Anti static textile tape containing plant fibers
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5911203000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6307908940 | 17.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5911900080 | 38.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6307905020 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5911203000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
π§΅ Anti-Static Textile Tape Containing Plant Fibers
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition and Classification: Do You Really Understand "Anti-Static Plant Fiber Tape"?
Anti-static textile tape containing plant fibers is a specialized industrial textile product. It combines plant-based fibers (such as cotton, hemp, or other natural cellulose fibers) with anti-static agents or conductive threads to dissipate static electricity. Its form is typically a textile tape or strip, used in industrial settings to prevent static buildup that could damage electronics, cause explosions in flammable environments, or disrupt sensitive processes.
In international trade, classification depends heavily on material composition, function (anti-static vs. fire-resistant), and end-use. The provided data focuses on fire-resistant applications, which is a common but critical distinction in customs classification.
β οΈ Key Distinction Point:
- If the tape is primarily anti-static but also meets fire-resistant specifications (common in industrial safety tape), it may be classified under Chapter 59 (Impregnated, Coated, Covered, or Laminated Textile Fabrics) for technical uses.
- If it is a general-purpose anti-static tape without specific fire-resistant certification, it might fall under Chapter 63 (Other Made-Up Articles) as a finished product.
- Plant fiber content is critical: If >50% plant fiber, it leans toward textile-specific subheadings; if mixed with synthetic conductive fibers, classification may shift.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided <DATA>, here are the relevant HS Codes for anti-static textile tape containing plant fibers, assuming it also meets fire-resistant criteria (as per the data):
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Scenario | Plant Fiber Content | Fire-Resistant? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5911.20.30.00 |
Fire-resistant textile tape made of plant fibers | Industrial safety, electronics manufacturing, oil/gas sectors | β Yes (Plant-based) | β Yes |
6307.90.89.40 |
Other made-up articles containing plant fibers (e.g., cotton) | General anti-static/industrial use, where no specific technical textile category fits | β Yes (e.g., Cotton) | β Not specified (often implied) |
5911.90.00.80 |
Technical textiles for anti-static/fire-resistant use, plant fiber-based | High-tech industrial applications, specialized protective gear | β Yes (Plant-based) | β Yes |
6307.90.50.20 |
Other made-up textile articles, non-cotton, plant-fiber-containing | General industrial use, where material is not primarily cotton | β οΈ Partial/Other Plant Fibers | β Not specified |
π Key Note:
- The data provided explicitly mentions "fire-resistant" in all summaries. Therefore, anti-static tapes must also meet fire-resistant standards to qualify for these HS Codes.
- If the tape is purely anti-static and not fire-resistant, it may not fit these codes and could require a different classification (e.g.,5911.10or6307.90.99).
- Plant fiber is a key determinant: Codes like5911.20.30.00and5911.90.00.80specifically require plant fiber content.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges, Policy Surcharges)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: From November 10, 2025 (and subsequent imports)
π― 1. 5911.20.30.00 β Fire-Resistant Textile Tape, Plant Fiber-Based
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25% (USITC Footnote 9903.88.01) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% (For Chinese/HK products, effective Nov 10, 2025) |
| Total Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β No (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:5911.20.30.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Explanation:
- The 25% Section 301 surcharge is applied due to the product being a textile article of Chinese origin.
- The 10% IEEPA surcharge is a separate layer for Chinese goods under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
- Total 35% is a high tariff, significantly impacting cost competitiveness.
π― 2. 6307.90.89.40 β Other Made-Up Articles Containing Plant Fibers
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 7% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Rate | 17.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 17% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β No (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Path | IEEPA:9901.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:6307.90.89.40 |
π Note:
- This code is a catch-all for made-up textile articles not specified elsewhere.
- Lower total rate (17%) makes it more competitive if the product qualifies.
- Requires proof of plant fiber content (e.g., cotton, hemp) to avoid misclassification.
π― 3. 5911.90.00.80 β Technical Textiles, Anti-Static/Fire-Resistant, Plant Fiber-Based
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.8% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Rate | 38.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38.8% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β No (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:5911.90.00.80 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- This is a technical textile classification.
- Highest total rate (38.8%) due to the combination of base rate and surcharges.
- Requires technical specifications proving anti-static and fire-resistant properties.
π― 4. 6307.90.50.20 β Other Made-Up Articles, Non-Cotton, Plant-Fiber-Containing
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Rate | 17.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 17.5% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β No (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Path | IEEPA:9901.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:6307.90.50.20 |
π Note:
- This code applies if the tape is not primarily cotton but contains other plant fibers.
- Low base rate (0%) and only 10% IEEPA make this a cost-effective option if material composition allows.
- Must provide material breakdown to prove non-cotton plant fiber content.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Avoidance Guide)
β 1. Required Documents Checklist (Non-Negotiable)
| Document | Mandatory | Description |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Must detail fiber content (e.g., "60% Cotton, 40% Polyamide with Conductive Thread"), anti-static resistance (Ξ©), and fire-resistant rating (e.g., UL94 V-0). |
| β Third-Party Test Report | βοΈ | Must include anti-static test (e.g., ASTM D257) and fire-resistance test (e.g., NFPA 701). |
| β Product Photos (Including Label) | βοΈ | Clear images showing tape width, thickness, and any certification marks. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Must explicitly state: "Anti-Static Textile Tape, Plant Fiber-Based, Fire-Resistant, for Industrial Use." |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Specify weight, dimensions, and quantity per box. |
| β Certificate of Origin (CO) | βοΈ | If not Chinese origin, to avoid Section 301/IEEPA surcharges. |
β 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantra)
π₯ "Material Determines Code, Function Determines Tariff, Precision Saves Thousands!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Incorrect Action |
|---|---|---|
| Tape is 60% Cotton, Fire-Resistant | 5911.20.30.00 (35%) |
Misdeclare as 6307.90.89.40 β 17% β Penalty for Misclassification |
| Tape is Non-Cotton Plant Fiber, Anti-Static | 6307.90.50.20 (17.5%) |
Declare as 5911.20.30.00 β 35% β Overpayment |
| Tape is Purely Anti-Static, No Fire Rating | β Cannot Use Provided Codes | Attempt to force into fire-resistant codes β Customs Rejection |
| Tape includes Conductive Synthetic Threads | Provide fiber blend ratio | Hide synthetic content β Audit Risk |
β 3. Special Case Handling
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Custom Tape | Provide customer PO + technical drawings to prove specific anti-static/fire-resistant specs. |
| Mixed Shipment (Tape + Other Goods) | Declare separately. Do not bundle non-textile items with textile HS Codes. |
| Non-Chinese Origin | If sourced from Vietnam, Thailand, etc., provide CO to avoid 35β38.8% rates. |
| Sample Shipment | Even samples are subject to tariffs. Declare accurately to avoid delays. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff Rate | Certification Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 6307.90.89.40 or 6307.90.50.20 |
17.0β17.5% | None specific, but test reports recommended | Avoid 5911 codes if possible (35β38.8%) |
| π¨π³ China | 5911.20.30.00 |
5β10% | CCC (if applicable) | No Section 301/IEEPA surcharges |
| πͺπΊ EU | 5911.90 |
0β6.5% | CE, REACH | No anti-dumping surcharges |
| π―π΅ Japan | 6307.90 |
0β8% | PSE (if electrical) | Competitive rates |
π Conclusion:
- USA imposes the highest tariffs on Chinese-origin anti-static plant fiber tapes.
- Opt for6307.90series if material composition allows, to save 18β21% in tariffs.
- EU and Japan offer more favorable rates, making them attractive alternative markets.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Blood-Taught Lessons)
β Mistake 1: Declaring anti-static tape as general textile without proving fire-resistant specs
π Consequence: Customs may upgrade to 5911.90.00.80 β 38.8% tariff + penalties!
β Mistake 2: Hiding synthetic fiber content in a "plant fiber" declaration
π Consequence: Audit, retroactive tax, and possible seizure.
β Mistake 3: Assuming all anti-static tapes qualify for 6307.90.89.40
π Consequence: If the tape is not fire-resistant, it may not meet the summary description, leading to declaration rejection.
β Mistake 4: Using generic terms like "textile tape" on the invoice
π Consequence: Customs will request clarification β Delays, storage fees, possible return.
β Correct Practice:
"Anti-Static Textile Tape, 60% Cotton/40% Polyamide, Fire-Resistant (UL94 V-0), Conductive Thread, for Industrial Electronics Handling, Model ABC, Certified by Lab XYZ"
π― VII. Conclusion: Precision in Classification, Profit in Clearance!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Material Dictates Code, Function Dictates Tariff, Precision Saves 20%!"
πΉ "HS Code is Life or Death, 18% vs 35% is a $10k Difference on $100k Shipments!"
π Pro Tip:
If your anti-static plant fiber tape is sourced from non-China countries (e.g., Vietnam, India, Bangladesh), you can avoid Section 301 and IEEPA surcharges, reducing the tariff to 0β7%.
π Apply for an Advance Ruling with US CBP to confirm the correct HS Code and avoid post-import audits.
π£ Immediate Action Required:
π Contact a Certified Customs Broker + Provide Test Reports + Apply for HS Code Advance Ruling
π Ensure Smooth Clearance, Maximize Profit, and Stay Compliant!
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Penny Saved is a Penny Earned!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.