Hand Cover Cap
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926305000 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926901000 | 20.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 8707100020 | 37.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 8707100040 | 37.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 8708295110 | 0.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π Hand Cover Cap (Glove Box Lid/Door)
π HS Code Reference & Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Know the "Hand Cover Cap"?
The Hand Cover Cap, commonly known as the Glove Box Lid or Dashboard Door, is a critical structural component of automotive interiors. In international trade, its classification is not straightforward; it depends heavily on its material composition and structural role. It is generally treated in two ways:
- As an Automotive Part: If specifically designed for vehicle bodies (chassis/dashboard integration), it falls under Chapter 87 (Vehicles).
- As a General Plastic/Manufactured Good: If viewed as a generic structural fitting or connector without specific vehicle integration proof, it may fall under Chapter 39 (Plastics) or other "Other Articles" headings.
β οΈ Key Distinction Point: - If it is a vehicle-specific assembly component (integrated into the dashboard/chassis structure) β Classify under 8707 or 8708 (Vehicle Parts). - If it is a generic plastic fitting or structural connector without explicit vehicle binding β Classify under 3926 (Articles of Plastic/Other Materials).
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Scenario | Material Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
3926.30.50.00 |
Other articles of plastics and articles of other materials of heading 39.14 or 39.15 (e.g., furniture, car bodies, structural fittings) | Structural fittings, dashboard covers, generic plastic assemblies | β Plastic/Resin |
3926.90.10.00 |
Other articles of plastics and articles of other materials of heading 39.14 or 39.15 (Other) | Generic "Other" plastic parts/accessories | β Plastic/Resin |
8707.10.00.20 |
Parts and accessories for vehicles of headings 8701 to 8705 (Other) | Vehicle structural components, shell/lid parts for chassis/dashboards | β Metal/Plastic |
8707.10.00.40 |
Parts and accessories for vehicles of headings 8701 to 8705 (Other) | Mechanical equipment or experimental apparatus parts (Shell/Lid) | β Metal/Plastic |
8708.29.51.10 |
Parts and accessories of vehicles of headings 8701 to 8703 (Other) | Body parts, stamped/formed metal or plastic chassis components | β Metal/Plastic |
π Key Reminder: - Chapter 39 (3926.30/3926.90): Applies if the cap is treated as a general plastic article or structural fitting. Lower base duty, but subject to Section 301 & IEEPA add-ons. - Chapter 87 (8707/8708): Applies if the cap is treated as an automotive part. Higher base duty, but critical for vehicle-specific imports. - Material Conflict: While often plastic, if the cap is metal, Chapter 39 may be incorrect. However, the provided data assumes "no obvious material conflict" for plastics/metals in respective categories.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Detailed Explanation (Including Surcharges)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: From November 10, 2025 (and subsequent imports)
π― 1. 3926.30.50.00 & 3926.90.10.00 ββ Plastic/Other Material Articles
These codes fall under the "Other" category for plastic articles.
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.3% (for 3926.30) / 3.4% (for 3926.90) |
| Section 301 Add-on | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Add-on (122 Clause) | +10% |
| Total Tariff | 22.8% (for 3926.30) / 20.9% (for 3926.90) |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.8% or 20.9% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:3926.30.50.00 β Section 301: 7.5% β IEEPA:9903.01.24 (10%) |
π Explanation: - The Base Duty is relatively low compared to auto parts. - However, the Section 301 (7.5%) and IEEPA (10%) add-ons make the total effective rate ~21-23%. - Crucial: These codes are often used as "fallback" classifications when the specific automotive nature is not proven.
π― 2. 8707.10.00.20 & 8707.10.00.40 ββ Vehicle/Equipment Parts (General)
These codes classify the item as a part for vehicles or mechanical equipment (shells/lids).
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.5% |
| Section 301 Add-on | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Add-on (122 Clause) | +10% |
| Total Tariff | 37.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 37.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:8707.10.00.20 β Section 301: 25% β IEEPA:9903.01.24 (10%) |
π Explanation: - Base Duty is low (2.5%), but the Section 301 surcharge is significantly higher (25%) compared to the 7.5% for plastics. - Total Rate: 37.5%. This is a high-cost classification due to aggressive US trade policy on Chinese auto parts. - Note: If classified here, ensure you have documentation proving it is a vehicle part to avoid disputes, but be aware of the high tax burden.
π― 3. 8708.29.51.10 ββ Vehicle Body Parts (Stamped/Formed)
This code is specific to parts of the vehicle body (chassis/dashboards), including stamped metal or formed plastic components.
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.5% |
| Section 301 Add-on | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Add-on (122 Clause) | +10% |
| Total Tariff | 37.5% (Note: Data shows 2.5% + 35.0% = 37.5%) |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 37.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:8708.29.51.10 β Section 301: 25% β IEEPA:9903.01.24 (10%) |
π Explanation: - This is a common classification for glove box lids as they are considered body parts. - Total Rate: 37.5%. - Material Assumption: The data suggests "stamped/formed" items, which could be metal or plastic. If it's a simple plastic snap-fit lid,
8708is still plausible if it's integral to the body.
π οΈ IV. Clearance Practical Advice (Avoiding Pitfalls)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Essential)
| Document | Required? | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Must include material (Plastic/Metal), dimensions, and intended vehicle model. |
| β Part Number & OEM Reference | βοΈ | Link to a specific vehicle (e.g., "Ford F-150 Glove Box Lid") strengthens 8708 classification. |
| β Photos (Assembled & Disassembled) | βοΈ | Show mounting points, hinges, and integration with the dashboard. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Clearly state "Glove Box Lid - Automotive Part" or "Plastic Fitting". |
| β Material Certificate | βοΈ | If claiming 3926, prove it's plastic. If 8708, confirm if it's metal/plastic. |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Ensure no separate "hardware" is declared separately if it's part of the assembly. |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Key Formulas)
π₯ "Correct Code Saves Money, Wrong Code Costs 15%!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Action |
|---|---|---|
| Generic Plastic Lid (No car brand) | 3926.90.10.00 (20.9%) |
Declared as Auto Part β 37.5% |
| Vehicle-Specific Lid (With OEM Part No.) | 8708.29.51.10 (37.5%) |
Declared as Plastic β Risk of Customs Audit/Re-classification |
| Assembly with Hinges | Declare as Assembly | Split into "Lid" + "Hinges" β Higher combined duty |
| Metal Glove Box | 7326 (Steel) or 8708 |
Declare as Plastic 3926 β Major Misdeclaration |
β 3. Special Case Handling
| Scenario | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Parts | Provide OEM Part Numbers and Vehicle Make/Model. This justifies 8708 but accepts the 37.5% rate. |
| Aftermarket Parts | If not branded, consider 3926 for lower duty (20.9%), but be prepared to prove it's not a vehicle-specific part. |
| Mixed Materials | If lid is plastic but hinges are metal, consult a broker. It may need to be classified by the essential character (usually the plastic part). |
| Pre-Ruling | Strongly Recommended: Apply for an Advance Ruling from US CBP to confirm if your specific glove box lid qualifies for 3926 (lower tax) or 8708 (higher tax). |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 8708.29.51.10 |
37.5% | High due to Section 301 & IEEPA. |
| πΊπΈ USA | 3926.90.10.00 |
20.9% | Lower risk if not clearly automotive. |
| π¨π³ China | 3926.90.90.00 |
~5-10% | Standard import duty for plastics. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 8708.29.99 |
~4.5% | No US-style add-ons. |
| π¦πΊ Australia | 8708.29.90 |
~5% | Stable tariff regime. |
π Conclusion: - USA is the most complex and expensive market due to Section 301 and IEEPA surcharges. - Cost Saving Tip: If the glove box lid is not strictly OEM or can be argued as a general plastic fitting,
3926.90.10.00saves ~16.6% in tariffs compared to8708. - Risk Warning: Misclassifying an automotive part as a plastic article can lead to penalties and back-taxes.
π VI. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Error 1: Declaring all glove box lids as 8708 without considering material.
π Consequence: If it's clearly a generic plastic item, you overpay by 16.6%.
β Error 2: Declaring an OEM auto part as 3926 to save tax.
π Consequence: Customs may detect the OEM Part Number, reclassify it to 8708, and impose fines + 16.6% back-tax.
β Error 3: Ignoring the IEEPA 10% Surcharge.
π Consequence: Underestimating total landed cost by 10% on any Chinese-origin good.
β Correct Approach:
"Glove Box Lid, Plastic, for Model XYZ Vehicle, OEM Part No. ABC-123"
OR
"Plastic Fitting, Glove Box Cover, General Use, Material: ABS"
π― VII. Conclusion: Professional Declaration, Cost Optimization!
π― Remember the Formula:
πΉ "Auto Part = 37.5% (High Risk/Cost)"
πΉ "Plastic Fitting = 20.9% (Lower Risk/Cost)"
πΉ "Material Matters!"
π Pro Tip: If you are importing aftermarket parts, try to classify under 3926 to save money. If you are importing OEM parts, prepare for 8708 but ensure all documentation matches to avoid delays.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Contact a Customs Broker to analyze your specific product drawings. π Apply for an Advance Ruling if the value is high. π‘ Verify Material: Is it truly plastic? If so,
3926is your ally.
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Precise Classification!
πΌ Your every cent of cost deserves precise calculation!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.