Leather Stain Repellent
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3307900000 | 40.4% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3403915000 | 41.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3307490000 | 41.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3403115000 | 36.4% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3809931000 | 41.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π§΄ Leather Stain Repellent (Leather Care & Protection Agents)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: What is "Leather Stain Repellent"?
Leather Stain Repellent is a specialized chemical formulation designed to protect leather goods (shoes, bags, upholstery, automotive interiors) from water, oil, and dirt stains. In international trade, its classification hinges on two critical factors: Chemical Nature and Primary Function.
Is it a cosmetic/nursing agent (Chapter 33)?
Is it a specific leather treatment preparation (Chapter 34)?
Or is it a general chemical auxiliary/impregnating agent (Chapter 38)?
β οΈ Key Distinction Point:
- If marketed as a "beauty/care" product for consumer use, it may fall under Chapter 33.
- If explicitly defined as a "preparation for treating leather" in industrial or professional contexts, it falls under Chapter 34.
- If it functions primarily as a chemical impregnating agent/penetrator without specific "care" branding, it may fall under Chapter 38.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided data, here are the 5 most likely HS Code classifications for "Leather Stain Repellent," ranked by logic and tax impact.
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Logic | Material Conflict? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3403.11.50.00 | Preparations for treating leather, fur skins, or other materials; oils and fats containing other substances | Best Fit: Explicitly covers "preparations for treating leather." "Stain repellent" is a form of leather treatment/protection. | β No |
| 3403.91.50.00 | Other preparations for treating leather, fur skins, or other materials; oils and fats containing other substances | Strong Fit: Covers leather treatment where the specific type isn't listed in 3403.11. Focuses on the "leather treatment" function. | β No |
| 3307.90.00.00 | Other perfumes and toilet preparations (including deodorants for personal use and antiperspirants); prepared room deodorizers | Alternative Fit: Classified as "cosmetic/toiletry." If the product is marketed as a personal care item for shoes/bags, it falls here. | β No |
| 3307.49.00.00 | Other deodorizers for rooms or other purposes (e.g., chemical preparations) | Weak Fit: Only applies if the primary function is interpreted as "deodorizing" or general chemical prep, not specific leather protection. | β No |
| 3809.93.10.00 | Finishing agents and other products (e.g., dressings, dyes, pigments) for use in leather industry | Industrial Fit: If used in large-scale leather manufacturing/finishing processes rather than consumer care. | β No |
π Key Insight:
- 3403.11.50.00 is generally the most accurate for consumer-grade leather protectants because it specifically mentions "treating leather."
- 3809.93.10.00 is typically for industrial processing, not retail "stain repellents."
- 3307.90.00.00 is often used if the product is sold in beauty supply chains as a "leather care cosmetic."
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: USA (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: From Nov 10, 2025 (incl. subsequent imports)
π― 1. 3403.11.50.00 ββ Preparations for Treating Leather (Lowest Base Rate)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 1.4% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% (Under Section 301 Duties) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% (For China/HK products, effective Nov 10, 2025) |
| Total Tax Rate | 36.4% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 36.4% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:3403.11.50.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Explanation:
- This is the most cost-effective option among the provided classifications.
- Despite the low base rate (1.4%), the 35% in additional tariffs (25% + 10%) make the total cost high.
- Crucial: If you can prove the product is NOT for personal use but for industrial leather processing, you might explore 3809, but consumer "stain repellents" are usually caught in 3403.
π― 2. 3403.91.50.00 ββ Other Leather Treatment Preparations
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 6.5% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:3403.91.50.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- Higher base rate than 3403.11.
- Still considered a "leather treatment" product, so same surcharge rules apply.
π― 3. 3307.49.00.00 ββ Chemical Preparations (Deodorizers/General)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 6.0% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 41.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 41.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:3307.49.00.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- This classification relies on interpreting the product as a "chemical preparation" for odor/general use rather than specific leather care. Riskier if customs inspects the label.
π― 4. 3809.93.10.00 ββ Finishing Agents for Leather Industry
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 6.5% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:3809.93.10.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- Typically for B2B industrial use. If selling B2C, customs may reclassify this to Chapter 34 or 33.
π― 5. 3307.90.00.00 β Other Perfumes/Toilet Preparations
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Rate | 5.4% (Ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 40.4% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 40.4% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:3307.90.00.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- Often used for consumer skincare-like leather care products.
- Lowest total rate among the "cosmetic" classifications, but higher than the best "leather treatment" code (3403.11.50.00).
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Avoidance)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Non-negotiable)
| Document | Required? | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Spec Sheet | βοΈ | Must clearly state: "For use on leather," ingredients list, active compounds (e.g., silicone, fluoropolymer). |
| β Product Photos (Label/Packaging) | βοΈ | Must show usage instructions ("Leather Protection," "Stain Repellent") to support Chapter 34 classification. |
| β Third-Party Test Report | βοΈ | EPA, REACH, or safety data sheets (SDS) to prove chemical composition. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Must describe item as "Leather Treatment Preparation" or "Leather Care Agent," NOT just "Cleaner." |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Clear quantity and weight details. |
β 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantra)
π₯ "Describe by Function, Don't Just Name It!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Leather Spray | "Chemical preparation for treating leather" β 3403.11.50.00 | "Shoe Polish" β Might be misclassified as cosmetic or general chemical. |
| Industrial Leather Finisher | "Finishing agent for leather industry" β 3809.93.10.00 | "Leather Cleaner" β Customs may reject if not for industrial scale. |
| Luxury Leather Care Kit | "Toiletry/Cosmetic preparation for leather" β 3307.90.00.00 | "Stain Repellent" β Too vague; customs will guess. |
| Deodorizer Spray (Non-Leather Specific) | "Deodorizing chemical preparation" β 3307.49.00.00 | "Leather Spray" β If it doesn't treat leather, this is wrong. |
π Critical Tip:
- Do NOT use vague terms like "Magic Spray."
- DO use terms like "Preparation for treating leather" (matches 3403).
- DO emphasize "Leather Protection/Impregnation" if using Chapter 38.
β 3. Special Cases & Risk Management
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Private Label | Provide contract + product design. Ensure label matches HS Code logic (e.g., if 3403, label must say "Leather Treatment"). |
| Mixed Packages (Leather Spray + Cloth) | Declare Leather Spray as main item. Cloth may be classified separately, but total value affects duty base. |
| Samples for Review | Even samples incur duty (De Minimis does not apply due to IEEPA/301 tariffs). |
| Chemical Composition Dispute | If customs challenges "Leather Treatment," provide SDS and usage instructions proving it bonds with/protects leather. |
π V. Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Certification | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3403.11.50.00 |
36.4% (Total) | SDS, FDA (if cosmetic claim) | Highest effective rate due to 301+IEEPA. |
| π¨π³ China | 3403.11.50.00 |
5% - 9% | None | Low tariff, easy clearance. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3403.91.50.00 |
0% - 2% (if GSP) | REACH | No high surcharges like US. |
| π¬π§ UK | 3403.91.50.00 |
0% - 4% | UK REACH | Post-Brexit rules apply. |
| π―π΅ Japan | 3403.91.50.00 |
0% - 3% | JIS | Low duty, strict chemical registration. |
π Conclusion:
- USA is the hardest market for Leather Stain Repellent due to 35%+ in additional tariffs.
- EU/Asia are much more favorable (0-5%).
- Strategy: For US imports, optimize packaging and marketing to support the lowest base rate (3403.11.50.00), but expect 36.4% total landed cost impact.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons from the Field)
β Mistake 1: Using "Shoe Cleaner" as the description for a "Stain Repellent."
π Result: Customs may classify as 3307.90.00.00 (40.4%) instead of 3403.11.50.00 (36.4%). Small difference, but precision saves money.
β Mistake 2: Claiming "De Minimis Exemption" for samples.
π Result: Denial. All China-origin goods under these chapters are subject to IEEPA/301 tariffs, no matter the value.
β Mistake 3: Omitting "Leather" from the product name in the invoice.
π Result: Customs may classify as 3809.93.10.00 (41.5%) or 3307.49.00.00 (41.0%), increasing cost.
β Mistake 4: Using "Cosmetic" claims for a chemical protectant.
π Result: Regulatory issues with FDA/FTC if marketed as beauty product but used for industrial leather.
β Correct Approach:
"Leather Treatment Preparation, Water-Based, Silicone-Containing, For Protection Against Stains and Water, Model XYZ, SDS Available"
π― VII. Conclusion: Precise Classification Saves 6%+ in Taxes!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Leather Treatment = 3403.11 (36.4%).
πΉ "Cosmetic Care = 3307.90 (40.4%).
πΉ "Industrial Finish = 3809.93 (41.5%).
πΉ "Choose 3403.11.50.00 for lowest total cost!"
π Pro Tip:
If your product contains fluoropolymers, ensure it meets EPA regulations. For US imports, apply for an Advance Ruling with CBP to lock in 3403.11.50.00 and avoid surprise reclassifications.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Contact a licensed customs broker + Provide Product Label + SDS + Request HS Code Advance Ruling.
π Minimize tax burden, ensure smooth clearance, maximize profit margins!
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every percentage point of tariff is real moneyβdon't leave it on the table!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.