Refillable Perfume Bottle
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7013993000 | 26.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7323995030 | 60.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7010903010 | 40.2% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3923300010 | 38.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
πΈ Refillable Perfume Bottle (Cosmetic Packaging)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: What is a "Refillable Perfume Bottle"?
A refillable perfume bottle is a container designed for storing and dispensing fragrances. In international trade, classification depends heavily on the material composition and specific design intent (e.g., is it a primary container for retail sale or a generic packaging component?).
Key Material Distinctions: * Glass Bottles: Traditional, high-end packaging. Often classified under Chapter 70. * Plastic Bottles: Lightweight, durable, often used for mass-market or eco-friendly refill systems. Often classified under Chapter 39. * Metal/Glass Mix: Some premium bottles combine metal caps/casings with glass inserts.
β οΈ Critical Classification Point:
- If the product is clearly identified as "Glassware" (regardless of refillability) β Likely Chapter 70.
- If the product is clearly identified as "Plastic Articles" β Likely Chapter 39.
- If the material is ambiguous or mixed, customs may apply "fallback" or specific container codes β Chapter 73 or 70 specific codes.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authorityε―Ήη §)
Based on the provided data, here are the 5 potential HS Codes with their corresponding tax rates and logic.
| HS Code | Product Description | Inference Logic (Material/Use) | Total Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
3926.90.99.89 |
Other Plastic Articles (General Containers) | Inferred as Plastic. Falls under "Other" container category. | 22.8% |
7013.99.30.00 |
Other Glass Tableware/Kitchenware | Inferred as Glass based on "Bottle" morphology resembling general glassware. | 26.5% |
7323.99.50.30 |
Other Steel/Aluminum/Copper Articles | Fallback/Container Logic. Inferred as Glass or Metal, but classified under metal containers/parts due to ambiguous material or specific manufacturing process. | 60.0% |
7010.90.30.10 |
Glass Ampoules, Bottles, Jars | Matches Glass material and Container/Packaging usage exactly. | 40.2% |
3923.30.00.10 |
Plastic Stops, Plugs, Caps, Lids, etc. | Matches Bottle/Container form and Packaging purpose. Inferred as Plastic. | 38.0% |
3923.30.00.90 |
Other Plastic Articles for Packaging | Matches Bottle morphology. Inferred as Plastic, classified as "Other" in this sub-category. | 38.0% |
π Key Insight:
- Plastic Options (3926vs3923):3923.30is more specific to packaging accessories/fillers, while3926.90is a general "other plastic article." Both incur 38.0% total tax. - Glass Options (7013vs7010):7010.90.30.10is the most precise fit for "glass bottles" for packaging, but carries a 40.2% rate.7013.99.30.00treats it as general glassware, with a lower 26.5% rate, though this may be challenged if the item is strictly for commercial packaging. - High Risk (7323): The 60.0% rate for steel/aluminum/copper is punitive due to additional tariffs. Avoid this classification unless the bottle is predominantly metal.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Detailed Tax Clauses)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: From November 10, 2025 onwards
π― 1. 3926.90.99.89 β Plastic Articles, Other (Inferred Plastic Container)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.3% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Tariff | +7.5% (China-specific additional tariff) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% (China-specific additional tariff) |
| Total Rate | 22.8% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Due to Section 122/301) |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3926.90.99.89 + 301:7.5% + 122:10% |
π Explanation:
- This is the lowest tax option among the plausible plastic classifications.
- The combination of base duty + Section 301 + Section 122 results in a moderate but manageable rate.
π― 2. 7013.99.30.00 β Other Glass Tableware/Kitchenware (Inferred Glass)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 9.0% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Tariff | +7.5% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Rate | 26.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 26.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis | USITC:7013.99.30.00 + 301:7.5% + 122:10% |
π Note:
- Although the base duty is higher (9.0%), the total rate is still lower than most glass packaging codes.
- Risk: Customs may argue that "perfume bottles" are not "tableware/kitchenware," leading to reclassification to7010(higher tax) or penalties. Only use if the product is clearly not for commercial packaging (e.g., decorative vases).
π― 3. 7323.99.50.30 β Steel/Aluminum/Copper Articles (Fallback/Metal)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Section 232/Other Additional | +50% (Steel/Aluminum/Copper additional tariff) |
| Total Rate | 60.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 60.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis | USITC:7323.99.50.30 + 122:10% + Steel/Alu/Cu:50% |
π Warning:
- This is the most expensive classification.
- The 50% additional tariff for steel/aluminum/copper products is punitive.
- Recommendation: Avoid this code unless the bottle is exclusively metal and no other code fits. It is likely a "fallback" classification for ambiguous goods.
π― 4. 7010.90.30.10 β Glass Ampoules, Bottles, Jars (Precise Glass Packaging)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.2% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Rate | 40.2% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 40.2% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis | USITC:7010.90.30.10 + 301:25% + 122:10% |
π Explanation:
- This is the most accurate code for glass perfume bottles.
- However, the Section 301 tariff is 25% (not 7.5%), likely due to the product being classified as "glass containers" under a higher-priority trade remedy list.
- Higher tax cost but legally robust.
π― 5. 3923.30.00.10 & 3923.30.00.90 β Plastic Packaging Articles (Precise Plastic Packaging)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 3.0% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Tariff | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Rate | 38.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3923.30.00.xx + 301:25% + 122:10% |
π Note:
- These two codes have identical tax rates (38.0%).
-3923.30.00.10is typically for "Stoppers, Plugs, Caps, Lids," while3923.30.00.90is "Other."
- If the perfume bottle is sold without the cap/lid as a separate item, it might be3923.30.00.90. If it's a complete assembly,3923.30.00.10might apply if the cap is the primary feature, or vice versa. 3926.90.99.89 (22.8%) is cheaper, but less specific.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Avoid Pitfalls)
β 1. Preparation Checklist (Essential Documents)
| Document | Required | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Clearly states material (Glass vs. Plastic), volume, and refill mechanism. |
| Material Declaration | βοΈ | Crucial: Must explicitly state "100% Glass" or "100% Plastic." Ambiguity leads to 7323 (60%) or delays. |
| Product Photos | βοΈ | Clear images showing the bottle structure, cap, and any branding. |
| Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Must match HS Code description (e.g., "Glass Perfume Bottle" vs. "Plastic Container"). |
| Packing List | βοΈ | Indicates if caps/seals are included or shipped separately. |
β 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantras)
π₯ "Material Clear, HS Precise, Tax Minimized!"
| Scenario | Recommended HS Code | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Plastic Bottle, General Container | 3926.90.99.89 |
Lowest Tax (22.8%). Use if it's not a standard "packaging accessory" (3923). |
| Plastic Bottle, Packaging Specific | 3923.30.00.10/90 |
Standard Tax (38.0%). More accurate if it's clearly for packaging. |
| Glass Bottle, General Glassware | 7013.99.30.00 |
Lowest Glass Tax (26.5%). Risky if customs sees it as "packaging." |
| Glass Bottle, Precise Packaging | 7010.90.30.10 |
Accurate Code (40.2%). Best for compliance, higher cost. |
| Metal/Glass Mix (Ambiguous) | 7323.99.50.30 |
Avoid! High tax (60%). Only use if forced by customs after audit. |
β 3. Special Cases
| Case | Advice |
|---|---|
| Refillable Systems (Bottle + Refill Pod) | Declare as two items: Bottle (HS Code) and Refill Pod (HS Code for liquid/chemical). Do not combine unless they are permanently attached. |
| Decorative vs. Functional | If "Decorative," argue for 7013 (Glassware) or 7323 (Metal Art) to avoid packaging codes, but ensure it's not for sale as a container. |
| Sample Shipments | Even samples are subject to 301/122 tariffs. No de minimis exemption for China-origin goods under these sections. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code (Plastic) | Recommended HS Code (Glass) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3926.90.99.89 (22.8%) or 3923.30.00.90 (38.0%) |
7013.99.30.00 (26.5%) or 7010.90.30.10 (40.2%) |
High additional tariffs (301+122). |
| π¨π³ China | 3926.90.99.89 |
7013.99.30.00 |
Lower base duties, no 301/122. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3926.90.99 (Varies, ~3-6%) |
7013.99 (Varies, ~0-4%) |
No Section 301/122. Standard WTO rates. |
π Conclusion:
- US Market: Plastic (3926) is the most cost-effective if defensible. Glass (7013) is cheaper than7010but risky.
- Compliance Priority: For Glass,7010is safer. For Plastic,3926offers savings but requires strong justification as "other article."
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls
β Mistake 1: Classifying a Glass Perfume Bottle as 7010 when it could be 7013.
π Result: Paying 40.2% instead of 26.5%.
π Fix: Argue "General Glassware" if the bottle has a unique shape not typical for standard packaging.
β Mistake 2: Classifying a Plastic Bottle as 3923.30 (Packaging Accessories) when it's a standalone container.
π Result: Potential reclassification to 3926 (22.8% vs 38.0%).
π Fix: If the bottle is sold alone, 3926 may be more appropriate and cheaper.
β Mistake 3: Ambiguous Material Declaration.
π Result: Customs defaults to 7323 (60%) or imposes penalties.
π Fix: Provide material test reports or manufacturer declarations.
β Correct Declaration Example:
"Plastic Refillable Perfume Bottle, 50ml, with Spray Atomizer, Model XYZ, Material: PP/PE."
β Use3926.90.99.89
π― VII. Conclusion: Strategic Classification for Cost Optimization
π― Remember the Key Takeaways:
πΉ Plastic is Cheaper:
3926.90.99.89(22.8%) is the lowest cost for plastic.
πΉ Glass is Risky:7013(26.5%) is cheaper than7010(40.2%) but may be rejected.
πΉ Avoid Metal:7323(60%) is a trap.
πΉ Document Everything: Material declaration is the key to avoiding high penalties.
π Pro Tip:
If you are importing large volumes, consider Advance Rulings from US Customs (CBP) to lock in your HS Code classification. This provides legal certainty and protects against retroactive duty assessments.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Consult your freight forwarder with material specifications.
π Request pre-classification if the product is new or ambiguous.
π Optimize your supply chain by choosing the lowest legal HS Code (3926.90.99.89for plastic).
β¨ Precision in Classification Saves Money!
πΌ Every percentage point in tax matters.
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.