Retro Cloth Wallet
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4202316000 | 43.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6307909891 | 24.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6307908940 | 17.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4202329300 | 52.6% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4202328000 | 40.7% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
π Retro Cloth Wallet: The Ultimate HS Code & Duty Clearance Guide (2026 Edition)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Logistics Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Know "Retro Cloth Wallet"?
The "Retro Cloth Wallet" is a stylish accessory blending vintage aesthetics with practical utility. In international trade, its classification does not depend solely on the word "cloth" or "retro." Instead, it hinges on two critical factors: 1. Outer Surface Material: Is it genuine leather,εη leather, cotton, or synthetic textile? 2. Construction & Usage: Is it a structured handbag accessory (Chapter 42) or a general textileεΆε (Chapter 63)?
β οΈ Key Distinction Point:
- If the outer surface is leather or regenerating leather β It falls under Chapter 42 (Articles of Leather) regardless of internal lining.
- If the outer surface is textile/cotton/fabric and it resembles a handbag/purse structure β It also falls under Chapter 42.
- If it is a simple textile pouch without handbag characteristics (e.g., no clasp, simple fold) β It might fall under Chapter 63 (Other Made-Up Textile Articles), but this is risky for wallets.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on your input data, here are the 5 possible classifications for "Retro Cloth Wallet" variants, ordered by tax efficiency.
| HS Code | Product Description | Material/Feature | Total Tax Rate | Tax Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6307.90.89.40 | Other made-up textile articles | Cotton/Textile, simple construction | 17.0% | Base: 7.0% Add-On: 0.0% Section 301 (122): 10% |
| 6307.90.98.91 | Other made-up textile articles | Fabric/Textile, minimalist | 24.5% | Base: 7.0% Add-On: 7.5% Section 301 (122): 10% |
| 4202.32.80.00 | Handbag-style purse | Vegetable Fiber Textile outer surface | 40.7% | Base: 5.7% Add-On: 25.0% Section 301 (122): 10% |
| 4202.31.60.00 | Vintage Wallet | Leather/Regenerating Leather | 43.0% | Base: 8.0% Add-On: 25.0% Section 301 (122): 10% |
| 4202.32.93.00 | Handbag-style purse | Textile Material outer surface | 52.6% | Base: 17.6% Add-On: 25.0% Section 301 (122): 10% |
π Critical Insight:
- "Cloth" in the name is misleading. Customs does not care if the lining is cloth. They care about the outer surface.
- Chapter 42 (Leather/Textile Handbags) generally carries higher duties (25% Add-On) than Chapter 63 (Other Textile Articles) which may have 0% or 7.5% Add-On.
- 6307.90.89.40 is the most tax-efficient option if the product qualifies as a "made-up textile article" rather than a handbag.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rateθ―¦θ§£ (Including Add-Ons & Policy Surcharges)
β Applicable Country: USA (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: From November 10, 2025 (and subsequent imports)
π― 1. 6307.90.89.40 ββ LOWEST TARIFF OPTION (Other Made-Up Textile Articles)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 7.0% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Add-On (301) | +0.0% (Exempt from 301 surcharge!) |
| IEEPA Surcharge (Section 122) | +10.0% (Targeting Chinese/ HK products) |
| Total Rate | 17.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 17% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No (Section 321 de minimis does not apply to goods subject to Section 301/IEEPA surcharges) |
| Legal Basis | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:6307.90.89.40 |
π Why this is best:
- The 0% Add-On saves you 7.5% to 25% compared to other classifications!
- Requires proving it is NOT a handbag (e.g., simple fold, no zipper/clasp, plain cotton pouch).
π― 2. 6307.90.98.91 ββ Fabric Minimalist Wallet
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 7.0% |
| USITC Add-On (301) | +7.5% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% |
| Total Rate | 24.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 24.5% |
| De Minimis? | β No |
| Legal Basis | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:6307.90.98.91 |
π Note:
- Slightly higher than #1. Used for more complex fabric constructions that still donβt qualify as "handbags."
π― 3. 4202.32.80.00 ββ Handbag-Style (Vegetable Fiber Textile)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.7% |
| USITC Add-On (301) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% |
| Total Rate | 40.7% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 40.7% |
| De Minimis? | β No |
| Legal Basis | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:4202.32.80.00 |
π Why so high?:
- Chapter 42 items from China face the full 25% Section 301 surcharge.
- Even though base duty is low (5.7%), the 25% add-on makes it expensive.
π― 4. 4202.31.60.00 ββ Vintage Wallet (Leather/Regenerating Leather)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 8.0% |
| USITC Add-On (301) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% |
| Total Rate | 43.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 43.0% |
| De Minimis? | β No |
| Legal Basis | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:4202.31.60.00 |
π Note:
- "Regenerating leather" (e.g., paper leather, recycled leather) is still classified under Chapter 42 if it mimics leather goods.
π― 5. 4202.32.93.00 ββ Handbag-Style (Other Textile)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 17.6% |
| USITC Add-On (301) | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% |
| Total Rate | 52.6% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 52.6% |
| De Minimis? | β No |
| Legal Basis | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β USITC:4202.32.93.00 |
π Warning:
- HIGHEST TAX. Avoid this unless the product is explicitly a handbag with textile outer and no other classification fits.
- High base duty (17.6%) + 25% add-on = Costly clearance.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Guide)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (Must-Have)
| Document | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specifications | βοΈ | Material composition (e.g., "Outer: 100% Cotton, Inner: Polyester"), dimensions, closure type (zipper, snap, fold). |
| β Product Photos | βοΈ | Front, back, inside, closure mechanism, and outer surface close-up. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Clear description: "Fabric Pouch, Cotton, No Hard Clasp, for Card Storage" (if aiming for 6307). |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Weight, quantity, dimensions. |
| β Origin Certificate (CO) | βοΈ | If claiming any preferential rates (rare for US-China, but good practice). |
β 2. Classification Strategy (Key Mantra)
π₯ βOuter Surface Rules! Handbag Definition Matters! 6307 vs 4202β
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Simple cotton pouch, fold-over, no clasp | 6307.90.89.40 (17.0%) |
β Best Option if truly simple |
| Fabric wallet with zipper/clasp, structured shape | 4202.32.xxxx (40-52%) |
β High tax, but accurate for "handbag-like" items |
| Leather or "Paper Leather" outer | 4202.31.60.00 (43.0%) |
β High tax, unavoidable if material is leather-like |
| Mixed material (e.g., leather trim + fabric body) | 4202.32.xxxx |
β Customs may classify based on essential character (usually the leather part) |
β 3. Special Handling Tips
| Situation | Advice |
|---|---|
| "Retro" Claim | Donβt use "Retro" in HS code justification. Focus on material and structure. |
| Minimalist Design | If the wallet has no metal hardware, no zipper, no clasp, argue for 6307 (Made-up Textile Article). |
| Textile Outer with Leather Lining | Still Chapter 42. Outer material dictates classification. |
| Vegetable Fiber (e.g., Jute, Raffia) | May qualify for 4202.32.80.00 (40.7%) β better than 4202.32.93.00 (52.6%). |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Duty (China Origin) | Key Certifications | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 6307.90.89.40 |
17.0% (Best) | N/A | Highest risk of audit. Ensure product is not a "handbag." |
| π¨π³ China | 6307.90.99.00 |
7.0% - 20% | N/A | Domestic tariffs vary; focus on US export. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 4202.32 or 6307.90 |
0% - 12% | CE (if electronic components) | EU may classify similar items under different subheadings. |
| π¬π§ UK | 4202.32 |
0% - 12% | N/A | Post-Brexit rules apply; check UK Integrated Tariff. |
| π―π΅ Japan | 4202.32 |
0% - 10% | PSE (if applicable) | Japan has FTA advantages with some countries. |
π Conclusion:
- USA is the most complex market due to Section 301 + IEEPA 10% surcharges.
- Target6307.90.89.40if your product is a simple fabric pouch.
- Avoid4202.32.93.00unless necessary, as 52.6% is extremely high.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Mistake 1: Calling it a "Wallet" and using 4202 codes |
π Consequence: If itβs a simple pouch, you might be underpaying if classified correctly as 6307, or overpaying if itβs truly a handbag. Misclassification risk.
β Mistake 2: Assuming "Cloth" = Low Tax |
π Consequence: If itβs a "handbag-style" cloth wallet, it falls under 4202 with 25% add-on. Donβt be fooled by the word "cloth."
β Mistake 3: Ignoring the Outer Surface |
π Consequence: If the outer is leather-like, even if mostly cloth, customs may classify as 4202.31 (Leather).
β Mistake 4: Not providing Closure Type |
π Consequence: Zippers/clasps suggest "handbag" (Chapter 42). No closure suggests "pouch" (Chapter 63). Be specific!
β Correct Approach:
"Cotton Fabric Pouch, Fold-Over, No Hardware, For Card Storage, Model XYZ" β Argue for
6307.90.89.40(17.0%).
π― VII. Conclusion: Precise Classification Saves Money!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Outer Surface First! No Clasp = 6307! Clasp = 4202!"
πΉ "17% vs 52%: A 35% Difference is Worth the Effort!"
πΉ "Section 301 Doesnβt Apply to 6307 (Sometimes) β Check Footnotes!"
π Pro Tip:
If your wallet has any metal hardware, zipper, or structured shape, assume it will be classified under Chapter 42.
If it is a simple, unstructured fabric pouch, push for 6307.90.89.40.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Consult a Customs Broker with product photos.
π Request an Advance Ruling if shipment volume is high.
π Optimize Design: Remove hardware if targeting the lowest tax bracket!
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Dollar Saved in Duty is Pure Profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.