Mobile Phone Holder
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926902500 | 24.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7326908688 | 87.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7326200090 | 88.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 8529909800 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 8529907700 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π± Mobile Phone Holder: The "HS Code Roulette" β Avoiding the 88% Tax Trap
π HS Code Reference & Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Customs Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Is Your Phone Holder Plastic or Metal?
A "Mobile Phone Holder" is a deceptively simple accessory. However, in international trade (especially US imports from China), material composition determines your destiny. The Customs classification is not based on "phone accessory" but strictly on the primary material and functional role of the item.
β οΈ Critical Distinction:
- Plastic Holders: Classified under Chapter 39 (Plastics). Generally lower base tariffs.
- Metal Holders (Iron/Steel): Classified under Chapter 73 (Iron/Steel). Subject to massive additional tariffs due to Section 301 & IEEPA provisions.
- Electronic/Device Parts: If integrated with circuitry, it might be misclassified as an electronic part (Chapter 85), but pure mechanical holders usually fall under plastics or metals.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Alignment)
Based on the provided data, here are the precise classifications for Mobile Phone Holders. Note the drastic tax differences between materials.
| HS Code | Product Description (Summary) | Material | Classification Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
3926.90.25.00 |
Plastic Phone Holder | Plastic | "Other plastic articles" β Bottom-down category for plastic goods. |
3926.90.99.89 |
Plastic/Metal Phone Holder | Plastic or Metal | "Other plastic articles" β Bottom-down category (Note: Often used if plastic is dominant or ambiguous). |
7326.90.86.88 |
Iron/Steel Phone Holder | Iron/Steel | "Other articles of iron or steel" β For ferrous metal holders. |
7326.20.00.90 |
Iron/Steel Phone Holder | Iron/Steel | "Other articles of iron or steel" β Bottom-down category for steel items. |
8529.90.98.00 |
Metal/Plastic Phone Holder | Metal/Plastic | "Parts of apparatus" β Classified as a part of a device (Risky if purely mechanical). |
8529.90.77.00 |
Metal/Plastic Phone Holder | Metal/Plastic | "Other parts/components" β Another electronic part category. |
π Key Insight:
- Plastic (3926...) is the safest and cheapest route for tariffs.
- Iron/Steel (7326...) triggers the highest taxes in the dataset.
- Electronic Parts (8529...) sit in the middle but carry risks of being flagged if the item is clearly a mechanical accessory rather than an electronic component.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β ηζζΆι΄: 2025εΉ΄11ζ10ζ₯θ΅· (Effective from Nov 10, 2025)
π― 1. 3926.90.25.00 ββ Plastic Mobile Phone Holder (Best Case Scenario)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 24.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 24% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β No (High tariff items are excluded from de minimis relief). |
π Explanation:
- This is the most favorable classification for plastic holders.
- The total burden is 24%, which is manageable compared to metal counterparts.
- Legal Path:Base TariffβSection 301βIEEPA:9903.01.25(122 Clause).
π― 2. 3926.90.99.89 ββ Plastic or Metal Phone Holder (Fallback Plastic Category)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.3% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 22.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.8% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β No |
π Explanation:
- Slightly lower total tax (22.8%) than3926.90.25.00due to a lower base rate (5.3% vs 6.5%).
- Use this if the item is a composite material where plastic is the defining characteristic, or if customs allows this "bottom-down" classification.
π― 3. 7326.90.86.88 ββ Iron/Steel Phone Holder (The 88% Trap!)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.9% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Steel/Aluminum/Copper Surcharge | +50% |
| Total Tax Rate | 87.9% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 87.9% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β No |
π Explanation:
- WARNING: This is an extremely high tariff.
- The 50% additional surcharge for Steel/Aluminum/Copper products under Section 301/IEEPA is the killer.
- Even though the base rate is low (2.9%), the cumulative effect makes it nearly impossible to compete on price.
- Legal Path:Base TariffβSection 301 (25%)βSteel Surcharge (50%)βIEEPA (10%).
π― 4. 7326.20.00.90 ββ Iron/Steel Phone Holder (Bottom-Down Steel)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.9% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Steel/Aluminum/Copper Surcharge | +50% |
| Total Tax Rate | 88.9% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 88.9% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β No |
π Explanation:
- Similar to the previous steel code but with a slightly higher base rate (3.9%).
- Total tax hits 88.9%.
- Avoid this classification for standard phone holders unless absolutely necessary.
π― 5. 8529.90.98.00 & 8529.90.77.00 ββ Electronic Parts Classification
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35.0% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β No |
π Explanation:
- If the holder is marketed as a "part of a communication device," it might fall here.
- Total tax is 35%.
- Risk: Customs may challenge this classification if the item is clearly a passive mechanical stand. If rejected, they will reclassify it to Plastic (24%) or Steel (88%).
- Strategy: Only use if the product has active electronic components (e.g., Bluetooth, wireless charging) integrated.
π οΈ IV. Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Guide)
β 1. Material Declaration is Key (The #1 Factor)
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Declaration | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic Holder | "Plastic Phone Stand" | "Steel Holder" | 88% Tax! |
| Metal Holder | "Iron Phone Mount" | "Plastic Holder" | 24% Tax vs 88% Tax (If caught, penalty + back tax). |
| Hybrid (Plastic Body, Metal Clip) | "Plastic Phone Holder with Metal Clip" | "Steel Holder" | Aim for 3926 (Plastic) if plastic is >50% by weight or essential character. |
π₯ Golden Rule:
"Plastic is King, Steel is King Killer, Electronic is Risky Middle!"
β 2. Documentation Checklist (Must-Have)
| Document | Required? | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Photos | βοΈ | Show clear material texture (matte plastic vs. metallic sheen). |
| β Bill of Materials (BOM) | βοΈ | List weights of plastic vs. metal components. Crucial for "Essential Character" determination. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Must explicitly state: "Mobile Phone Holder, Plastic" or "Iron/Steel". Do NOT use vague terms like "Gadget". |
| β Structure Diagram | βοΈ | If claiming 8529 (Electronic Part), prove it is a part of an electronic device. |
| β HS Code Pre-Ruling | βοΈ | Strongly Recommended for first-time shipments to avoid customs audits. |
β 3. Classification Strategy by Material
| Material Type | Recommended HS Code | Total Tax | Why? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Plastic | 3926.90.25.00 |
24.0% | Lowest tax among safe options. |
| Composite (Plastic Dominant) | 3926.90.99.89 |
22.8% | Slightly lower base rate, but ensure plastic is the main feature. |
| 100% Iron/Steel | 7326.90.86.88 |
87.9% | Avoid if possible. Only if design requires metal. |
| Active Electronic Holder | 8529.90.98.00 |
35.0% | Only if it has circuits/wireless charging. Otherwise, risk of reclassification. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Key Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3926.90.25.00 |
24.0% | Strict material declaration. Steel items hit 88%. |
| π¨π³ China | 3926.90.25.00 |
~6.5% | Standard import duty. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3926.90.99 |
0-4% | CE Marking required. No Section 301/IEEPA. |
| π¬π§ UK | 3926.90.99 |
0-4% | UKCA Marking required. |
π Conclusion:
- The US market is the most hostile for Chinese-made phone holders due to the Steel Surcharge.
- If you are selling in the US, optimize for Plastic to keep costs down.
- For Steel holders, the 88% tax may make the product uncompetitive unless priced significantly higher.
π VI. Common Errors & Pitfall Guide (Blood & Tears Lessons)
β Error 1: Calling a "Steel Phone Holder" a "Phone Stand" without specifying material.
π Result: Customs may assign a default high tariff or audit the shipment, leading to delays.
β Error 2: Classifying a plastic holder as 8529.90 (Electronic Part) to avoid Section 301.
π Result: Customs will reject it because it lacks electronic components. You will face penalties and be forced to pay the correct plastic tax (24%) + fines.
β Error 3: Ignoring the "Steel/Aluminum/Copper" surcharge for metal holders.
π Result: Budgeting for 25% tax when the real cost is 88%. This wipes out all profit margins.
β Correct Practice:
"Plastic Phone Holder, Model XYZ, 100% ABS Plastic, No Electronic Components"
(For Steel): "Metal Phone Mount, Type 304 Stainless Steel, Non-Electronic"
π― VII. Conclusion: Professional Classification Saves Money!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Plastic is Cheap (24%), Steel is Expensive (88%), Electronic is Risky (35%)."
πΉ "Declare Material Clearly, Or Pay the Penalty Twice!"
πΉ "Composite Goods: Essential Character Rules!"
π Pro Tip:
If your supplier offers both plastic and metal versions, choose plastic for the US market to save 64% in taxes.
If you must ship steel, consider shifting production to Vietnam or Mexico to avoid the China-specific surcharges (if applicable under current trade rules).
π£ Immediate Action:
π Contact your Customs Broker: Provide photos and material specs.
π Request a Pre-Ruling: Get an official HS Code determination before shipping.
π Optimize Your Supply Chain: Switch to plastic or composite designs to survive the 88% steel tariff.
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every 1% of Tax Saved is Pure Profit Added!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.