Polymerization Inhibitor
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2931909052 | 38.7% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 2843290100 | 38.7% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3815905000 | 40.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3815190000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 2931906000 | 41.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π§ͺ Polymerization Inhibitors (Chemical Additives)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Level Compliance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly is a "Polymerization Inhibitor"?
Polymerization inhibitors are specialized chemical additives used to prevent or slow down the unwanted polymerization of monomers during storage, transportation, and processing. They are critical in industries such as petrochemicals, plastics manufacturing, and paints.
In international trade, these chemicals are classified based on their chemical nature (organic vs. inorganic) and their functional role (catalyst, intermediate, or general chemical).
β οΈ Key Classification Challenge:
- If the inhibitor is a pure organic compound acting as a reaction stopper β Likely Chapter 29 or 3815.
- If it acts as a catalyst accelerator/preventer β Likely 3815 (Catalytic preparations).
- If it is an inorganic compound (e.g., silver-based) β Likely Chapter 28.
- Misclassification Risk: Declaring as a "General Chemical" (3824) when it fits a specific chemical category (2931) can lead to duty differences.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Cross-Reference)
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Scenario | Chemical Category | Total Tax Rate (US Import from CN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2931.90.90.52 |
Other organo-inorganic compounds (General Fallback) | General chemical inhibitors not specified elsewhere | Organic/Inorganic Hybrid | 38.7% |
2843.29.01.00 |
Other silver compounds (Inorganic Intermediate) | Silver-based inhibitors or specific inorganic reaction additives | Inorganic Compound | 38.7% |
3815.90.50.00 |
Other catalytic preparations (Reaction accelerators/stoppers) | Functional additives that modify reaction rates | Catalytic Preparation | 40.0% |
3815.19.00.00 |
Other prepared catalysts (General Fallback) | General-purpose inhibitors without specific material conflict | Catalytic Preparation | 35.0% |
2931.90.60.00 |
Other organic aromatic compounds | Aromatic-based inhibitors (e.g., phenolic derivatives) | Organic Aromatic | 41.5% |
π Key Insight:
-3815.19.00.00offers the lowest base duty (0%), but still incurs high additional tariffs due to trade policies.
-2931series implies the product is a distinct organic chemical compound, often requiring more rigorous chemical specification documentation.
-3815.90.50.00assumes the productβs primary function is catalytic (even if it inhibits), which attracts a higher base duty (5%).
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Add-on Duties & Policy Surcharges)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: November 10, 2025 onwards (including subsequent imports)
π― 1. 2931.90.90.52 ββ Organo-inorganic Compounds (General Fallback)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 3.7% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Duty (USITC) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 38.7% |
| Calculation Basis | CIF Value Γ 38.7% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β Not Eligible (Denied) |
| Legal Authority Path | USITC:2931.90.90.52 β FOOTNOTE:301-2931 β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Explanation:
- This classification assumes the inhibitor is a generic organic-inorganic compound not specified in other chapters.
- The 38.7% rate includes the standard US base tariff plus significant trade war-related surcharges.
π― 2. 2843.29.01.00 ββ Other Silver Compounds
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 3.7% |
| Section 301 Duty (USITC) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 38.7% |
| Calculation Basis | CIF Value Γ 38.7% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Authority Path | USITC:2843.29.01.00 β FOOTNOTE:301-2843 β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Note:
- Only applicable if the inhibitor is specifically a silver-based compound.
- Misclassifying a non-silver compound here can lead to severe penalties.
π― 3. 3815.90.50.00 ββ Other Catalytic Preparations
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.0% |
| Section 301 Duty (USITC) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 40.0% |
| Calculation Basis | CIF Value Γ 40.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Authority Path | USITC:3815.90.50.00 β FOOTNOTE:301-3815 β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Warning:
- This has the highest total rate (40%) due to a higher base duty (5% vs. 0-3.7%).
- Use only if the product is formally classified as a "catalytic preparation" rather than a pure chemical compound.
π― 4. 3815.19.00.00 ββ Other Prepared Catalysts (Lowest Base Duty)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Duty (USITC) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 35.0% |
| Calculation Basis | CIF Value Γ 35.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Authority Path | USITC:3815.19.00.00 β FOOTNOTE:301-3815 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 |
π Strategy:
- This offers the lowest total rate (35%).
- Suitable if the inhibitor can be argued as a "prepared catalyst" (reaction accelerator/stopper) under Chapter 38, rather than a pure chemical (Chapter 29).
π― 5. 2931.90.60.00 ββ Other Organic Aromatic Compounds
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Duty (USITC) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 41.5% |
| Calculation Basis | CIF Value Γ 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Authority Path | USITC:2931.90.60.00 β FOOTNOTE:301-2931 β IEEPA:9903.01.25 |
π Caution:
- This is the most expensive option (41.5%).
- Only use if the inhibitor is definitively an aromatic organic compound and cannot be classified under other more favorable headings.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Guide)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Mandatory)
| Document | Required? | Description |
|---|---|---|
| β SDS (Safety Data Sheet) | βοΈ | Must specify chemical composition, CAS number, and function (inhibitor). |
| β COA (Certificate of Analysis) | βοΈ | Confirms purity and chemical structure to support HS Code. |
| β Product Specification | βοΈ | Details physical state, concentration, and packaging. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Must clearly state "Polymerization Inhibitor" and its function. |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Accurate weight and volume for duty calculation. |
| β CAS Number | βοΈ | Critical for customs verification of chemical identity. |
β 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mnemonic)
π₯ βFunction First, Chemistry Second; Catalyst vs. Compound; Choose Wisely!β
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Chemical Inhibitor (e.g., Hydroquinone) | 2931.90.90.52 or 2931.90.60.00 |
Declaring as 3815 β Audit Risk |
| Mixed Preparation/Reaction Additive | 3815.19.00.00 |
Declaring as pure chemical β Missed Savings |
| Silver-Based Compound | 2843.29.01.00 |
Declaring as organic β Misclassification |
| Aromatic-Based Inhibitor | 2931.90.60.00 |
Declaring as generic β Higher Duty |
β 3. Special Handling
| Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Generic "Inhibitor" in Invoice | β Avoid. Use specific chemical name + CAS #. |
| Multiple Inhibitors in One Shipment | β Declare separately if HS Codes differ; otherwise, aggregate under highest duty. |
| Sample Shipments | β No De Minimis. All values are taxed. |
| US-Made Origin | β No Section 301/IEEPA duties. Rate = Base Duty only. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Duty Rate | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3815.19.00.00 |
35.0% | None | Highest complexity due to tariffs. |
| π¨π³ China | 2931.90.90.52 |
~3.7% | CCC (if applicable) | Lower base duty, no surcharges. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3815.19.00 |
0-6.5% | REACH Registration | REACH compliance is critical. |
| π¬π§ UK | 3815.19.00 |
0-6.5% | UK REACH | Post-Brexit rules apply. |
π Conclusion:
- USA imposes the highest effective duty due to Section 301 (+25%) and IEEPA (+10%).
- EU/UK require strict REACH registration for chemical imports.
- China has the lowest base duty but serves as the origin for most exports.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Mistake 1: Declaring all inhibitors under 3815 to simplify.
π Consequence: If the product is a pure chemical, customs may reclassify to 2931 with higher base duty or penalties for misdeclaration.
β Mistake 2: Omitting CAS Number on Invoice.
π Consequence: Customs hold, delay, or forced reclassification to highest duty category (2931.90.60.00 at 41.5%).
β Mistake 3: Assuming "Chemical Additive" is a valid HS Code.
π Consequence: Rejection. Must specify exact chemical nature (Organic, Inorganic, Catalyst).
β Correct Approach:
"Polymerization Inhibitor, [Chemical Name], CAS #[Number], Used for [Monomer Type], Form: Liquid/Solid, Purity: 99%"
π― VII. Conclusion: Precision Classification Saves Money!
π― Remember:
πΉ "Chemical Nature dictates Chapter; Function dictates Heading."
πΉ "3815.19.00.00 is the sweet spot (35%) if eligible!"
πΉ "2931 is safer for pure compounds but costs more (38.7%-41.5%)."
π Pro Tip:
If your product is not made in China (e.g., Vietnam, Germany), you can avoid all additional tariffs.
Recommend Advance Ruling from US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for high-volume shipments to lock in the 35.0% rate under 3815.19.00.00 if applicable.
π£ Action Item:
π Consult with a licensed customs broker + Provide CAS Number + Apply for CBP Ruling
π Ensure your Polymerization Inhibitors clear US customs efficiently and minimize tax burden!
β¨ Professional Classification, Cost Efficiency, and Risk Mitigation!
πΌ Every Percentage Point Counts in Chemical Trade!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.