定型枕
CN → US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6307908945 | 17.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6307909891 | 24.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926902100 | 21.7% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 9404902030 | 23.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
🛌 Ergonomic & Shaped Pillows (定型枕)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Entry Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly Is a "Shaped Pillow"?
Shaped pillows (often referred to as ergonomic, contour, or memory foam pillows) are bedding articles designed to support the head, neck, and spine. In international trade, their classification is highly sensitive to two factors: Material Composition and Functional Form.
Misclassification here is critical because US tariffs under Section 301 and IEEPA vary significantly depending on whether the item is classified as a "Textile," "Plastic Product," or "Bedding Article."
⚠️ Key Distinction Point:
- If the pillow has a fabric cover (cotton, polyester, etc.) and acts primarily as a textile article → Often falls under 6307.90.89.45 or 6307.90.98.91.
- If the core is solid plastic/memory foam without textile integration → Often falls under 3926.90.99.89 or 3926.90.21.00.
- If it is explicitly a "Bedding Article" (like a traditional pillow) → Falls under 9404.90.20.30.
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (Based on Provided Data)
| HS Code | Summary Description | Primary Basis for Classification |
|---|---|---|
6307.90.89.45 |
Based on Cotton Pillowcase Form & Use | Textile-based; assumes cotton fabric cover dominates |
6307.90.98.91 |
Based on Other Manufactured Goods | Generic textile/made-up article; broader category |
3926.90.99.89 |
Based on Plastic/Synthetic Material | Core is plastic/synthetic foam; minimal textile |
3926.90.21.00 |
Based on Polyurethane (PU) Plastic Use | Specific PU foam application |
9404.90.20.30 |
Based on Bed Pillow Form & Filling | Classified as a bedding article (head support) |
🔍 Critical Insight:
- The highest tax rate (24.5%) applies to the generic textile category (6307.90.98.91).
- The lowest tax rate (17.0%) applies to the cotton-specific textile category (6307.90.89.45).
- Plastic-based classifications (3926...) fall in the middle (21.7% – 22.8%).
- Bedding Article (9404.90.20.30) is taxed at 23.5%.
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges & Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Time: Current rates including Section 301 & IEEPA surcharges
🎯 1. 6307.90.89.45 — Cotton-Based Pillow Classification (Lowest Rate)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 7.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Surcharge | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 17.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 17.0% |
| Legal Basis | USITC:6307.90.89.45 → IEEPA:122 |
📌 Explanation:
- This classification assumes the product is primarily defined by its cotton fabric cover and form.
- No Section 301 tariff applies, resulting in the lowest overall burden (17%).
- Strategy: If your product has a dominant cotton outer layer, argue for this classification to save ~7.5% compared to other textile codes.
🎯 2. 6307.90.98.91 — Other Manufactured Textile Articles (Highest Rate)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 7.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 7.5% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Surcharge | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 24.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 24.5% |
| Legal Basis | USITC:6307.90.98.91 → USITC:Footnote → IEEPA:122 |
📌 Explanation:
- This is a "catch-all" for other made-up textile articles.
- It attracts the Section 301 surcharge of 7.5%, pushing the total to 24.5%.
- Risk: Avoid this if possible. It is the most expensive classification in the provided data.
🎯 3. 3926.90.99.89 — Plastic/Synthetic Material Classification
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 5.3% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 7.5% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Surcharge | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 22.8% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 22.8% |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3926.90.99.89 → IEEPA:122 |
📌 Explanation:
- Applicable if the pillow is made entirely or mostly of plastic/synthetic foam with little textile component.
- Lower base rate (5.3%) but still carries the 7.5% Section 301 surcharge.
🎯 4. 3926.90.21.00 — Polyurethane (PU) Plastic Products
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 4.2% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 7.5% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Surcharge | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 21.7% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 21.7% |
| Legal Basis | USITC:3926.90.21.00 → IEEPA:122 |
📌 Explanation:
- Specific to Polyurethane (PU) foam, common in memory foam pillows.
- Lowest base rate (4.2%) among non-textile options, but still taxed at 21.7% total.
🎯 5. 9404.90.20.30 — Bedding Article (Bed Pillow)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 7.5% |
| IEEPA 122 Clause Surcharge | 10.0% |
| Total Tax Rate | 23.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 23.5% |
| Legal Basis | USITC:9404.90.20.30 → IEEPA:122 |
📌 Explanation:
- Classified as a "Bedding Article" rather than a simple textile or plastic good.
- Often used for traditional pillows with filling.
- Mid-range tax (23.5%).
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Avoiding Pitfalls)
✅ 1. Preparation Checklist (Non-Negotiable)
| Document | Required? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specification Sheet | ✔️ | Must detail material composition % (e.g., "70% Polyester Cover, 30% Memory Foam Core") |
| ✅ Material Composition Statement | ✔️ | Critical for distinguishing between 6307 (Textile) vs 3926 (Plastic) |
| ✅ Product Photos (Labeled) | ✔️ | Show seams, fillings, and any removable covers |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must match HS Code description exactly (see below) |
| ✅ Certificate of Origin | ✔️ | For US-China trade, verify eligibility for de minimis or exemptions |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mnemonics)
🔥 “Material Dictates Code, Cover vs. Core, Choose Wisely!”
| Scenario | Recommended HS Code | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Cotton Cover + Any Filling | 6307.90.89.45 |
Lowest tax (17%); argues cotton fabric is primary feature |
| Generic Textile/Made-Up | 6307.90.98.91 |
Avoid if possible; highest tax (24.5%) |
| Solid Memory Foam/PU Core | 3926.90.21.00 |
Lowest base rate among plastics (4.2%) |
| Traditional Bed Pillow | 9404.90.20.30 |
Standard for "pillow" articles; mid-range tax (23.5%) |
✅ 3. Special Cases & Risk Mitigation
| Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Removable Cover | Declare as two items? No! US CBP often requires single classification for the composite good. Argue based on essential character (usually the cover if cotton, or the foam if PU). |
| Mixed Materials | If >50% cotton by weight/value, push for 6307.90.89.45. |
| "Ergonomic" Marketing | Do not use "Ergonomic" as the primary descriptor in HS code search. Use "Cotton Pillow" or "PU Foam Article." |
| Customs Audit Risk | High. CBP frequently reclassifies pillows. Pre-ruling (Advance Ruling) is highly recommended. |
🌍 V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Update)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Est. Total Tax (CN Origin) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 6307.90.89.45 |
17.0% | Lowest among options; IEEPA + Section 301 applied |
| 🇨🇳 China | 6307.90.89.45 |
~7-13% | Different duty structure; no IEEPA |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 6307.90.98 |
~0-6.5% | No Section 301/IEEPA; lower base duties |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 6307.90.98 |
~0-6.5% | Post-Brexit rules apply; similar to EU |
📌 Conclusion:
- The US market is the most expensive due to IEEPA (10%) + Section 301 (0-7.5%).
- Optimal Strategy: Aim for6307.90.89.45(17%) by emphasizing cotton fabric content.
- Fallback: If no cotton,3926.90.21.00(21.7%) is the next best plastic-based option.
📌 VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
❌ Mistake 1: Calling it "Pillow" without specifying material
👉 Consequence: CBP may assign 6307.90.98.91 (24.5%) or 9404.90.20.30 (23.5%) → Overpayment of 7.5%+
❌ Mistake 2: Ignoring the Cover vs. Core distinction
👉 Consequence: If you have a cotton cover but declare as "Plastic Product," CBP may reject it → Delays + Storage Fees
❌ Mistake 3: Assuming all pillows get the same tax
👉 Consequence: Missing the 17% vs. 24.5% difference → Profit margin erosion
✅ Correct Approach:
"Cotton Fabric Covered Contour Pillow, with Memory Foam Core, Model XYZ, 100% Cotton Cover (Removable), 70% Polyester Fill"
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Precision Classification = Profit Protection
🎯 Remember the Rules:
🔹 "Cotton Cover = 17% (Best)"
🔹 "PU Foam = 21.7% (Good)"
🔹 "Generic Textile = 24.5% (Avoid)"
🔹 "Bed Pillow = 23.5% (Mid)"
📌 Pro Tip:
If your product is 100% Cotton (no foam core, just stuffed cotton), argue for 6307.90.89.45 aggressively. This saves you 7.5% in Section 301 tariffs compared to other textile codes.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Request an Advance Ruling from CBP if your product composition is mixed.
📄 Document Material % in all invoices and packing lists.
🚀 Optimize Your Labeling to highlight "Cotton" if applicable.
✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
💼 Your Profit Margin Depends on That 7.5% Difference!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) — Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) — More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) — Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) — Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate — The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate — Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties — Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.