Hemp Shoelaces
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5607902500 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5607903500 | 38.4% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6307905010 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6307905020 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5302100000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
π Hemp Shoelaces (Natural Fiber Laces)
π HS Code Reference & Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Customs Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly Are "Hemp Shoelaces"?
Hemp shoelaces are textile accessories made from natural plant fibers (primarily hemp, jute, or similar bast fibers), processed into twisted cords or flat bands for tying footwear. In international trade, their classification depends heavily on material composition, physical form (twisted cord vs. flat band), and processing level.
β οΈ Critical Distinction:
- Are they twisted ropes/cords (strands twisted together)? β Likely Chapter 56 (Impregnated, Coated, Covered or Reinforced Textile Yarns; Cordage, Rope, Cables and Articles thereof).
- Are they flat, woven, or knitted bands not classified as cords? β Likely Chapter 63 (Other made-up textile articles).
- Are they raw, unspun hemp fibers (not yet made into laces)? β Chapter 53 (Vegetable textile fibres; paper yarn and paper fabrics).
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Material/Form |
|---|---|---|---|
5607.90.25.00 |
Twisted hemp cordage/lace | Hemp shoelaces formed as twisted ropes/cords, natural fiber | β Twisted Cord |
5607.90.35.00 |
Other hemp cordage/lace | Hemp shoelaces as bands/straps made from hemp fiber | β Band/Cord |
6307.90.50.10 |
Other made-up textile articles (non-cotton) | Hemp shoelaces classified as general textile accessories | β Made-up Article |
6307.90.50.20 |
Shoelaces made of non-cotton textile materials | Hemp shoelaces explicitly as shoelaces, non-cotton | β Shoelace |
5302.10.00.00 |
Raw/hemp fibers (not spun) | Unprocessed hemp, not yet made into laces | β Raw Fiber |
π Key Reminder:
- If the hemp is twisted into a cord β Classify under 5607.
- If it is a flat lace or band intended specifically for shoes β Classify under 6307.90.50.
- Do not classify finished hemp shoelaces as raw fibers (5302); this is a common and costly error.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Additional Taxes & Policies)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: From November 10, 2025 (and subsequent imports)
π― 1. 5607.90.25.00 ββ Twisted Hemp Cordage
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25% (from USITC Footnote 9903.88.01) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% (targeting China/HK products, effective Nov 10, 2025) |
| Total Tax Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:5607.90.25.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Explanation:
- "USITC 25%" is the Section 301 tariff under the US Trade Act;
- "IEEPA 10%" is the additional tariff under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act targeting China;
- Total 35%, a moderate-to-high rate for textile accessories.
π― 2. 5607.90.35.00 ββ Other Hemp Cordage (Non-Twisted or Specific Band)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.4% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 38.4% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38.4% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:5607.90.35.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- This rate is higher than5607.90.25.00due to the 3.4% base tariff;
- Applies if the hemp lace is not twisted but still classified as cordage/rope-like.
π― 3. 6307.90.50.10 & 6307.90.50.20 ββ Made-Up Hemp Shoelaces (Non-Cotton)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 17.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 17.5% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:6307.90.50.10/.20 |
π Explanation:
- Significantly lower total rate (17.5%) compared to cordage classifications (35β38.4%);
- Recommended if the hemp shoelaces can be justified as "made-up textile articles" rather than "cordage";
- Must ensure the product is not twisted into a rope-like structure to qualify here.
π― 4. 5302.10.00.00 ββ Raw Hemp Fibers (Not for Shoelaces)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35.0% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:5302.10.00.00 |
π Warning:
- DO NOT use this code for finished shoelaces;
- This is for raw, unspun hemp fibers only;
- Misclassification can lead to severe penalties and cargo detention.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance)
β 1. Required Documentation Checklist
| Document | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Include fiber type (hemp), form (twisted/flat), width, length |
| β Product Photos (Labeled) | βοΈ | Show texture, packaging, and any branding |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Clearly state "Hemp Shoelaces" or "Natural Fiber Laces" |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Detail quantity, weight, and packaging type |
| β Fiber Content Certificate | βοΈ | Confirm 100% hemp or blend ratio to support classification |
β 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mnemonic)
π₯ "Twisted Rope? 5607. Flat Lace? 6307. Raw Fiber? Donβt Lie!"
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Consequence of Misclassification |
|---|---|---|
| Hemp laces are twisted cords | 5607.90.25.00 (35%) |
If declared as 6307 (17.5%) β Underpayment penalty |
| Hemp laces are flat bands | 6307.90.50.10/.20 (17.5%) |
If declared as 5607 (35%) β Overpayment, no refund |
| Raw hemp fibers | 5302.10.00.00 (35%) |
If declared as finished laces β Severe fraud allegations |
β 3. Special Cases Handling
| Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Organic Hemp Certification | Provide certificate to potentially support environmental claims, but does not change HS Code or Tax Rate |
| Hybrid Laces (Hemp + Cotton) | If cotton > hemp, may shift to cotton-based classification; consult customs broker |
| Small Quantity Samples | Still subject to 17.5β38.4% tariffs; de minimis exemption does not apply |
| Pre-Cutting/Lacing | If sold pre-cut for retail, classify as 6307 (17.5%) to save costs |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff | Certification | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 6307.90.50.20 |
17.5% (CN origin) | None required | 35β38.4% if classified as cordage |
| πͺπΊ EU | 5607.90 or 6307 |
4β6% | CE (if applicable) | No Section 301/IEEPA tariffs |
| π¨π³ China | 5607.90 or 6307 |
0β7% | N/A | Lower base rates |
| π¬π§ UK | 6307.90 |
6.5% | UKCA | Post-Brexit rules apply |
π Conclusion:
- USA has the highest effective tariff due to additional surcharges;
- Classification as "made-up textile article" (6307) saves ~17.5β21% in duties vs. "cordage" (5607);
- EU/UK have no political surcharges, making hemp laces more competitive in Europe.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfall Guide (Lessons from Real Cases)
β Mistake 1: Classifying flat hemp laces as "Twisted Cord" (5607)
π Result: Pay 35β38.4% instead of 17.5% β 100% overpayment!
β Mistake 2: Declaring finished shoelaces as "Raw Hemp Fiber" (5302)
π Result: Cargo rejected for misdeclaration; fines + storage fees!
β Mistake 3: Assuming "Natural Material" = Duty-Free
π Result: No tariff exemption exists for hemp textiles under current US-China trade policies!
β Mistake 4: Using "Shoelace" generically without specifying material/form
π Result: Customs audit risk; potential reclassification and penalties!
β Correct Approach:
"Hemp Shoelaces, Flat Band, Non-Cotton, Natural Fiber, For Footwear Use, Model XYZ, Organic Certified"
π― VII. Conclusion: Professional Declaration Saves Money!
π― Remember the Mnemonic:
πΉ "Twisted? 5607 (35%). Flat? 6307 (17.5%). Raw? 5302 (35%). Choose Wisely!"
πΉ "HS Code Determines Cost, 17.5% vs 35% Makes a Big Difference!"
π Pro Tip:
- If you have large import volumes, consider applying for a US Customs Ruling to confirm classification as 6307.90.50 (17.5%) vs 5607 (35%);
- For non-China origins (e.g., India, Vietnam, EU), tariffs drop significantly (often 0β6%), so supply chain diversification can reduce costs.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Contact a licensed customs broker + Provide product samples + Apply for HS Code Pre-Ruling
π Ensure your hemp shoelaces clear customs smoothly, minimize duties, and maximize profit!
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Percentage Point of Tariff Matters!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.