Polyurethane Textile Composite Sound Absorbing Coating Board
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5911101000 | 37.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5911102000 | 38.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926905900 | 37.4% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926905700 | 41.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
ποΈ Polyurethane Textile Composite Sound Absorbing Coating Board
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand This Composite Board?
The Polyurethane Textile Composite Sound Absorbing Coating Board is a specialized industrial material combining the acoustic dampening properties of polyurethane (PU) with the structural integrity of textile layers. In international trade, it is classified based on its primary material composition and functional characteristics.
Key Distinction:
Heading 5911: Textiles specially prepared for technical uses (e.g., impregnated, coated, covered, or laminated with rubber or plastic). This applies if the textile fabric is the essential character and the PU coating is secondary for static/dust control or sound absorption.
* Heading 3926: Other articles of plastics and articles of other materials of heading 39. This applies if the PU plastic layer is the essential character* and the textile is merely a reinforcement or backing.
β οΈ Critical Decision Point:
- If the product is primarily a fabric with a PU coating for anti-static or sound-absorbing purposes β HS 5911.
- If the product is primarily a plastic board reinforced with textile fibers β HS 3926.
- Note: The user input mentions "Sound Absorbing," but the provided<DATA>summaries focus on "Anti-Static" (ι²ιη΅) functions for HS 5911 and general composite properties for HS 3926. We must align with the provided data.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority)
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Key Classification Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
5911.10.10.00 |
Polyurethane textile composite anti-static coating board, material: PU, form: composite coating board, purpose: anti-static. | Textile layer-laminated structure, anti-static function, matches printing rubber cloth attributes. | β Textile Essential: PU-coated textile board for anti-static use. |
5911.10.20.00 |
Polyurethane textile composite anti-static coating board, material: PU, form: textile fabric lamination, purpose: anti-static. | No conflict in material/shape; standard textile lamination for anti-static purposes. | β Textile Essential: Standard anti-static textile lamination. |
3926.90.59.00 |
Polyurethane textile composite anti-static coating board, material: PU (Plastic/Ch. 39), form: board, contains textile fibers. | Classification consistent as plastic article; textile is secondary reinforcement. | β Plastic Essential: Plastic board with textile fibers. |
3926.90.57.00 |
Polyurethane textile composite anti-static coating board, material: PU (Plastic/Synthetic), form: composite board, purpose: anti-static. | Classification logic consistent as composite plastic article with anti-static feature. | β Plastic Essential: Composite plastic board. |
π Key Insight:
- HS 5911 codes imply the textile is the base, and the PU is a coating/lamination for technical use (anti-static/sound absorbing).
- HS 3926 codes imply the PU plastic is the base material, and the textile is a filler or reinforcement.
- Misclassification Risk: Declaring a plastic-heavy board as textile (5911) or vice versa can lead to customs audits, delays, and penalties.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: USA (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: 2025+ (Post-Section 301 & IEEPA measures)
π― 1. 5911.10.10.00 ββ Polyurethane Textile Composite Anti-Static Coating Board
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.9% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Surtax | +10.0% |
| Total Tariff | 37.9% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 37.9% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β No (Deny De Minimis for high-tariff goods) |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:5911.10.10.00 β Section 301: 25% β Section 122: 10% |
π Explanation:
- This code falls under Textiles/Technical Textiles.
- Despite being a textile, it attracts high US tariffs due to its origin (China) and composite nature.
- Total 37.9% is significant; profit margins must account for this.
π― 2. 5911.10.20.00 ββ Polyurethane Textile Composite Anti-Static Coating Board (Fabric Lamination)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.8% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Surtax | +10.0% |
| Total Tariff | 38.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38.8% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:5911.10.20.00 β Section 301: 25% β Section 122: 10% |
π Note:
- Slightly higher than5911.10.10.00due to a higher base rate (3.8% vs 2.9%).
- Applies to standard textile fabric laminations without conflicting material attributes.
π― 3. 3926.90.59.00 ββ Polyurethane Textile Composite Anti-Static Board (Plastic Classification)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.4% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Surtax | +10.0% |
| Total Tariff | 37.4% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 37.4% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:3926.90.59.00 β Section 301: 25% β Section 122: 10% |
π Explanation:
- Classified under Plastics (Ch. 39).
- Lowest total tariff (37.4%) among the four options.
- Suitable if the product is predominantly PU plastic with textile fibers as reinforcement.
π― 4. 3926.90.57.00 ββ Polyurethane Composite Board with Anti-Static Function
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Surtax | +10.0% |
| Total Tariff | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 41.5% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:3926.90.57.00 β Section 301: 25% β Section 122: 10% |
π Note:
- Highest total tariff (41.5%) due to a significantly higher base rate (6.5%).
- Avoid unless no other classification fits, as it increases import costs.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Guide)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Non-Negotiable)
| Document | Required | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Must detail: PU content %, textile fiber type, coating thickness, anti-static performance (ohms/sq), sound absorption coefficient (NRC). |
| β Structure Diagram | βοΈ | Show layer order: e.g., Textile Base β PU Coating β Anti-Static Layer. Critical for 5911 vs 3926 decision. |
| β Product Photos (Label + Cross-Section) | βοΈ | Clear view of layers and branding. |
| β Third-Party Test Report | βοΈ | UL, Oeko-Tex, or equivalent for anti-static and fire retardancy (if applicable). |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Describe as "Polyurethane-Coated Textile Composite Board for Industrial Use" or similar. Avoid vague terms like "Plastic Sheet." |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Specify weight, dimensions, and material composition. |
β 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantra)
π₯ "Material Defines Code, Function Defines Subheading!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Textile-heavy, PU-coated for anti-static | 5911.10.10.00 or 5911.10.20.00 |
Misdeclare as plastic β 41.5% tariff |
| Plastic-heavy board, textile reinforcement | 3926.90.59.00 |
Misdeclare as textile β 38.8% tariff |
| Generic "Composite Board" without detail | β Rejected by Customs | Vague description β Delay + Audit |
| "Sound Absorbing" only, no anti-static mention | Risk of misclassification if data focuses on anti-static | Inconsistent with provided data |
π Critical Tip:
- The provided data emphasizes anti-static functions for all codes. If your product is only sound-absorbing and not anti-static, you may need to explore other HS codes (e.g.,5906or3926.90.98). However, based strictly on<DATA>, we assume anti-static is a key feature.
β 3. Special Case Handling
| Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| OEM Custom Board | Provide clientβs technical drawings showing material percentages. |
| Mixed Shipments | Separate textile vs. plastic goods in the same shipment to avoid confusion. |
| Anti-Static Certification Missing | Customs may question the "anti-static" claim, leading to reclassification. Ensure test reports are available. |
| Sound Absorbing vs. Anti-Static | If primarily sound-absorbing, consider if 5906.99.90 (Textile sheets/boards) or 3926.90.98 (Plastic articles) might be more accurate. Consult a customs broker for pre-ruling. |
π V. Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026 Update)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 5911.10.10.00 or 3926.90.59.00 |
37.4% β 38.8% | No specific CE/FCC, but anti-static test required | High tariffs due to Section 301 & 122. |
| π¨π³ China | 5911.10.10.00 or 3926.90.59.00 |
7.5% β 10% | RoHS (if for electronics) | Lower import duties. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 5906.99.90 or 3926.90.98 |
0% β 6% | CE, REACH | Lower tariffs, but stricter chemical regulations (REACH). |
| π¬π§ UK | 5906.99.90 or 3926.90.98 |
0% β 6% | UKCA, REACH | Post-Brexit rules apply. |
π Conclusion:
- USA is the most expensive market due to 37.4% β 41.5% total tariffs.
- EU/UK have lower tariffs but higher compliance costs (REACH).
- Optimization Strategy: If possible, classify under3926.90.59.00(37.4%) rather than5911.10.20.00(38.8%) or3926.90.57.00(41.5%) to minimize costs.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Mistake 1: Declaring as "Plastic Sheet" when it is primarily textile
π Consequence: Customs may reclassify to 5911, increasing tariff to 38.8% or triggering scrutiny on textile imports.
β Mistake 2: Ignoring the "Anti-Static" claim in documentation
π Consequence: If customs suspects anti-static properties but documentation is silent, they may apply general tariff rates or demand additional testing.
β Mistake 3: Mixing "Sound Absorbing" and "Anti-Static" without clarity
π Consequence: Ambiguous description leads to customs hold and potential demurrage fees.
β Mistake 4: Using 3926.90.57.00 (41.5%) when 3926.90.59.00 (37.4%) is applicable
π Consequence: Overpaying 4.1% tariff unnecessarily. Always check the most specific subheading.
β Correct Approach:
"Polyurethane-Coated Textile Composite Board, Anti-Static, for Industrial Acoustic Panels, Material: PU + Polyester, Form: Rigid Board, US Origin: China"
π― VII. Conclusion: Professional Declaration, Cost Optimization!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Textile vs. Plastic defines the code. Anti-static is the key function. Section 301 & 122 drive the cost."
πΉ "3926.59.00 is the cheapest (37.4%). 5911.20.00 is the most expensive (38.8%). 3926.57.00 is the highest (41.5%)."
π Pro Tip:
If your product is primarily for sound absorption and not anti-static, consider consulting a customs broker for HS 5906.99.90 (Textile boards) or HS 3926.90.98 (Other plastic articles), which may have different tariff treatments. However, based on the provided
<DATA>, the anti-static feature is central to the classification.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Contact a licensed customs broker for a Pre-Ruling (Advance Ruling) from US CBP.
π Provide material breakdowns (PU % vs. Textile %) to justify your chosen HS code.
π‘ Optimize your supply chain to account for the ~38% tariff impact on your landed cost.
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every percentage point saved is pure profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.