Chocolate Mold
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7323915020 | 15.3% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3924102000 | 24.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7323930035 | 62.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6912004890 | 19.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6912004810 | 19.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π« Chocolate Molds: The Ultimate HS Code & Tariff Survival Guide | 2026 Customs Clearance Strategy
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | Latest 2026 Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly is a "Chocolate Mold"?
Chocolate molds are specialized tools used in confectionery manufacturing and home baking to shape chocolate, ganache, or fondant into specific forms. In international trade, they are not a single unified category but are strictly classified based on material composition. The material dictates the HS Code, which in turn determines the tariff burdenβoften ranging from a manageable 15.3% to a staggering 62.0%.
Key Classification Logic: * Metal/Alloy Based (Cast Iron, Stainless Steel, Aluminum, Copper): Classified under Chapter 73 (Articles of Iron or Steel) or specific metal articles. * Plastic/Silicone Based: Classified under Chapter 39 (Plastics and Articles Thereof) or Chapter 85/90 depending on specificity, but here primarily 3924. * Ceramic/Porcelain Based: Classified under Chapter 69 (Ceramic Products).
β οΈ Critical Distinction:
- If the mold is Metal (Cast Iron/Stainless Steel) β It falls under 7323.91 or 7323.93.
- If the mold is Plastic/Silicone β It falls under 3924.10.
- If the mold is Ceramic/Non-Porcelain β It falls under 6912.00.
Misclassification is the #1 cause of customs delays and unexpected tax bills!
π¦ II. Detailed HS Code Classification Matrix (2026 Latest Tariff Schedule)
| HS Code | Product Description | Material Composition | Category | Total Tax Rate (CN Origin) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
7323.91.50.20 |
Baking utensils; Chocolate Molds | Cast Iron or Metal | Baking Utensil | 15.3% |
7323.93.00.35 |
Baking utensils; Chocolate Molds | Stainless Steel, Aluminum, Copper | Baking Utensil | 62.0% |
3924.10.20.00 |
Kitchenware & Household Articles | Plastic or Silicone | Kitchen Utensil | 24.0% |
6912.00.48.90 |
Tableware/Kitchenware; Other | Ceramic, Metal, Silicone (Non-porcelain fallback) | Kitchenware (Fallback) | 19.8% |
6912.00.48.10 |
Tableware/Kitchenware; Other | Metal or Silicone (Non-porcelain) | Non-Porcelain Kitchenware | 19.8% |
π Key Insight:
- Stainless Steel is surprisingly expensive in tariffs (62.0%) due to specific steel/aluminum/copper additional duties.
- Cast Iron is the most tax-efficient metal option (15.3%).
- Silicone/Plastic sits in the middle at 24.0%.
- Ceramic/Other categories offer a "safe harbor" at 19.8% if the material isn't standard steel or iron.
π° III. 2026 Detailed Tariff Breakdown (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Country of Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: Current 2026 Tariff Schedule
π― 1. 7323.91.50.20 ββ Chocolate Molds (Cast Iron/Metal)
The Most Cost-Effective Metal Option
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.3% |
| Surtax (Section 301) | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Surtax | 10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 15.3% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 15.3% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Denied) |
| Legal Basis | Base Rate + 122 Clause |
π Explanation:
- This is the lowest tariff for metal chocolate molds.
- While the Section 301 surtax is 0%, the Section 122 surtax (10%) applies.
- Strategy: If your mold is made of cast iron, always use this code to save ~40% compared to stainless steel.
π― 2. 7323.93.00.35 ββ Chocolate Molds (Stainless Steel/Aluminum/Copper)
The High-Tariff Trap
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.0% |
| Surtax (Section 301) | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Surtax | 10% |
| Steel/Al/Cu Additional Duty | 50% |
| Total Tax Rate | 62.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 62.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Denied) |
| Legal Basis | Base Rate + 122 Clause + Steel/Cu Add-on |
π Warning:
- Despite a low base rate (2%), the 50% additional duty on steel, aluminum, and copper products is brutal.
- Total 62% makes stainless steel molds highly uncompetitive in the US market unless value-added significantly.
- Strategy: Avoid this code unless absolutely necessary. Consider switching to cast iron or silicone alternatives.
π― 3. 3924.10.20.00 ββ Chocolate Molds (Plastic/Silicone)
The Balanced Choice
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| Surtax (Section 301) | 7.5% |
| Section 122 Surtax | 10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 24.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 24.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Denied) |
| Legal Basis | Base Rate + 301 Surtax + 122 Clause |
π Explanation:
- Silicone and plastic molds fall under plastics.
- They incur both the Section 301 surtax (7.5%) and Section 122 surtax (10%).
- Strategy: This is a moderate-cost option. Ensure the description clearly states "Silicone" or "Plastic" to avoid being misclassified as metal.
π― 4. & 5. 6912.00.48.90 / 6912.00.48.10 ββ Ceramic/Other Kitchenware (Fallback Categories)
The "Safe Harbor" for Ambiguous Materials
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 9.8% |
| Surtax (Section 301) | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Surtax | 10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 19.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 19.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Denied) |
| Legal Basis | Base Rate + 122 Clause |
π Explanation:
- These codes are for ceramic, non-porcelain, or mixed materials (Metal/Silicone fallbacks).
- No Section 301 surtax, only Base (9.8%) + 122 (10%).
- Strategy: If your product is a complex composite (e.g., metal frame with silicone insert) and doesn't fit neatly into 7323 or 3924, use this as a fallback to avoid the 62% steel penalty or 7.5% plastic surtax.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Non-Negotiable)
| Document | Required? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specifications | βοΈ | Must explicitly state Material (e.g., "Food-grade Silicone," "Cast Iron," "304 Stainless Steel"). |
| β Product Photos | βοΈ | Clear images showing texture, flexibility (for silicone), and any markings. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Item name must match HS Code description (e.g., "Silicone Chocolate Mold"). |
| β HS Code Pre-Ruling | βοΈ | Highly recommended for mixed-material molds to avoid 62% surprise. |
| β Certificate of Origin | βοΈ | For US import from China. |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Golden Rules)
π₯ "Material First, Name Second, Code Third!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Incorrect Declaration | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicone Mold | 3924.10.20.00 |
"Kitchen Tool" (Vague) | Misclassification β 19.8% or 62% |
| Cast Iron Mold | 7323.91.50.20 |
"Metal Chocolate Tray" | Could be pushed to 7323.93 β 62% |
| Stainless Steel Mold | 7323.93.00.35 |
"Steel Utensil" | Accept 62% tax or switch material |
| Ceramic Mold | 6912.00.48.90 |
"Baking Pan" | Vague β Delayed clearance |
π Critical Note:
- Do NOT describe stainless steel molds as "Cast Iron" to save tax. Customs uses X-ray and material testing. Fraud leads to penalties and blacklisting.
- Do use the 6912 codes if your mold is a composite (e.g., metal handle with silicone cavity) and you want to avoid the 50% steel surtax. Check with a broker if 6912 is acceptable for your specific composite structure.
β 3. Special Situations
| Situation | Advice |
|---|---|
| Mixed Material Molds | If >50% by value is metal, customs may still apply steel tariffs. Use 6912 as a fallback if legally defensible. |
| Samples vs. Bulk | Both are subject to the same rates. De Minimis ($800) does NOT apply to China-origin goods under current Section 301/122 rules. |
| Packaging | Pack with plastic inserts? Ensure the invoice separates the mold value from the packaging value. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026)
| Market | Recommended HS Code | Estimated Total Tax (CN Origin) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 7323.91.50.20 (Cast Iron) |
15.3% | Best for metal. Avoid 7323.93 (62%). |
| πΊπΈ USA | 3924.10.20.00 (Silicone) |
24.0% | Moderate tax. Popular for home bakers. |
| πͺπΊ EU | Various (Chapter 73/39) | ~0% - 6% | No Section 301/122 equivalents. Much cheaper. |
| π¨π³ China | Various | ~0% - 9% | Domestic trade or export to non-US markets has low barriers. |
π Conclusion:
- The US market is highly punitive for Chinese-manufactured chocolate molds due to Section 122 and potential steel surcharges.
- Cast Iron (15.3%) and Silicone (24.0%) are the most viable options.
- Stainless Steel (62.0%) is commercially challenging unless high-value branding justifies the cost.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Mistake 1: Classifying Stainless Steel Molds under Cast Iron Codes
π Result: Customs inspection reveals material mismatch β Seizure, Penalty, and Audit.
β Mistake 2: Ignoring the "122 Clause"
π Result: Underpaying 10% tax β Back taxes + Interest.
π Remember: Section 122 applies to almost all consumer goods from China to the US in 2026.
β Mistake 3: Using "Generic" Terms on Invoice
π Result: "Chocolate Mold" is too vague. Customs will assign the highest dutiable code (often 62% for steel) to protect revenue.
β
Fix: Be specific: "Silicone Chocolate Mold, Food Grade, 12-Cavity."
π― VII. Conclusion: Strategic Sourcing for Profit Maximization
π― Key Takeaways:
πΉ Material is Destiny: Choose Cast Iron (15.3%) or Silicone (24.0%) for the US market. Avoid Stainless Steel (62%) unless absolutely required.
πΉ No De Minimis: Do not expect the $800 exemption. Every shipment is taxed.
πΉ Use Fallbacks Wisely: If materials are mixed, consider 6912.00.48 (19.8%) to avoid steel surtaxes, but verify with a customs broker.
πΉ Be Precise: Vague descriptions lead to maximum tax rates.
π£ Immediate Action Plan: 1. Audit your Product List: Identify all metal vs. silicone molds. 2. Switch Materials if Possible: Convert stainless steel SKUs to cast iron or silicone to save ~40% in tariffs. 3. Update Invoices: Ensure material composition is explicitly stated. 4. Consult a Broker: Get a pre-ruling for complex composite molds.
β¨ Clear Customs, Clear Profits!
πΌ Your tariff rate is a decision, not a destiny. Optimize your material choice today!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.