sealed tank
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3923300090 | 38.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7323999030 | 88.4% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7323995030 | 60.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7010905009 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 7010905039 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
πΊ Sealed Tanks / Containers (Sealed Jars & Canisters)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Truly Understand "Sealed Tanks"?
In international trade, "Sealed Tanks" (often referred to as Jars, Canisters, or Storage Containers) are not a single uniform product. The HS Code classification is entirely dependent on the Material Composition and Intended Use. Misclassification can lead to severe tariff discrepancies due to the varying trade policies applied to plastic, glass, and metal products from China.
The data provided analyzes four specific material categories: 1. Plastic Containers 2. Glass Containers 3. Iron/Steel Containers 4. Tinplate/Iron Containers (Kitchenware)
β οΈ Critical Distinction:
- Plastic & Glass are primarily subject to standard Section 99 tariffs (Base + Section 301 + IEEPA).
- Iron/Steel & Tinplate are subject to Section 232 Tariffs (Steel/Aluminum/Copper surcharge), making their tax burden significantly higher and more complex.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Matrix (Based on Provided Data)
| HS Code | Material | Summary Description | Primary Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
3923.30.00.90 |
Plastic | Sealed tank, material inferred as plastic | General storage, chemical containers, food-grade plastic jars |
7010.90.50.09 |
Glass | Sealed tank, material inferred as glass | Beverage packaging, cosmetic storage, general preservation |
7010.90.50.39 |
Glass | Sealed tank, material inferred as glass | Specific sealed glass containers (e.g., specialized packaging) |
7323.99.50.30 |
Iron/Tinplate | Sealed tank, material inferred as iron/tinplate | Kitchen/home use items (e.g., tin canisters) |
7323.99.90.30 |
Iron/Steel | Sealed tank, material inferred as iron or steel | Kitchen or tableware (e.g., steel canisters, lunch boxes) |
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Detailed Policy Analysis)
β Applicable Market: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Timeline: Based on current trade measures (Section 301, IEEPA, Section 232)
π― 1. Plastic Containers
HS Code: 3923.30.00.90
Material: Plastic
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (122 Clause) | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 38.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38% |
| Key Note | No Section 232 steel/aluminum surcharge applies. |
π Explanation:
- Base (3%): Standard Most Favored Nation (MFN) rate for plastic articles. - Section 301 (25%): Standard retaliatory tariff on Chinese goods. - IEEPA (10%): Additional tariff under International Emergency Economic Powers Act (often referred to as the "122 clause" in specific trade contexts). - Total 38%: This is the standard high-duty bracket for plastic packaging materials.
π― 2. Glass Containers
HS Codes: 7010.90.50.09 / 7010.90.50.39
Material: Glass
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (122 Clause) | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 35.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 35% |
| Key Note | Glass is exempt from Steel/Aluminum surcharges. |
π Explanation:
- Base (0%): Many glass packaging articles have a low or zero base MFN rate. - Section 301 (25%): Applies uniformly to Chinese glass products. - IEEPA (10%): Applies as an additional layer. - Total 35%: Slightly cheaper than plastic, making glass a potentially more cost-effective option for shipping bulk goods if weight constraints allow.
π― 3. Iron/Tinplate Containers (Kitchen/Home Use)
HS Code: 7323.99.50.30
Material: Iron or Tinplate
Use: Kitchen/Home Items
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (122 Clause) | 10.0% |
| Section 232 Surcharge (Steel/Al/Cu) | 50.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 60.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 60% |
| Key Note | High risk due to Section 232 Steel Tariff. |
π Explanation:
- Base (0%): Low base rate for certain tinplate articles. - Section 301 (0%): Note: Some specific tinplate sub-headings may be excluded from certain Section 301 lists, but the Section 232 tariff dominates. - Section 232 (50%): CRITICAL. Under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, steel and aluminum products from China face a 50% surcharge. This applies to iron/tinplate containers. - IEEPA (10%): Additional tariff on top. - Total 60%: This is a punitive tariff tier. Importers must carefully verify if the product is classified as "Steel" or "Tinplate" as this triggers the massive 50% add-on.
π― 4. Iron/Steel Containers (Kitchen/Tableware)
HS Code: 7323.99.90.30
Material: Iron or Steel
Use: Kitchen/Tableware
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.4% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 25.0% |
| IEEPA Surcharge (122 Clause) | 10.0% |
| Section 232 Surcharge (Steel/Al/Cu) | 50.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 88.4% |
| Calculation | CIF Value Γ 88.4% |
| Key Note | Highest Tariff Bracket. |
π Explanation:
- Base (3.4%): Standard rate for steel tableware. - Section 301 (25%): Applies. - Section 232 (50%): Applies because the material is Steel. - IEEPA (10%): Applies. - Total 88.4%: This is an extremely high duty. Almost all steel-based kitchenware (lunch boxes, steel canisters) from China falls into this high-tax category. - Warning: A nearly 90% duty significantly impacts profitability. Many importers switch to plastic or glass for cost reasons, or source from Vietnam/Mexico for Section 232 exemption.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Operational Advice (Pitfall Avoidance Guide)
β 1. Material Verification is Key
Customs officers may not visually distinguish between Tinplate (7323.99.50.30) and Steel (7323.99.90.30).
- Risk: If you declare as Tinplate (60%) but Customs classifies as Steel (88.4%), you will owe 28.4% additional duty + penalties.
- Action: Provide detailed material composition certificates. Ensure the "Tin" coating thickness is documented if claiming Tinplate status.
β 2. Avoid "General" Descriptions
- Bad Declaration: "Metal Sealed Container"
- Good Declaration: "Stainless Steel Sealed Food Container, for Kitchen Use, HS 7323.99.90.30"
- Why: Specificity allows for faster clearance and accurate tariff application.
β 3. Section 232 Exemption Checks
- If your product is made from Aluminum or Copper (not Iron/Steel), check if it falls under the Section 232 exemptions or different sub-headings.
- Plastic and Glass are NOT subject to Section 232, making them safer from the 50% surcharge volatility.
β 4. Documentation Checklist
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) | For plastic/chemical containers, proves non-hazardous nature. |
| Material Composition Certificate | Crucial for Iron/Steel vs. Tinplate distinction. |
| Intended Use Statement | Clarifies if it's for "Kitchen/Tableware" (triggering 7323) or "General Packaging" (triggering 7010/3923). |
| Commercial Invoice | Must clearly state "Made in China" to trigger applicable Section 301/IEEPA/232 rates. |
π V. Global Market Comparison (Quick View)
| Destination | Plastic (3923) | Glass (7010) | Steel/Iron (7323) |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 38.0% | 35.0% | 60.0% - 88.4% |
| π¨π³ China | ~5-10% (Import) | ~5-10% (Import) | ~5-10% (Import) |
| πͺπΊ EU | ~3-6.5% | ~3-6.5% | ~4-6.5% |
| π¬π§ UK | ~3-6.5% | ~3-6.5% | ~4-6.5% |
π Conclusion:
- The US market is exceptionally costly for Chinese steel/aluminum products due to the Section 232 50% surcharge. - Glass offers the lowest total tax burden (35%) among all options. - Plastic is a close second (38%) and avoids the complex Section 232 steel regulations.
π VI. Common Errors & Blood-Letting Lessons
β Error 1: Declaring a Steel Lunch Box as "Plastic Container"
π Consequence: Customs inspection reveals metal content β Back taxes + 25% Penalty + Seizure Risk.
β Error 2: Ignoring the "Tinplate" vs. "Steel" distinction
π Consequence: Declaring Tinplate (60%) when it's actually Steel (88.4%) β 28.4% deficit in profit margin.
β Error 3: Using generic HS Codes
π Consequence: "Other containers" codes attract higher discretionary duties or lack legal protection for tariff exclusions.
β Correct Strategy:
"For US Export, prioritize Glass or Plastic to avoid the 50% Steel Surcharge. If Steel is unavoidable, ensure exact HS Code alignment to avoid penalties."
π― VII. Conclusion: Professional Clearance, Cost Control
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Plastic 38%, Glass 35%, Steel 88%."
πΉ "Steel triggers the 50% Section 232 Hammer."
πΉ "Material defines the tariff destiny."
π Pro Tip:
If you are exporting Steel/Tinplate containers to the US, strongly consider:
1. Supplier Switch: Source from Vietnam or Mexico (avoiding Section 232/301 on China origin).
2. Material Switch: Convert designs to Glass (35% tax) or Plastic (38% tax) to save ~50% in duties.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Verify Material Composition β π Calculate Total Landed Cost (CIF + Duty) β π Choose Optimal HS Code.
β¨ Accurate Classification Saves Millions!
πΌ Every Percent of Duty is Pure Profit Lost or Saved!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.