工业级亚麻酸盐
CN → US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3823192000 | 19.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 2916151000 | 41.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 1521100060 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 1521904000 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3823194000 | 20.7% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
🌿 Industrial Grade Linoleic Acid Salts / Industrial Linoleic Acid
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Compliance Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: What Exactly is "Industrial Linoleic Acid"?
Industrial Linoleic Acid (often referred to as Linoleic Acid Salts or Soaps in broad trade terms) is a fatty acid derivative primarily sourced from vegetable oils (such as linseed, soybean, or sunflower oil). In international trade, its classification depends heavily on its purity, state (solid/liquid), and specific industrial application.
Key Distinctions: * Pure Fatty Acid (Chemical Intermediate): If the product is >90% pure linoleic acid intended for chemical synthesis or further refining, it falls under Chapter 29 (Organic Chemicals) or Chapter 38 (Miscellaneous Chemical Products). * Industrial Lubricant/Additive Base: If it is used primarily as a lubricant, emulsifier, or industrial soap precursor, it may fall under Chapter 38 (Industrial single carboxylic fatty acids). * Vegetable Wax/Grease Residue: If it is a by-product or less refined fat substance, it might be misclassified under Chapter 15 or 1521 (Vegetable waxes).
⚠️ Critical Classification Point:
- If the product is explicitly Linoleic Acid (chemical compound) → 2916.15.10.00 (High Risk, High Tariff).
- If it is a Mixed Industrial Fatty Acid → 3823.19.xx.xx (Moderate Risk, Moderate Tariff).
- If it is considered a Vegetable Oil Residue/Wax Derivative → 1521.90.40.00 (Lowest Tariff, High Risk of Rejection).
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Application Scenario | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
2916.15.10.00 |
Unsaturated monocarboxylic acids... Linoleic acid | Pure chemical intermediate, pharmaceutical grade, high-purity synthesis | 🚩 High (Most specific) |
3823.19.20.00 |
Industrial single carboxylic fatty acids (Other) | Industrial soap base, lubricant additives, mixed fatty acids | ✅ Moderate |
3823.19.40.00 |
Industrial single carboxylic fatty acids (Other) | General industrial fatty acid derivatives | ✅ Moderate |
1521.10.00.60 |
Vegetable waxes (other) | Low-purity fat residues, plant-derived waxy substances | 🚩 High (Often challenged as incorrect) |
1521.90.40.00 |
Other vegetable waxes (including jojoba oil wax) | Non-triglyceride fat derivatives, by-products | 🚩 High (Often challenged as incorrect) |
🔍 Key Insight:
- 2916.15.10.00 is the most accurate for pure Linoleic Acid. Customs will likely accept this if purity is >90%.
- 3823.19.xx is used for industrial-grade fatty acids that are not pure chemicals but are used as industrial inputs.
- 1521.xx is often used for low-cost, low-purity fatty residues. Using this for high-purity acid can lead to tax evasion penalties.
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges & Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: From November 10, 2025 (and subsequent imports)
🎯 1. 2916.15.10.00 —— Linoleic Acid (Organic Chemical)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% (From USITC Footnote 9903.88.01) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% (Targeting China/HK products, from Nov 10, 2025) |
| Total Tariff Rate | 41.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:2916.15.10.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Explanation:
- This is the highest tariff category among the options.
- Because it is classified as an "Organic Chemical," it is fully subject to both Section 301 (25%) and IEEPA (10%) surcharges.
- Total Cost Impact: 41.5% significantly reduces profit margins. Must be calculated into the FOB price.
🎯 2. 3823.19.20.00 —— Industrial Single Carboxylic Fatty Acids (Other)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.3% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% (From USITC Footnote 9903.88.01) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% (Targeting China/HK products) |
| Total Tariff Rate | 19.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 19.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3823.19.20.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Explanation:
- This is a cost-saving option if the product can be legally classified as an "Industrial Fatty Acid" rather than a pure "Chemical."
- The base rate is low (2.3%), and the surcharge is lower (7.5% vs 25%).
- Risk: Customs may challenge this if the product is pure Linoleic Acid. Requires strong justification (e.g., impurities, industrial use).
🎯 3. 3823.19.40.00 —— Industrial Single Carboxylic Fatty Acids (Other)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.2% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% (From USITC Footnote 9903.88.01) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% (Targeting China/HK products) |
| Total Tariff Rate | 20.7% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 20.7% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:3823.19.40.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Explanation:
- Very similar to3823.19.20.00, but with a slightly higher base rate (3.2% vs 2.3%).
- Total rate is 20.7%. Use only if3823.19.20.00is not applicable for your specific product specifications.
🎯 4. 1521.10.00.60 —— Vegetable Waxes (Other)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% (From USITC Footnote 9903.88.01) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% (Targeting China/HK products) |
| Total Tariff Rate | 17.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 17.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:1521.10.00.60 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Explanation:
- Lowest Total Tariff (17.5%).
- High Compliance Risk: Linoleic Acid is not a wax. Customs often rejects this classification for pure fatty acids.
- Only use if the product is a waxy by-product or residue with low fatty acid content. Misclassification can lead to seizure and fines.
🎯 5. 1521.90.40.00 —— Other Vegetable Waxes
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 0.0% (ad valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% (From USITC Footnote 9903.88.01) |
| IEEPA Surcharge | +10.0% (Targeting China/HK products) |
| Total Tariff Rate | 17.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 17.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Eligible (deny_de_minimis) |
| Legal Authority Path | IEEPA:9903.01.25 → IEEPA:9903.01.24 → USITC:1521.90.40.00 → FOOTNOTE:9903.88.01 |
📌 Explanation:
- Same tariff rate as1521.10.00.60.
- Used for non-triglyceride fat derivatives.
- Warning: Do not use this for pure Linoleic Acid. It is considered a "non-triglyceride" derivative, which is technically incorrect for pure fatty acids.
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance Guide)
✅ 1. Documentation Checklist (Mandatory)
| Document | Must Provide | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specification Sheet | ✔️ | Must include: Purity %, CAS Number (if applicable), Physical State, Industrial Use. |
| ✅ Certificate of Analysis (COA) | ✔️ | Crucial: Proves purity level. If >90%, Customs will likely force 2916 or 3823. |
| ✅ Product Photos (including Label) | ✔️ | Clear view of packaging, hazard symbols, and chemical name. |
| ✅ Third-Party Test Report | ✔️ | SGS, Intertek, or similar report confirming composition. |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must specify: "Industrial Linoleic Acid" or "Fatty Acid for Industrial Use." |
| ✅ Bill of Lading | ✔️ | Ensure consistency with Invoice description. |
| ✅ Origin Certificate (CO) | ✔️ | If claiming preferential treatment (not applicable here due to US-China tariffs). |
✅ 2. Declaration Tactics (Key Mnemonics)
🔥 “Purity Dictates HS, Industrial Use Saves Costs, Avoid Wax for Acid!”
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Wrong Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Linoleic Acid (>90%) | 2916.15.10.00 (41.5%) |
Misdeclare as 3823 or 1521 → Penalty Risk |
| Technical Grade Fatty Acid Mix | 3823.19.20.00 (19.8%) |
Over-declare as pure acid → Higher Tax |
| Low-Purity Residue/Wax | 1521.90.40.00 (17.5%) |
Use for high-purity acid → Seizure/Fine |
| Salts/Soaps | 3823.19.xx (Check specific salt type) |
Declare as "Acid" → Mismatch |
✅ 3. Special Case Handling
| Scenario | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Custom Fatty Acid Blend | Provide blend formula + COA. Justify 3823 over 2916 based on impurities. |
| Linoleic Acid Salts (Soaps) | Ensure declaration specifies "Salts" or "Soaps." HS Code may differ from pure acid. Check 3401 or 3823. |
| Industrial Lubricant Additive | Provide usage statement. Justify 3823 as "industrial single carboxylic fatty acid." |
| Small Sample (<$800) | Not Exempt: IEEPA and Section 301 apply to de minimis imports. No tax exemption. |
🌍 V. Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 2916.15.10.00 or 3823.19.20.00 |
19.8% - 41.5% | None | Highest risk market due to surcharges. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 2916.15.10.00 |
~5-10% | None | Low import tariff, but environmental checks strict. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 2916.15.00 |
0% (Most FTA) | REACH Registration | REACH compliance is mandatory. |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 2916.15.00 |
0% (Most FTA) | UK REACH | Post-Brexit UK REACH applies. |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | 2916.15.00 |
5% | None | Standard GST applies. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 2916.15.00 |
0-5% | FSC | Low tariff, stable market. |
📌 Conclusion:
- USA is the most expensive market due to 10-25% surcharges.
- EU/UK/Japan offer better tariff structures but require chemical compliance (REACH/FSC).
- China has low import tariffs but strict environmental/safety controls on chemical imports.
📌 VI. Common Errors & Pitfall Guide (Lessons Learned)
❌ Error 1: Declaring pure Linoleic Acid as 1521.90.40.00 (Wax) to save tax.
👉 Consequence: Customs rejects, imposes 19.8%-41.5% + fines + delay.
Reality: It is not a wax. It is a fatty acid.
❌ Error 2: Using 3823.19.20.00 for high-purity (>95%) acid without justification.
👉 Consequence: Customs may reclassify to 2916.15.10.00, demanding 21.7% difference + penalties.
Reality: Purity matters. High purity = Chemical (2916).
❌ Error 3: Ignoring IEEPA 10% surcharge in cost calculation.
👉 Consequence: Profit margin erosion.
Reality: All China-origin goods are subject to 10% IEEPA surcharge from Nov 10, 2025.
✅ Correct Practice:
“Linoleic Acid, Industrial Grade, 90% Purity, CAS 60-33-3, For Use as Lubricant Additive”
- Provide COA proving ~90% purity.
- Justify3823.19.20.00over2916if acceptable.
- Calculate 19.8% tariff into FOB price.
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Professional Declaration, Cost Control, Compliance First!
🎯 Remember the Mnemonic:
🔹 “High Purity = 41.5% (2916), Mixed = 19.8% (3823), Wax = 17.5% (1521) – But Don’t Lie!”
🔹 “HS Code Determines Tax, 25% Section 301, 10% IEEPA, Always Include!”
📌 Pro Tip:
If your Linoleic Acid is sourced from Vietnam, Thailand, or Malaysia, you may qualify for IEEPA Exemptions or lower Section 301 rates under specific trade agreements.
Recommend Applying for Advance Ruling if unsure about classification.
📣 Immediate Action:
📞 Contact a Professional Customs Broker + Provide COA + Apply for HS Code Advance Ruling
🚀 Let your Linoleic Acid Clear Smoothly, Reduce Costs, and Maximize Profit!
✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
💼 Every Cent of Your Cost Deserves Precise Calculation!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) — Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) — More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) — Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) — Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate — The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate — Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties — Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.