label
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4821902000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4821102000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4821104000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5807100510 | 42.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 5807900510 | 42.9% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π·οΈ Label (Tags & Labels)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional-Level Clearance Strategy
π 1. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand "Labels"?
Labels are ubiquitous in global trade, used for identification, branding, compliance, and logistics. In international trade, they are strictly categorized by material and application. Misclassification often leads to massive tax discrepancies due to the varying tariff rates for paper, textile, and plastic materials under US Trade Acts (Section 301 & IEEPA).
β οΈ Key Distinction Points:
- Paper/Cardboard Labels: Base tariff 0%, but heavily impacted by Section 301 (+25%) and IEEPA (+10%). Total: 35%.
- Textile Labels (Cotton/Synthetic): Higher base tariff (7.9%) + Section 301 (+25%) + IEEPA (+10%). Total: 42.9%.
- Plastic Labels (PP/PET): Moderate base tariff (5.3%) + Section 301 (+7.5% for some plastics) + IEEPA (+10%). Total: 22.8%.
π¦ 2. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority)
| HS Code | Product Description | Material Inference | Application | Total Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
4821.90.20.00 |
Paper labels, inferred material as paper or self-adhesive | Paper / Self-adhesive | General purpose, packaging, general goods | 35.0% |
4821.10.20.00 |
Paper or cardboard labels, inferred material based on fallback category rules | Paper / Cardboard | Fallback category, standard paper tags | 35.0% |
4821.10.40.00 |
Paper labels for apparel, conforming to paper and cardboard label uses | Paper | Clothing tags, hangtags, paper-based garment labels | 35.0% |
5807.10.05.10 |
Garment labels, inferred material as cotton or man-made fibers | Cotton / Man-made Fibers | Woven labels, textile hangtags, clothing brand labels | 42.9% |
5807.90.05.10 |
Garment labels, inferred material as cotton, man-made fibers, or other textile materials | Textile (Various) | Non-woven textile labels, complex textile tags | 42.9% |
3926.90.99.89 |
Garment labels, inferred material as plastic (e.g., PP, PET) | Plastic (PP/PET) | Plastic hangtags, synthetic labels, waterproof labels | 22.8% |
π Key Reminder:
- Paper labels are subject to 35% total tax (0% base + 25% Sec 301 + 10% IEEPA).
- Textile labels are the most expensive at 42.9% due to the higher base tariff (7.9%).
- Plastic labels are the most tax-efficient at 22.8%, thanks to a lower base tariff and reduced Section 301 impact on certain plastic goods.
π° 3. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Surcharges & Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: 2025εΉ΄11ζ10ζ₯θ΅· (Including subsequent imports)
π― 1. 4821.90.20.00 / 4821.10.20.00 / 4821.10.40.00 ββ Paper Labels
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0% (ad valorem) |
| USITC Surcharge (Sec 301) | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (China) | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 35.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Deny de minimis) |
| Legal Basis | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:4821.xx.xx β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Explanation:
- Paper labels fall under Chapter 48. The base tariff is 0%, but Section 301 adds 25% and IEEPA adds 10%.
- Total 35% is a significant cost. Ensure your supplier invoices clearly state "Paper Labels" to avoid being misclassified as higher-tax textile items.
π― 2. 5807.10.05.10 / 5807.90.05.10 ββ Textile Labels (Cotton/Synthetic)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 7.9% |
| USITC Surcharge (Sec 301) | +25% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (China) | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 42.9% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 42.9% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Deny de minimis) |
| Legal Basis | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:5807.xx.xx β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Note:
- Textile labels have a higher base tariff (7.9%) compared to paper (0%).
- This makes them the most expensive option at 42.9%.
- Woven labels (εΈΈθ§δΊζθ£ εη/ζ΄ζ ) must be declared accurately as "Textile" to avoid penalty for misclassification.
π― 3. 3926.90.99.89 ββ Plastic Labels (PP/PET)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.3% |
| USITC Surcharge (Sec 301) | +7.5% (Specific to this plastic subheading) |
| IEEPA Surcharge (China) | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 22.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 22.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption | β Not Eligible (Deny de minimis) |
| Legal Basis | IEEPA:9903.01.25 β IEEPA:9903.01.24 β USITC:3926.90.99 β FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
π Advantage:
- Plastic labels benefit from a lower base tariff (5.3%) and a reduced Section 301 rate (7.5%) compared to paper/textile.
- Total 22.8% is significantly lower than paper (35%) and textile (42.9%).
- If possible, consider using plastic (PP/PET) labels to reduce customs costs, provided they meet product requirements.
π οΈ 4. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Practical Pitfall Avoidance Guide)
β 1. Documentation Checklist (All Required)
| Document | Mandatory | Description |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Must specify material (Paper, Cotton, Plastic), size, adhesive type |
| β Product Photos (Clear Label) | βοΈ | Show texture, material, printing details to prove material type |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Clearly state: "Paper Labels", "Textile Labels", or "Plastic Labels" |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Describe contents accurately; avoid vague terms like "Goods" |
| β Material Declaration | βοΈ | Explicitly declare: "Made of 100% Paper", "Cotton Woven", or "PP Plastic" |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Key Mantras)
π₯ "Material Defines Tax, Classification Determines Cost!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Paper Hangtags | 4821.10.40.00 (Paper Labels) |
Misclassified as "Textile" β 42.9% |
| Woven Care Labels | 5807.10.05.10 (Textile Labels) |
Misclassified as "Paper" β Penalty & Back Tax |
| Plastic PVC/PP Tags | 3926.90.99.89 (Plastic Labels) |
Misclassified as "Paper" β 35% instead of 22.8% |
| Mixed Material Labels | Declare Main Material | If mixed, declare based on essential character; risk of dispute |
β 3. Special Cases Handling
| Scenario | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| Self-Adhesive Paper Labels | Declare as Paper (4821.90.20.00). Adhesive does not change material classification to textile/plastic. |
| Woven Labels with Plastic Backing | If plastic backing is substantial, may be classified as plastic. Consult customs broker. |
| Gold/Silver Foil Labels | If base is paper, still Paper (4821). Foil coating doesn't change HS code. |
| Fabric Patches (Embroidery) | May fall under 5810 or 6217. Different from standard labels. Check carefully. |
π 5. Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Certification | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 4821.10.40.00 (Paper) |
35.0% | None | Highest tax burden on paper/textile |
| πͺπΊ EU | 4821.10.20.00 (Paper) |
2.7% | CE (if applicable) | No Section 301/IEEPA |
| π¨π³ China | 4821.10.40.00 (Paper) |
2.0% | N/A | Low domestic tariff |
| π¬π§ UK | 4821.10.20.00 (Paper) |
3.0% | N/A | Post-Brexit tariffs |
| π―π΅ Japan | 4821.10.20.00 (Paper) |
3.0% | N/A | Stable low tariff |
π Conclusion:
- USA is the most expensive market for labels due to Section 301 and IEEPA surcharges.
- Paper labels (35%) and Textile labels (42.9%) are heavily taxed.
- Plastic labels (22.8%) offer a 10-20% tax savings compared to paper/textile in the US market.
- EU/China/Japan do not have these surcharges, making them much cheaper.
π 6. Common Errors & Pitfall Avoidance (Blood & Tears Lessons)
β Error 1: Declaring "Textile Labels" as "Paper Labels"
π Consequence: Underpayment of tax (42.9% vs 35%). Back taxes + fines + seizure risk!
β Error 2: Declaring "Plastic Labels" as "Textile"
π Consequence: Overpayment of tax (42.9% vs 22.8%). Unnecessary cost!
β Error 3: Vague Description "Labels" without material specification
π Consequence: Customs will classify based on the highest possible risk or random audit, leading to delays and potential 42.9% rate.
β Error 4: Ignoring IEEPA 10% Surcharge
π Consequence: All these HS codes are subject to 10% IEEPA. If not accounted for, profit margins vanish.
β Correct Practice:
"Paper Hangtags, Unprinted, 2x3 inch, for Apparel Use"
OR
"Woven Cotton Care Labels, 1.5 inch, for Garment Use"
OR
"PP Plastic Hangtags, Clear, for Retail Use"
π― 7. Conclusion: Precise Classification, Save Money, Smooth Clearance!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Paper 35%, Textile 42.9%, Plastic 22.8%!"
πΉ "Material is Key, IEEPA is Always 10%, Sec 301 Varies!"
πΉ "Declare Precisely, Avoid Penalties, Maximize Profit!"
π Pro Tip:
If your product allows, consider switching to Plastic Labels (PP/PET) for the US market to save 10-20% in customs duties.
Always request a HS Code Advance Ruling from CBP before shipment if unsure about material classification.
π£ Take Action Now:
π Contact a Professional Customs Broker + Provide Material Samples + Apply for HS Code Advance Ruling
π Let Your Labels Clear Smoothly, Cross Borders Efficiently, and Boost Profits!
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Penny of Tax Saved is Pure Profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.