Processing...

Thinking...

AI is analyzing your product

60s

tableware organizer box

CN β†’ US
HS Code Tariff Rate Origin Destination Doc
4420908000 38.2% CN US Official Doc
4202929315 52.6% CN US Official Doc
3926901000 20.9% CN US Official Doc
4202926010 41.3% CN US Official Doc
3926909989 22.8% CN US Official Doc

Product Images

AI Analysis

πŸ“¦ Tableware Organizer Box


🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Compliance Strategy
πŸ“Œ I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly Is a "Tableware Organizer"?

A Tableware Organizer Box is a storage container designed specifically for holding cutlery, utensils, or dining accessories. In international trade, classification hinges heavily on material composition and specific design features. Since the term "Organizer Box" is generic, it can fall into multiple HS Code categories depending on whether it is made of wood, plastic, or textile/material combinations.

⚠️ Critical Distinction:
- If made of Wood and resembles jewelry/cutlery boxes β†’ Chapter 44
- If made of Plastic and fits general storage categories β†’ Chapter 39
- If made of Textiles/Vinyl or structured as a case β†’ Chapter 42


πŸ“Š II. HS Code Classification Details (Based on Provided Data)

Based on the input data, the following HS Codes and tax structures are applicable, depending on the inferred material:

HS Code Inferred Material Summary/Logic Total Tax Rate
4420.90.80.00 Wood Matches "jewelry or cutlery boxes and similar wooden articles." Fits the form of a wooden container without material conflict. 38.2%
4202.92.93.15 Textile/Unknown Surface Inferred as a container type. Based on "no obvious conflict," assumed to have a textile outer surface (common for fabric organizers). 52.6%
3926.90.10.00 Plastic Inferred as plastic (common for Chapter 39). Matches "other articles" including buckets/pails in form/function. 20.9%
4202.92.60.10 Plastic/Textile (Fallback) Fits the form of jewelry/utensil containers. Using "other/fallback" logic, assumes plastic or textile with no conflict. 41.3%
3926.90.99.89 Plastic (General) Inferred as plastic based on common sense. Matches "other plastic articles" with no form/usage conflict. 22.8%

πŸ” Key Takeaway:
- Plastic organizers generally attract lower base tariffs (3.4%-5.3%) but are subject to specific additional duties.
- Wooden organizers benefit from lower base tariffs (3.2%) but face a 10% Section 301/IEEPA surcharge.
- Textile-based organizers often face the highest total tax rates (up to 52.6%) due to higher base tariffs (17.6%).


πŸ’° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Detailed Tax Clauses)

βœ… Applicable Country: United States (US)
βœ… Origin: China (CN)
βœ… Effective Date: Post-2025 Regulations (Including Section 301 & IEEPA measures)

🎯 1. 4420.90.80.00 β€” Wooden Tableware/Jewelry Boxes

Item Detail
Base Tariff 3.2%
Additional Duty (Section 301/122) 25.0%
IEEPA Additional Duty 10.0%
Total Tax Rate 38.2%
Calculation CIF Value Γ— 38.2%
De Minimis Exemption ❌ Not Eligible (Deny de minimis for Chinese-origin goods under these specific codes)
Legal Basis USITC: 4420.90.80.00 β†’ Section 301: 25% β†’ IEEPA: 10%

πŸ“Œ Explanation:
- The 25% is the standard Section 301 tariff on many Chinese manufactured goods.
- The 10% is an additional IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) duty specific to certain Chinese imports.
- Total: 38.2%. This is a high-cost classification for wooden items.


🎯 2. 4202.92.93.15 β€” Textile/Composite Tableware Organizers

Item Detail
Base Tariff 17.6%
Additional Duty (Section 301/122) 25.0%
IEEPA Additional Duty 10.0%
Total Tax Rate 52.6%
Calculation CIF Value Γ— 52.6%
De Minimis Exemption ❌ Not Eligible
Legal Basis USITC: 4202.92.93.15 β†’ Section 301: 25% β†’ IEEPA: 10%

πŸ“Œ Warning:
- This is the highest tax bracket among the options.
- High base tariff (17.6%) combined with full additional duties makes this extremely expensive.
- Avoid this classification unless the product is definitively textile-based and cannot be reclassified.


🎯 3. 3926.90.10.00 β€” Plastic Tableware Organizers (Buckets/Pails Type)

Item Detail
Base Tariff 3.4%
Additional Duty (Section 301) 7.5%
IEEPA Additional Duty 10.0%
Total Tax Rate 20.9%
Calculation CIF Value Γ— 20.9%
De Minimis Exemption ❌ Not Eligible
Legal Basis USITC: 3926.90.10.00 β†’ Section 301: 7.5% β†’ IEEPA: 10%

πŸ“Œ Advantage:
- Significantly lower total tax (20.9%) compared to wood or textile.
- Lower Section 301 duty (7.5%) for specific plastic articles.
- Best cost-effective option if the product is plastic.


🎯 4. 4202.92.60.10 β€” Plastic/Textile Fallback (Jewelry/Utensil Cases)

Item Detail
Base Tariff 6.3%
Additional Duty (Section 301/122) 25.0%
IEEPA Additional Duty 10.0%
Total Tax Rate 41.3%
Calculation CIF Value Γ— 41.3%
De Minimis Exemption ❌ Not Eligible
Legal Basis USITC: 4202.92.60.10 β†’ Section 301: 25% β†’ IEEPA: 10%

πŸ“Œ Note:
- While the base tariff is moderate (6.3%), the 25% Section 301 duty pushes the total to 41.3%.
- This is comparable to wooden boxes. Use only if material is ambiguous but leans toward structured cases.


🎯 5. 3926.90.99.89 β€” General Plastic Articles

Item Detail
Base Tariff 5.3%
Additional Duty (Section 301) 7.5%
IEEPA Additional Duty 10.0%
Total Tax Rate 22.8%
Calculation CIF Value Γ— 22.8%
De Minimis Exemption ❌ Not Eligible
Legal Basis USITC: 3926.90.99.89 β†’ Section 301: 7.5% β†’ IEEPA: 10%

πŸ“Œ Comparison:
- Slightly higher than 3926.90.10.00 (20.9% vs 22.8%).
- Still the most economical category among all provided options.
- Suitable for general plastic storage boxes not specifically classified as buckets/pails.


πŸ› οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Guide)

βœ… 1. Documentation Checklist (Must-Have)

Document Required? Purpose
βœ… Product Specification Sheet βœ”οΈ Defines material (Wood/Plastic/Textile), dimensions, and capacity.
βœ… Material Composition Certificate βœ”οΈ Critical to distinguish between HS 39 (Plastic) and HS 44 (Wood).
βœ… Product Photos (Labeled) βœ”οΈ Show texture, hinges, and any textile linings to support classification.
βœ… Commercial Invoice βœ”οΈ Must clearly state: "Plastic Tableware Organizer Box" or "Wooden Cutlery Box" – No vague terms.
βœ… Packing List βœ”οΈ Details volume and weight for duty calculation.

βœ… 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mnemonic)

πŸ”₯ "Material Dictates Code, Vague Names Cost Extra!"

Scenario Correct Declaration Incorrect Declaration Consequence of Error
Plastic Organizer 3926.90.99.89 (22.8%) 4202.92.93.15 (52.6%) Overpay by 29.8%!
Wooden Box 4420.90.80.00 (38.2%) 3926.90.10.00 (20.9%) Under-declare β†’ Penalties/Fines
Textile Case 4202.92.93.15 (52.6%) 3926.90.99.89 (22.8%) Under-declare β†’ High Risk Audit

πŸ’‘ Pro Tip:
- If your product is mixed material (e.g., Plastic body with Fabric lining), customs may classify it based on the principal material or the essential character.
- Plastic is usually the principal material for rigid organizer boxes, favoring Chapter 39 (Lower Tax).
- Do NOT declare as "Organizer" alone. Use "Plastic Tableware Storage Box".


βœ… 3. Special Circumstances & Mitigation

Situation Recommendation
Mixed Material (Plastic + Wood) Provide a bill of materials. If plastic >50% by weight/value, argue for HS 39.
Textile-Lined Plastic Box Still likely HS 39 if the plastic structure is dominant. Avoid HS 42 unless fully textile.
Sample vs. Bulk Ensure samples match bulk material. Discrepancies cause customs holds.
Section 301 Exclusions Check if your specific plastic item was removed from Section 301 lists (rare, but verify).

🌍 V. Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026)

Country/Region Recommended HS Code Estimated Tax (CN Origin) Notes
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ USA 3926.90.99.89 22.8% Lowest among options. Avoid HS 42 (52.6%).
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί EU 3926.90.99.89 ~6-7% No Section 301/IEEPA surcharges. Much cheaper.
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ China 3926.90.99.89 ~6% Import duty + VAT. No additional US-style tariffs.
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada 3926.90.99.89 ~5-6% Generally lower than US, no 25% surcharge.

πŸ“Œ Conclusion:
- The USA is the most expensive market due to Section 301 (7.5%-25%) and IEEPA (10%) duties.
- Plastic organizers (HS 39) are the most tax-efficient choice for US imports.
- Wooden (HS 44) and Textile (HS 42) items face significantly higher duties.


πŸ“Œ VI. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)

❌ Error 1: Declaring a Plastic box as "Wooden Organizer"
πŸ‘‰ Result: Tax evasion audit. Customs will test material. If found plastic, you pay back duties + penalties.
πŸ‘‰ Correction: Always declare actual material.

❌ Error 2: Declaring a Textile case as Plastic to save tax
πŸ‘‰ Result: Seizure or Heavy Fine. Textile cases (HS 42) have 52.6% tax. If declared as Plastic (22.8%), customs may suspect fraud.
πŸ‘‰ Correction: Provide material samples for customs verification.

❌ Error 3: Using vague terms like "Home Storage Box"
πŸ‘‰ Result: Customs Delay. Officers may classify to the highest general rate (often HS 39 or 42) or require additional info.
πŸ‘‰ Correction: Use specific terms: "Plastic Cutlery Organizer".

❌ Error 4: Ignoring IEEPA 10% Duty
πŸ‘‰ Result: Underestimating Landed Cost. Many brokers miss the 10% IEEPA duty on top of Section 301.
πŸ‘‰ Correction: Always calculate Base + Section 301 + IEEPA.


🎯 VII. Final Recommendations: Optimize Your Clearance

🎯 Strategic Advice:
1. Prefer Plastic: If designing a new product, choose Plastic (HS 39) to minimize US tariffs (20.9%-22.8%).
2. Avoid Textile Cases: HS 42 codes attract 52.6% tax. Extremely costly.
3. Wood is Middle-Ground: HS 44 is 38.2%. Acceptable but not optimal.
4. Clear Documentation: Always provide Material Composition Certificates to prevent misclassification.
5. Apply for Advance Ruling: If the material is mixed, file a Request for Advance Ruling with US Customs to get a binding classification decision.


πŸ“Œ Cost-Saving Mantra:

πŸ”Ή "Plastic is King (Lowest Tax), Textile is Queen (Highest Tax)."
πŸ”Ή "Declare Material, Not Just 'Box'."
πŸ”Ή "Add Base + 25% (or 7.5%) + 10% = Total Landed Duty."


✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πŸ’Ό Every Percentage Point Counts in Landed Cost!

Customer Reviews

About HS Code Classification

The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.

Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:

  • Chapter (2 digits) β€” Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
  • Heading (4 digits) β€” More specific grouping within the chapter
  • Subheading (6 digits) β€” Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
  • National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β€” Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes

Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.

When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:

  • Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β€” The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
  • General rate β€” Applied to countries without trade agreements
  • Trade remedy duties β€” Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties

The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.