橡胶防粘剂
CN → US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3812399000 | 40.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3812397000 | 35.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 2934203500 | 41.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 2934991500 | 16.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3808922800 | 38.7% | CN | US | Official Doc |
AI Analysis
🛡️ Rubber Anti-Adhesive / Anti-Stick Agent
(Chemical Additives for Rubber Processing)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: What is a "Rubber Anti-Adhesive"?
A Rubber Anti-Adhesive (also known as mold release agent or anti-stick agent) is a chemical additive used in rubber manufacturing. Its primary function is to prevent rubber compounds from sticking to molds, rollers, or machinery during the vulcanization or shaping process.
Key Characteristics: - Function: Release agent, anti-stick, mold lubricant. - Composition: Typically chemical mixtures containing silicones, fluoropolymers, waxes, or specific organic compounds. - Application: Industrial rubber molding, tire manufacturing, silicone product production.
⚠️ Critical Classification Distinction:
- If the product is primarily a biocide/fungicide intended to prevent mold growth on stored rubber, it may fall under Chapter 38 (Biocides/Fungicides).
- If the product is a processing aid (preventing sticking during manufacture), it generally falls under Chapter 38 (Preparations for Chemical/Industrial Use).
- If it is specifically a stabilizer/antioxidant for rubber, it may fall under 3812.Note: The provided data suggests ambiguity between "Mold Release/Processing Aid" (often grouped with fungicides/anti-mildew in broad chemical preparations) and "Stabilizers." We will analyze all provided HS Codes from the
<DATA>set.
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (Based on Provided Data)
| HS Code | Product Description | Matching Logic (Based on <DATA>) |
Total Tax Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
2934.20.35.00 |
Benzothiazole-containing Heterocyclic Compound | Chemical Structure Match: Inferred as a heterocyclic compound containing a benzothiazole ring. Matches the material category of pesticides/preservatives. No material conflict. | 41.5% |
2934.99.15.00 |
Other Heterocyclic Compounds | Residual Category Match: Classified as a heterocyclic compound under "Other." Based on the "catch-all" principle for n.e.s. items, it fits here if no specific ring structure is confirmed. | 16.5% |
3808.92.28.00 |
Biocides, Fungicides, Anti-Mildew Agents | Functional Match: The name "Anti-Mildew" (防霉) matches the function of "Fungicide/Anti-mildew." Inferred chemical nature fits the chemical preparation category. | 38.7% |
3808.92.50.80 |
Fungicides, Anti-Mildew Agents (Other) | Functional Match: "Anti-Mildew" (防霉) is classified as a fungicide. Chemical nature is consistent with chemical preparations. | 40.0% |
3812.39.90.00 |
Compounded Stabilizers for Rubber/Plastic | Usage Match: Explicitly identified as a chemical additive for rubber. Matches "Anti-oxidants and other compounded stabilizers." "Anti-mildew" is considered a functional subset of stabilization/preservation. | 40.0% |
🔍 Key Insight:
- HS 2934 vs. 3808/3812: The core dispute is whether the substance is a pure chemical (Ch 29) or a preparation/mixture (Ch 38).
- If it is a pure, defined heterocyclic compound → Ch 29.
- If it is a mixture, emulsion, or specifically formulated for rubber stabilization/mold release → Ch 38.
- "Anti-Adhesive" vs. "Anti-Mildew": The term "Anti-Adhesive" (防粘) is often confused with "Anti-Mildew" (防霉) in broad chemical classifications if the specific "release agent" code doesn't exist in the target jurisdiction's 10-digit tariff. The provided data heavily leans on Fungicide/Anti-Mildew logic for Ch 38 codes.
💰 III. Detailed Tariff Breakdown (2026)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Date: Post-2025 November 10
🎯 1. 2934.20.35.00 — Heterocyclic Compounds (Benzothiazole Derivatives)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 41.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 41.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 2934.20.35.00 + Section 301 Footnotes + IEEPA 9903 |
📌 Explanation:
- This code assumes the product is a specific chemical (Benzothiazole).
- High tariff due to Section 301 (25%) and IEEPA (10%) on Chinese goods.
🎯 2. 2934.99.15.00 — Other Heterocyclic Compounds
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Duty | 0.0% |
| IEEPA Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 16.5% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 16.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 2934.99.15.00 + IEEPA 9903 |
📌 Explanation:
- Significant Savings: This is the lowest cost option if the product can be classified here.
- Condition: It must be a heterocyclic compound but not specifically Benzothiazole (or not covered under the specific 2934.20.35.00 subheading).
- Risk: Customs may argue it should be under 2934.20 if it is a benzothiazole derivative.
🎯 3. 3808.92.28.00 — Biocides, Fungicides, Anti-Mildew Agents
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 3.7% |
| Section 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 38.7% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 38.7% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 3808.92.28.00 + Section 301 + IEEPA |
📌 Explanation:
- Functional Classification: Based on "Anti-Mildew" function.
- Risk: If the product is truly an anti-adhesive (lubricant) and not a fungicide, this classification is incorrect and may lead to audits.
- Base Rate: Lowest base rate (3.7%), but high附加 taxes.
🎯 4. 3808.92.50.80 — Other Fungicides/Anti-Mildew Agents
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.0% |
| Section 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 40.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 40.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 3808.92.50.80 + Section 301 + IEEPA |
📌 Explanation:
- Similar to 3808.92.28.00 but for "Other" fungicides.
- Slightly higher base rate (5.0%) vs. 3.7%.
🎯 5. 3812.39.90.00 — Compounded Stabilizers for Rubber
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.0% |
| Section 301 Duty | +25.0% |
| IEEPA Duty | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 40.0% |
| Calculation | CIF Value × 40.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis | USITC HTSUS 3812.39.90.00 + Section 301 + IEEPA |
📌 Explanation:
- Best Functional Fit for "Rubber Additive": This is the most technically accurate code if the product is a stabilizer/additive for rubber processing.
- Terminology: "Anti-Adhesive" is often a subset of "Stabilizers/Processing Aids" in rubber compounding.
- Rate: 40.0%. Slightly higher than 2934.99.15.00 (16.5%) but more defensible than 3808 (Fungicide).
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Recommendations (Practical Guide)
✅ 1. Documentation Checklist (Essential)
| Document | Required? | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Data Sheet (TDS) | ✅ Yes | Must specify: Chemical composition, function (Anti-adhesive vs. Anti-mildew), CAS numbers. |
| Safety Data Sheet (SDS) | ✅ Yes | Section 3: Composition/Information on Ingredients. Crucial for Ch 29 vs. Ch 38 distinction. |
| Product Label & Photos | ✅ Yes | Show "Rubber Processing Aid" or "Mold Release Agent" if true. Avoid "Fungicide" if not intended. |
| Statement of Use | ✅ Yes | Explicitly state: "Used as a processing aid to prevent sticking in rubber molding," NOT "To kill mold." |
| Commercial Invoice | ✅ Yes | Clear description: "Rubber Anti-Adhesive Agent, Chemical Formulation, for Industrial Use." |
✅ 2. Classification Strategy (Key Decision Matrix)
| Product Fact | Recommended HS Code | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Chemical (e.g., specific Benzothiazole derivative) | 2934.20.35.00 |
Matches chemical structure. |
| Pure Chemical (Unknown/Other Heterocycle) | 2934.99.15.00 |
Lowest Tax (16.5%). Best if structure is complex/unknown. |
| Mixture/Formulation (Intended for Rubber Stability) | 3812.39.90.00 |
Most Accurate for "Rubber Additive." Functional match. |
| Mixture/Formulation (Marketed as Anti-Mildew) | 3808.92.28.00 / 3808.92.50.80 |
Only if Fungicidal function is primary. High Risk if it's just an anti-stick. |
🔥 Golden Rule:
- If the product is only preventing sticking (lubricant), do NOT use 3808 (Fungicide). Use 3812 (Stabilizer/Additive) or 2934 (if pure chemical).
- Misclassifying an anti-adhesive as a fungicide (3808) can lead to penalties if the product lacks biocidal efficacy data.
✅ 3. Special Considerations
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Is it a "Release Agent"? | If it is primarily silicone-based or fluoropolymer-based, check if it falls under 3901/3913 (Plastics) or 3824 (Preparations). The provided data does not include these, so stick to 2934/3808/3812. |
Can it be classified as 2934.99.15.00? |
This offers the biggest savings (16.5%). If the active ingredient is a heterocyclic compound, argue for this code. Provide CAS number. |
| Origin Non-China? | If sourced from Vietnam, Thailand, etc., IEEPA 10% may be avoided. Section 301 may still apply depending on trade rules. |
🌍 V. Global Market Comparison (2026)
| Region | Likely HS Code | Est. Duty (China Origin) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 2934.99.15.00 |
16.5% | Best cost if chemical structure allows. |
| 🇺🇸 USA | 3812.39.90.00 |
40.0% | Safer if it's a rubber formulation. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 3812.30.00 |
~4.3% | Lower base rates, but verify VAT. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 3812.39.00 |
~5-7% | Import duty + VAT (13%). |
📌 Conclusion:
- The USA is the most critical market due to Section 301 + IEEPA.
-2934.99.15.00is the optimal code for cost reduction if the chemical nature is heterocyclic.
-3812.39.90.00is the optimal code for regulatory compliance if it's a rubber processing aid.
📌 VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfalls
❌ Mistake 1: Using 3808 (Fungicide) for a pure Anti-Stick/Lubricant.
👉 Consequence: Customs may reject the declaration for false classification. Anti-stick agents are not necessarily biocides.
❌ Mistake 2: Claiming 2934 for a Mixture/Formulation.
👉 Consequence: Chapter 29 is for pure substances. If it's a mixture with solvents/additives, it belongs in Chapter 38.
❌ Mistake 3: Ignoring IEEPA 10% on Ch 29/38 goods.
👉 Consequence: Underpayment of duties. Always include the 10% IEEPA surcharge in cost calculations for Chinese origin.
🎯 VII. Final Recommendation: Which Code to Choose?
| Priority | HS Code | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 💰 Lowest Cost | 2934.99.15.00 |
16.5% Total Tax. Only if the product is a heterocyclic compound. |
| ✅ Best Compliance | 3812.39.90.00 |
40.0% Total Tax. Accurate for "Rubber Stabilizer/Additive." |
| ⚠️ High Risk | 3808.92.28.00 |
38.7% Total Tax. Only if the product is proven to be anti-mildew/fungicidal. |
📞 Action Item:
1. Check CAS Number: If known, determine if it's a heterocyclic compound.
2. Check Formulation: Is it a pure chemical or a mixture?
3. Check Primary Function: Is it for processing (anti-stick) or preservation (anti-mold)?
4. Apply for Advance Ruling: If uncertain, request a binding ruling from CBP.
✨ Professional Customs Clearance Starts with Precise Classification!
💼 Every Percent Counts in Tariff Costs!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) — Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) — More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) — Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) — Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate — The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate — Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties — Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.