骑行鞋
CN → US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6403194090 | 21.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6403197091 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6402191520 | 22.6% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6402191541 | 22.6% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6404119080 | 37.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6404116930 | 47.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
👟 Cycling Shoes (Footwear for Cycling)
🌐 HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Compliance Strategy
📌 I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand "Cycling Shoes"?
Cycling shoes are specialized athletic footwear designed for performance, efficiency, and safety in cycling. In international trade, they are strictly classified under Chapter 64 (Footwear) due to their specific functional design and material composition.
The classification depends heavily on: 1. Sole Material: Rubber or Plastic (most common for road/mountain bike shoes with cleats). 2. Upper Material: Leather, Synthetic Leather, or Textile. 3. Specific Category: Athletic/Sports footwear vs. General footwear.
⚠️ Key Distinction:
- If the shoe has a rubber/plastic sole and a leather/synthetic upper → Classified under 6402 or 6403.
- If the shoe has a rubber/plastic sole and a textile upper (common in breathable road shoes) → Classified under 6404.
- Do NOT classify as "parts of bicycles" (Chapter 87) unless they are detachable components, which cycling shoes generally are not.
📦 II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
Based on the provided data, here are the precise HS Code mappings for different types of cycling shoes:
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Upper Material | Sole Material | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6402.19.15.41 |
Other footwear with outer soles of rubber/plastics, with uppers of leather/synthetic | Road cycling shoes, indoor spin bikes | Leather/Synthetic | Rubber/Plastic | No material conflict; standard athletic form |
6403.19.40.90 |
Footwear with outer soles of rubber/plastics, uppers of leather | Athletic footwear, sports-specific | Leather | Rubber/Plastic | Meets "Athletic" category requirements |
6402.19.15.20 |
Other footwear with outer soles of rubber/plastics, uppers of leather/synthetic | General cycling shoes, casual cycling | Leather/Synthetic | Rubber/Plastic | Inferred rubber/plastic sole; standard classification |
6404.11.90.80 |
Sports footwear, textile upper, rubber/plastic sole | Breathable road cycling shoes, mesh shoes | Textile | Rubber/Plastic | Non-ski sports footwear; high tax bracket |
6404.11.69.30 |
Sports footwear, textile upper, rubber/plastic sole (Male/General) | Men's cycling shoes, general athletic | Textile | Rubber/Plastic | Default male/general classification; highest base tax |
🔍 Critical Reminder:
- Material Matters: The distinction between Leather/Synthetic (6402/6403) and Textile (6404) is the single biggest factor in tax liability. Textile uppers often incur significantly higher base tariffs in certain jurisdictions (e.g., US). - Sports vs. General: Cycling shoes are explicitly recognized as "Athletic/Sports" footwear. Do not classify as "General Footwear" (e.g., 6402.19.15.90) if they have specific sports features (cleats, stiff soles, specific shaping).
💰 III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges & Policy Add-ons)
✅ Applicable Country: United States (US)
✅ Country of Origin: China (CN)
✅ Effective Time: Current rates apply (including Section 301 & IEEPA add-ons)
🎯 1. Leather/Synthetic Upper Shoes (6402.19.15.41 / 6402.19.15.20)
These codes typically have a higher total tax due to specific surcharge structures, despite lower base rates in some contexts.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 6402.19.15.41 / 6402.19.15.20 |
| Base Tariff | 5.1% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% (Specific to these sub-categories in the dataset) |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% (Additional levy on specific footwear categories) |
| Total Tax Rate | 22.6% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 22.6% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable (For shipments over $800, full duty applies) |
| Legal Path | USITC:6402.19.15 → Section 301: Footwear Surtax → Section 122 |
📌 Explanation:
- The 5.1% base is standard for leather/synthetic athletic shoes. - The 7.5% Section 301 is a significant add-on for Chinese-origin athletic footwear. - The 10% Section 122 is a special tariff applied to certain imported footwear to protect domestic manufacturing. - Total: 22.6%. This is a moderate-high burden, but lower than textile options.
🎯 2. Leather Upper Athletic Shoes (6403.19.40.90)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 6403.19.40.90 |
| Base Tariff | 4.3% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 21.8% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 21.8% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Path | USITC:6403.19.40 → Section 301 → Section 122 |
📌 Note:
- Slightly lower total tax (21.8%) than6402.19.15.41due to a lower base rate (4.3% vs 5.1%). - Still subject to full Section 122 and 301 surcharges.
🎯 3. Textile Upper Sports Shoes (6404.11.90.80)
⚠️ WARNING: Higher Tax Bracket
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 6404.11.90.80 |
| Base Tariff | 20.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 37.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 37.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Path | USITC:6404.11.90 → Section 301 → Section 122 |
📌 Explanation:
- The 20.0% base tariff is significantly higher for textile sports footwear. - Total tax jumps to 37.5%. This is a high-cost classification. - Common in breathable mesh cycling shoes. Misclassification here can lead to severe cost overruns.
🎯 4. Textile Upper Male/General Sports Shoes (6404.11.69.30)
⚠️ HIGHEST TAX BRACKET
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| HS Code | 6404.11.69.30 |
| Base Tariff | 37.5% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Tax Rate | 47.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value × 47.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption | ❌ Not Applicable |
| Legal Path | USITC:6404.11.69 → Section 122 |
📌 Critical Note:
- The 37.5% base rate is exceptionally high. - Total tax is 47.5%. This is the most expensive classification in the dataset. - This code applies when the shoe is deemed "Male/General" textile sports footwear. Avoid this if a more specific "Athletic" or "Leather" code applies.
🛠️ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battle-Tested Pitfall Avoidance)
✅ 1. Preparation Checklist (Non-Negotiable)
| Document | Required? | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Product Specification Sheet | ✔️ | Detail sole material (Rubber/Plastic vs. Leather), upper material (Textile vs. Leather), and presence of cleats. |
| ✅ Photos (Clear & Detailed) | ✔️ | Show the sole tread, upper material texture, and any branding/labels. Crucial for determining "Textile" vs. "Leather". |
| ✅ Commercial Invoice | ✔️ | Must clearly state "Cycling Shoes" or "Athletic Footwear". Avoid vague terms like "Shoes". |
| ✅ Packing List | ✔️ | Confirm quantities and sizes. |
| ✅ Origin Certificate | ✔️ | If claiming preferential rates (though US-China rates are high, origin verification is key). |
✅ 2. Declaration Strategy (Key Mantra)
🔥 "Material Determines Rate, Category Defines Duty, Precision Saves Money!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Common Mistake | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leather/Synthetic Upper | 6402.19.15.41 or 6403.19.40.90 |
Declaring as "Textile" | Overpaying (37.5% vs 22.6%) |
| Textile Upper (Mesh) | 6404.11.90.80 |
Declaring as "Leather" | Undeclared Duty → Penalty + Back Taxes |
| Men's General Textile | 6404.11.69.30 |
Declaring as "Sports Specific" | Potential Dispute if not clearly male/general |
| Sole Material Confusion | Clearly state "Rubber/Plastic Sole" | Ambiguous description | Classification Error → Delays |
✅ 3. Special Case Handling
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| Detachable Cleats | If cleats are attached, classify as Cycling Shoes. If sold separately, classify as Accessories/Parts (potentially different HS, e.g., 6406.90). |
| Mixed Packaging | If shoes come with a bag or box, declare Shoes Only. Do not include packaging value in the dutiable value unless it's a standard retail package. |
| Custom/One-Off Shoes | Provide detailed material breakdown. If upper is hybrid (e.g., Leather + Mesh), consult a customs broker for the "Substantial Transformation" rule. |
| Sample Shipments | Even samples are subject to duty if value exceeds $800 (De Minimis). For samples under $800, ensure proper "Sample" designation to potentially avoid duty (but check Section 122 applicability). |
🌍 V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (China Origin) | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 USA | 6402.19.15.41 / 6404.11.90.80 |
22.6% (Leather) 37.5% (Textile) |
No specific cert. for footwear, but FCC for any electronic components (e.g., smart shoes). | High tariffs due to Section 122 & 301. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 6402.19.15.41 |
15% - 20% | CCC (if applicable) | Lower base tariffs, no Section 122. |
| 🇪🇺 EU | 6402.91.10 / 6403.99.00 |
12% - 17% | CE (if smart/electronic) | No Section 122. Standard MFN rates. |
| 🇬🇧 UK | 6402.91.10 |
12% - 17% | UKCA (if applicable) | Post-Brexit rules. No US-style surcharges. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 6402.91.00 |
30% - 50% | PSE (if electronic) | High base tariffs for footwear. |
📌 Conclusion:
- The US market is the most challenging for cycling shoe importers due to the Section 122 (10%) and Section 301 (7.5%) surcharges on top of base rates. - Textile uppers are significantly more expensive to import into the US than leather/synthetic uppers. - EU and China offer more stable and generally lower tariff structures for footwear.
📌 VI. Common Errors & Pitfall Guide (Lessons Learned)
❌ Error 1: Classifying Textile Cycling Shoes as 6402 (Leather/Synthetic)
👉 Consequence: Underpayment of ~15%. Customs will audit, demand back taxes + penalties.
❌ Error 2: Ignoring Section 122
👉 Consequence: Failure to include the 10% add-on leads to immediate seizure or penalty notices.
❌ Error 3: Misidentifying Sole Material
👉 Consequence: If sole is not rubber/plastic (e.g., wood, other materials), HS Code changes entirely. Ensure "Rubber/Plastic" is accurate.
❌ Error 4: Using Generic Terms like "Sports Shoes"
👉 Consequence: Customs may choose the highest applicable rate (6404.11.69.30 at 47.5%). Be specific: "Cycling Shoes".
✅ Correct Declaration Example:
"Men's Road Cycling Shoes, Leather Upper, Rubber Sole, with Detachable Cleats, Model XYZ, Made in China"
🎯 VII. Conclusion: Precision in Classification Saves Thousands!
🎯 Remember the Mantra:
🔹 "Leather is Cheaper (22.6%), Textile is Expensive (37.5-47.5%)."
🔹 "Section 122 is 10% - Don't Forget It!"
🔹 "HS Code Choice = Profit Margin. Choose Wisely!"
📌 Pro Tip:
- If your cycling shoes are made in Vietnam, Thailand, or Indonesia, you may avoid Section 301 (7.5%) and potentially Section 122 depending on current trade agreements.
- Always apply for an Advance Ruling (ISF/ACE) before shipment to confirm the HS Code and mitigate risk.
📣 Take Action Now:
📞 Consult a Customs Broker + Provide Material Specs + Verify Section 122 Applicability
🚀 Ensure Smooth Clearance, Maximize Profit, and Stay Compliant!
✨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
💼 Every Percentage Point Counts in International Trade!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) — Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) — More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) — Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) — Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate — The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate — Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties — Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.