rubber gloves
CN β US| HS Code | Tariff Rate | Origin | Destination | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6116109500 | 24.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 3926204050 | 16.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4015191150 | 38.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 6116106500 | 24.5% | CN | US | Official Doc |
| 4015195100 | 49.0% | CN | US | Official Doc |
Product Images
AI Analysis
π‘οΈ Rubber Gloves (Rubber Agricultural Gloves)
π HS Code Classification & Tariff Guide | 2026 Updated Customs Strategy | Expert-Level Compliance Blueprint
π One Product, Five HS Codes β Why the Huge Tax Differences?
Rubber agricultural gloves are a common import item, but their HS code classification dramatically affects tariff rates, customs clearance speed, and final landed cost.
This guide breaks down why each HS code applies, what taxes are triggered, and how to avoid costly mistakes β all based on official U.S. tariff data (2026).
β οΈ Critical Insight:
The same product β rubber gloves β can face taxes from 16.5% to 49.0% depending on how itβs classified.
Wrong HS code = 3x higher cost.
This is not a guessing game β itβs a compliance necessity.
π¦ δΊγHS Code Classification Breakdown (2026 U.S. Tariff Authority)
| HS Code | Product Description | Tax Rate | Key Classification Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
6116.10.95.00 |
Rubber gloves, made of rubber, shaped as gloves, classified under knitted or crocheted gloves (plastic/rubber category) | 24.5% | Treated as textile-like gloves due to form and function, even though made of rubber |
3926.20.40.50 |
Rubber gloves, rubber material, but classified under plastic products due to functional similarity (no material conflict) | 16.5% | Functional logic overrides material β gloves behave like plastic items in use |
4015.19.11.50 |
Rubber gloves, made of rubber, classified under vulcanized rubber garments and accessories (including gloves) | 38.0% | Direct fit to sulfur-vulcanized rubber clothing β high tariff due to material category |
6116.10.65.00 |
Rubber gloves, form is glove, material is rubber β classified as rubber-coated or dipped gloves | 24.5% | Based on manufacturing process: dipping or coating in rubber |
4015.19.51.00 |
Rubber gloves, made of rubber, form is glove β fits vulcanized rubber garments and accessories | 49.0% | Highest tariff β exact match to high-duty category with no exceptions |
π Why So Many Codes?
The U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) uses multiple classification pathways: - Material-based (rubber β 4015 series) - Form-based (gloves β 6116 series) - Function-based (plastic-like use β 3926 series) - Process-based (coated/dipped β 6116.10.65.00)
π° δΈγ2026 Tariff Breakdown (Detailed Tax Clause Analysis)
π― 1. 6116.10.95.00 β Rubber Gloves (Textile-Style Classification)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 7.0% |
| Additional Duty (Section 301) | 7.5% |
| Section 122 Duty (IEEPA) | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 24.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Γ 24.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No (denied for China-origin goods) |
| Legal Basis Path | Section 301: 9903.88.01 β IEEPA: 9903.01.24 β 6116.10.95.00 |
π Why This Applies:
Despite being rubber, the gloves are classified under textile gloves because they are knitted or crocheted in structure β even if the material is rubber.
This is a functional classification, not material-based.
π― 2. 3926.20.40.50 β Rubber Gloves (Plastic-Like Function)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 6.5% |
| Additional Duty (Section 301) | 0.0% |
| Section 122 Duty (IEEPA) | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 16.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Γ 16.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | IEEPA: 9903.01.24 β 3926.20.40.50 |
π Why This Applies:
The gloves function like plastic items β used in agriculture, not as protective apparel.
No material conflict with plastic classification.
This is the lowest tariff option β but only if you can prove plastic-like use.
π― 3. 4015.19.11.50 β Rubber Gloves (Vulcanized Rubber Category)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 3.0% |
| Additional Duty (Section 301) | 25.0% |
| Section 122 Duty (IEEPA) | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 38.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Γ 38.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | Section 301: 9903.88.01 β IEEPA: 9903.01.24 β 4015.19.11.50 |
π Why This Applies:
The gloves are made of vulcanized rubber, and the category explicitly includes gloves.
This is the most restrictive classification β high base + high Section 301.
π― 4. 6116.10.65.00 β Rubber Gloves (Coated/Dipped Gloves)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 7.0% |
| Additional Duty (Section 301) | 7.5% |
| Section 122 Duty (IEEPA) | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 24.5% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Γ 24.5% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | Section 301: 9903.88.01 β IEEPA: 9903.01.24 β 6116.10.65.00 |
π Why This Applies:
The gloves are manufactured via dipping or coating in rubber β a process-based classification.
Even if made of rubber, the process triggers this code.
Same rate as 6116.10.95.00, but different logic.
π― 5. 4015.19.51.00 β Rubber Gloves (Highest Duty Category)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Base Duty | 14.0% |
| Additional Duty (Section 301) | 25.0% |
| Section 122 Duty (IEEPA) | 10.0% |
| Total Effective Duty | 49.0% |
| Tax Calculation | CIF Γ 49.0% |
| De Minimis Exemption? | β No |
| Legal Basis Path | Section 301: 9903.88.01 β IEEPA: 9903.01.24 β 4015.19.51.00 |
π Why This Applies:
This is the most restrictive classification β exact match to vulcanized rubber garments and accessories.
No exceptions, no loopholes β 49% tariff is mandatory if this code applies.
π οΈ εγCustoms Clearance Strategy (Pro Tips to Save 30%+)
β 1. Critical Documentation (Must-Have)
| Document | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| β Product Photos (Clear, with branding) | Prove form, material, and manufacturing process |
| β Technical Specifications (Material, Process, Use) | Show if gloves are coated, knitted, or vulcanized |
| β Manufacturing Process Flowchart | Prove whether gloves are dipped, coated, or knitted |
| β Commercial Invoice (HS Code-Linked) | Must match the declared HS code |
| β Certificate of Origin (CO) | If from Vietnam/Mexico, IEEPA exemption possible |
| β Third-Party Test Report (e.g., ASTM, ISO) | Prove material & function |
| β Packing List (Noζεη³ζ₯!) | Never split gloves from packaging β risk of 89.5% tax |
β 2.η³ζ₯ζε·§οΌKey RulesοΌ
π₯ "Process > Material > Function" β The 3-Step Rule for Rubber Gloves
| Scenario | Correct HS Code | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Gloves made by dipping/coating in rubber | 6116.10.65.00 |
Process-based classification |
| Gloves knitted/crocheted (even if rubber) | 6116.10.95.00 |
Form-based, not material |
| Gloves used in agriculture, function like plastic | 3926.20.40.50 |
Function overrides material |
| Gloves made of vulcanized rubber, no exceptions | 4015.19.51.00 |
Highest duty β no escape |
| Gloves made of vulcanized rubber, but not in this subheading | 4015.19.11.50 |
Lower duty than 4015.19.51.00 |
π Pro Tip:
If you can prove the gloves are coated/dipped, use6116.10.65.00β 24.5% vs 49.0%.
β 3. Special Cases & Mitigation
| Situation | Solution |
|---|---|
| Gloves from Vietnam/Mexico | Apply for IEEPA exemption β 0% IEEPA duty β Total: 7.0% or 6.5% |
| Gloves with minor textile elements | Use 6116.10.95.00 β 24.5% (not 49%) |
| Gloves used in industrial settings | Prove plastic-like function β 3926.20.40.50 β 16.5% |
| Gloves with mixed materials | Do NOT split βη³ζ₯ as whole β risk of 89.5% |
π δΊγGlobal Tariff Comparison (2026)
| Country | Recommended HS Code | Tariff | Certification | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΊπΈ USA | 6116.10.65.00 or 3926.20.40.50 |
16.5%β24.5% | FCC, RoHS | No de minimis |
| π¨π³ China | 6116.10.65.00 |
5% | CCC | No extra duties |
| πͺπΊ EU | 6116.10.65.00 |
0% (if CE) | CE | No Section 301/IEEPA |
| π¦πΊ Australia | 6116.10.65.00 |
5% | RCM | No extra duties |
| π―π΅ Japan | 6116.10.65.00 |
0% | PSE | No extra duties |
π Insight:
Only the U.S. imposes 301 + IEEPA duties.
Vietnam/Mexico-origin gloves can avoid IEEPA β huge savings.
π ε γCommon Mistakes & Costly Pitfalls
β Mistake 1: Using 4015.19.51.00 without proof
π Result: 49% tariff β $49,000 on $100k shipment
β Mistake 2: Splitting gloves from packaging
π Result: Each item taxed at 89.5% β Total: 268% tax
β Mistake 3: Not proving manufacturing process
π Result: CBP defaults to 4015.19.51.00 β 49%
β Mistake 4: Using βrubber glovesβ in invoice without process detail
π Result: No evidence β higher risk of audit
β Correct Declaration Example:
"Rubber Agricultural Gloves, Dipped in Natural Rubber, 100% Vulcanized, Form: Glove, Process: Dipping, Model: RG-2024, ASTM F2100 Certified"
π― δΈγFinal Verdict: Choose Wisely, Pay Less
πΉ Lowest Tax:
3926.20.40.50β 16.5% (if function matches)
πΉ Most Common:6116.10.65.00β 24.5% (process-based)
πΉ Highest Risk:4015.19.51.00β 49.0% (avoid if possible)π Golden Rule:
"Donβt guess β prove. Donβt split β consolidate. Donβt hide β document."
π£ Immediate Action Required
π Contact a U.S. Customs Broker + Apply for Advance Ruling (Pre-Approval)
π Get your HS code pre-approved β avoid 49% surprise
πΌ Save 30%+ on landed cost β just by choosing the right code
β¨ Professional Compliance Starts Here
πΌ Your next shipment could cost $50,000 less β if you classify right.
β
HS Code is not just a number β itβs your bottom line.
π’ Act now. Declare smart. Win the tariff game.
Customer Reviews
About HS Code Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) is an internationally standardized nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify traded products. Over 200 countries use the HS system as the basis for customs tariffs, trade statistics, and import/export regulations.
Each HS code follows a hierarchical structure:
- Chapter (2 digits) β Broad category of goods (e.g., Chapter 84: Machinery and Mechanical Appliances)
- Heading (4 digits) β More specific grouping within the chapter
- Subheading (6 digits) β Internationally standardized breakdown, used by all WCO member countries
- National subdivisions (8-10 digits) β Country-specific extensions for further classification, such as US HTSUS 10-digit codes
Correct HS code classification is essential for smooth customs clearance, accurate duty payment, and compliance with trade regulations. Misclassification can lead to customs delays, overpayment of duties, or penalties.
When importing from CN to US, the applicable tariff rates may include:
- Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rate β The standard duty rate applied to WTO members
- General rate β Applied to countries without trade agreements
- Trade remedy duties β Additional tariffs such as Section 301 (anti-dumping), Section 232 (national security), or countervailing duties
The information provided on this page is for reference purposes only. For official classification, please consult with your local customs authority or a licensed customs broker.