Shoe Covers (Acid and Alkali Resistant)
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926909989 | 22.8% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4015900010 | 39.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6116109500 | 24.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4015900050 | 39.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π¦Ά Acid & Alkali Resistant Shoe Covers (Chemical Protective Footwear)
π HS Code Classification & Customs Clearance Guide | 2026 Tariff Landscape for China-Origin Goods | Precision Clearance Strategy
π I. Product Definition & Critical Classification Logic: Are Your Shoe Covers "Plastic", "Rubber", or "Gloves"?
Acid and alkali-resistant shoe covers are specialized personal protective equipment (PPE) designed to prevent chemical exposure to footwear in industrial, laboratory, and healthcare settings. In international trade, the HS Code classification is NOT determined solely by the product name, but by the material composition and structural characteristics.
Misclassification is the #1 cause of customs delays and penalty taxes. The product falls into one of three distinct legal categories under the Harmonized System:
- Plastic Other Articles: If made of synthetic polymers/plastics without specific glove features.
- Sulfur-Vulcanized Rubber Accessories: If made of rubber, classified as apparel accessories.
- Gloves/Hosiery: If made of rubber/plastic but structured as "foot gloves" (covering the foot individually like a glove).
β οΈ Key Distinction Logic:
- Material: Is itPlastic(39xx) orRubber(40xx)?
- Function/Structure: Is it anAccessoryto clothing (4015) or aProtective Hand/Footwearitem (6116)?
- Note:6116implies a "glove-like" structure (individual feet covers), while4015implies general "apparel accessories."
π¦ II. HS Code Classification Matrix (Based on Provided Data)
The following table details the four specific HS Codes derived from your product data. Note the significant tariff differences based on classification.
| HS Code | Product Description & Logic | Material/Category | Total Tax Rate (US/China Origin) | Breakdown Detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3926.90.99.89 | Plastic Shoe Covers Classified as "Other articles of plastic." Lowest Tax Option |
Plastic / Other Articles | 22.8% | Base: 5.3% Section 301: 7.5% Section 122: 10% |
| 6116.10.95.00 | Rubber/Plastic Shoe Covers (Glove Type) Classified under "Gloves, Mittens..." Mid-Range Tax |
Rubber/Plastic / Gloves | 24.5% | Base: 7.0% Section 301: 7.5% Section 122: 10% |
| 4015.90.00.10 | Vulcanized Rubber Shoe Covers (Accessory 1) Classified as "Other accessories to outerwear." Highest Tax Option |
Sulfur-Vulcanized Rubber / Apparel Accessory | 39.0% | Base: 4.0% Section 301: 25.0% Section 122: 10% |
| 4015.90.00.50 | Vulcanized Rubber Shoe Covers (Accessory 2) Classified as "Other other apparel accessories." Highest Tax Option |
Sulfur-Vulcanized Rubber / Apparel Accessory | 39.0% | Base: 4.0% Section 301: 25.0% Section 122: 10% |
π Critical Observation:
- Plastic (3926) and Glove-Type Rubber (6116) have similar, lower tax burdens (~23-25%). - Rubber Apparel Accessories (4015) suffer from a 25% Section 301 tariff, bringing the total to 39.0%. - Strategy: If your product is rubber, ensure it does NOT get misclassified as a generic "apparel accessory" under 4015 unless structurally required. However, if it is structurally a "shoe cover" (open toe/heel or slip-on), customs may lean toward 4015. If it covers the foot entirely like a sock/glove, 6116 may apply. Plastic is the safest for lower duties.
π° III. Detailed Tariff Structure Analysis (2026 Outlook)
β Applicable Market: United States (US)
β Origin: China (CN)
β Key Tariff Components
1. Base Duty (MFN): The standard Most Favored Nation rate applied to all trading partners. 2. Section 301 Tariff: Additional duties imposed on Chinese goods under the US Trade Act. Rates vary by HS Code (5.3%, 7.5%, or 25%). 3. Section 122 Tariff: A specific additional duty (10%) currently applicable to certain Chinese imports (likely referring to recent executive actions or specific trade remedy lists included in the prompt data).
π― Case 1: Plastic Shoe Covers (3926.90.99.89)
| Component | Rate | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Base Duty | 5.3% | US HTSUS Standard MFN |
| Section 301 | 7.5% | List 3 / Exclusions check |
| Section 122 | 10.0% | Specific Executive Action |
| TOTAL | 22.8% | Ad Valorem |
π Analysis: This is the most cost-effective classification for plastic-based covers. The Section 301 rate is moderate (7.5%).
π― Case 2: Glove-Type Covers (6116.10.95.00)
| Component | Rate | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Base Duty | 7.0% | US HTSUS Standard MFN |
| Section 301 | 7.5% | List 3 / Exclusions check |
| Section 122 | 10.0% | Specific Executive Action |
| TOTAL | 24.5% | Ad Valorem |
π Analysis: Slightly higher base duty (7.0%) than plastic, but the Section 301 rate remains low (7.5%). Ideal if the product is structurally a "glove" (individual foot encasement).
π― Case 3: Rubber Apparel Accessories (4015.90.00.10 / .50)
| Component | Rate | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Base Duty | 4.0% | US HTSUS Standard MFN |
| Section 301 | 25.0% | List 4 / High Risk Category |
| Section 122 | 10.0% | Specific Executive Action |
| TOTAL | 39.0% | Ad Valorem |
π Analysis: Despite a low base duty (4.0%), the 25% Section 301 tariff makes this the most expensive option. This classification is applied if customs views the item strictly as a "clothing accessory" rather than protective gear or gloves.
π οΈ IV. Customs Clearance Strategy & Practical Advice
β 1. Documentation & Declaration Essentials
To avoid misclassification and subsequent audits, provide the following:
| Document | Requirement | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Product Specification | Clearly state Material (Plastic vs. Rubber) and Structure (Slip-on vs. Individual Glove-like). | Determines HS Code (39xx vs 40xx vs 61xx). |
| Technical Data Sheet | Show chemical resistance (Acid/Alkali pH range). | Proves "Protective Equipment" nature, supporting 6116 or 4015 over general goods. |
| Photos (360Β°) | Show the product on a foot vs. off. Show thickness, texture, and any closures. | Visual proof of "Glove-like" structure (for 6116) vs. "Slip-on Cover" (for 3926/4015). |
| Invoice Description | Use precise language: e.g., "Plastic Acid-Resistant Shoe Covers, Model X, 100% PVC" | Avoid vague terms like "Protective Gear" which invites broader, higher-tariff classifications. |
β 2. Classification Optimization Tactics
π’ Scenario A: Product is Plastic (PVC, PE, PU)
- Recommendation: Declare under
3926.90.99.89. - Reasoning: Lowest total tax (22.8%).
- Declaration Text: "Plastic Shoe Covers, Acid/Alkali Resistant, for Industrial Use, Non-Glove Type."
π‘ Scenario B: Product is Rubber (Latex, Nitrile) & Structurally a "Sleeve" (Slip-on)
- Risk: High (39.0% under 4015).
- Strategy: Argue for
6116.10.95.00if the item fits the definition of "Gloves" (enclosing the foot entirely like a sock). - Declaration Text: "Rubber Protective Foot Gloves, Acid/Alkali Resistant, Individual Foot Encasement."
- Savings: Saves 14.5% compared to 4015.
π΄ Scenario C: Product is Rubber & Classified as Apparel Accessory (4015)
- Risk: Highest Tax (39.0%).
- Mitigation: Only use this if the product is a part of a larger uniform system or strictly defined as an accessory. If possible, request a Binding Ruling from CBP to see if it qualifies for 6116 or 3926 (if mixed material).
β 3. Section 122 & Section 301 Compliance
- Section 301 Check: Ensure the HS Code is not on an exclusion list (if applicable for your specific manufacturer).
- Section 122 Compliance: All four codes listed include a 10% Section 122 tariff. This is likely a mandatory surcharge for China-origin goods in the current regulatory climate. No mitigation strategy other than accurate HS code selection.
π V. Global Market Comparison (2026 Snapshot)
| Market | Recommended HS Code | Est. Total Duty | Key Certification |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 3926.90.99.89 (Plastic) |
22.8% | None specific for PPE (FDA if medical grade) |
| πΊπΈ USA | 4015.90.00.10 (Rubber) |
39.0% | OSHA Compliance (if industrial) |
| πͺπΊ EU | 3926.90.90 (Plastic) |
~4-6% | CE Marking (PPE Regulation 2016/425) |
| π¬π§ UK | 3926.90.90 (Plastic) |
~5% | UKCA Marking |
| π¨π¦ Canada | 3926.90.99 (Plastic) |
~5-10% | CSA Certification |
π Note: The US Section 301/122 tariffs make the US market significantly more expensive than the EU/UK/Canada for these goods. Always factor in the 10-15% tax differential when pricing for the US vs. other markets.
π VI. Common Pitfalls & Error Prevention
β Error 1: Declaring "Rubber Shoe Covers" as 3926 (Plastic).
* Consequence: Customs audit β Penalty + Back Taxes + Re-classification to 4015 (39%) or 6116 (24.5%).
* Fix: Verify material composition. If rubber, do NOT use 3926.
β Error 2: Declaring "Glove-like Rubber Covers" as 4015 (Accessory).
* Consequence: Overpayment of tax (39% vs 24.5%).
* Fix: Provide photos showing individual foot enclosure to support 6116 classification.
β Error 3: Ignoring Section 122. * Consequence: Underpayment β Seizure or Penalty. * Fix: All China-origin goods in the provided list include 122. Ensure your broker applies it correctly.
β Best Practice Declaration Example:
"Plastic Acid-Resistant Shoe Covers, Model XYZ, 100% PVC, Non-Glove Slip-On Type, Intended for Industrial Chemical Protection."
π― VII. Conclusion: Strategic Classification for Profit Protection
π― Key Takeaway:
1. Plastic is King: If your supply chain can accommodate Plastic (PVC/PE), choose 3926.90.99.89 for the lowest tax (22.8%).
2. Rubber is Risky: If using Rubber, fight for 6116.10.95.00 (24.5%) by proving it is a "Glove" structure. Avoid 4015 (39.0%) unless structurally unavoidable.
3. Documentation is Key: Clear photos and material specs are your best defense against customs re-classification.
π Action Item:
π Submit Pre-Submission Documentation to your customs broker: 1. Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) 2. High-res photos of the product structure 3. Bill of Lading description matching the HS Code logic.
π Clear the hurdles of Section 301 & 122 with precision. Protect your margin!
β¨ Professional Classification Starts with Accurate Data!
πΌ Your Profit Margin Depends on the First Digit of Your HS Code!
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.