Footwear (HS Code 6402914005)
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6402997990 | 0.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6402993177 | 16.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6404192030 | 47.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6405203060 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6405203080 | 17.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π Footwear β Rubber/Plastic Outer Sole & Upper (HS Code 6402.91.40.05)
π HS Code Reference & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Clearance Strategy
π 1. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Really Understand This Footwear?
Footwear in this category consists of shoes with an outer sole and upper made primarily of rubber or plastics. The key distinguishing factor is the material composition:
- Material: The upper and outer sole are rubber/plastic, NOT leather, textile, or other materials.
- Type: This HS code typically covers specific types of footwear within the rubber/plastic category (often aligned with specific national sub-codes like the 10-digit US HTSUS).
- Application: Commonly used for casual wear, rain boots, or specific industrial rubber shoes depending on exact design.
β οΈ Critical Distinction:
- If the upper is textile (cloth/synthetic fabric) β It falls under 6404 or 6402.99 (different tax rates).
- If the upper is leather β It falls under 6403 (different tax rates).
- Only if both outer sole AND upper are rubber/plastic does this classification apply.
π¦ 2. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Cross-Reference)
The user input provided specific HS codes related to footwear. Below is the detailed breakdown for the queried code and related alternatives from the dataset:
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Tax Rate Overview |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6402.91.40.05 | Footwear with outer sole and upper of rubber or plastics (Note: This is the user-specified code, not in the main dataset but requested) | Assumed Standard: General rubber/plastic footwear. See Tax Note Below. | See Section 3 |
6402.99.79.90 |
Footwear, rubber/plastic sole & upper, generic/fallback classification | Other rubber/plastic shoes not specified elsewhere | 90Β’/pr + 37.5% + 10% |
6402.99.31.77 |
Footwear, rubber/plastic sole & upper, other "catch-all" | General rubber/plastic footwear | 16.0% |
6404.19.20.30 |
Footwear, textile upper, men's protective | Textile Upper (Different Material!) | 47.5% |
6405.20.30.60 |
Footwear, vegetable fiber material | Vegetable Fiber (Different Material!) | 17.5% |
6405.20.30.80 |
Footwear, textile upper, women's specific | Textile Upper (Different Material!) | 17.5% |
π Important Note on 6402.91.40.05:
The specific HS Code6402.91.40.05is not explicitly listed in the provided<DATA>JSON. However, based on standard US HTSUS,6402.91refers to "Other footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather composition or reground leather, with uppers of leather."
Wait: The user input says "Footwear (HS Code 6402914005)" but the data provided is about "Rubber or Plastic".
Correction: The prompt asks to explain why it is classified into<DATA>HS codes. Since6402.91.40.05is not in the<DATA>, and the<DATA>contains codes for6402.99,6404, and6405, there is a material mismatch.Hypothesis: The user might have meant
6402.99(Rubber/Plastic) or provided a code for Leather (6402.91).
However, the instruction says: "Explain why classified into HS codes... do not exceed ".Decision: Since
6402.91.40.05(Leather Upper) is NOT in the data, and the data focuses on Rubber/Plastic (6402.99) and Textile/Vegetable Fiber (6404/6405), I must address the discrepancy.Actually, looking closely at the prompt: The user input is
Footwear (HS Code 6402914005). The<DATA>contains6402.99.79.90and6402.99.31.77(Rubber/Plastic).
Crucial Insight:6402.91is Leather.6402.99is Rubber/Plastic.
If the user insists on6402.91.40.05, it does not match the<DATA>description of "Rubber or Plastic".BUT, the prompt says: "Explain why classified into HS codes". This implies the user thinks it belongs there, or I should map it.
Correction Strategy: I will assume the user made a typo and meant a Rubber/Plastic shoe (as per the bulk of the data), OR I must clarify that
6402.91is leather and not in the data, but the data provided is for Rubber/Plastic.However, to strictly follow "Explain why classified into ", and given the data is all about Rubber/Plastic/Textile/Vegetable, I will focus on the Rubber/Plastic entries (
6402.99...) as the most likely intended target if the user is shipping general footwear, but I must add a WARNING that6402.91is Leather.Wait, let's look at the Tax Details in Data:
-6402.99.79.90: "Footwear, rubber or plastic outer sole and upper"
-6402.99.31.77: "Footwear, rubber or plastic outer sole and upper"The user's code
6402914005is likely a typo for6402.99.40.00(generic rubber/plastic) or similar.
I will proceed by assuming the product is Rubber/Plastic footwear (matching the data) and map it to the most appropriate<DATA>HS codes, while noting the user's code might be a variant.Actually, the safest and most accurate approach: The user provided a specific HS Code
6402914005. This code (in US HTSUS) is Leather Upper. The data provided is Rubber/Plastic (6402.99) and Textile (6404,6405).
Therefore,6402.91.40.05is NOT in the dataset.Constraint Check: "Explain why classified into HS codes".
This is a contradiction. I cannot explain why it is classified into a code not in the data.
Interpretation: The user likely wants me to use the Data to classify a product they called "Footwear (HS Code 6402914005)". Since the data doesn't have6402.91, I will assume the product is Rubber/Plastic (matching6402.99entries) and classify it under the most suitable<DATA>HS code for Rubber/Plastic footwear, which is6402.99.79.90or6402.99.31.77.I will structure the response to:
1. Acknowledge the user input.
2. Clarify that6402.91is Leather, but since the data is for Rubber/Plastic, I will classify it under6402.99.79.90(the primary Rubber/Plastic fallback in the data) assuming the user meant Rubber/Plastic.
3. Provide tax details for6402.99.79.90and6402.99.31.77from the data.
4. Add a disclaimer.
π° 3. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Breakdown (Including Surcharges, Policy Additions)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Date: November 10, 2025 onwards (including subsequent imports)
Based on the provided <DATA>, there are two main HS Codes for Rubber/Plastic Footwear. Since 6402.91 (Leather) is not in the data, we assume the product falls under 6402.99 (Other Rubber/Plastic Footwear).
π― 1. 6402.99.79.90 β Footwear, Rubber/Plastic Outer Sole & Upper, General/Fallback Classification
This is the most comprehensive "catch-all" for rubber/plastic footwear not otherwise specified in the dataset.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 90Β’/pr. + 37.5% (Ad Valorem) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 37.5% + 10% + 90Β’/pair |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 37.5% + (90Β’ Γ Quantity) + CIF Value Γ 10% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β NO (Denied for Section 301/122 items) |
| Legal Basis | USITC:6402.99.79.90 β FOOTNOTE:122 |
π Explanation:
- The 37.5% is the base MFN (Most Favored Nation) rate.
- The 10% is the Section 122 Tariff (often applied to certain Chinese imports).
- Section 301 is 0% for this specific subcode in the provided data.
- Total Tax Burden: High. The combination of ad valorem duties and per-pair fees makes this costly.
π― 2. 6402.99.31.77 β Footwear, Rubber/Plastic Outer Sole & Upper, Other Catch-All
This is another fallback category for rubber/plastic footwear.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10.0% |
| Total Effective Rate | 16.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 16.0% |
| De Minimis Eligible? | β NO (Denied for Section 122 items) |
| Legal Basis | USITC:6402.99.31.77 β FOOTNOTE:122 |
π Explanation:
- The 6.0% base rate is significantly lower than6402.99.79.90(37.5%).
- The 10% Section 122 tariff is still applied.
- Total Tax Burden: 16%. This is much more cost-effective than6402.99.79.90.
- Strategic Insight: If the product qualifies for6402.99.31.77, it saves over 20% + 90Β’/pair in taxes compared to6402.99.79.90.
π οΈ 4. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Battlefield Pitfall Guide)
β 1. Preparation Checklist (Must-Haves)
| Document | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Photos | βοΈ | Must clearly show Rubber/Plastic upper and sole. No leather or textile visible. |
| β Material Declaration | βοΈ | Explicitly state: "100% Rubber Upper, 100% Rubber Sole" or "PVC Upper, PVC Sole". |
| β Invoice | βοΈ | Must match the HS Code exactly. Do not use generic "Shoes". Use "Rubber/Plastic Footwear". |
| β Packaging List | βοΈ | Ensure quantity per carton matchesη³ζ₯ (declaration) to avoid penalties. |
β 2. Classification Strategy (Key Mantra)
π₯ βMaterial is King! Rubber = 6402.99. Textile = 6404. Leather = 6403.β
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Tax Rate | Pitfall if Wrong |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber/Plastic Sole & Upper | 6402.99.79.90 or 6402.99.31.77 |
16% or 37.5%+90Β’ | If misclassified as Textile (6404), tax jumps to 47.5%. |
| Textile Upper | 6404.19.20.30 |
47.5% | Higher tax. Avoid if possible. |
| Vegetable Fiber | 6405.20.30.60/80 |
17.5% | Niche material. Ensure accuracy. |
β οΈ Critical Warning:
- The user input6402.91.40.05is for LEATHER.
- If your product is Rubber/Plastic, do NOT use6402.91.
- If you use6402.91for Rubber shoes, you risk severe penalties for misclassification (0% duty vs actual 16-47%).
- Recommendation: Use6402.99.31.77(16%) if possible, as it is the cheapest for Rubber/Plastic in the provided data.
β 3. Special Case Handling
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Mixed Materials | If upper is Rubber but sole is Leather β Not Rubber/Plastic. Re-classify. |
| Section 122 Applicability | Both 6402.99.79.90 and 6402.99.31.77 carry the 10% Section 122 tariff. Ensure origin is correctly declared. |
| De Minimis | DO NOT rely on de minimis (Section 321). These items are excluded due to Section 122 tariffs. Full entry required. |
π 5. Global Market Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country | Recommended HS Code | Tariff Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 6402.99.31.77 |
16.0% | Best rate for Rubber/Plastic in data. |
| πΊπΈ USA | 6402.99.79.90 |
37.5% + 90Β’ | Higher tax. Use only if specific classification applies. |
| π¨π³ China | 6402.99 |
~10-15% | Check Chinese tariff schedule for import. |
| πͺπΊ EU | 6402.99 |
~2.5% + 12% | VAT applies. No Section 122. |
| π¬π§ UK | 6402.99 |
~2.5% + 12% | Post-Brexit rules apply. |
π Conclusion:
- USA is the most complex market due to Section 122 tariffs.
- Always aim for6402.99.31.77if your product fits, to save 21.5% + 90Β’/pair vs6402.99.79.90.
π 6. Common Errors & Pitfalls (Lessons Learned)
β Error 1: Using 6402.91 for Rubber Shoes
π Result: Misclassification. 6402.91 is Leather. You will face 0% duty vs 16-47%, leading to seizure or back-taxes.
β Error 2: Assuming De Minimis Applies
π Result: Section 122 tariffs block de minimis. Small shipments will still be taxed and held at customs.
β Error 3: Vague Description "Shoes"
π Result: Customs will inspect physically. If they find Rubber, they apply 6402.99. If you declared 6404 (Textile), you face penalties.
β Correct Action:
Declare as: "Footwear, Outer Sole and Upper of Rubber or Plastics, [Men's/Women's], [Specific Use]", and select
6402.99.31.77for optimal 16% tax rate.
π― 7. Conclusion: Professional Classification, Cost Savings!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Rubber/Plastic = 6402.99. Textile = 6404. Leather = 6403."
πΉ "Aim for 6402.99.31.77 (16%) to save huge taxes!"
πΉ "Section 122 = 10% Extra. Plan for it!"
π Pro Tip:
If your footwear is partially rubber/plastic, ensure the primary material is correctly identified. Misclassification can lead to 10x penalties.
Contact a Customs Broker to confirm if your specific rubber/plastic shoe qualifies for6402.99.31.77(16%) vs6402.99.79.90(37.5%+90Β’).
π£ Immediate Action:
π Verify Material β Select
6402.99.31.77β Declare 16% Tariff
π Save Money, Avoid Delays, Clear Customs Smoothly!
β¨ Professional Customs Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Dollar Saved in Tariffs is Pure Profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.