Rubber Gloves for Fisheries
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6116109500 | 24.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926204050 | 16.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4015191150 | 38.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6116106500 | 24.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4015195100 | 49.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
𧀠Rubber Gloves for Fisheries (Agricultural/Industrial Use)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand "Rubber Fishing Gloves"?
Rubber gloves for fisheries (often categorized broadly under agricultural/industrial gloves) are protective equipment designed for hands in wet, corrosive, or heavy-duty environments. In international trade, the classification depends heavily on material composition (Natural Rubber vs. Synthetic/Plastic) and manufacturing process (Knitted vs. Molded/Vulcanized).
The data provided highlights a critical ambiguity: Even though the product is "Rubber," it can be classified under different chapters depending on the specific sub-category interpretation. This leads to drastically different tax liabilities.
β οΈ Key Distinction Point:
- If viewed as Knitted/Crocheted items impregnated with rubber/plastic β Chapter 61 (Textiles)
- If viewed as Solid Molded/Vulcanized rubber articles β Chapter 40 (Rubber) or Chapter 39 (Plastics)
- Misclassification Risk: Choosing Chapter 61 vs. Chapter 40 can result in a tax difference of up to 32.5%.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided data, here are the 5 potential HS Codes for "Rubber Gloves for Fisheries," ranked by total tax burden:
| HS Code | Product Description & Logic | Total Tax Rate | Key Reason for Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
3926.20.40.50 |
Rubber fishing gloves, treated similarly to plastic goods in usage classification. | 16.5% | Lowest Tax. Classified under plastics chapter due to usage logic, avoiding high rubber tariffs. |
6116.10.95.00 |
Rubber gloves, knitted/crocheted base with rubber coating/impregnation. | 24.5% | Mid-range tax. Standard textile-based glove classification. |
6116.10.65.00 |
Rubber gloves, inferred as rubber-impregnated or coated gloves (textile base). | 24.5% | Mid-range tax. Similar to above, often depends on specific coating process. |
4015.19.11.50 |
Gloves made of vulcanized rubber (apparel/accessories). | 38.0% | High tax. Classified strictly as rubber apparel/accessories under Chapter 40. |
4015.19.51.00 |
Gloves made of vulcanized rubber (high-tier apparel/accessories). | 49.0% | Highest Tax. Strictest interpretation of rubber apparel classification. |
π Critical Insight:
- The 16.5% rate (3926.20.40.50) is significantly lower than the 49.0% rate (4015.19.51.00).
- This 32.5% difference is purely based on whether customs authorities view the item as a "Plastic-like article" (Ch 39) or a "Vulcanized Rubber Garment" (Ch 40).
- Note: All classifications assume origin from China and import into a market with Section 122 tariffs and Base Tariffs as detailed below.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: Importing Market (Implied US/Strict Tariff Regime based on "122 Clause")
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: 2025/2026 Period
π― 1. 3926.20.40.50 β The "Plastic Logic" Classification (Best Option)
Summary: Rubber gloves, but classified under plastic goods logic for gloves.
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Surtax | 0.0% (No additional 301 tariff) |
| 122 Clause Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Rate | 16.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 16.5% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β οΈ Check specific country rules (usually < $800 exempt, but high-value batches subject to duty) |
| Legal Path | Ch 39 β 3926 (Other articles of plastics) β Usage Logic Application |
π Explanation:
- This classification leverages the argument that the glove's function aligns more with plastic household goods than raw rubber products.
- Zero Section 301 tax makes this the most cost-effective choice if defensible.
π― 2. 6116.10.95.00 & 6116.10.65.00 β The "Textile Base" Classification (Standard Option)
Summary: Knitted/Crocheted gloves, impregnated/coated with rubber.
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 7.0% |
| Section 301 Surtax | 7.5% |
| 122 Clause Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Rate | 24.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 24.5% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β οΈ Check specific country rules |
| Legal Path | Ch 61 (Articles of apparel, knitted/crocheted) β 6116 (Gloves) β Textile Logic |
π Explanation:
- These codes assume the glove has a knitted fabric base that is then dipped/coated in rubber.
- The 7.5% Surtax applies here, making it more expensive than the Ch 39 option but cheaper than Ch 40.
π― 3. 4015.19.11.50 β The "Vulcanized Rubber" Classification (High Risk)
Summary: Rubber gloves, classified as vulcanized rubber apparel/accessories.
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.0% |
| Section 301 Surtax | 25.0% (Heavy Penalty) |
| 122 Clause Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Rate | 38.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38.0% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β High Risk of Audit |
| Legal Path | Ch 40 (Rubber) β 4015 (Vulcanized rubber articles) β Apparel Logic |
π Explanation:
- This classification treats the glove purely as a rubber product, ignoring textile bases.
- The 25% Section 301 surtax is the main driver of cost.
- Even though the base rate is low (3%), the surtax makes it expensive.
π― 4. 4015.19.51.00 β The "Strict Rubber" Classification (Worst Option)
Summary: Rubber gloves, strictly categorized under high-tier vulcanized rubber apparel.
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 14.0% |
| Section 301 Surtax | 25.0% |
| 122 Clause Tariff | 10.0% |
| Total Rate | 49.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 49.0% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β High Risk of Audit |
| Legal Path | Ch 40 β 4015.19.51 (Specific sub-category for rubber gloves) |
π Explanation:
- This is the most punitive classification.
- High base rate (14%) + 25% Surtax + 10% 122 Clause = 49% Total.
- Avoid this classification unless the product is solid rubber with no textile backing and fits this specific sub-heading perfectly.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Guide)
β 1. Essential Documentation Checklist (Non-Negotiable)
| Document | Required? | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Must detail: Material (Natural/Synthetic Rubber), Base Material (Knitted/None), Coating Thickness. |
| β Production Process Diagram | βοΈ | Crucial for Ch 61 vs Ch 40 distinction. Shows if it's "Knitted then Dipped" (Ch 61) or "Molded" (Ch 40/39). |
| β Product Photos (Internal/External) | βοΈ | Show texture, lining (if any), and packaging. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Clearly state: "Fishing Gloves, Rubber Coated, Knitted Base" or "Solid Rubber Gloves". Avoid vague terms like "Industrial Gloves". |
| β Origin Certificate (CO) | βοΈ | Required for 122 Clause verification. |
β 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mnemonic)
π₯ "Knitted Base = Ch 61 (24.5%), Solid Molded = Ch 40 (38-49%), Plastic Logic = Ch 39 (16.5%)"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration Strategy | Consequence of Error |
|---|---|---|
| Knitted Glove + Rubber Dip | Declare as 6116.10.xxxx |
If declared as 4015, you pay ~15-25% extra in surtaxes. |
| Solid Molded Rubber Glove | Declare as 4015.19.xxxx |
If declared as 3926, risk of penalty for misclassification of material. |
| "Plastic-like" Rubber Glove | Argue for 3926.20.40.50 |
Strongest argument for lowest tax (16.5%). Requires strong evidence of usage/logic alignment. |
β 3. Special Handling Tips
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| Mixed Materials | If the glove has a cotton liner, do not claim Ch 40. Push for Ch 61 or Ch 39. Ch 40 is for "pure" rubber articles. |
| 122 Clause Impact | All codes in the data include a 10% 122 Clause tariff. This is a fixed add-on. Focus on minimizing the Base + Surtax portion. |
| Pre-Ruling | Strongly Recommended: If shipping large volumes, apply for a Binding Tariff Information (BTI) or Pre-Ruling. The difference between 16.5% and 49% is significant. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Market | Recommended HS Code | Est. Total Tax | Key Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ US (with 122/301) | 3926.20.40.50 |
16.5% | Prove "Plastic Logic" or "Non-Rubber Article" status. |
| πΊπΈ US (Standard) | 6116.10.95.00 |
24.5% | Standard for knitted/rubber-dipped gloves. |
| πΊπΈ US (High Risk) | 4015.19.51.00 |
49.0% | Avoid unless solid rubber. |
| π¨π³ China | 4015.19.90 |
~10-15% | Lower base tariffs, no Section 301. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 4015.11.00 |
~14% | No 122 Clause. Standard rubber glove duty. |
π Conclusion:
- The US market (as implied by the tax structure) is the most complex due to Section 301 and 122 Clause add-ons.
- Goal: Avoid4015codes if possible. Aim for3926(16.5%) or6116(24.5%).
- Strategy: Use the "Plastic Logic" argument for3926.20.40.50to achieve the lowest tax rate.
π VI. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Error 1: Declaring Rubber Gloves as 4015 when they have a knitted liner.
π Consequence: Overpaying surtaxes. If correctly classified as Ch 61, tax drops from 49% to 24.5%.
β Error 2: Ignoring the "122 Clause" in tariff calculations.
π Consequence: Budgeting fails. The 10% is added on top of everything else.
β Error 3: Using generic terms like "Industrial Gloves" on the invoice.
π Consequence: Customs may choose the highest applicable duty rate (4015.19.51.00) due to ambiguity.
β Correct Declaration Example:
"Fishing Gloves, Rubber-Coated Knitted Fabric, Cotton Liner, Model FG-100, HS 3926.20.40.50"
π― VII. Conclusion: Precision Classification = Profit Protection
π― Remember the Golden Rule:
πΉ "Material Matters, but Logic Wins."
πΉ "Knitted Base? Go Ch 61 (24.5%). Plastic Logic? Go Ch 39 (16.5%). Pure Rubber? Brace for Ch 40 (38-49%)."
π Pro Tip:
- If your product is solid molded rubber, you may not escape Ch 40.
- If your product is knitted and dipped, fight for Ch 61.
- If your product is synthetic/rubber blend, argue for Ch 39 (3926.20.40.50) for the 16.5% sweet spot.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Review your product specs.
π Check for knitted bases.
π‘ Consult a customs broker to support the3926or6116classification before shipment.
π Save up to 32.5% in taxes by choosing the right HS Code.
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every percent saved is pure profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.