Leather Surface Disinfecting Wipes
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3401190000 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926909950 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3401115000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3808945010 | 40.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π§΄ Leather Surface Disinfecting Wipes
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand "Leather Disinfecting Wipes"?
Leather Surface Disinfecting Wipes are specialized hygiene products designed to clean and sanitize leather goods (such as furniture, automotive interiors, shoes, and bags). In international trade, they are primarily classified based on their material composition (non-woven fabric impregnated with chemicals) or their primary function (disinfection vs. cleaning).
Key Distinction:
- If the primary purpose is chemical disinfection (killing pathogens) and the wipes contain active biocidal agents β They may fall under Chapter 38 (Chemical Products).
- If the primary purpose is surface cleaning/maintenance using surfactants/soap β They may fall under Chapter 34 (Soaps, Cleaning Preparations).
- If the primary characteristic is the non-woven fabric container itself without strong chemical attribution β They may fall under Chapter 39 (Plastics/Other Material Articles).
β οΈ Critical Classification Point:
- Customs authorities often scrutinize whether the chemical content makes the product a "disinfectant" (Ch 38) or a "cleaning wipe" (Ch 34).
- Misclassification can lead to significant tariff differences (from 17.5% to 40%) and potential compliance risks.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Reference)
Based on the provided data, here are the four most likely HS Codes for Leather Surface Disinfecting Wipes, ranked by relevance and risk:
| HS Code | Product Description | Matching Criteria | Why This Code? |
|---|---|---|---|
3401.19.00.00 |
Other Soaps & Organic Surface Active Products (Impregnated Wipes) | Form: Wipes; Material: Non-woven fabric impregnated with surfactants/disinfectants. | Matches the definition of "impregnated/coated non-wovens" under Soaps/Cleaning Products. Assumes the surfactant/cleaning agent is the primary value driver. |
3926.90.99.50 |
Other Articles of Plastics & Plastic Materials (For Disinfection/Cleaning Dispensers/Wipes) | Usage: Disinfecting wipes; Material: Inferred plastic packaging or plastic-fiber blend material. | Fits if the classification leans towards the physical article (plastic/non-woven hybrid) rather than the chemical content. Often used for general hygiene plastic articles. |
3401.11.50.00 |
Soaps & Surface Active Products (Impregnated Coated with Soap/Cleaning Agents) | Form: Wipes; Content: Impregnated with cleaning agents; Use: Cleaning/Maintenance. | Specifically targets "non-wovens impregnated with soap or cleaning agents." Strong match for leather care wipes that focus on cleaning over strict biocidal disinfection. |
3808.94.50.10 |
Insecticides, Rodenticides, Fungicides, Herbicides, Disinfectants (Other Disinfectants) | Form: Wipes/Rags; Use: Disinfection; Material: Non-paper/non-woven (inferred). | High Risk/High Cost. If the product is primarily marketed as a biocidal disinfectant (killing bacteria/viruses), customs may classify it here. Matches "disinfectant" usage but excludes paper-based items. |
3926.90.99.89 |
Other Articles of Plastics & Plastic Materials (Miscellaneous) | Material: Plastic/Fiber blend; General Use: General purpose wipe. | A fallback category for plastic/fiber articles not specified elsewhere. Used if the chemical content is deemed secondary to the material structure. |
π Key Insight:
-3401codes are generally for cleaning/surfactant-based wipes.
-3808codes are for biocidal/disinfectant-based wipes.
-3926codes are for material-based articles where the chemical function is ambiguous or secondary.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Additional Taxes & Policies)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: Post-2025/2026 (Current Trade Environment)
β οΈ Note: All rates below include Section 301 (7.5%) and IEEPA (10%) additional tariffs for Chinese origin.
π― 1. 3401.19.00.00 ββ Soaps & Surface Active Products (Impregnated Wipes)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Tariff | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Additional Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 17.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 17.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Deny de minimis for goods under Section 301/IEEPA) |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3401.19.00.00 β 301 Footnote β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Explanation:
- This is the lowest risk code among the options if the product is viewed as a "cleaning wipe" with surfactants.
- The base rate is 0%, but the additional tariffs push the total to 17.5%.
π― 2. 3926.90.99.50 ββ Other Articles of Plastics (Hygiene/Disinfection Related)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.3% |
| Section 301 Tariff | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Additional Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 22.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3926.90.99.50 β 301 Footnote β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Explanation:
- Higher base rate (5.3%) due to classification as a plastic article.
- Suitable if the product is perceived as a "plastic-based hygiene article" rather than a chemical product.
π― 3. 3401.11.50.00 ββ Soaps & Cleaning Agents (Impregnated Non-Wovens)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Additional Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3401.11.50.00 β 301 Footnote (25%) β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Explanation:
- High Risk. While the base rate is 0%, the Section 301 tariff is 25% (higher than the 7.5% for other 3401/3901 items).
- This specific subheading often carries a higher additional duty burden under current trade policies. Avoid unless necessary.
π― 4. 3926.90.99.89 ββ Other Plastic Articles (Miscellaneous)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.3% |
| Section 301 Tariff | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Additional Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 22.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3926.90.99.89 β 301 Footnote β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Explanation:
- Same rate as3926.90.99.50. Used as a fallback for miscellaneous plastic/fiber wipes.
π― 5. 3808.94.50.10 ββ Disinfectants (Other Chemical Disinfectants)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.0% |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Additional Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 40.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 40.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3808.94.50.10 β 301 Footnote (25%) β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Explanation:
- Highest Tax Rate. If customs classifies the product strictly as a "disinfectant" (biocidal) under Chapter 38, you face the 25% Section 301 tariff.
- This is the most expensive classification. Only use if the product is primarily a biocidal agent and cannot be argued as a cleaning wipe.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Avoiding Pitfalls)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Essential)
| Document | Must Provide | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Composition Sheet | βοΈ | Detail % of surfactants, disinfectants, and non-woven fabric. Critical for Chapter 34 vs. 38 distinction. |
| β Safety Data Sheet (SDS) | βοΈ | Prove the nature of the chemicals. Is it a "cleaning agent" or a "biocide"? |
| β Product Photos (Open & Closed) | βοΈ | Show the wipe material (non-woven) and packaging. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Description: "Leather Care Wipes, Non-Woven, Impregnated with Cleaning Agent" (Avoid "Disinfectant" if aiming for Ch 34). |
| β Marketing Materials | βοΈ | Show "Cleaning" vs. "Disinfecting" claims. Emphasize "Leather Conditioner/Cleaner" over "Kills 99.9% Germs" if possible. |
| β Labeling | βοΈ | Ensure labels match the declared HS Code function. |
β 2. Classification Strategy (Key Tips)
π₯ "Cleaner Not Killer, Lower Tariff Follows!"
| Scenario | Recommended HS Code | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Product emphasizes: "Cleans, Softens, Maintains Leather" | 3401.19.00.00 or 3401.11.50.00 |
Focus on surfactants/cleaning agents. Lower risk if 301 rate is 7.5% (Ch 3401.19) vs 25% (Ch 3401.11). Best Option: 3401.19.00.00 (17.5%). |
| Product emphasizes: "Disinfects, Sanitizes, Kills Viruses" | 3808.94.50.10 |
High risk. Classifies as chemical disinfectant. Tax: 40%. Only use if mandatory. |
| Material is ambiguous | 3926.90.99.50 |
If chemical content is low or packaging is dominant. Tax: 22.8%. |
π Strategic Advice:
- Avoid3401.11.50.00if possible due to the 25% Section 301 tariff, despite being a cleaning product.
- Prefer3401.19.00.00(17.5%) as it combines a 0% base rate with only 7.5% + 10% additional tariffs.
- Do NOT use3808.94.50.10unless the product is exclusively a biocidal disinfectant. The 40% tax is prohibitive for most consumers.
β 3. Special Circumstances Handling
| Situation | Handling Suggestion |
|---|---|
| Dual Purpose (Clean + Disinfect) | Argue for Cleaning (Ch 34) if the primary consumer use is maintenance. Provide SDS showing low biocide concentration. |
| OEM/White Label | Ensure the supplierβs classification matches your claim. Request their technical data sheet. |
| Small Quantities (De Minimis) | β No Exemption. Goods under Section 301/IEEPA are not eligible for the $800 de minimis exemption. Duties apply from the first unit. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Outlook)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Estimated Total Tariff | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3401.19.00.00 |
17.5% (Best Case) | Avoid Ch 38 (40%) and Ch 3401.11 (35%). |
| π¨π³ China | 3401.19.00.00 |
~5-10% (Import) | Lower tariffs for domestic consumption; import duties vary. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3401.30.00 |
~4-6% | EU classifies wipes differently. No Section 301. |
| π¬π§ UK | 3401.30.00 |
~4-6% | Post-Brexit, aligns with EU structure. |
π Conclusion for US Market:
-3401.19.00.00is the optimal HS Code for Leather Disinfecting Wipes, balancing classification accuracy with the lowest possible tax burden (17.5%) under current US-China trade tensions.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Mistake 1: Declaring as "Disinfectant" (3808) |
π Result: 40% Tax. Avoid if the product is primarily a cleaner.
β Mistake 2: Using 3401.11.50.00 without checking Section 301 rates |
π Result: 35% Tax. This specific subheading carries a higher additional duty.
β Mistake 3: Assuming De Minimis applies |
π Result: Seizure or back taxes. Section 301/IEEPA goods are excluded from $800 exemption.
β Mistake 4: Vague Description "Wipes" |
π Result: Customs audit. Always specify: "Non-woven wipes impregnated with [Cleaner/Disinfectant] for leather use."
β Correct Declaration Example:
"Leather Care Wipes, Non-Woven Fabric, Impregnated with Surfactants & Conditioning Agents, for Cleaning & Maintaining Leather Surfaces. Not for Medical Disinfection."
π― VII. Conclusion: Smart Classification Saves Money!
π― Remember the Golden Rule:
πΉ "Cleaner > Disinfectant for Tax Savings."
πΉ Target3401.19.00.00(17.5%) instead of3808(40%) or3401.11(35%).
πΉ No De Minimis for Section 301 Goods. Plan for duties from day one.
π Pro Tip:
If your product contains high concentrations of quaternary ammonium compounds or other biocides, consult a customs broker to see if a HTSUS Exclusion or Advance Ruling is possible. For most consumer leather wipes, framing them as cleaning/maintenance products (Ch 34) is the safest and most cost-effective strategy.
π£ Action Required:
π Contact a Customs Broker to review your SDS and Marketing Claims.
π Update Product Labels to emphasize "Cleaning & Care" over "Disinfection" if possible.
π Optimize Your Supply Chain for the 17.5% tariff rate, not the 40% risk!
β¨ Professional Customs Clearance Starts with Precise Classification!
πΌ Every Percent Saved is Profit Earned!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.