Dyed Plain Man made Short Fiber Fabric
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5513290010 | 49.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5513290090 | 49.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5407820020 | 49.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5407820010 | 49.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
𧡠Dyed Plain Man-made Short Fiber Fabric (Lining Material)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly is This Fabric?
This product is defined as "Dyed Plain Man-made Short Fiber Fabric", specifically used as lining material.
Key characteristics:
* Material: Blended fabric consisting of Cotton and Synthetic Short Fibers (or other man-made short fibers).
* Form: Woven fabric (ζ’η»η©).
* Processing State: Dyed (ζθ²).
β οΈ Key Classification Distinction:
- If the fabric is a blend of Cotton + Synthetic Short Fibers, it generally falls under Chapter 55 (Man-made Staple Fibers).
- The specific HS codes provided in the data highlight two main logical paths based on the specific sub-category of synthetic fibers (short fiber vs. filament logic overlap in classification descriptions):
1. 5513.29.00.10 / 90: Focuses on "Synthetic Short Fiber + Cotton" blends.
2. 5407.82.00.10 / 20: Focuses on "Synthetic Filament/Short Fiber + Cotton" blends, often applied to lining fabrics with specific dyeing characteristics.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Key Material Composition | Classification Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
5513.29.00.10 |
Dyed Cotton-blended Man-made Short Fiber Lining Fabric | Synthetic Short Fibers + Cotton | Primary classification for woven blends of synthetic staple fibers and cotton. |
5513.29.00.90 |
Dyed Cotton-blended Man-made Short Fiber Lining Fabric | Synthetic Fibers + Cotton | "Other" category for similar blends not specified in .10; logical overlap with .10. |
5407.82.00.20 |
Dyed Cotton-blended Man-made Short Fiber Lining Fabric | Cotton + Synthetic Fibers | Focuses on the "Dyed Woven" characteristic of blends involving synthetic fibers and cotton. |
5407.82.00.10 |
Dyed Cotton-blended Man-made Short Fiber Lining Fabric | Long/Short Synthetic Filaments + Cotton | Logical overlap with filament classification; meets "dyed fabric" requirements for blends. |
π Important Note:
- All four HS codes listed share the exact same tax structure in the provided data.
- The choice between 5513 and 5407 often depends on the specific technical definition of the "man-made" component (staple/short fiber vs. filament) and the exact blend ratio, but for tariff purposes in this specific dataset, they are treated identically.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Country of Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: Current (Post-2025 policies)
π― 1. Universal Tariff Structure for All Listed HS Codes (5513.29.00.10/90, 5407.82.00.10/20)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 14.9% (Basic Customs Duty) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% (Additional Tariffs under Section 301) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% (Specific Trade Remedy Tariff) |
| Total Effective Duty | 49.9% |
| Tax Calculation Basis | CIF Value (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) Γ 49.9% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (High duty rates typically exclude small package exemptions under current scrutiny) |
| Legal Basis Path | HTSUS: 5513/5407 β Section 301: Footnote 9903.08.01 β Section 122: 19 U.S.C. 1673 |
π Explanation:
- "Base Duty 14.9%": The standard Most Favored Nation (MFN) rate for woven cotton-blended fabrics under Chapters 55 and 54.
- "Section 301 Surcharge 25%": Applies to a vast range of Chinese-origin textiles and apparel components, including woven fabrics.
- "Section 122 Tariff 10%": A specific additional tariff often applied to imports to address trade imbalances or specific sector protections.
- Combined Total of 49.9%: This is a very high duty rate. It significantly impacts profit margins and requires careful cost planning.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance)
β 1. Required Documentation Checklist (Non-Negotiable)
| Document | Must Provide? | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| β Fabric Specifications | βοΈ | Must clearly state: Blend Ratio (e.g., 65% Polyester/35% Cotton), Weight (GSM), Width, Weave Type (Plain). |
| β Dyeing Method Confirmation | βοΈ | Must explicitly state "Dyed" (not printed or raw). This determines the heading. |
| β Certificate of Origin (CO) | βοΈ | Crucial for verifying Chinese origin to apply correct surcharges; needed for any potential FTZ exemptions (if applicable). |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Description must match HS Code summary: "Dyed Woven Fabric, Cotton/Synthetic Blend, for Lining Use." |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Detailed packing list to verify quantity and value. |
| β Labeling Info | βοΈ | Fiber content labels on the fabric roll/bale are often checked during customs inspection. |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Key Mantras)
π₯ "Blend Ratio is King, Dyeing Status is Crucial, Origin Determines Surcharge!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration Approach | Common Error |
|---|---|---|
| Cotton + Synthetic Blend | Declare exact blend % (e.g., "60% Polyester, 40% Cotton"). | Vague terms like "Synthetic Fabric" β High risk of reclassification & penalties. |
| Lining Use | Specify "Lining Fabric" but ensure HS code is based on material composition, not end-use. | Using end-use codes incorrectly β Wrong duty rate. |
| Dyed vs. Printed | Clearly state "Dyed Plain" or "Dyed Patterned". | Confusing "Dyed" with "Printed" β Different HS codes & rates. |
| Short Fiber vs. Filament | Clarify if fibers are "Staple/Short" or "Filament". | Misidentifying fiber type β 5513 vs. 5407 dispute. |
β 3. Special Considerations for This Product
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| Small Parcel Imports (De Minimis) | Warning: With a 49.9% total duty, small parcel exemptions may not be cost-effective or legally safe if duties are collected retroactively. |
| Anti-Dumping/Countervailing Duties (AD/CVD) | Check if the specific synthetic fiber (e.g., Polyester) has separate AD/CVD cases against China. This data does not show it, but it's a critical check. |
| Textile Quotas | Note: While most textile quotas are gone, ensure no specific bilateral agreement restrictions apply. |
| Origin Marking | Ensure each roll/bale is marked "Made in China" as required for Section 301 enforcement. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Base Duty | Section 301 (China) | Section 122 (China) | Total Estimated Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ United States | 5513.29.00.10 / 5407.82.00.10 |
14.9% | +25.0% | +10.0% | 49.9% |
| π¨π³ China (Import) | 60% Cotton or more: 9% 50-60%: 12% <50%: 17% |
9-17% | N/A | N/A | 9-17% |
| πͺπΊ European Union | 5513 / 5407 | 4-7% | N/A | N/A | 4-7% |
| π¬π§ United Kingdom | 5513 / 5407 | 4-12% | N/A | N/A | 4-12% |
| π¨π¦ Canada | 5513 / 5407 | 4-14% | N/A | N/A | 4-14% |
π Conclusion:
- The US market is the most expensive for this product due to the triple-layered tariff structure (Base + Sec 301 + Sec 122).
- European and Asian markets offer significantly lower duty burdens (4-17%).
- Strategy: If possible, consider sourcing lining materials from non-China origins (e.g., Vietnam, Bangladesh) to mitigate US tariffs, though supply chain complexity increases.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfall Guide (Lessons Learned)
β Mistake 1: Declaring "Cotton Fabric" when the blend is >50% synthetic.
π Consequence: Misclassification β Potential fraud allegations & higher duties.
β
Fix: Always declare the dominant fiber and exact blend ratio.
β Mistake 2: Ignoring the "Dyed" status.
π Consequence: If declared as "Greige" (undyed), the HS code changes, leading to incorrect duty calculation.
β
Fix: Ensure the invoice clearly states "Dyed".
β Mistake 3: Assuming "Lining" allows for a lower duty rate.
π Consequence: Duty is based on material composition (Chapter 55/54), not end-use (Chapter 61/62).
β
Fix: Classify by fabric, not by garment part.
β Mistake 4: Overlooking Section 122.
π Consequence: Budgeting only for Sec 301 (25%) + Base (14.9%) = 39.9%, but actual is 49.9%.
β
Fix: Include all surcharges in cost models.
π― VII. Conclusion: Precise Classification Saves Money!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Blend Ratio Dictates Code, Dyeing Status Confirms Chapter, Origin Triggers Surcharge!"
πΉ "49.9% is the US Reality for China-origin Blends. Plan accordingly!"
π Pro Tip:
- For US imports, calculate landed cost using 49.9% duty.
- Consider Advance Rulings with CBP if the blend ratio or fiber type is ambiguous to avoid post-entry audits.
- For non-US markets, the duty burden is much lower, making them more attractive if supply chain flexibility allows.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Verify Blend Ratio β Confirm "Dyed" Status β Check Origin β Calculate 49.9% Duty for US.
π Ensure accurate documentation to prevent delays and penalties at US Customs.
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every percentage point of duty matters in textile margins!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.