Mouse Traps
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4421919880 | 38.3% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7326908688 | 87.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7326200090 | 88.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4421999880 | 38.3% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π Mouse Traps: Strategic Classification & Clearance Guide (US Import 2026)
π HS Code Reference & Clearance Strategy | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Protocols
π Part 1: Product Definition & Classification Logic
Mouse traps, while seemingly simple, fall into distinct customs categories based strictly on their manufacturing material. In international trade, the "form" of the trap dictates the HS Code, which in turn determines the tariff burden. Misclassification can lead to severe penalties, especially given the high additional duties on Chinese goods entering the US.
The product is broadly categorized into three material groups: * Wood/Bamboo Traps: Traditional snap traps or cage traps made from natural fibers. * Plastic Traps: Modern, durable, or bait station-style traps made from polymer materials. * Metal Traps: Industrial or high-durability traps made from steel or iron wire.
β οΈ Critical Distinction:
- If the trap is predominantly wooden or bamboo βε½ε ₯ Chapter 44 (Wood Products).
- If the trap is predominantly plastic βε½ε ₯ Chapter 39 (Plastics).
- If the trap is predominantly iron/steel βε½ε ₯ Chapter 73 (Iron/Steel Articles).
Note: Mixed materials are classified based on the component that gives the good its essential character, usually the main structural frame.
π¦ Part 2: Detailed HS Code Classification (2026 Authoritative Mapping)
Based on the provided data, here is the precise mapping for Mouse Traps:
| HS Code | Material Description | Classification Summary | Essential Characteristic |
|---|---|---|---|
4421.91.98.80 |
Wooden/Bamboo | Other articles of wood; specifically bamboo other articles. | Primarily wooden or bamboo frame construction. |
4421.99.98.80 |
Wooden (General) | Other articles of wood (general category). | Wooden items not specifically listed elsewhere. |
3926.90.99.89 |
Plastic | Other articles of plastics and articles of other materials. | Primarily plastic casing or mechanism. |
7326.90.86.88 |
Iron/Steel (General) | Other articles of iron or steel (unspecified). | General iron/steel trap not meeting specific wire criteria. |
7326.20.00.90 |
Iron/Steel (Wire) | Articles of wire of iron or steel. | Constructed from iron/steel wire (cage type). |
π Key Insight:
- Wood & Bamboo fall under the same broad tax bracket (38.3%).
- Plastic offers the lowest total tax burden (22.8%).
- Metal (Steel/Iron) incurs the highest penalty due to specific steel/aluminum/copper tariffs (87.9% - 88.9%).
π° Part 3: 2026 Tariff Rate Breakdown (US Imports from China)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: Current regulations apply (Including Section 301 & 122 Clauses)
π― 1. Wooden/Bamboo Traps (4421.91.98.80 & 4421.99.98.80)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 3.3% |
| Section 301 Additional Duty | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Tax Rate | 38.3% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38.3% |
| Legal Basis | Standard HTSUS rates + Section 301 Footnotes + IEEPA/Section 122 provisions |
π Analysis:
- Wood products are moderately taxed. The 25% Section 301 duty significantly impacts profit margins.
- Strategy: Consider if the product can be marketed as "Bamboo" specifically to ensure correct sub-heading, though rates are currently identical.
π― 2. Plastic Traps (3926.90.99.89)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 5.3% |
| Section 301 Additional Duty | +7.5% |
| Section 122 Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Tax Rate | 22.8% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.8% |
| Legal Basis | Standard HTSUS rates + Lower Section 301 bracket for plastics |
π Analysis:
- Most Cost-Effective Option: Plastic traps attract a lower Section 301 rate (7.5%) compared to wood or metal.
- Recommendation: If product design allows, utilizing plastic components for the main structure can reduce total duties by ~15.5% compared to wooden traps.
π― 3. Metal Traps β General (7326.90.86.88)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 2.9% |
| Section 301 Additional Duty | +25.0% |
| Steel/Aluminum/Copper Surcharge | +50.0% |
| Section 122 Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Tax Rate | 87.9% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 87.9% |
| Legal Basis | Standard HTSUS + Section 301 + High Tier Steel Surcharge |
π Analysis:
- Extremely High Cost: The 50% surcharge on "Steel, Aluminum, Copper products" makes general metal traps prohibitively expensive for US import.
- Risk: Do not ship metal traps without verifying if they qualify for a lower tier.
π― 4. Metal Traps β Wire/Cage Type (7326.20.00.90)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty Rate | 3.9% |
| Section 301 Additional Duty | +25.0% |
| Steel/Aluminum/Copper Surcharge | +50.0% |
| Section 122 Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Tax Rate | 88.9% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 88.9% |
| Legal Basis | Standard HTSUS + Section 301 + High Tier Steel Surcharge |
π Analysis:
- Highest Penalty: Wire traps (often used for live catch) are classified under "Articles of wire of iron or steel." They incur the full brunt of all taxes.
- Warning: An 88.9% duty rate will likely destroy margins. Avoid this classification if possible.
π οΈ Part 4: Practical Clearance Recommendations (Pitfall Avoidance)
β 1. Material Verification Checklist
| Document | Requirement | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Bill of Materials (BOM) | βοΈ Required | Must explicitly state % of wood, plastic, and metal. Customs uses this to determine "Essential Character." |
| Product Photos | βοΈ Required | High-res images showing the main structural frame. |
| Supplier Declaration | βοΈ Required | Written confirmation that the trap is made of [Wood/Plastic/Metal]. |
| Commercial Invoice | βοΈ Required | Must list HS Code and precise material description (e.g., "Plastic Mouse Trap," not just "Mouse Trap"). |
β 2. Strategic Classification Tips
π₯ Golden Rule: "Material Dictates Duty; Plastic is King for Margins!"
| Scenario | Correct Classification | Duty Rate | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trap is 90% Plastic | 3926.90.99.89 |
22.8% | β Best for Profit |
| Trap is Wood Frame + Plastic Bait | 4421.91.98.80 (Usually) |
38.3% | β οΈ Moderate Cost |
| Trap is Steel Wire Cage | 7326.20.00.90 |
88.9% | β Avoid if Possible |
| Mixed Metal/Plastic Trap | Depends on Primary Structure | Varies | β οΈ High Risk of Re-classification |
β 3. Special Case Handling
| Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| OEM Custom Designs | Provide engineering drawings to prove if the "frame" is plastic or wood, even if metal springs are used. Springs do not define the classification. |
| Packaging Materials | Ensure packaging (cardboard/plastic bags) is not included in the duty valuation if possible, or ensure it is minor accessory. |
| "Eco-Friendly" Claims | Marketing a wooden trap as "eco-friendly" does not change the HS Code. Stick to factual material descriptions. |
π Part 5: Global Market Comparison (2026 Overview)
| Region | Preferred HS Code | Est. Duty (China Origin) | Key Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3926.90.99.89 (Plastic) |
22.8% | None specific for traps | Metal traps face ~88% duty. Plastic is strategic. |
| π¨π³ China | 3926.90.99.89 |
~5-10% (Local) | CCC (if electrical) | Low barrier, high competition. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3926.90.99 |
~4.5% | REACH (Chemicals in plastic) | Lower base tariffs, no Section 301. |
| π¬π§ UK | 3926.90.99 |
~4.5% | UKCA Marking | Post-Brexit rules similar to EU but distinct. |
| π¦πΊ Australia | 3926.90.99 |
~5.0% | ACCC Standards | Low tariffs, strict safety standards. |
π Conclusion:
- The US market is uniquely punitive on metal and wood products due to Section 301 and specific surcharges.
- Plastic traps are the only viable high-margin option for the US market among the three main types.
- For other markets (EU/Asia), material preference is driven by environmental regulations (REACH) rather than duty costs.
π Part 6: Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Error 1: Classifying a Steel Wire Cage as "General Steel Articles" to avoid the 50% surcharge.
π Consequence: Customs will reclassify as 7326.20.00.90 + Back taxes + Penalties. The 88.9% rate is rigid for wire products.
β Error 2: Labeling a Wooden Trap as "Plastic" because the bait holder is plastic.
π Consequence: Rejected at border for misdeclaration. Material is determined by the main frame.
β Error 3: Ignoring Section 122 Duties.
π Consequence: Forgetting the 10% additional duty leads to underpayment. All categories in the data include this 10% levy.
β Error 4: Splitting shipments (Wood frame, Plastic bait) without declaration.
π Consequence: Customs may view the product as complex and assign the higher duty rate (Metal or Wood) depending on the "essential character" interpretation.
β Correct Practice:
"Plastic Mouse Trap, Non-Electric, 10-count Pack, Model XYZ. Material: 100% Polypropylene Frame."
Use the plastic HS Code (3926.90.99.89) to secure the 22.8% rate.
π― Part 7: Conclusion: Optimize for Material, Maximize Profit
π― Remember theε£θ― (Mantra):
πΉ "Plastic is Cheap, Wood is Middle, Metal is Dead (88%+)."
πΉ "Check the Frame, Not the Spring; Duty Rates Vary Wildly."
πΉ "Section 301 + 122 = High Cost; Material Choice is Your Shield."
π Pro Tip:
If your design allows, switch from Metal/Wood to Plastic for the US market. The 15.5% - 66% duty savings per unit can make the difference between profit and loss.
Consult a licensed customs broker to request a Pre-Ruling (HTSUS Advisory) if your product has mixed materials.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Verify material composition with your supplier.
π Update product listings to reflect accurate material descriptions.
πΌ Select HS Code3926.90.99.89if your trap is plastic-based to minimize US import costs.
β¨ Professional Clearance, Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Percentage Point Saved is Pure Profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.