Plastic Sports Shoes
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6402191520 | 22.6% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6402191541 | 22.6% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6404112060 | 20.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6402993145 | 16.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
πββοΈ Plastic Sports Shoes β Comprehensive HS Code & Tariff Guide (2026 Edition)
π HS Code Classification & Customs Clearance Strategy | 2026 Updated Tariff Rules | Expert-Level Import Planning
π One: Product Definition & Classification β What Exactly Are "Plastic Sports Shoes"?
Plastic sports shoes are athletic footwear where plastic materials play a dominant role in key structural components β particularly the outsole and upper (shoe face) β and are designed for performance, durability, and lightweight use in sports or fitness activities.
These are not general-purpose shoes. They are specifically categorized based on material composition, structural design, and functional classification under the Harmonized System (HS).
β οΈ Key Classification Clue:
- If the outsole and upper are made of plastic and the shoe is intended for sports use, it falls under 6402.19.15 or 6404.11.20.
- If the plastic is only a minor component, it may be classified elsewhere (e.g., 6402.99.31).
- No "plastic" label alone determines classification β function and material dominance do.
π¦ Two: HS Code Breakdown (2026 Official Tariff Matrix)
| HS Code | Product Description | Material Focus | Sports Use? | Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
6402.19.15.20 |
Plastic material footwear, sport shoes category | Plastic upper & outsole | β Yes | 22.6% |
6402.19.15.41 |
Plastic outsole and upper, sport shoe type | Plastic sole + plastic upper | β Yes | 22.6% |
6404.11.20.60 |
Plastic material sport shoes, reasonable material inference | Plastic components, sport use | β Yes | 20.5% |
6402.99.31.45 |
Plastic upper footwear, other category features | Plastic upper only, non-sport or mixed | β No (or unclear) | 16.0% |
π Critical Insight:
-6402.19.15.20and6402.19.15.41are identical in classification β both refer to plastic sport shoes with plastic outsoles and uppers.
-6404.11.20.60applies when plastic is used in a reasonable, expected way for sport shoes β even if not 100% plastic.
-6402.99.31.45is lower tax but only applies if the plastic is not the dominant structural element.
π° Three: 2026 U.S. Tariff Breakdown (With Full Legal Basis)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: November 10, 2025 (with retroactive enforcement)
π― 1. 6402.19.15.20 β Plastic Material Sport Shoes (Plastic Upper & Outsole)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.1% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 (USITC) Additional Duty | +7.5% |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Additional Duty | +10% |
| Total Effective Rate | 22.6% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.6% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No (denied under 19 CFR Β§ 10.18) |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:6402.19.15.20 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Explanation:
- 7.5% Section 301: Imposed under the U.S. Trade Act of 1974, targeting Chinese goods with unfair trade practices.
- 10% Section 122 (IEEPA): From the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, targeting goods from China, Hong Kong, and Macau.
- Total = 22.6% β highly punitive for plastic-heavy sport footwear.
π― 2. 6402.19.15.41 β Plastic Outsole & Upper, Sport Shoe Type
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.1% |
| Section 301 (USITC) Additional Duty | +7.5% |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Additional Duty | +10% |
| Total Effective Rate | 22.6% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Γ 22.6% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:6402.19.15.41 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- Identical to 6402.19.15.20 β same tariff treatment.
- Even if the plastic is used in separate parts, as long as both outsole and upper are plastic and sport-oriented, 22.6% applies.
π― 3. 6404.11.20.60 β Plastic Material Sport Shoes (Reasonable Material Inference)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 10.5% |
| Section 301 (USITC) Additional Duty | +0.0% (No 301 duty applied) |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Additional Duty | +10% |
| Total Effective Rate | 20.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Γ 20.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β 6404.11.20.60 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Why Lower?
- This code applies when plastic is used in a way that is reasonable and consistent with sport shoe design, but not necessarily dominant.
- No 301 duty β because this code is not listed under the 301 List.
- Still subject to 10% IEEPA β the core China-specific tariff.
π― 4. 6402.99.31.45 β Plastic Upper Footwear, Other Category Features
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 6.0% |
| Section 301 (USITC) Additional Duty | +0.0% |
| Section 122 (IEEPA) Additional Duty | +10% |
| Total Effective Rate | 16.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Γ 16.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β 6402.99.31.45 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π When to Use This Code?
- Only if plastic is used in the upper only, and the shoe is not clearly sport-oriented.
- If the shoe is not designed for athletic use, or plastic is not the main structural material, this is the lowest tax option.
- No 301 duty β because itβs not in the targeted sport shoe category.
π οΈ Four: Customs Clearance Best Practices (Pro Tips)
β 1. Required Documentation (Must-Have Checklist)
| Document | Required? | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Shows material composition, structure, intended use |
| β Technical Drawings / 3D Models | βοΈ | Proves plastic is used in outsole/upper |
| β High-Res Product Photos (with labels) | βοΈ | Critical for customs visual inspection |
| β Third-Party Test Reports | βοΈ | ASTM, ISO, CE, or RoHS (if applicable) |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Must state: "Plastic Sport Shoes, Designed for Athletic Use" |
| β Certificate of Origin (CO) | βοΈ | If from China, confirms origin for IEEPA/301 |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Shows full shoe unit, noζε (no disassembly) |
β 2.η³ζ₯ζε·§ (η³ζ₯ε£θ―)
π₯ βPlastic dominant? Sport use? β 6402.19.15 β 22.6%β
π₯ βPlastic in reasonable design? β 6404.11.20 β 20.5%β
π₯ βPlastic only in upper? Not sporty? β 6402.99.31 β 16.0%β
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Wrong Code | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic outsole + plastic upper, for running | 6402.19.15.20 |
6402.99.31.45 |
Tax increase by 6.6% |
| Plastic upper only, casual style | 6402.99.31.45 |
6402.19.15.20 |
Tax overcharged by 6.6% |
| Plastic used in sport shoe, but not dominant | 6404.11.20.60 |
6402.19.15.20 |
Tax overcharged by 2.1% |
β 3. Special Cases & Solutions
| Scenario | Recommended Action |
|---|---|
| OEM/White Label Shoes | Provide design specs + order proof to avoid "non-standard" classification |
| Shoes with Partial Plastic + Rubber | Use 6404.11.20.60 if plastic is reasonable and expected |
| Shoes for Fitness, Not Sports | Still qualify as sport shoes if used for athletic activity |
| Shoes with Plastic Laces or Decor | Ignore β not structural; doesnβt affect classification |
π Five: Global Market Tariff Comparison (2026)
| Country | Recommended HS Code | Tariff | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 6402.19.15.20 |
22.6% | FCC, CE, RoHS | IEEPA + 301 = high cost |
| π¨π³ China | 6402.19.15.20 |
5% | CCC | No extra duties |
| πͺπΊ EU | 6402.19.15.20 |
0% | CE | No 301/IEEPA |
| π¦πΊ Australia | 6402.19.15.20 |
5% | RCM | No extra duties |
| π―π΅ Japan | 6402.19.15.20 |
0% | PSE | No extra duties |
π Takeaway:
- The U.S. is the only market imposing 301 + IEEPA on plastic sport shoes.
- China-origin goods face the highest cost in the U.S. β 22.6%.
- Consider relocating production to Vietnam, Mexico, or Thailand to avoid IEEPA/301.
π Six: Common Mistakes & How to Avoid Them
β Mistake 1: Using 6402.99.31.45 for sport shoes with plastic outsoles
π Result: Tax undercharged β back taxes + penalties
β Mistake 2: Claiming "plastic shoes" without proof of material use
π Result: Customs may reclassify β higher duty + delay
β Mistake 3: Splitting shoe into parts (sole, upper, insole)
π Result: Each part may face 89.5%+ tax β total over 200%
β Mistake 4: Using vague terms like βplastic footwearβ
π Result: Classification error β rejection or seizure
β Correct Declaration Phrase:
"Plastic Sports Shoes, with Plastic Outsole and Upper, Designed for Running and Fitness, Model XYZ, ASTM F2913-20 Certified"
π― Seven: Final Verdict β Smart Importing Starts with Accurate HS Code
π― Golden Rule:
πΉ "Plastic + Sport + Outsole + Upper = 6402.19.15 β 22.6%"
πΉ "Plastic in reasonable design β 6404.11.20 β 20.5%"
πΉ "Plastic only in upper, not sporty β 6402.99.31 β 16.0%"
πΉ "Splitting = Disaster β 89.5%+ per part!"
π Pro Tip:
If your shoes are produced in Vietnam, Mexico, or Thailand, you may qualify for IEEPA exemption β tariff drops to 0%β5%.
π Action Step:
β Contact a customs broker with pre-ruling experience
β Submit product photos + specs for HS Code pre-approval
β Avoid surprises β declare right the first time!
π£ Ready to Ship?
π Your plastic sports shoes deserve a smooth, low-cost journey to market!
πΌ Precision classification = Lower taxes = Faster clearance = More profit!
β¨ Expert-Level Clearance Starts Here
πΌ Your next shipment shouldnβt be a gamble β make it a strategy.
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.