Shoe Covers (Anti slip Sole)
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6401999000 | 47.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6217909095 | 32.1% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6401993000 | 42.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926201020 | 10.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π Shoe Covers (Anti-slip Sole)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Strategies
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Know "Shoe Covers"?
Shoe covers are protective garments designed to be worn over existing footwear. They serve dual purposes: maintaining hygiene (clean rooms, hospitals) and providing safety (anti-slip soles, waterproofing). In international trade, classification is highly contested because they can be viewed as plastic articles, footwear, or apparel accessories depending on material and construction.
β οΈ Key Distinction Points:
- If primarily made of Plastic/Synthetic materials and considered "other articles of plastics" β 3926.90.99.89 or 3926.20.10.20
- If classified as Footwear (worn over shoes, waterproof/rubber/plastic) β 6401.99.90.00 or 6401.99.30.00
- If classified as Apparel Accessories/Parts (textile-like or general garment components) β 6217.90.90.95
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicability Logic | Total Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
3926.90.99.89 |
Other articles of plastics, not elsewhere specified | Material: Plastic/Synthetic. Form: Not specifically listed elsewhere. | 22.8% |
6401.99.90.00 |
Waterproof footwear, other, with outer soles of rubber/plastics | Form: Shoe cover. Material: Rubber/Plastic inferred. Fits "Footwear" definition. | 47.5% |
6217.90.90.95 |
Other made-up clothing accessories; parts of garments | Category: Accessory/Part of apparel. No material conflict. | 32.1% |
6401.99.30.00 |
Waterproof footwear, with outer soles of rubber/plastics, without fastening | Form: Shoe cover worn over shoes. Protective type, no closure device. | 42.5% |
3926.20.10.20 |
Other articles of plastics for clothing (One-time use) | Material: Plastic. Form: One-time shoe cover. Fits "Clothing Accessory" purpose. | 10.0% |
π Critical Reminder:
- Plastic vs. Footwear: If the item is thin, disposable, and clearly a "cover" for hygiene, it may lean towards 3926 or 6217. If it is thick, durable, and primarily for safety/waterproofing, customs often classify it as Footwear (6401).
- "Anti-slip Sole" Impact: The presence of a dedicated anti-slip sole strengthens the argument for Footwear classification (6401), potentially increasing tax liability significantly.
- One-time Use: If marketed as disposable/one-time, 3926.20.10.20 offers the lowest tax rate but requires strict proof of "single-use" design.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surtaxes & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: From November 10, 2025 (including subsequent imports)
π― 1. 3926.90.99.89 ββ Other Plastic Articles
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.3% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +7.5% |
| IEEPA 122 Provision | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 22.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | Base: 5.3% β Section 301: 7.5% β IEEPA: 10% |
π Explanation:
- Classified as generic plastic goods.
- Moderate tax burden compared to footwear.
- Suitable if the product is thin, disposable, and lacks structural complexity.
π― 2. 6401.99.90.00 ββ Waterproof Footwear (General)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 37.5% |
| Section 301 Surtax | 0.0% |
| IEEPA 122 Provision | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 47.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 47.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | Base: 37.5% β Section 301: 0% β IEEPA: 10% |
π Warning:
- Highest tax rate in the list.
- Triggered when Customs views the shoe cover as "footwear" due to sole construction (anti-slip) or material thickness.
- High Risk: Misclassification here can lead to massive duty underpayments.
π― 3. 6217.90.90.95 ββ Apparel Accessories/Parts
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 14.6% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +7.5% |
| IEEPA 122 Provision | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 32.1% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 32.1% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | Base: 14.6% β Section 301: 7.5% β IEEPA: 10% |
π Note:
- A "middle ground" classification.
- Useful if the shoe cover is made of fabric-like synthetic materials or is considered a "part" of a larger garment system.
- Less common for pure plastic/rubber shoe covers unless specific textile blends are used.
π― 4. 6401.99.30.00 ββ Waterproof Footwear (No Fastening)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 25.0% |
| Section 301 Surtax | +7.5% |
| IEEPA 122 Provision | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 42.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 42.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | Base: 25.0% β Section 301: 7.5% β IEEPA: 10% |
π Explanation:
- Specifically for footwear without fastening devices (like lace-ups or buckles).
- Shoe covers naturally fit this "no fastening" description.
- Still high tax due to footwear base rates.
π― 5. 3926.20.10.20 ββ Plastic Articles for Clothing (One-time Use)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Surtax | 0.0% |
| IEEPA 122 Provision | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 10.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 10.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | Base: 0.0% β Section 301: 0% β IEEPA: 10% |
π Optimal Choice:
- Lowest Tax Rate (10%).
- Applies if the product is explicitly disposable/one-time use and made of plastic.
- Condition: Must prove it is not durable footwear. No Section 301 tax applies here.
- Strategy: If possible, market and design as "Disposable Hygienic Shoe Covers" rather than "Safety Anti-slip Shoe Covers."
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-world Pitfall Avoidance)
β 1. Required Documentation Checklist (All Mandatory)
| Document | Must Provide | Description |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification | βοΈ | Material composition (Plastic vs. Rubber vs. Fabric), thickness, weight. |
| β Usage Scenario Proof | βοΈ | Photos/Videos showing "one-time use" or "disposable" nature. |
| β Product Photos | βοΈ | Clear images of sole, interior, and any packaging. |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Accurate description: "Disposable Plastic Shoe Cover, Anti-slip Sole." |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Quantity per box, total weight. |
| β Origin Certificate (CO) | βοΈ | Essential for verifying China origin and applying correct surtaxes. |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Key Mnemonic)
π₯ "Material Dictates Code, Use Defines Duty, Name Controls Tax!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Disposable, Thin Plastic | 3926.20.10.20 |
Call it "Safety Footwear" β 42.5%+ |
| Thick, Durable, Anti-slip Sole | 6401.99.90.00 |
Call it "Plastic Accessory" β Risk of re-classification |
| Textile/Non-woven Fabric | 6217.90.90.95 |
Call it "Plastic" β Customs may reject |
| Mixed Materials | 3926.90.99.89 |
Ambiguous description β Delays & Penalties |
β 3. Special Handling Scenarios
| Scenario | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Custom Orders | Provide client design specs. If client demands "Safety Certified," expect Footwear (6401) classification. |
| Anti-slip Sole Feature | High Risk: This feature pushes classification toward Footwear (6401). To avoid this, emphasize "Hygiene/Cleanliness" over "Safety/Traction" in marketing. |
| Reusable vs. Disposable | Reusable β Higher chance of Footwear/Apparel classification. Disposable β Higher chance of 3926.20.10.20 (10% tax). |
| Medical vs. Industrial | Medical use may require additional certifications (FDA, CE), but does not change HS Code. Industrial use is straightforward. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3926.20.10.20 |
10% | IEEPA 10% only | Best rate for disposable plastic. |
| πΊπΈ USA | 6401.99.90.00 |
47.5% | No Exemption | Highest risk if misclassified. |
| π¨π³ China | 3926.90.99.89 |
5% | None | Low export tax. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3926.90.99.89 |
6.5% | CE/REACH | Standard plastic tariff. |
| π¬π§ UK | 3926.90.99.89 |
6.5% | UKCA | Similar to EU post-Brexit. |
π Conclusion:
- USA is the most critical market due to high surtaxes (IEEPA + Section 301).
- Strategic Shift: To minimize costs in the US, aim for3926.20.10.20(10%) by positioning the product as disposable hygiene gear, not safety footwear.
- Avoid6401unless the product is genuinely durable, heavy-duty, and marketed for traction/safety, despite the 42.5%β47.5% tax.
π VI. Common Errors & Pitfall Guide (Lessons Learned)
β Error 1: Declaring durable, anti-slip shoe covers as "Plastic Bags" (3926.90.99.89)
π Consequence: Customs re-classifies as Footwear (6401) β 20%+ tax increase + Penalties!
β Error 2: Calling disposable covers "Shoes" or "Footwear"
π Consequence: Triggers Footwear tariffs (42.5%β47.5%) instead of Plastic/Apparel rates β Massive cost overrun.
β Error 3: Ignoring the "Anti-slip" feature in description
π Consequence: Customs may doubt the "disposable" claim, leading to audits or delays.
β Error 4: Using vague terms like "Protective Cover" without material details
π Consequence: Customs requests additional information β Shipment delayed at port.
β Correct Practice:
"Disposable Plastic Shoe Cover, Single-use, Non-woven/PE Material, Anti-slip Sole, For Hygiene/Cleanroom Use, Not for Safety Footwear Replacement."
π― VII. Conclusion: Professional Classification Saves Money!
π― Remember the Mnemonic:
πΉ "Disposable = Plastic (10%), Durable = Footwear (47%), Accessory = Apparel (32%)!"
πΉ "Anti-slip is a Trap for Footwear Classification β Position as Hygiene to Save Taxes!"
π Pro Tip:
If your shoe covers are originally made in Vietnam, Mexico, or Thailand, you may qualify for IEEPA Exemptions, reducing taxes to 0%β5%.
Recommend Applying for a Binding Ruling (Advance Ruling) from US Customs (CBP) to lock in the 10% tariff for disposable plastic covers.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Consult with a Licensed Customs Broker + Provide Product Samples + Request HS Code Binding Ruling
π Ensure Smooth Clearance, Minimize Duties, Maximize Profit Margins!
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Cent Saved on Tariffs is Pure Profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.