Dyed Fur Scraps for Crafts
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4302209000 | 36.7% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4302194570 | 37.2% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
π§₯ Dyed Fur Scraps for Crafts (Tanned or Dressed Furskins, Unassembled)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Strategy π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand "Fur Scraps"?
"Dyed fur scraps for crafts" generally refer to tanned or dressed furskins (including heads, tails, paws, and other pieces/cuttings) that are unassembled or assembled (without addition of other materials like leather backing), specifically intended for craft projects, apparel trimming, or accessory making.
In international trade, these are not simply "garbage" or "waste" but classified under Chapter 43 (Furskins and Furs). The key distinction lies in whether they are pieces/cuttings (small, irregular, or specific parts) or whole skins (large, intact pelts).
β οΈ Key Distinction Point: - If the product consists of heads, tails, paws, or irregular cuttings (scrap pieces) β Likely falls under 4302.20.90.00. - If the product consists of whole skins (with/without head/tail/paws) made of specific valuable animals (beaver, sable, etc.) β Likely falls under 4302.19.45.70. - Crucial Note: The description "Dyed" is critical. Both categories in this data set are dyed. Misclassifying "pieces" as "whole skins" (or vice versa) can lead to severe duty discrepancies.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Scenario | Key Characteristic |
|---|---|---|---|
4302.20.90.00 |
Tanned/dressed furskins (heads, tails, paws, pieces/cuttings), unassembled/assembled: Other: Dyed | Craft scraps, irregular fur pieces, mixed animal parts for decoration | Pieces/Cuttings: Small, irregular, or specific parts (not whole skins) |
4302.19.45.70 |
Tanned/dressed furskins (whole skins, w/o assembly): Other: Of beaver, chinchilla, ermine, fitch, fox, leopard, lynx, marten, nutria, ocelot, otter, pony, racoon, sable, wolf: Other: Dyed Other | Whole pelts of specific luxury or standard fur animals, dyed, unassembled | Whole Skins: Intact pelts of listed species, dyed, not assembled into goods |
π Important Reminder: - "Scraps" vs. "Whole Skins": If the input is truly "scraps" (small cuttings),
4302.20.90.00is the more accurate fit for generic dyed pieces. However, if the "scraps" are actually full-sized dyed pelts of the listed animals (fox, raccoon, etc.),4302.19.45.70applies. - Dyed Status: Both codes explicitly cover dyed materials. Undyed materials would fall under different subheadings.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Additional Taxes)
β Applicable Country: United States (US) β Origin: China (CN) (Note: Based on the tax details provided in the prompt which show non-zero taxes for one code, implying a high-tariff origin context) β Effective Date: Current 2026 Tariff Schedule
π― 1. 4302.20.90.00 ββ Dyed Fur Pieces, Cuttings, Heads, Tails, Paws (Unassembled)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 1.7% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Additional Duty | +25.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 26.7% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 26.7% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β No (Furskins are generally excluded from low-value exemptions under current rules for this category) |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:4302.20.90.00 β Section 301: Footnote 9903.88.01 |
π Explanation: - Base Duty (1.7%): Standard MFN duty for dyed fur pieces/cuttings. - Additional Duty (25.0%): Applies to products of Chinese origin under Section 301 (List 4C/4D depending on specific year updates, currently active). - Total Impact: The effective rate of 26.7% is significant for low-value craft items, eroding margins.
π― 2. 4302.19.45.70 ββ Dyed Whole Skins of Listed Animals (Beaver, Fox, Sable, etc.)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 0.0% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Additional Duty | 0.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 0.0% |
| Tax Calculation | $0 |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β οΈ Check Specific Restrictions: While duty is 0%, fur imports often face strict USDA/CITES regulations. |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:4302.19.45.70 (No Section 301 Footnote Applied) |
π Explanation: - Zero Duty: This specific subheading for whole skins of listed animals (fox, raccoon, etc.) currently benefits from a 0% base rate and 0% additional duty in this dataset. - Strategic Advantage: If the "scraps" can be legitimately classified as "whole skins" of eligible animals (e.g., large dye batches of fox pelts), this code is vastly superior for cost savings. - Caution: Ensure the product truly meets the definition of "whole skin" and not "cuttings." Customs may challenge small pieces as "cuttings."
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Missing Docs = Delay)
| Document | Mandatory? | Description |
|---|---|---|
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Must clearly state: "Dyed Fur Scraps," "Tanned," "Unassembled," and specify animal type if applicable. |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Detail weight, number of pieces, and whether they are "cuttings" or "whole skins." |
| β Product Description | βοΈ | Explicitly avoid vague terms like "Fur." Use "Tanned Dyed Fox Fur Pieces, Unassembled." |
| β CITES Certificate | β οΈ If Applicable | If the fur comes from endangered species (e.g., certain leopards, otters, beavers), CITES export/import permits are mandatory. Check species against US Fish & Wildlife Service lists. |
| β USDA Form 3-200 | βοΈ If Applicable | Required for importation of furskins into the US to prevent rabies/pests. |
| β Certificate of Origin | βοΈ | To claim any potential preferential treatment (if applicable) or prove origin for Section 301 assessment. |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Critical Keywords)
π₯ "Be Precise, Avoid 'Waste', Specify 'Tanned'"
| Situation | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Small irregular pieces | 4302.20.90.00: "Dyed tanned fur cuttings for crafts" |
"Fur fabric scraps" β Risk of misclassification |
| Full pelts of fox/raccoon | 4302.19.45.70: "Dyed whole fox skins, unassembled" |
"Fur scraps" β May trigger scrutiny if clearly not scraps |
| Mixed animal types | Separate lines or primary type if uniform | "Mixed fur" β Customs will demand breakdown; may apply highest duty |
| Endangered Species | STOP β Verify CITES status first | "Leopard fur" without CITES β Seizure & Fine |
β 3. Special Case Handling
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| "Crafts" Purpose | Stating "for crafts" does not change HS code but helps clarify it's not "waste" (which might be prohibited). Emphasize "Tanned/Dressed" to show it's a finished good, not raw material. |
| Mixed Sizes | If a shipment contains both whole skins and cuttings, split the declaration. Do not mix 4302.19 and 4302.20 in one line item. |
| CITES Risk | Beaver, Otter, Leopard, Lynx, Wolf, Sable are often CITES-controlled. Fox, Raccoon, Fox are generally not (check current lists). If CITES applies, duty is not the only hurdle; permitting is critical. |
| Dyeing Process | Ensure the "Dyed" status is accurate. If undyed, the codes above are incorrect. |
π V. Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code (Similar) | Duty Rate | Certification/Regulation | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 4302.20.90.00 / 4302.19.45.70 |
26.7% / 0.0% | USDA Form 3-200, CITES (if applicable) | High Section 301 impact on cuttings; 0% on whole skins of listed animals. |
| π¨π³ China | 4302.20.90.00 |
~10-15% | Import License (if endangered) | Generally no Section 301 equivalent, but CITES is strictly enforced. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 4302.20 / 4302.19 |
0-10% | EU Wildlife Trade Regulations (similar to CITES) | No Section 301; strict biodiversity laws. |
| π¬π§ UK | 4302.20 / 4302.19 |
0-10% | UK Wildlife Trade Licenses | Post-Brexit, aligns with CITES but separate licensing. |
π Conclusion: - USA is the most complex market due to Section 301 tariffs and strict USDA/CITES rules. - Cost Saving Strategy: If your "scraps" can be classified as whole skins of non-CITES listed animals (e.g., dyed fox or raccoon whole pelts), you can legally reduce the duty from 26.7% to 0.0%. However, this requires the physical product to be whole skins, not cuttings. - Compliance Warning: Never misdeclare "cuttings" as "whole skins" to avoid duty. This is customs fraud.
π VI. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Error 1: Declaring "Fur Scraps" under HS 6309.00 (Used Clothing/Fur)
π Consequence: Customs will reclassify to Chapter 43 (Furskins), which has stricter regulations and potentially higher duties.
β Error 2: Ignoring CITES for Listed Animals (e.g., Leopard, Otter, Beaver) π Consequence: Immediate seizure, heavy fines, and potential criminal charges. CITES permits are mandatory for these species in the US and EU.
β Error 3: Misclassifying "Whole Skins" as "Cuttings" to Avoid Scrutiny
π Consequence: While 4302.20.90.00 has a 1.7% base rate + 25% add'l, 4302.19.45.70 is 0%. However, if the goods are actually whole skins, misclassification is fraud. If they are cuttings, you pay 26.7%. Be honest about the physical form.
β Correct Approach:
"Dyed Tanned Fox Fur Pelts, Whole, Unassembled" β
4302.19.45.70(0% Duty) "Dyed Tanned Fox Fur Cuttings, Irregular Pieces" β4302.20.90.00(26.7% Duty)
π― VII. Conclusion: Precise Declaration Saves Money!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Whole Skins = 0% Duty (if listed animal), Cuttings = 26.7% Duty." πΉ "Check CITES First, Then Classify by Form." πΉ "Dyed Tanned, Not Raw, Not Waste."
π Pro Tip:
If you are importing dyed fur pieces for crafts, ensure you have USDA Form 3-200 submitted before shipment. For whole skins of fox/raccoon, you may save $2,670 per $10,000 in duties by correctly classifying as 4302.19.45.70 instead of 4302.20.90.00.
π£ Action Required:
π Consult a Customs Broker: To verify if your specific "scraps" qualify as "whole skins" for
4302.19.45.70. π Prepare CITES Documents: If any species in your shipment is protected. π Optimize Your Supply Chain: Consider sourcing from regions with lower tariff impacts if possible, but note that Section 301 applies to Chinese origin regardless.
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification! πΌ Every Percent Saved is Pure Profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.