shoe covers low density
CN → US| HS编码 | 关税税率 | 原产国 | 目的国 | 文档 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6307909891 | 24.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 6307909875 | 24.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 6405902000 | 21.3% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 6405209080 | 22.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
| 3926204010 | 16.5% | CN | US | 官方文档 |
商品图片
AI分析
👟 Shoe Covers (Low Density)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Know "Low Density Shoe Covers"?
Shoe covers are essential protective gear used in cleanrooms, medical facilities, construction sites, and food processing plants. In international trade, they are often misunderstood. While your input mentions "Low Density," the provided data (<DATA>) specifically analyzes "High Density" variations. However, the classification logic for plastic/polymer shoe covers generally remains consistent regarding material vs. function.
⚠️ Key Distinction:
- If the product is a flexible plastic/polymer wrap (like a bag) → Classified under Chapter 39 (Plastics) or Chapter 63 (Other Made-up Articles).
- If the product resembles a shoe/bootie with structure → Classified under Chapter 64 (Footwear).
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (Based on Provided Data)
| HS Code | Product Description | Logical Basis | Material/Function Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
6307.90.98.91 |
Other made-up articles | "Catch-all" for other finished products | Plastic/Synthetic material; generic finished good |
6307.90.98.75 |
Other protective finished articles | Protective function is clear | Plastic material; no functional conflict |
6405.90.20.00 |
Other footwear | One-time use product characteristics | High-density polyethylene (HDPE) or similar plastic |
6405.20.90.80 |
Other footwear (parts/accessories) | Shoe accessory "catch-all" logic | High-density synthetic material |
3926.20.40.10 |
Plastic articles | One-time consumable usage characteristic | Polyethylene (PE) or similar plastic |
🔍 Critical Note:
- The term "Low Density" in your query contrasts with the "High Density" analysis in<DATA>.
- Classification Risk: Customs authorities often look at structure (does it look like a shoe?) vs. material (is it just plastic?).
- If your "Low Density" covers are flimsy and bag-like,3926or6307is more likely. If they are structured like booties,6405is possible.
- All codes below assume US Import from China, as indicated by the "122 Clause" and "Section 301" references in the tax details.
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges & Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Time: 2025/2026 Import Season
✅ Key Policy: Section 122 Tariff (10% additional duty) + Section 301/IEEPA Surcharges
🎯 1. 6307.90.98.91 — Other Made-up Articles
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 7.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 7.5% |
| Section 122 Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 24.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 24.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable (High tariffs usually waive de minimis benefits or trigger strict scrutiny) |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 6307.90.98.91 + Trade Policy Footnotes |
📌 Interpretation:
- This is a "catch-all" category. It attracts the full burden of all applicable surcharges.
- Ideal if the product is considered a "general textile/plastic made-up article" without specific footwear characteristics.
🎯 2. 6307.90.98.75 — Other Protective Finished Articles
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 7.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 7.5% |
| Section 122 Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 24.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 24.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 6307.90.98.75 + Trade Policy Footnotes |
📌 Interpretation:
- Similar to above, but emphasizes "protective" function.
- No tax advantage over the generic "other" category in this specific dataset.
🎯 3. 6405.90.20.00 — Other Footwear (Plastic)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.8% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 7.5% |
| Section 122 Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 21.3% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 21.3% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 6405.90.20.00 + Trade Policy Footnotes |
📌 Interpretation:
- Lower Base Tariff (3.8%) compared to Chapter 63 (7.0%).
- However, the surcharges remain the same, so the total is still high (21.3%).
- Requires proof that the product is "footwear" (i.e., it has a sole or structured shape, not just a bag).
🎯 4. 6405.20.90.80 — Other Footwear (Parts/Accessories)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 12.5% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% (Note: Data shows 0.0%, possibly due to specific subheading exemption or error in source) |
| Section 122 Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 22.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 22.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 6405.20.90.80 + Trade Policy Footnotes |
📌 Interpretation:
- Higher base tariff (12.5%) but no Section 301 surcharge (0.0%) according to the provided data.
- This might be a slightly better option if the Section 301 rate for this specific subheading is indeed 0%.
- Caution: Verify the "0.0% surcharge" with current USITC lists, as 301 tariffs often apply broadly to footwear.
🎯 5. 3926.20.40.10 — Plastic Articles (Bags/Garments)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% (Note: Data shows 0.0%) |
| Section 122 Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 16.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 16.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 3926.20.40.10 + Trade Policy Footnotes |
📌 Interpretation:
- Lowest Total Tax Rate (16.5%) in the provided dataset.
- Best for "Low Density" or Bag-like Covers: If the shoe cover is flimsy, plastic, and resembles a bag or garment rather than a structured shoe, this is the most tax-efficient classification.
- Requirement: Must prove it is a "plastic article" and not footwear.
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance)
✅ 1. Preparation Checklist (Non-negotiable)
| Document | Mandatory? | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specification | ✔️ | Detail material (e.g., LDPE, HDPE), thickness (denier/gsm), and density. |
| ✅ Product Photos | ✔️ | Show flexibility, lack of sole, and how it is worn. Crucial for distinguishing from footwear. |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Use precise description: "Plastic Shoe Covers, Low Density, For Temporary Use." Avoid "Footwear" if using 3926/6307. |
| ✅ Bill of Lading/Packing List | ✔️ | Ensure weight and volume match declarations. |
| ✅ Third-Party Test Report | ✔️ | Material composition report (e.g., FTIR) to prove plastic type. |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantra)
🔥 "Material Over Shape, Function Over Form, Be Precise, Save Thousands!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Flimsy, bag-like plastic cover | 3926.20.40.10 (Plastic Article) |
"Shoe" → 6405 (Higher base, risk of reclassification) |
| Structured bootie with sole | 6405.90.20.00 (Footwear) |
"Plastic Bag" → 3926 (Customs may reject if too structured) |
| General textile/paper cover | 6307.90.98.91 (Other Made-up) |
Mislabeling as plastic |
✅ 3. Special Handling
| Situation | Advice |
|---|---|
| Low Density vs. High Density | Low density implies thinner, flimsier material. This supports classification under 3926 (Plastic Articles) or 6307 rather than 6405 (Footwear), as it lacks structural integrity of a shoe. |
| Volume Shipping | If importing large volumes, consider applying for a Section 301 Exclusion if available for your specific use case (e.g., medical vs. industrial). |
| Labeling | Mark products as "Disposable Shoe Covers" not "Shoes" to avoid immediate scrutiny under Chapter 64. |
🌍 V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Snapshot)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code (Based on Data) | Est. Total Duty | Key Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 3926.20.40.10 (Best Rate: 16.5%) |
16.5% | Prove it's not footwear; strict Section 122/301 applies. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 6307.90.90 or 3926.20 |
~5-7% | Standard import duties; no Section 122. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 3926.20 or 6307.99 |
4-6% | CE marking may be required for medical use. |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 3926.20 |
4-6% | Post-Brexit rules apply; verify UK GTIN. |
📌 Conclusion:
- For US Imports,3926.20.40.10offers the lowest tax burden (16.5%) if the product can be legally classified as a plastic article rather than footwear.
- "Low Density" strongly suggests a material that is more akin to a bag/garment, supporting the3926classification.
📌 VI. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
❌ Error 1: Calling "Shoe Covers" "Footwear" in the commercial invoice when they are flimsy plastic.
👉 Consequence: Customs may reject the HS Code 6405 if it doesn't meet the definition of footwear, or apply the wrong tariff. If it's misclassified as footwear when it should be plastic, you face reclassification penalties.
❌ Error 2: Ignoring Section 122 (10%).
👉 Consequence: Every item in the provided data includes this 10% surcharge. Failing to account for it leads to underpayment and seizure.
❌ Error 3: Assuming De Minimis ($800) applies.
👉 Consequence: With tariffs >10% and Section 122, de minimis exemptions are often voided or strictly enforced for Chinese goods. Do not rely on it.
✅ Correct Approach:
"Disposable Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) Shoe Covers, Transparent, Non-Slip, For Industrial Use, Model XYZ, Bulk Pack"
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Professional Classification, Cost Optimization!
🎯 Remember the Mantra:
🔹 "Low Density = Flimsy = Plastic Article (3926)"
🔹 "High Density + Structure = Footwear (6405)"
🔹 "Section 122 is Always There (+10%)"
🔹 "Check the Surcharge: 301 might be 0% for 3926, saving you 7.5%!"
📌 Pro Tip:
If you are importing Low Density covers, push for 3926.20.40.10. It has the lowest base tariff (6.5%) and, according to the data, no Section 301 surcharge (0.0%), resulting in the lowest total tax of 16.5%.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Confirm material thickness and flexibility with your supplier.
📄 Draft invoice as "Plastic Shoe Covers" not "Footwear."
🚀 Calculate landed cost using 16.5% for optimal budgeting.
✨ Professional clearance starts with precise classification!
💼 Every percentage point saved is pure profit!
用户评价
关于 HS 编码归类
协调制度(HS)是由世界海关组织(WCO)制定的国际贸易商品分类标准。全球 200 多个国家采用 HS 系统作为海关关税、贸易统计和进出口监管的基础。
每个 HS 编码遵循以下层级结构:
- 章(2 位)——商品大类(例如:第 84 章:机器和机械设备)
- 品目(4 位)——章内的更具体分类
- 子目(6 位)——国际通用细分,所有 WCO 成员国统一使用
- 本国细分(8-10 位)——各国自行扩展的细分编码,如美国 HTSUS 10 位编码
正确的 HS 编码归类对于顺利通关、准确缴纳关税和遵守贸易法规至关重要。错误归类可能导致海关延误、多缴关税或罚款。
从CN进口到US时,适用的关税税率可能包括:
- 最惠国(MFN)税率——适用于 WTO 成员国的标准关税税率
- 普通税率——适用于无贸易协定国家
- 贸易救济关税——附加关税,如 301 条款(反倾销)、232 条款(国家安全)或反补贴税
本页内容仅供参考。如需正式归类,请咨询当地海关或持牌报关代理。