Plastic/Leather Composite Wood Sole Sandals
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6405100090 | 27.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6405909060 | 22.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6405100030 | 27.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π©΄ Plastic/Leather Composite Wood Sole Sandals
π HS Code Classification & 2026 US Import Tax Guide | Precision Duty Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification Logic
This product is not a simple "leather sandal" or "plastic footwear." It is a composite material footwear item with specific construction features that dictate its HS Code and tax burden:
- Material Composition: A blend of Plastic + Leather for the upper.
- Sole Construction: Wooden Sole (Platform or non-platform).
- Key Classification Trigger: The presence of a wooden sole combined with plastic/leather composite upper places it in the "Other Footwear" category, distinct from standard rubber/plastic sole sandals or pure leather shoes.
β οΈ Critical Distinction:
- If the sole were Rubber/Plastic (even with a wooden look): It would fall under 6402.
- If the sole is Solid Wood: It falls under 6405 or 6403 (depending on platform structure).
- Composite Upper: The mix of plastic/leather often pushes it to the "Other" sub-categories within 6405 or 6403.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Matrix (Based on Your Data)
| HS Code | Product Summary (From Data) | Key Features | Total Tax (US) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6405.90.90.60 | Plastic/Leather Composite, Wood Sole Sandals | Upper: Plastic/Leather Mix Sole: Wood Type: Sandal |
22.5% |
| 6403.99.20.60 | Wood Sole Platform Shoes (Leather/Plastic) | Upper: Leather/Plastic Sole: Wood (Platform feature implied) Type: Wood Sole Platform |
18.0% |
| 6405.10.00.90 | Leather/Synthetic Leather, Wood Sole | Upper: Leather/Synthetic Sole: Wood Type: Other Footwear |
27.5% |
| 6402.99.23.90 | Wood Sole + Plastic (Platform/Rubber/Plastic Mix) | Upper: Plastic Sole: Wood + Plastic Mix Type: Rubber/Plastic & Wood |
25.5% |
| 6402.99.23.60 | Plastic + Wood Sole (Specific Restriction) | Upper: Plastic Sole: Wood (Restricted) Type: Rubber/Plastic & Wood |
25.5% |
π Analysis:
The specific classification depends on the exact blend ratio of plastic/leather and whether the wooden sole is a "platform" or a simple "flat" sole.
- Sandal classification strongly points to 6405.90.90.60 (22.5%).
- Platform/Heel structure may shift it to 6403.99.20.60 (18.0%).
π° III. 2026 Tax Rate Breakdown (Detailed Policy Analysis)
β Market: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Status: Active (2025-2026 Import Cycle)
π― Scenario A: 6405.90.90.60 (Plastic/Leather Sandals)
Most likely for standard "Plastic/Leather Composite Wood Sole Sandals"
| Tax Component | Rate | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 12.5% | General Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) Rate |
| Section 301 (Added Tax) | 0.0% | Note: No Section 301 additional tax applied to this specific sub-code in the provided data. |
| Section 122 (China) | 10.0% | IEEPA Section 122 (Specific to China-origin footwear) |
| TOTAL EFFECTIVE RATE | 22.5% | (12.5% + 0% + 10%) |
π Strategic Insight:
This is the lowest tax bracket in your dataset for this product type. The absence of "Section 301" (7.5% or 25%) makes it highly cost-effective compared to other codes.
π― Scenario B: 6403.99.20.60 (Wood Sole Platform Shoes)
| Tax Component | Rate | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 8.0% | Lower MFN Rate for Wood Sole Platforms |
| Section 301 (Added Tax) | 0.0% | No Section 301 |
| Section 122 (China) | 10.0% | IEEPA Section 122 |
| TOTAL EFFECTIVE RATE | 18.0% | (8.0% + 0% + 10%) |
π Strategic Insight:
If the sandal has a platform or heel (making it a "platform shoe"), this is the absolute cheapest option at 18.0%.
π― Scenario C: 6405.10.00.90 (Leather/Synthetic, Wood Sole)
If "Plastic" is minimal and classified as "Synthetic Leather"
| Tax Component | Rate | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 10.0% | Standard Leather Shoe Rate |
| Section 301 (Added Tax) | 7.5% | Additional 301 Tariff |
| Section 122 (China) | 10.0% | IEEPA Section 122 |
| TOTAL EFFECTIVE RATE | 27.5% | (10% + 7.5% + 10%) |
β οΈ Warning:
This is the highest tax bracket (27.5%). If your product has significant plastic content, misclassifying it as "Synthetic Leather" will cost you an extra 5%.
π― Scenario D: 6402.99.23.90 / 6402.99.23.60 (Rubber/Plastic Sole Mix)
If the "Wood Sole" is actually a composite of Wood + Plastic/Rubber
| Tax Component | Rate | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 8.0% | Rubber/Plastic Base |
| Section 301 (Added Tax) | 7.5% | High 301 Tariff |
| Section 122 (China) | 10.0% | IEEPA Section 122 |
| TOTAL EFFECTIVE RATE | 25.5% | (8% + 7.5% + 10%) |
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Strategy & Action Plan
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Mandatory)
| Document | Requirement | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Product Description | "Plastic/Leather Composite Upper, Solid Wood Sole Sandal" | Must explicitly state "Wood Sole" to trigger 6405/6403 vs 6402. |
| Material Composition Report | % of Plastic vs. Leather | Determines if it falls under 6405.90 (Composite) or 6405.10 (Synthetic). |
| Sole Construction Photos | Side view showing wood grain/structure | Proves "Wood Sole" to avoid 6402 (Rubber/Plastic) misclassification. |
| Bill of Materials (BOM) | Explicitly list "Wooden Sole" | Critical for Section 122 tax calculation. |
| Country of Origin Cert | Certificate of Origin (China) | Required to apply 122 Tax. |
β 2. Classification Optimization (The "Cost-Saving" Move)
Goal: Achieve 18.0% or 22.5% tax instead of 27.5%.
| Strategy | Action | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Maximize "Sandals" Definition | Ensure the product fits the legal definition of "Sandals" (open toe, strapped) to qualify for 6405.90.90.60. | Tax: 22.5% |
| Highlight "Platform" Feature | If the wooden sole is elevated, market as "Wood Sole Platform" to qualify for 6403.99.20.60. | Tax: 18.0% (Best!) |
| Avoid "Synthetic Leather" Label | If the plastic content is >50%, DO NOT label as "Synthetic Leather" (6405.10) or risk the 27.5% rate. | Avoid Tax: 27.5% |
| Prevent "Rubber/Plastic" Mix | Ensure the sole is 100% Wood (or wood-core) to avoid 6402 codes. | Avoid Tax: 25.5% |
π₯ Pro Tip:
"If the sole is wooden, emphasize 'Wood Sole' in the commercial invoice. If it looks like rubber with a wood finish, it will be taxed as 6402 (25.5%). Real wood = 18-22.5%."
β 3. Common Pitfalls & Fixes
| β Mistake | π« Consequence | β Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Calling it "Rubber Sole" | Tax jumps to 25.5% (Section 301 applies) | Verify sole material; use photos. |
| Calling it "Leather Only" | Tax jumps to 27.5% (Base 10% + 7.5%) | Disclose "Plastic/Leather Composite". |
| Missing "Section 122" Flag | Underpayment risk; penalty | Ensure COO is marked "China" for 10% add-on. |
| Ignoring Platform vs. Flat | Wrong HS Code (6402 vs 6403) | Measure heel/platform height. |
π V. Market Comparison & Strategic Outlook
| Market | Recommended HS Code | Est. Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| USA | 6403.99.20.60 (Platform) |
18.0% | Best option for Wood Sole. |
| USA | 6405.90.90.60 (Sandal) |
22.5% | Standard for open-toe. |
| EU | 6405 |
~6-10% | Lower rates, but CE/FSC certification needed. |
| Vietnam | 6405 |
0% | Potential duty-free if assembled in Vietnam. |
π Conclusion:
For the US market, the Wood Sole is your best friend. It qualifies for Section 122 (10%) but avoids Section 301 (7.5%) if classified correctly.
Target Tax: 18.0% (Platform) or 22.5% (Sandals).
π VI. Final Checklist for Shippers
- Verify Sole Material: Is it 100% Wood or a Wood/Plastic composite?
- 100% Wood β
6405or6403(Lower Tax). - Wood + Plastic β
6402(Higher Tax: 25.5%).
- 100% Wood β
- Confirm Upper Material: Is it Plastic/Leather Composite?
- Yes β
6405.90.90.60(22.5%). - No (Pure Leather) β
6405.10.00.90(27.5% - Avoid!).
- Yes β
- Select "Platform" if applicable: If the wooden sole adds height, use
6403.99.20.60for 18.0%. - Invoice Wording:
> "Wood Sole Sandals, Plastic/Leather Composite Upper, Platform Style, Origin: China"
β¨ Ready to Ship?
Precision Classification = Lower Costs + Faster Clearance.
Don't let a misclassified "Wood Sole" cost you 10% in extra duties. Get it right now!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.