for a chemical protectant.
👉 Result: Regulatory issues with FDA/FTC if marketed as beauty product but used for industrial leather.
✅ Correct Approach:
"Leather Treatment Preparation, Water-Based, Silicone-Containing, For Protection Against Stains and Water, Model XYZ, SDS Available"
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Precise Classification Saves 6%+ in Taxes!
🎯 Remember the Mantra:
🔹 "Leather Treatment = 3403.11 (36.4%).
🔹 "Cosmetic Care = 3307.90 (40.4%).
🔹 "Industrial Finish = 3809.93 (41.5%).
🔹 "Choose 3403.11.50.00 for lowest total cost!"
📌 Pro Tip:
If your product contains fluoropolymers, ensure it meets EPA regulations. For US imports, apply for an Advance Ruling with CBP to lock in 3403.11.50.00 and avoid surprise reclassifications.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Contact a licensed customs broker + Provide Product Label + SDS + Request HS Code Advance Ruling.
🚀 Minimize tax burden, ensure smooth clearance, maximize profit margins!
✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
💼 Every percentage point of tariff is real money—don't leave it on the table!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。