Rubber Composite Gloves (No Four Finger Insertion)
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926204010 | 16.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4006905000 | 37.7% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4015191150 | 38.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6116104830 | 36.1% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6216001900 | 0.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
𧀠Rubber Composite Gloves (No Four-Finger Insertion)
π HS Code Reference & Clearance Guide | 2026 Latest Tariff Analysis | Professional Customs Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Classification: Do You Truly Understand "Rubber Composite Gloves"?
"Rubber Composite Gloves" refer to protective handwear made from materials where rubber (natural or synthetic) is combined with other substances (such as fabrics, plastics, or other polymers) to enhance durability, grip, or chemical resistance. The specific designation "No Four-Finger Insertion" implies a design where the fingers are not individually inserted through separate tubes in the traditional four-finger glove style, or it refers to a specific manufacturing method where the four fingers are formed as a single unit or with a distinct structural separation from the thumb/palm assembly.
In international trade, these gloves are classified based on: 1. Material Composition: Is it primarily plastic-coated fabric, vulcanized rubber, or non-vulcanized rubber? 2. Manufacturing Process: Are they knitted/hooked and coated? Or are they molded rubber products? 3. Usage: Industrial protection, medical, or general utility?
β οΈ Key Classification Distinction:
- If the glove is knitted/fabric-based and coated/impregnated with rubber/plastic β Falls under Chapter 61 or 62. - If the glove is molded rubber (vulcanized or not) β Falls under Chapter 40. - If the glove is made of plastic/synthetic rubber composites β Falls under Chapter 39.
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Details (2026 Latest Tariff Authority Comparison)
| HS Code | Product Description | Applicable Scenario | Material/Structure Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
3926.20.40.10 |
Gloves of plastics or synthetic rubber, not fitted with four separate finger insertions | General industrial gloves, plastic-coated work gloves | β Plastic/Synthetic Rubber Composite |
4006.90.50.00 |
Rubber composite gloves, no four-finger insertion, fallback for non-vulcanized rubber | Non-vulcanized rubber products, raw rubber forms | β οΈ Non-vulcanized Rubber (Fallback) |
4015.19.11.50 |
Vulcanized rubber composite gloves, no four-finger insertion, used as garment accessories/gloves | Medical, culinary, or industrial vulcanized rubber gloves | β Vulcanized Rubber |
6116.10.48.30 |
Rubber composite gloves, no four-finger insertion, knitted/hooked and coated/impregnated | Knitted fabric gloves dipped in rubber/plastic | β Knitted/Hooked Base + Coating |
6216.00.19.00 |
Rubber composite gloves, no four-finger insertion, core feature classification | Non-knitted woven/fabric gloves coated with rubber | β Non-Knitted Base + Coating |
π Critical Reminder:
- "No Four-Finger Insertion" is a specific structural descriptor. If the glove has separate finger tubes, it may fall under different subheadings. This classification assumes the fingers are formed in a way that does not require individual insertion, or it is a specific design variant. - Chapter 39 applies if the base is plastic/synthetic rubber. - Chapter 40 applies if the base is natural or synthetic rubber (vulcanized or not). - Chapter 61/62 applies if the base is knitted or non-knitted textile fabric with a rubber/plastic coating.
π° III. 2026 Latest Tariff Rate Details (Including Surcharges, Policy Add-ons)
β Applicable Country: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Effective Time: From November 10, 2025 (including subsequent imports)
π― 1. 3926.20.40.10 ββ Gloves of Plastics/Synthetic Rubber (Composite)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 6.5% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Rate | 16.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 16.5% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Applicable (High risk of audit) |
| Legal Basis Path | HTSUS:3926.20.40.10 β Section 122:10% |
π Explanation:
- This is the most favorable tariff rate among the options. - It applies if the glove is primarily composed of plastics or synthetic rubber composites. - No Section 301 tariff applies, making it significantly cheaper than rubber chapters. - Section 122 adds a 10% levy, but the total remains low at 16.5%.
π― 2. 4006.90.50.00 ββ Non-Vulcanized Rubber Composite Gloves (Fallback)
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 2.7% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Rate | 37.7% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 37.7% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | HTSUS:4006.90.50.00 β Section 301:25% β Section 122:10% |
π Note:
- This is a fallback classification for non-vulcanized rubber. - High Section 301 tariff makes this expensive. - Only use if the product is definitively non-vulcanized and cannot be classified under other chapters.
π― 3. 4015.19.11.50 ββ Vulcanized Rubber Composite Gloves
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 3.0% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +25.0% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Rate | 38.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 38.0% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | HTSUS:4015.19.11.50 β Section 301:25% β Section 122:10% |
π Note:
- Applies to vulcanized rubber gloves (e.g., medical, heavy-duty industrial). - Similar to4006, but specifically for vulcanized goods. - Total rate 38.0% is high. Ensure the glove is truly vulcanized rubber to avoid misclassification penalties.
π― 4. 6116.10.48.30 ββ Knitted/Hooked Rubber Composite Gloves
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 18.6% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Rate | 36.1% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Value Γ 36.1% |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | HTSUS:6116.10.48.30 β Section 301:7.5% β Section 122:10% |
π Note:
- Applies if the glove is knitted or hooked fabric coated/impregnated with rubber. - High base tariff (18.6%) due to textile origin. - Section 301 is lower (7.5%) than rubber chapters, but total is still high.
π― 5. 6216.00.19.00 ββ Non-Knitted Rubber Composite Gloves
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Base Tariff | 11.1Β’/kg + 5.5% |
| Section 301 Surcharge | +7.5% |
| Section 122 Tariff | +10% |
| Total Rate | 11.1Β’/kg + 5.5% + 7.5% + 10% |
| Tax Calculation | (Weight Γ 11.1Β’) + (CIF Value Γ (5.5%+7.5%+10%)) |
| De Minimis Eligibility | β Not Applicable |
| Legal Basis Path | HTSUS:6216.00.19.00 β Section 301:7.5% β Section 122:10% |
π Note:
- Applies if the glove is non-knitted (woven, felt, etc.) and coated with rubber. - Mixed tariff: Specific duty per kg + Ad Valorem percentage. - Base ad valorem is low (5.5%), but Section 301 and 122 add up.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Practical Advice (Real-World Pitfall Avoidance)
β 1. Required Documentation Checklist (Mandatory)
| Document | Must Provide | Description |
|---|---|---|
| β Product Specification Sheet | βοΈ | Material composition (e.g., "70% Cotton, 30% Nitrile"), coating thickness, vulcanization status |
| β Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) | βοΈ | To confirm chemical composition and vulcanization process |
| β Product Photos (Labeled) | βοΈ | Clear shots of interior/exterior, showing "no four-finger insertion" structure |
| β Commercial Invoice | βοΈ | Must state "Rubber Composite Gloves, No Four-Finger Insertion" |
| β Packing List | βοΈ | Weight and dimensions for specific duty calculation (if applicable) |
| β Certificate of Origin (CO) | βοΈ | If applicable for preferential treatment (though US-China has few preferences) |
| β Third-Party Test Report | βοΈ | ISO, CE, or FDA (if medical) to prove compliance |
β 2. Declaration Tips (Key Mantras)
π₯ "Material First, Structure Second, Coating Clear, Tax Lower!"
| Scenario | Correct Declaration | Incorrect Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Plastic/Synthetic Rubber Composite | 3926.20.40.10 |
Misclassified as Rubber β 16.5% vs 38% |
| Vulcanized Rubber (Molded) | 4015.19.11.50 |
Misclassified as Plastic β 38% vs 16.5% |
| Knitted Fabric + Rubber Coating | 6116.10.48.30 |
Misclassified as Rubber β 36.1% vs 38% (close, but risk of audit) |
| Non-Knitted Fabric + Rubber Coating | 6216.00.19.00 |
Misclassified as Knitted β 36.1% vs 36.1%+Specific |
| Crucial: | "No Four-Finger Insertion" must be explicitly stated in description | Generic "Gloves" β High risk of reclassification |
β 3. Special Situation Handling
| Situation | Handling Advice |
|---|---|
| OEM Custom Gloves | Provide design blueprints showing the "no four-finger" structure to justify classification |
| Mixed Materials | If base is fabric, classify under Chapter 61/62. If base is rubber, classify under Chapter 40/39. Do not mix. |
| Medical Use | If for medical use, ensure FDA compliance even if not explicitly stated in HS code |
| Seasonal Variations | Ensure "No Four-Finger Insertion" is consistent across all batches to avoid customs disputes |
π V. Global Market Clearance Comparison (2026 Latest)
| Country/Region | Recommended HS Code | Tariff (CN Origin) | Certification Requirements | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3926.20.40.10 (if plastic/synthetic) |
16.5% | No specific | Lowest rate among options |
| πΊπΈ USA | 4015.19.11.50 (if vulcanized) |
38.0% | No specific | High tariff, avoid if possible |
| πͺπΊ EU | 4015.19 or 6116.10 |
~0-4% | CE, REACH | No Section 122/301 |
| π¨π³ China | 4015.19 or 6116.10 |
~5-10% | CCC (if applicable) | Low tariffs |
| π¬π§ UK | 4015.19 or 6116.10 |
~0-5% | UKCA | Post-Brexit rules apply |
π Conclusion:
- USA has the highest effective tariff for rubber composite gloves from China due to Section 122 and Section 301. - Chapter 39 (3926.20.40.10) offers the lowest risk and lowest cost (16.5%) if the product qualifies as plastic/synthetic rubber composite. - Chapter 40 (4015.19.11.50) is the most expensive (38.0%) for vulcanized rubber. - Strategy: Verify if the glove can be classified under Chapter 39 (plastic/synthetic rubber composite) rather than Chapter 40 (natural/vulcanized rubber) to save 21.5% in tariffs.
π VI. Common Mistakes & Pitfall Guide (Lessons Learned)
β Mistake 1: Classifying a plastic-coated glove as vulcanized rubber
π Consequence: Tariff jumps from 16.5% to 38.0% β Loss of 21.5% margin!
β Mistake 2: Ignoring the "No Four-Finger Insertion" descriptor
π Consequence: Customs may reclassify as standard gloves under different subheadings β Delays and audits
β Mistake 3: Using generic term "Gloves" in invoice
π Consequence: Ambiguity β Customs may select the highest possible tariff for audit
β Mistake 4: Confusing knitted vs non-knitted base
π Consequence: Chapter 61 vs 62 classification β Different specific duties
β Correct Approach:
"Rubber Composite Gloves, No Four-Finger Insertion, Plastic/Synthetic Rubber Coating, Industrial Use, Model XYZ, Batch #123"
π― VII. Conclusion: Precise Classification, Maximize Profit!
π― Remember the Mantra:
πΉ "Plastic/Synthetic = 16.5% (Chapter 39)"
πΉ "Vulcanized Rubber = 38.0% (Chapter 40)"
πΉ "Knitted Coating = 36.1% (Chapter 61)"
πΉ "Non-Knitted Coating = Mixed (Chapter 62)"
πΉ "Choose Chapter 39 if possible to save 21.5%!"
πΉ "Always specify 'No Four-Finger Insertion' to avoid reclassification!"
π Pro Tip:
- If your gloves are made of synthetic rubber (e.g., Nitrile, Neoprene), they may qualify for Chapter 39 or Chapter 40. Check the vulcanization process. If not vulcanized, Chapter 40 still applies but may have different subheadings.
- Pre-ruling is highly recommended for Chapter 39 vs Chapter 40 distinction.
- Work with a seasoned customs broker to confirm the exact material composition and manufacturing process.
π£ Immediate Action:
π Contact your customs broker with Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) + Product Photos
π Apply for an Advance Ruling to lock in the 16.5% tariff if eligible!
πΌ Your profit margin depends on precise classification!
β¨ Professional Clearance Starts with Accurate Classification!
πΌ Every Percent Saved is Pure Profit!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.