Rapeseed meal
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2306100000 | 0.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 2309901050 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 2309909500 | 36.4% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 1214900090 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 1214100060 | 36.4% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
πΎ Rapeseed Meal (Rapeseed Cake)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly is "Rapeseed Meal"?
Rapeseed meal is the solid residue left after extracting oil from rapeseed (canola). It is a high-protein vegetable by-product widely used in animal feed (livestock, poultry, and aquaculture).
In international trade, its classification depends heavily on how it is processed: 1. Raw/Crude Residue: Simple mechanical pressing or initial solvent extraction without further processing β Falls under Oilseed Residues. 2. Processed/Prepared Feed: Mixed with other ingredients, treated, or specifically formulated as a compound feed ingredient β Falls under Prepared Animal Feeds.
β οΈ Key Distinction Point:
- If it is pure, unadulterated rapeseed cake/residue βε½ε ₯ 2306.10.00.00
- If it is mixed, treated, or formulated as a specific feed preparation βε½ε ₯ 2309.90.10.50, 2309.90.95.00, or 1214.90.00.90
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Reason for Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
2306.10.00.00 |
Oilcake and other solid residues (extracted oil from vegetable materials), of cottonseed | Note: Data suggests "Cottonseed" classification for Rapeseed Meal due to material consistency with "solid residues" | The summary states: "Rapeseed meal belongs to residues after oil extraction, matching the material of 'Cottonseed cake and other solid residues'." |
2309.90.10.50 |
Preparations of a kind used in animal feeding | Prepared animal feed ingredients, mixed feed components | "Rapeseed meal is a plant-based feed ingredient, fitting 'Other mixed feeds or feed components'." |
2309.90.95.00 |
Other preparations of a kind used in animal feeding | General animal feed raw materials, fallback category | "Fits 'Animal feed preparations' purpose and falls under the residual/catch-all category." |
1214.90.00.90 |
Fodder, including hay and lucerne flour | Plant-based feed by-products, dry grasses | "Fits 'Other feed products' attribute, similar to hay/alfalfa in usage." |
1214.10.00.60 |
Hay, even if crushed or powdered | Plant by-products/feed category | "Fits the material scope of feed products in 1214.10, with no conflicting shape/use descriptions." |
π Key Reminder:
-2306.10.00.00is the most cost-effective option (lowest tax burden) if the product is accepted as a simple solid residue.
-2309and1214categories carry significantly higher tariffs due to "Section 301" and "122 Clause" additional duties.
- Classification must align with the actual physical form and processing level. If itβs pure meal, argue for2306. If mixed/formulated, prepare for higher rates under2309.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: 2025/2026 Period (Subject to ongoing trade policies)
π― 1. 2306.10.00.00 ββ Rapeseed/Cottonseed Cake (Solid Residues)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.56Β’/kg (Specific Duty) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% (Specific Policy Tariff) |
| Total Effective Rate | 0.56Β’/kg + 17.5% (Mixed Specific + Ad Valorem) |
| Tax Calculation | (Specific Fee) + (CIF Value Γ 17.5%) |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (High risk for small shipments) |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:2306.10.00.00 β Section 301: 7.5% β Section 122: 10% |
π Explanation:
- This is the lowest risk/cost option provided in the data.
- The "0.56Β’/kg" is a specific duty per kilogram, added to the ad valorem percentage.
- 17.5% total ad valorem burden (7.5% + 10%) is much lower than the 25-36% seen in other categories.
- Critical: Requires proving the product is a "solid residue" from oil extraction, not a processed feed mix.
π― 2. 2309.90.10.50 ββ Prepared Animal Feed Ingredients
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:2309.90.10.50 β Section 301: 25% β Section 122: 10% |
π Note:
- Higher tariff due to classification as "Prepared Feed."
- The 25% Section 301 rate applies broadly to many animal feed products from China.
π― 3. 2309.90.95.00 ββ Other Animal Feed Preparations (Fallback)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 1.4% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 36.4% |
| Tax Calculation | (CIF Value Γ 1.4%) + (CIF Value Γ 35% Surtax) β 36.4% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:2309.90.95.00 β Section 301: 25% β Section 122: 10% |
π Note:
- This is the most expensive option at 36.4%.
- Used only if the product cannot be classified under more specific feed codes.
π― 4. 1214.90.00.90 ββ Other Fodder/Feed Products
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:1214.90.00.90 β Section 301: 25% β Section 122: 10% |
π Note:
- Similar to2309.90.10.50, but classified under Chapter 12 (Vegetable Products) rather than Chapter 23 (Residues).
- Justification: "Plant-based feed by-product similar to hay/alfalfa."
π― 5. 1214.10.00.60 ββ Hay/Forage (Expanded Category)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 1.4% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 36.4% |
| Tax Calculation | (CIF Value Γ 1.4%) + (CIF Value Γ 35% Surtax) β 36.4% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis Path | USITC:1214.10.00.60 β Section 301: 25% β Section 122: 10% |
π Note:
- High cost due to base tariff plus surtaxes.
- Requires strong argument that rapeseed meal is comparable to "hay" in function.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Guide)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Mandatory)
| Document | Required | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Detail protein/fiber content, origin of rapeseed, extraction method. |
| β Certificate of Origin (CO) | βοΈ | To prove CN origin and determine applicability of Section 301/122. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Clearly state "Rapeseed Meal" or "Rapeseed Cake," not just "Feed." |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Show gross/net weight, bag type, and no mixed items. |
| β Feed License/Registration | βοΈ | FDA Feed Facility Registration is required for animal feed imports. |
| β Phytosanitary Certificate | βοΈ | USDA APHIS requirement to ensure no pests/diseases. |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Key Mantras)
π₯ "Pure Residue = 2306 (Low Tax); Mixed Feed = 2309 (High Tax)"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration Strategy | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Rapeseed Meal (Unmixed) | Classify under 2306.10.00.00 |
Misdeclare as "Feed Mix" β 35-36% tax |
| Pre-mixed Feed (Contains additives) | Classify under 2309.90.10.50 |
Claim pure residue β Audit risk |
| Importing under De Minimis | β Avoid | Section 301/122 often block $800 de minimis for CN goods |
| Labeling | "Rapeseed Meal for Animal Feed" | "Vegetable Protein" β Misclassification risk |
β 3. Special Circumstances Handling
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM/Private Label | Ensure the invoice lists the actual manufacturer, not just the brand, to avoid origin disputes. |
| High Moisture Content | Ensure moisture is within standard limits (usually <12%) to avoid rejection or re-classification as "fresh" vs "dried." |
| Anti-Dumping Duties | Check if specific anti-dumping cases apply to rapeseed/canola products from China. |
| Transshipment | Do not route through Vietnam/Mexico to evade tariffs. US CBP aggressively audits transshipments. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 2306.10.00.00 (Preferred) |
0.56Β’/kg + 17.5% | FDA + USDA | Highest risk of Section 301/122. |
| π¨π³ China | 2306.10.00.00 |
~0-5% | Domestic Standards | Major importer/exporter market. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 2306.10.00 |
0% | EU Feed Hygiene Rules | Strict on GMOs and pesticides. |
| π²π½ Mexico | 2306.10.00 |
0% (USMCA) | NOM Standards | Potential for lower tariffs if processed in US/Mexico. |
| π―π΅ Japan | 2306.10.00 |
Low (FTAA) | JAS Standards | High demand for non-GMO. |
π Conclusion:
- USA is the most tariff-sensitive market for this product.
-2306.10.00.00is the only viable low-cost option in the US data provided.
- EU/Japan are safer bets with lower/no surtaxes but stricter quality controls.
π VI. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Error 1: Classifying pure meal as "Prepared Feed" (2309)
π Consequence: Unnecessary ~35% tax increase.
β
Fix: Prove it is a simple extraction residue.
β Error 2: Ignoring Section 122 Tariff
π Consequence: Under-declaration leads to seizure and fines.
β
Fix: Always include the 10% Section 122 in cost calculations.
β Error 3: Failing FDA Registration
π Consequence: Cargo held at port until registration is verified.
β
Fix: Register Facility # with FDA before shipping.
β Error 4: Mislabeling as "Human Food Ingredient"
π Consequence: Rejection by USDA/FDA; requires relabeling or re-export.
β
Fix: Clearly mark "For Animal Use Only."
π― VII. Conclusion: Professional Declaration, Cost Efficiency
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Pure = 2306 (Cheap); Mixed = 2309 (Expensive)"
πΉ "Check Section 301 & 122; They Add Up Fast!"
πΉ "FDA + USDA = No Delays!"
π Pro Tip:
If your rapeseed meal is mixed with vitamins or minerals, it likely falls under 2309 and faces 35%+ taxes. If itβs pure, fight for 2306 at 17.5%.
Request an Advance Ruling from US CBP if the product is borderline.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Contact a Customs Broker + Provide Lab Reports + Verify FDA Registration
π Save 18%+ in Taxes by Correct Classification!
β¨ Professional Customs Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Percent of Tax Matters in Margins!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.