Polyurethane Textile Composite Anti static Film
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5911101000 | 37.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5911102000 | 38.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926905900 | 37.4% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926905700 | 41.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
𧡠Polyurethane Textile Composite Anti-static Film
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional-Level Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition and Classification: Do You Really Understand "PU Textile Composite Anti-static Film"?
Polyurethane (PU) Textile Composite Anti-static Film is a specialized industrial material combining a polyurethane substrate with textile fabrics, featuring anti-static coating properties. It is widely used in electronics manufacturing, cleanrooms, packaging, and precision machinery to prevent electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage.
In international trade, its classification depends on the dominant material, structure, and functional purpose. Since it involves both plastics (PU) and textiles, it falls under specific harmonized system headings that prioritize either the plastic component (Chapter 39) or the textile component (Chapter 59).
β οΈ Key Distinction Points:
- If the polyurethane layer is the primary structural base and the textile acts as a reinforcing composite β Often classified under Chapter 59 (Impregnated Textiles) due to the composite nature and technical function.
- If the textile is the base and PU is merely a surface coating without significant structural integration β May fall under Chapter 39 (Plastics) as an artificial plastic product.
- Anti-static function is a technical characteristic but does not change the HS code category; it only affects the subheading description.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Material/Structure Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
5911.10.10.00 |
Textile products for technical uses, impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics, of cellular plastics, whether or not reinforced, containing 2.9% basic tariff | PU-based composite anti-static film, textile-reinforced, laminated structure | β PU as primary, textile composite, anti-static function |
5911.10.20.00 |
Similar to above, but with 3.8% basic tariff, reflecting different PU/textile ratio or manufacturing process | Same product, alternative PU formulation or textile weave density | β Same category, slight tariff variation due to material specs |
3926.90.59.00 |
Other articles of plastics and articles of other materials of heading 3901 to 3914, containing textile fibers | PU-based board/film with textile fibers, classified as plastic article | β Plastic-centric view, textile as additive |
3926.90.57.00 |
Other articles of plastics, containing textile fibers, with 6.5% basic tariff | Alternative plastic classification logic, emphasizing composite nature | β Plastic-centric, higher base tariff |
π Key Reminder:
- Chapter 59 codes (5911.10.x0) are preferred when the textile component is structurally significant and the plastic (PU) serves as a coating/lamination for technical purposes (like anti-static).
- Chapter 39 codes (3926.90.xx) are used if the product is viewed primarily as a plastic article with textile reinforcement, rather than a textile product with plastic coating.
- The anti-static feature does not create a separate HS code; it is a functional attribute within the chosen classification.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surtaxes, Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Country of Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: November 10, 2025 (and subsequent imports)
π― 1. 5911.10.10.00 β Textile Products for Technical Uses, PU Composite, Anti-static
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff Rate | 2.9% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge (Section 301) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 37.9% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 37.9% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:5911.10.10.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Explanation:
- The 25% Section 301 surcharge applies to all Chinese-origin products in this category.
- The 10% IEEPA surcharge targets specific Chinese goods under national emergency powers.
- Total 37.9% is a significant cost driver; accurate classification is critical to avoid overpayment.
π― 2. 5911.10.20.00 β Alternative PU Composite Classification
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff Rate | 3.8% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge (Section 301) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 38.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38.8% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:5911.10.20.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- This code applies to similar PU-textile composites but may differ in PU formulation, textile density, or lamination method.
- The 0.9% difference from the previous code is due to a slightly higher base tariff, but the surcharges remain identical.
π― 3. 3926.90.59.00 β Plastic Articles with Textile Fibers (Plastic-Centric View)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff Rate | 2.4% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge (Section 301) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 37.4% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 37.4% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:3926.90.59.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Explanation:
- Classifying under Chapter 39 may yield a slightly lower base rate (2.4% vs. 2.9%), but the total impact is minimal after surcharges.
- Use this code only if the plastic component is deemed structurally dominant (e.g., thick PU layer, minimal textile integration).
π― 4. 3926.90.57.00 β Higher Base Plastic Classification
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff Rate | 6.5% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge (Section 301) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (Section 122) | +10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 41.5% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:3926.90.57.00 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Warning:
- This code has the highest total tax rate (41.5%) due to a significantly higher base tariff.
- Only use this classification if the product is strictly defined as a plastic article with no substantial textile structural role.
- Recommendation: Avoid this code unless necessary, as it increases costs by 4.1% compared to the most favorable option (3926.90.59.00).
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Operational Advice (Practical Pitfall Avoidance Guide)
β 1. Required Documentation Checklist (All Mandatory)
| Document | Must Provide | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Include PU thickness, textile weave type, anti-static resistance level (ohms/sq) |
| β Structure Diagram | βοΈ | Show layer composition (e.g., PU top, textile middle, PU bottom) |
| β Product Photos | βοΈ | Clear images of roll/film, labels, and anti-static certification marks |
| β Third-Party Test Report | βοΈ | ESD performance test (e.g., IEC 61340-5-1), material safety data sheet (MSDS) |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Clearly state: "Polyurethane Textile Composite Anti-static Film, HS Code [Insert Code]" |
| β Certificate of Origin (CO) | βοΈ | If not Chinese-origin, may qualify for reduced duties (unlikely for US-China trade) |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Detail weight, dimensions, and packaging type to prevent misdeclaration |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Critical Mnemonic)
π₯ "Structure Dominates, Function Follows, Label Precisely, Tax Saves!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| PU-heavy composite with anti-static film | 5911.10.10.00 or 3926.90.59.00 |
Mislabel as "Textile Only" β Higher scrutiny |
| Textile-heavy with PU coating | 5911.10.20.00 |
Mislabel as "Plastic Sheet" β 41.5% tax |
| Full anti-static certification | Include test report in documents | No proof β Delayed clearance or seizure |
| Mixed shipments (with non-compliant items) | Separate declaration for compliant items | Combined shipment β Entire batch penalized |
β 3. Special Case Handling
| Scenario | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| Custom Anti-static Specification | Provide detailed resistance values (e.g., 10^6β10^9 ohms/sq) to justify technical use |
| OEM/White Label Products | Include client contract and design specs to prove commercial nature |
| Samples vs. Commercial Goods | Clearly mark "Sample β Not for Resale" if applicable, but still subject to duty |
| Returns/Replacements | Provide proof of prior importation and duty payment for potential duty drawback |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 5911.10.10.00 |
37.9% (CN origin) | ESD Certification, MSDS | High duty; pre-clearance critical |
| π¨π³ China | 5911.10.10.00 |
5% | RoHS, REACH | Lower duty; no surcharges |
| πͺπΊ EU | 5911.10.10.00 |
4% | CE, REACH, RoHS | No surcharges; strict ESD standards |
| π¬π§ UK | 5911.10.10.00 |
4% | UKCA, RoHS | Post-Brexit rules apply |
| π―π΅ Japan | 5911.10.10.00 |
3% | JIS ESD Standards | Low duty; high quality focus |
π Conclusion:
- USA imposes the highest effective tariff (37.9β41.5%) on Chinese-origin PU anti-static films.
- EU, Japan, and China offer significantly lower duties, making these markets more cost-effective for non-Chinese-origin goods.
- Pre-import compliance (ESD testing, MSDS) is mandatory to avoid delays.
π VI. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons from Experience)
β Error 1: Declaring as "Textile Fabric Only"
π Consequence: Incorrect classification β Additional 10β15% duty + penalty.
β Error 2: Ignoring Anti-static Certification
π Consequence: Customs rejection β Delay of 2β4 weeks + storage fees.
β Error 3: Using Vague Descriptions like "Plastic Film"
π Consequence: Misclassification under 3926.90.57.00 β 41.5% tax instead of 37.9%.
β Error 4: Failing to Provide Structure Diagrams
π Consequence: Borderline classification dispute β Audit and potential reassessment.
β Correct Practice:
"Polyurethane-Textile Composite Anti-static Film, PU Layer: 0.5mm, Textile: Polyester Woven, Anti-static Resistance: 10^7 ohms/sq, Certified to IEC 61340-5-1, HS Code 5911.10.10.00"
π― VII. Conclusion: Precise Classification, Cost Efficiency, Smooth Clearance!
π― Key Takeaways:
πΉ "Structure Determines Code, Function Adds Value, Label Accurately, Tax Minimizes!"
πΉ "HS Code Choice Impacts 4% Cost Difference; Declaration Clarity Prevents Delays!"
π Pro Tip:
- If your PU textile composite anti-static film is originating from Vietnam, Malaysia, or Thailand, you may qualify for preferential tariffs under USMCA or ASEAN agreements, reducing rates to 0β5%.
- Recommendation: Apply for a Binding Ruling from US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) before shipment to confirm the correct HS code and avoid post-import audits.
π£ Immediate Action Required:
π Engage a Licensed Customs Broker + Provide Product Specs + Request CBP Pre-Ruling
π Ensure Smooth Clearance, Cost Control, and Compliance for your Polyurethane Textile Composite Anti-static Film!
β¨ Professional Customs Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Dollar Saved on Tariffs is Pure Profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.