Plant Protection Insecticide
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2827399050 | 10.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3808913000 | 40.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3808915001 | 40.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 2942003500 | 41.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3105900050 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
πΏ Plant Protection Insecticide (Chemical Pest Control Agents)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Compliance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly Is a "Plant Protection Insecticide"?
"Plant Protection Insecticide" is a broad trade term for chemicals designed to control, repel, or mitigate pests that damage crops, ornamental plants, or stored goods. In international trade, the classification depends strictly on two factors: 1. Chemical Nature: Is it an inorganic compound (mineral-based) or an organic compound (carbon-based)? 2. Formulation & Purpose: Is it a pure chemical, a formulated pesticide (insecticide), or a fertilizer with insecticidal properties?
β οΈ Critical Distinction:
- If the product is a pure inorganic chemical (e.g., sulfur, copper sulfate) without specific pesticidal formulation claims β It may fall under Chapter 28 (Inorganic Chemicals).
- If it is a formulated product specifically labeled/used as an insecticide/pesticide β It generally falls under Chapter 38 (Miscellaneous Chemical Products).
- If it is primarily a fertilizer that also suppresses pests β It may fall under Chapter 31 (Fertilizers).
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Matrix (Based on Provided Data)
| HS Code | Classification Logic | Tax Rate | Key Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
2827.39.90.50 |
Inorganic Chlorides/Bromides | +10.0% | Inferred as an inorganic compound based on chemical attributes. Falls under Chapter 28 (Inorganic Chemicals). |
3808.91.30.00 |
Insecticides (Inorganic Basis) | +40.0% | Explicitly identified as containing inorganic materials with insecticidal use. Matches Chapter 38 requirements for pesticides. |
3808.91.50.01 |
Insecticides (Formulated) | +40.0% | Matches Chapter 38 insecticide category. Identified by its specific pesticidal function and chemical formulation. |
2942.00.35.00 |
Organic Compounds (Misc) | +41.5% | Inferred as an organic compound. No material or form conflict detected. Classified under Chapter 29 (Organic Chemicals). |
3105.90.00.50 |
Fertilizers (Other) | +35.0% | Inferred as a fertilizer based on common sense. Contains N/P/K minerals/chemicals; "pest inhibitor" seen as secondary benefit. |
π° III. 2026 Tariff Rate Breakdown (Detailed Tax Clauses)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: From Nov 10, 2025 (and onwards)
π― 1. 2827.39.90.50 β Inorganic Chlorides/Bromides
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Tariff (122 Clause) | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | +35.0% (Note: Data shows "Total Tax: +10.0%" but details list Base 0 + 301 25% + IEEPA 10% = 35%. However, the summary explicitly states +10.0%. We will adhere strictly to the provided data's total_tax field: +10.0% as per the input constraint, but note the detail lists 301+IEEPA. Let's re-read carefully.)Correction based on strict data adherence: The data says total_tax: "+10.0%" and tax_detail: "εΊη‘ε
³η¨: , ε εΎε
³η¨: 25.0%,122ζ‘ζ¬Ύε
³η¨10%". This is contradictory in standard math (0+25+10=35). However, the prompt asks to explain why it is classified and the tax. I must report what is in <DATA>. The total_tax field says +10.0%. The tax_detail says 301 is 25% and IEEPA is 10%. This might be a data artifact. I will report the Total Tax as +10.0% as per the explicit summary, but clarify the components in the detail.*(Self-Correction: Looking at other entries, 3808.91.30.00 has Total 40% and Details 5+25+10=40. So the math holds there. For 2827.39.90.50, Base is empty (0?), 301 is 25%, IEEPA is 10%. Sum is 35%. But Total says 10%. This is a data inconsistency. I will state the Total Tax as +10.0% as explicitly written in the total_tax field, but note the components from tax_detail.)*Actually, let's look at the "Summary" field. It says "Inferred as inorganic...". Decision: I will list the Total Tax as +10.0% because that is the final calculated value in the total_tax key, even if the components seem to add up to 35%. This is the safest adherence to the provided JSON.*(Wait, looking at 2942.00.35.00: Total 41.5%. Details: 6.5 + 25 + 10 = 41.5. Math works. 3105.90.00.50: Total 35%. Details: 0 + 25 + 10 = 35. Math works. 2827.39.90.50: Total 10.0%. Details: Base empty, 301 25%, IEEPA 10%. Math = 35%. Why is Total 10%? Perhaps Base is -15%? Or the data is flawed. I will report the Total Tax as +10.0%* as per the total_tax field, but I will quote the components.) |
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 2827.39.90.50 |
| Classification | Inorganic Chemicals (Chlorides/Bromides) |
| Basis | Inferred material property as inorganic compound |
| Total Tax Rate | +10.0% |
| Tax Components | Base: Unspecified (likely 0), Section 301: 25%, IEEPA (122 Clause): 10% |
π Explanation:
- Classified under Chapter 28 because the product is inferred to be an inorganic chemical rather than a formulated pesticide. - Warning: If this is actually a formulated insecticide, misclassification here could lead to penalties. The low total tax (10%) suggests a preferential or specific duty calculation, or a data anomaly in the source.
π― 2. 3808.91.30.00 β Insecticides (Inorganic Basis)
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 3808.91.30.00 |
| Classification | Insecticides, Pesticides, Fungicides, etc. |
| Basis | Product name explicitly mentions inorganic material and insecticidal use. Fully meets Chapter 38 criteria. |
| Total Tax Rate | +40.0% |
| Tax Components | Base: 5.0%, Section 301: 25.0%, IEEPA (122 Clause): 10.0% |
π Explanation:
- This is the most likely correct classification for most commercial insecticides. - Chapter 38 covers "Miscellaneous Chemical Products," and heading 3808 specifically covers insecticides. - The high tax rate (40%) reflects the Section 301 and IEEPA surcharges on Chinese chemical imports.
π― 3. 3808.91.50.01 β Insecticides (Formulated)
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 3808.91.50.01 |
| Classification | Insecticides, Pesticides, Fungicides, etc. |
| Basis | Explicit insecticidal use matches Chapter 38. Inorganic nature fits chemical formulation characteristics. |
| Total Tax Rate | +40.0% |
| Tax Components | Base: 5.0%, Section 301: 25.0%, IEEPA (122 Clause): 10.0% |
π Explanation:
- Similar to3808.91.30.00, this is a high-tax classification. - The distinction between30.00and50.01often lies in the specific chemical composition or physical form (e.g., dust vs. liquid), but both attract the same total tax burden.
π― 4. 2942.00.35.00 β Organic Compounds (Miscellaneous)
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 2942.00.35.00 |
| Classification | Organic Chemicals |
| Basis | Inferred as an organic compound with no material or form conflicts. |
| Total Tax Rate | +41.5% |
| Tax Components | Base: 6.5%, Section 301: 25.0%, IEEPA (122 Clause): 10.0% |
π Explanation:
- If the insecticide is based on organic chemistry (e.g., pyrethroids, neonicotinoids), it may fall here. - This has the highest total tax rate (+41.5%) among the options, making it the most expensive classification for importers.
π― 5. 3105.90.00.50 β Fertilizers (Other)
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 3105.90.00.50 |
| Classification | Fertilizers |
| Basis | Common-sense inference: Plant pest inhibitors often contain N, P, K minerals. Classified as "Other Fertilizers." |
| Total Tax Rate | +35.0% |
| Tax Components | Base: 0.0%, Section 301: 25.0%, IEEPA (122 Clause): 10.0% |
π Explanation:
- This classification is risky. If the primary purpose is pest control, not nutrition, customs may reject this. - However, it offers a lower base tariff (0%), resulting in a moderate total tax of 35%.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice
β 1. Document Preparation Checklist
| Document | Required? | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Product Spec Sheet | β Yes | Detail chemical composition (Organic vs. Inorganic). |
| MSDS (Safety Data Sheet) | β Yes | Critical for hazardous chemical classification. |
| EPA Registration Number | β Yes | If imported into the US, the product must be EPA-registered for pesticide claims. |
| Certificate of Analysis (COA) | β Yes | To prove purity and chemical structure. |
| Commercial Invoice | β Yes | Clearly state "Insecticide" or "Plant Protection Chemical" and HS Code. |
β 2. Strategic Recommendations
- Confirm EPA Registration: For any product claiming insecticidal properties, US EPA registration is mandatory. Without it, the shipment will be seized. Ensure the EPA Reg. No. is on the label and invoice.
- Chemical Structure Verification:
- If Inorganic: Aim for
3808.91.30.00(40% tax). - If Organic: Prepare for
2942.00.35.00(41.5% tax) or check if it fits3808(40% tax) if formulated. - Avoid
2827unless it is a pure mineral salt (like Sulfur) with no pesticide formulation.
- If Inorganic: Aim for
- Do Not Misclassify as Fertilizer (
3105): Only use3105.90.00.50if the product is primarily a fertilizer with secondary pest control benefits. Misclassifying a pure pesticide as fertilizer can result in penalties and detention by USDA/EPA. - Leverage the 10% IEEPA Tariff: All classifications are subject to the 10% IEEPA (122 Clause) tariff on Chinese goods. There is no exemption shown in the data. Plan cash flow accordingly.
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026)
| Market | Recommended HS Code | Est. Total Tax (China Origin) | Key Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3808.91.30.00 |
40.0% | EPA Registration is Mandatory. |
| π¨π³ China | 3808.91.30.00 |
~5-10% (Domestic) | Pesticide License |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3808.94 (Similar) |
~0-6% + VAT | EFSA Approval (Complex) |
| π―π΅ Japan | 3808.91 (Similar) |
~6-10% | Ministry of Agriculture Approval |
π Conclusion:
The USA market imposes significant tariffs (35-41.5%) on these products due to Section 301 and IEEPA policies. Compliance with EPA regulations is the biggest non-tariff barrier.
π VI. Common Pitfalls & Avoidance Guide
β Pitfall 1: Assuming all "plant protection" products are fertilizers.
π Consequence: Customs rejection, EPA violation, fines.
β
Fix: Use 3808 for insecticides, 3105 only for fertilizers.
β Pitfall 2: Ignoring the Organic vs. Inorganic distinction.
π Consequence: Wrong HS Code β Audit risk.
β
Fix: Provide a detailed Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) Number on documents.
β Pitfall 3: Not accounting for the 10% IEEPA Tariff.
π Consequence: Under-budgeted landing cost.
β
Fix: Add 10% to your duty calculation for all Chinese-origin chemical imports.
π― VII. Final Verdict
π― Key Takeaway:
πΉ Insecticides = Chapter 38 (
3808) is the safest bet.
πΉ Tax Rate = 40% (Base 5% + 301 25% + IEEPA 10%).
πΉ Critical Doc = EPA Registration Number.
π£ Immediate Action:
- Verify EPA Registration.
- Confirm Chemical Structure (Organic vs. Inorganic).
- Prepare MSDS and COA.
- Budget for 40% Total Duty (for
3808codes).
β¨ Professional Customs Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Protect Your Margin, Comply with Regulations, Ship with Confidence!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.